This is true. I have noticed that for some matches we are only allowed to place one live bet for that event. If you try to place another live bet, the system won't accept it. For other events, there are no such restrictions.

If you can't reach them over email, you can always try via the Telegram support. Here is the link > https://t.me/JASupport24. You can find the same link at the bottom of Betja.

I was wondering why is this person answering riddles that have been solved a long time ago, but then I checked the trust feedback that The Pharmacist posted about you. Everything is clear now. I guess we can't expect anything better from someone like you.

Bitcoin doesn't work the same way as a bank account or even as Ethereum for that matter.
If you have 1 ETH and you send 0.1 to someone else, your address will now show a balance of 0.9 ETH - the transaction fees.

Bitcoin has inputs and outputs. Look at your UTXOs as individual fiat money bills. Each UTXO is one bill, no matter the amount. It works the same for 1 BTC as well as 0.0087 BTC, for example.

If you have an UTXO of 1 BTC and you send 0.1 to someone else, that entire sum will be spent in the following way:
- 0.1 BTC will go to the receiver.
- the rest (change) will be sent back to a new address in your wallet - the transaction fee.

After you made the transaction, the whole UTXO got spent, so when you imported your private key, it showed you that it had no balance. And that's correct, it doesn't. The remaining coins were sent to your change address. The private key of the change address would have to be imported to be able to spend the remaining funds.

If you are using a seed created in a hot wallet, that seed is already at a greater risk depending on how safe the system where you created it is. A seed generated by a hardware wallet and especially one created on an airgapped device is much safer than using Electrum as a hot wallet (or Wasabi). You further increase that risk by exporting and importing that seed into multiple other hot wallets (Wasabi > Electrum > Blockchain.com > Coinomi, etc.). The chances for a compromise are higher because multiple clients have been used with the same seed. Especially, if you are using a software that is closed-source and you don't know what it's doing.

Maybe I misunderstood your post, but ProtonMail requires a phone number or a secondary email account when you create a new email address. They will send you a one-time code that you need to copy and paste before the new account is set up. You will have to send this code to an alternative email or via SMS. They will also ask you to enter a second email or phone number in case you need to recover the password for your ProtonMail account. This step can be skipped though.

In 99% of the time, you will just be wasting your time participating in airdrops. Those days when "airdrops" were actually airdrops, are long gone. Check out pooya87's answer above for the reasons why.

NFT is the newest hype. Airdrops that could give you some NFTs could maybe be worth your time. One day, they might be worth something. Again, it depends on the requirements to receive them. Never perform KYC or share your private keys/seeds to receive an airdrop. Those are scams that will result in you losing your money. Even worse, your personal data could be stolen, sold, and abused.

Things that are good aren't usually given for free. Apply the same logic to airdrops.   

Youtubers and influencers are getting hacked because they click on unknown links that these hackers send to them. They download and run unknown software that leads to cookie theft, keyloggers, and whatnot. You would think that someone who lives and makes money on their online presence could spend some time to learn basic security recommendations, or at least pay someone to advise them about online threats. Until they start being more careful, we will keep hearing about similar incidents.   

Yes, your answer is correct.

#5 has been solved already. Your second guess is unfortunately wrong.

Good guess.
That's it for Round #2!

Yes, a new set of words will be ready for Round #3. Starting from next round, members of all ranks will be allowed to participate from day 1.

That's the point I was trying to make as well. If you allow people to use the faucet every hour (and you obviously do because that's the way it was set up), why restrict those who do it? If they can claim satoshis from the free BTC faucet, lose their bets, and keep claiming, why can't they also claim and win without getting restricted?

Members of all other ranks can now participate and guess the remaining words! There are only a few left...

---

The terms are supposed to be related to Bitcoin, crypto, and blockchain only.

Not needed really. If you are interested in the terms, you can just search for their meaning on your own.

I can swear that I have seen instances where it is just one word. Feeding the term into a google search shows two separate words. I guess this is my mistake, sorry.
Anyways, "rug pull" or "rugpull" is correct (even though you were faster to answer than me giving the green light for all ranks to participate)!

Do you have the seed phrase of the wallet you are searching for? If the seed is in a safe place and you have a way to check that the coins are still in that wallet (if you know your addresses), you have nothing to worry about. Your coins wont go missing if you can't access them on that particular phone. You always have the option to recover your Electrum wallet from seed on a different mobile or desktop device. 

They keep delivering more and more disappointing news. It's as if they have a branch in their assembly team that is intentionally messing with their products hardware-wise.

---

Here is an interesting poll that a user posted in the reddit thread you linked to. He asked users to vote on how their Ledger Nano X purchase was. Out of 707 votes, 623 voted that it was in working order. The rest voted that it was either not working and was replaced, replaced with another faulty device, etc.

OmegaStarScream could use this as a reference point if he is still set on purchasing a Nano X. The poll results show that the majority of voters were indeed satisfied. Those who weren't are of course making themselves heard.

I wouldn't agree with that. One of the features of Betja is that it has a free BTC faucet that can be claimed every hour. The TOS and FAQ doesn't put limitations on the number of times a player can claim the faucet. Therefore, if someone wanted to, he could do that all the time and he would still not be breaking any of their terms. The only way to break the terms is by having multiple accounts that are abusing the faucet claims and that is not what is going on in this particular case.

Maybe he wanted to deposit the required 0.001 BTC at one point in time, but since his account has been restricted, he isn't comfortable doing that anymore. I could understand that. The question is, will the restrictions be lifted if he makes a deposit?

If those altcoins that you have are ERC-20 tokens (I am assuming they are since you mentioned MetaMask), I think you are better off keeping them in your MetaMask wallet. You can always check https://www.ledger.com/supported-crypto-assets to see if Ledger supports the assets you own.

dkbit98 is correct when he mentioned various issues we have seen in the past when there are too many coins in your Ledger portfolio. A user in our Croatian local board couldn't access or do anything with his Ledger Ethereum account for a long time because it couldn't sync with the network. The culprit was a token he had in his account there. It took a while before Ledger fixed the problem. dkbit98 maybe remembers more details about that particular case?!

---

@OmegaStarScream
Have a look at this.

Even though it seems that you made two posts in a row, that isn't the case. The user Rockstarguy wrote a post in between the two posts you made. Merkle Tree is correct!

You just repeated what others already wrote in the previous replies. "Contiply" is the only new piece of information that you provided.

---

All other guesses besides "merkle tree" are wrong!   

@Tuesdaynight
This thread would have been much better if you had shared your own interpretation of what that user said. But you didn't. Do you agree with his statement? Do you understand what he said, or are you asking how others interpret his words? Do you agree, disagree, things like that...

I am not really sure why he created that thread. He is saying that people should strive to gain knowledge. That knowledge will somehow help them against those who have hurt them while they were still newbies. At least that's how I see it.

Looks like OP locked the topic because there was no reason to create it in the first place, or someone reported it and it got locked by mods.

That is like standing in a crowded area screaming I am a millionaire. I made my money in a legit way and I have nothing to hide. Come visit me anytime you want! You never know who might hear you and what intentions that someone might have. It's the same with KYC data. You submit it with good intentions, but you can't know what the person on the other side will do with it. Even if it won't be used for something bad by them, there is always the possibility of hacks and data leaks.   

This particular scam is new to me. I have never received such an email.
I have been getting some spam informing me that crypto transactions have been made in my name and that I need to confirm my identity and send personal documents to gain access to the money. Not to mention that plenty of local girls want to have sex with me at least twice a week. I guess word gets around quickly.

A i oni koji budu primljeni u kampanju ne bi trebali prestati pisati u Gamblingu jer svaka kampanja može da završi kad tad a onda dolaze druge od kojih kako si i sam rekao većina traži postove u tom dijelu foruma. Ja i ako sam u ChipMixeru gledam da napišem bar 5-6 dobrih postova tjedno u gamblingu iako to CM od mene ne zahtjeva. Može kampanja da završi, može DS da me izbaci, svašta se može desiti pa je bolje biti pripremljen. 

All three are correct, nice work!

Everything is correct, but you get only one point because rosenbauer02 solved words #2, 3, and 4 before you.

---

4 terms have been solved and there are 4 remaining! Who is next?