The last paragraph on that image is the most important one. Although Coinkite might be deleting the data just like they say they do, their partners and 3rd-parties do things differently and probably don't take such actions. It's also worth asking how much of their work and processes is Coinkite outsourcing to 3rd-parties? Remember the Trezor hack from not that long ago. It was caused by Trezor outsourcing their customer support platform to an outside party, which then got hacked, leaking the data that it kept.

Ledger Live does have coin control, but it isn't done in a good and user-friendly way. In Electrum, you can simply go to the 'Coins' tab and select one or more coins to spend from. In Ledger Live, you can't select individual UTXOs in that way. When you activate the coin control feature, you see a list of all UTXOs associated to that bitcoin wallet. They are all pre-selected by default. You have to manually untick those you don't want to use and leave a tick for those you want. It isn't that big of a problem if you have a small number of coins, but imagine a wallet with 50 or 100 different UTXOs.

That's how it was when I last tested LL's coin control feature. I haven't updated the software in a long time, I can't rule out that they made this feature better in the meantime.

I am not from the US, so I don't know anything about the regulations regarding mining bitcoin for private entities. But I am pretty sure that it's your responsibility to report to the IRS any income that you receive or generate. Bitcoin falls into one such category that you have to report. If you don't do it, maybe nothing will happen and nobody will find out. It's like failing to report any other taxes. Maybe the IRS won't notice or maybe they will and you will be facing penalties and possibly jail time.

One miner could go unnoticed. Having your whole basement equipped with ASICs will probably raise some alarms about what you are spending your electricity on and why your bills are so high. You could get raided if the authorities mistaken your home for a marihuana lab.   

You are living in imaginationland where you pull the strings deciding who does what for you and how. In the real world, things work a bit differently. In the real world, you were offered the money that you are owed, but you turned it down. You still do it even today. In your imagination, someone giving you what you are owed is a scammer because they are not dancing to the music you like to play.

No, he doesn't have to do anything! You do with your money as you please. All he has to do is to return it to you, which remains an impossible task because of your reluctance to accept it.

A request to introduce support for Taproot was made as early as 2021, and it's still not there. I have personally never used it, and I am not sure what benefits it will give you if you are not going to use a multisig setup. I know that Muun wallet is one mobile wallet that supports Taproot. Check it out if you are interested. But take note that they do things a bit differently, and don't have the standard recovery phrases we are used to see in other bitcoin wallets.

Then there is no reason that you have to stick with that electrum.diynodes server that is causing those Sparrow error messages. Go into the settings menu and pick a different one. If you have plans to run your own Bitcoin Node, you don't have to worry about Electrum servers anymore, as you are going to be using the Bitcoin Core client.

Ledger Live will never display and generate 10 new addresses in one Bitcoin account. To make it as simple as possible, it only shows one unfunded address each time you click on the receive bitcoin button. And, it will always be the same one until you send some BTC to it. If you want multiple new addresses at once, you are going to have to connect your Ledger with Electrum. Then, you'll always have access to 20 new and unfunded BTC addresses at once with default settings. This can be adjusted according to your needs.

Don't think of bitcoin as a total count in your balance. Let's use your example with 100 BTC. 100 + 100 equals 200 BTC, but those are two different UTXOs. They are separate coins, regardless if you deposit them into the same address or two different ones. If one day you want to spend 150 BTC, you are going to have to use both of your 100 BTC coins in a new transaction. 

The OP of this scam accusation has failed to prove that a scam happened, and so I see no reason to support their claims for the time being. But I do believe that they are misleading their players by showing a wrong license logo. If they don't change it, I will PM the casino admin and ask them to comment about their license information and why they are still displaying the wrong one. If they don't want to take any action and make changes to their site, I will tag them afterwards.

Bitcoin mining is already taxed in the United States according to whatever law exists in the jurisdiction the mining operation is located. Mining companies pay taxes like any other business ventures, they aren't exempt from it. Plus, the companies are registered as being mining operations, so there is already a paper trail of what they are doing.

It's still a long string of characters and numbers that make no apparent sense to the human eye in the format they are written it. Even if a recovery phrase is longer, it's made up of familiar words you have seen thousands of times, making it easy to back up and even remember if you are into mind tricks. Making a physical backup of a WIF key still requires more patience not to mess something up as it can have devastating consequences if you do.

I would suggest going to the server settings and finding a different server to connect to. If you don't see the same error message, it's safe to say that there is an error message with that electrum.diynodes.com server. If you can change the server and there is no reason which you aren't telling us about that makes you use that particular one, just pick a different one.

That depends on what you mean with cold storage? Are we talking about a hardware wallet or some airgapped machine you intend to bring online? It stops being cold storage if the private keys touch an internet-connected computer. So, please pay attention to what you are doing to not reduce the security of your setup.

The new TikTok-brain generations don't have the attention span to participate in a forum discussion. That's also something worth taking into consideration. They didn't grow up with a resource of information where you had to read 20-30 posts from other people before engaging normally. They don't want to do that. Their interests lie in short content with small amounts of text where a tweet is the perfect length. Attention-grabbing headlines, a few pictures or a video and that's it.

I wonder if their reluctance to remove the Curacao logo is reason enough to give them a negative trust rating?! They are intentionally lying about their license without showing signs that they will correct it. What's more, they have locked their ANN thread on Bitcointalk, showing once again that they aren't interested in communicating with the community. Besides the Curacao logo, Blackjack.Fun also has a Provably Fair logo at the bottom of their website. It's a different matter, but worth checking if the site is provably fair or not. If it isn't, they are again guilty of providing false information and lying.   

That sort of knowledge and information can be learned on Bitcointalk. I am not saying it can't or shouldn't. But I am saying that this isn't the only place to learn those things. There are other beginner-oriented resources where you can learn about custodial and non-custodial wallets and everything you need for proper bitcoin storage. You can even get it on YouTube by watching videos. Or if you got introduced to Bitcoin by a friend/relative, that's the sort of thing I would expect them to explain to you.

Mali procenat i amerikanaca bi znali da nabroje 50 američkih država i bilo koji broj iznad 40. To nije tako lako kako zvuči. Siguran sam da bi oni brkali neke velika gradove i savezne države. Odmah se sjetim one scene sa Prijatelja kad se Ross i Joey takmiče ko će prvi napisati svih 50 država. Joey vidi 'Utah' kod Rossa na papiru i kaže mu "ne možeš izmišljati imena".

Meni toliko ne smeta, pogotovo što je npr. 'ć' i slovo i glas kojeg nema u mnogim drugim jezicima. Njemci i englezi nemaju 'ć' u svom izgovoru ali imaju 'č'. I u našim jezicima je moglo da bude samo 'č' a riječi sa 'ć' da se drugačije zovu ali nismo išli tim putem. 

Ima nekoliko novih slobodnih pozicija u nekim od aktualnih signature kampanja.

---

U BC. Game kampanji ima jedno mjesto za Sr. Member rang. A možda icopress primi i nekoliko dodatnih novih članova.

U CoinRoyale kampanji je također slobodno mjesto za jednog Sr. Membera.

Just.Casino kampanja je na čekanju, možda će biti i završena. Menadžer je obavijestio učesnike da mogu skinuti signature.

BullBear.Fun kampanja je završena poslje 2 tjedna:

Svaki staking na centraliziranim servisima u kakve spadaju i online kockarnice može da djeluje sigurno sve do onog trenutka dok se sve ne sruši poslje čega ćeš izgubiti svu svoju lovu. Celsius i slične platforme su djelovale sigurno i korisnici su bili zadovoljni i hvalili ih na sva usta pa pogledaj kako je sve to završilo.

Kad radiš staking, imaš višestruki rizik. Prvi je taj da stranica može da povlači veoma rizične poteze koje mogu biti razlog gubitka novca. Zatim, tu je i opasnost da ih neko hakira i ukrade deponovani kripto i u konačnici opet ostaneš bez svega. A poslje slijedi dugogodišnja bitka sa dokazivanjem koliko si novca imao da bi možda izvukao sve ili dio svoje investicije.

They are lazy because the little effort they put in is usually enough to get a satisfactory number of victims fall for their schemes and make them money. The scams worked in the past and they still work today. There will always be new internet users browsing the web with not enough knowledge about how to protect themselves. There will also be new elderly people who have no one to protect them who will fall for scams because they use their hearts when making decisions. It's a sad reality.

I wouldn't call it worthless. It's better than nothing, but it's obviously nowhere close to the quality and requirements of the Malta Gaming Authority, Kahnawake Gaming Commission, or the UK Gambling Commission. The common person doesn't really know the difference. To them, it's just the name of a brand and logo they see on casino websites. And like I mentioned previously, the Curacao brand is a widespread one, making it a familiar sight.

There is no such thing as crypto-friendly politicians on a large scale. Politicians represent the interest of private businesses, big tech, pharma, etc., and these giants aren't interested and don't need bitcoin or crypto. They don't mind profiting from you and me using it, but they don't represent self-custody and any type of increase in personal freedoms.