The face of all ICOs belongs to buterim because most of the ICOs good and bad are on ethereum. For individual ICOs it is better to pick ones that have someone promoting it on youtube, instagram, and any live conferences
Maybe because he just started the term "smart contract" and that contract is being adopted by many cryptocurrencies that run based on their own Blockchain technology, such as EOS. I think yeah, the face of ICO is Vitalik, I wonder why other says it's magic, they are pertaining on the reviews on how the ICO is performing not really providing the answer on which or whom 'tops' the rank in ICOS and projects. |
|
|
|
It is 25$ worth not 40$ worth.
But in return, they are asking for personal information and a kyc. 25$ worth your kyc is something debatable.
Basically, misleading information is everything I've read on this day, I saw that airdrop last january and think it was very hard to accomplish though, I believe that blockchain will going to really provide the compensation, I think they should better decrease the difficulty in the verification process. |
|
|
|
They are not launching anything, they only reserved a trademark for the word cryptokicks, but it doesn´t mean that they will launch something. Who knows what cryptokicks mean.  Yeah, and I think they will just beginning their move on how they can start to use the cryptocurrency market in selling their shoes on cryptokick trademark. Well, he just speculate so far, but I guess it is much possible to happen on the latter stage if we allow them with that plan on the market. |
|
|
|
This has been tackled before and you can't stop those people to blame bounty hunters for their losses. They tend to blame anyone that they want because of the losses that they are already making. It's the sad truth that whenever something bad happens to you, you tend to blame someone with your misfortune. Yes, allocation with bounty hunters are too low to think that they are the reason and cause for a tokens dumping. The eye has been set for them and ignoring those developers that holds the largest allocation.
Basically, when thinking about the matter how they provide allocation for the bounty hunters, these allocation is not quite good enough to let the entire project to go down. So, If they are blaming the hunters, I think they are just somehow want someone to be blame and to pass the attention to when they are really the one incompetent. |
|
|
|
Wow. It is bluer than blue. Maybe you should've stayed with just using black fonts and not that sore in the eye colorful thread. I read it and it is all just basics which have been posted here a lot of times. You wont get any merits from this since it is just like a repeated thread and you might even get a warning for your colorful art.  Yes that's somehow correct but considering the fact that he just applied what he just learned from the basic and beginner tips, it is quite still important to consider as he is making the topic updated, in that case, everyone to altcoins or investment specifically on trading can figure out what should be the essential. |
|
|
|
Yes you are right the biggest reasons for dumps are the tokens given to team members and developers by the owner of the project and secondly the big bonuses to the early and big investors they just sell to take out their seed money as soon as possible.
I think the best solution possible in order to fix that issue is to provide a salary fixed to their developers and team. I wonder because they are actually working on the same building and I don't think that they are so far away to use their token as a payment for the job or salary. They should have a better hiring process as well. |
|
|
|
I always stick to the bounty manager as well, because some of them have great reputation and almost all projects are already listed on exchanges. But there are some examples of bounties that have distributed huge rewards and are already listed with great volumes as well.
If that so, would you mind creating some list that determines which bounty hunters are the most efficient and reliable at all? Because as I can see on your point, you are telling that a successful projects can be hinted by the successful bounty managers that conducts the initial inspection of the projects background and team. |
|
|
|
There's a ton of exit scam ICO's within this community. Anytime a crypto enthusiasts tries to speak up, they are usually silenced by the deceptive company. With Tipestry, you can now comment on any page without the fear of being censored. You can also tip users in crypto if you like what a specific user says. I encourage any of you to start speaking up about companies that are scamming users. Companies are STILL scamming users to this day...if you see something suspicious use Tipestry to expose them to the community. Tipestry - https://tipestry.com/ As what I've observed on the ICO process and regulations that they are conducting is that, almost many of the talented and skilled persons are getting hired to do such task which is considerably fraud. In that case, I can say, they just missed out the opportunity to be productive because they support negative projects rather than legit one's. |
|
|
|
Isn't it unfair?
Most of the bounty managers has red trust but they never accept red trusted participants mostly on their signature campaign. If ico making this decision so why are they hiring a red trusted manager?
Basically in the first place, we cannot blame the bounty managers as they are not really responsible on how the projects will going through on the entire process. But to consider the fact that they are tasked to run a bounty that is filtered out and have a standard, they need to do such things and limiting the participants to make the process better. |
|
|
|
No bitcoin is not shady and every transactions and mining rewards have been recorded on the blockchain, everything is decentralized. Its just that the early miners always get more because they take risk on mining that. That was their reward in doing so, they believe in the technology itself.
I think the only reason why bitcoin can be shady is that, when transactions and blocks becomes constrained, there is a possibility that they transaction fee can increase way too much. I don't like that in terms of transaction basically, I am having a small amount BTC transacting often and because of that, they are giving me a so much transaction fee saying the blockchain is having some constraints. |
|
|
|
New bitcoin? no, or in what term? Why people seem to think that there will be another or next bitcoin? Don't compare any altcoin to bitcoin as they're all different. Binance is a tiger coin and its huge increase has made it nearly back to its ath prices but it has a different purpose from bitcoin. I like the coin and on how the development team of it works for the progress of this coin and I appreciate all of that. But when it comes to this kind of thinking, I'll refuse to say that it will be the next bitcoin or so.
And the bitcoin is called, the "dragon", or the "rabbit", I think considering the fact that BNB is gaining to much momentum at the moment, there is insufficient reason to say that it can be like bitcoin or so called, near bitcoin, if we are just looking at the market price, the difference is too big, and we should consider that these coins are better to their aspects, we shouldn't just look at one characteristics to compare a coin. |
|
|
|
Focus on exchange tokens. Exect bnb there are a lot of others (KuCoin Shares, Huobi Token, EXMO Coin....the list is big now...)
But BNB is a flagship among them
Is that somehow can be called the utility tokens in the market? I think you are saying that because many will going to trade sooner and they will going to use these tokens to buy in order to have lower transaction fees, and through that, these coins might be boosted up as well. I think a good choice to consider. |
|
|
|
A quite clickbait to consider, I think when we are just reading a news, we can just see the website and that's it. Another thing here is that, I think the security of ethereum blockchain wallet is strong enough such as what My Ether Wallet has, and there's no fear that we need to consider about that. |
|
|
|
It is no news that rewards of bounty campaigns are getting lesser by each passing day. Many still feel that the reward will increase when bull run come but i doubt if there will be any changes to the reward because developers and teams have now adopt the less reward as a strategy to protect the price of their token. Many bounty hunters are crying everyday for a better reward which will not likely come. I see bounty rewards more as a privilege than a right. Many at times if the token has been listed before the reward was given out,there may even be a reduction especially when the token is doing well in the market. The question to my fellow hunters is that, why cry over spill milk? when you can actually produce as much as you want. Do you know you can make much more than your bounty rewards trading some of those token you have promoted. I have made nothing less than 300% of my bounty rewards trading some of the tokens i have promoted,one of such token is Vanta (VNT). I made 500% of the money i invested participating in vanta trading competition on Allbit for 34 days which is 2000% of the bounty reward that i was given,why many were complaining of the bounty rewards,i was smiling to my portfolio. Why limit yourself to bounty rewards when there are other areas you can explore. The more you waste your time crying over bounty rewards the more you will be blind to other opportunities around the project. As bounty hunter my advice is
1).Take time to monitor closely the progress of the project you are promoting to see other opportunity apart from the bounty reward
2).Be ready to invest when opportunity present itself.
With the number of bounty hunters increasing by the day,the reward is more likely to reduce than to increase. The earlier will accept that and move on the better for everyone of us. We should understand that, crying for unrealistic rewards can make developers and teams to promised unrealistic rewards.
I wonder why there are some members here that is in to the bounty campaign industry. Because I, myself learned allot of lesson in 2018, that bounty hunting isn't effective anymore, we could think of the fact that, many projects mostly anonymous, are just taking advantage of free works that hunters offers. |
|
|
|
Looking at the success of Ethereum in 2017, so many new ventures started their journey in order to compete Ethereum. Some took momentum as a matter of fact like Tron and Eos. Other names like Cardano and Zilliqa etc are also running in the race.
What do you think would Ethereum sustain this pressure and retain its leading spot?
How would the Proof of Stake, if implemented in time, work for Ethereum?
Would Ethereum solve their scalability issue?
Does Ethereum decentralization give it an edge over other centralized smart contract platforms?
I don't really like the way you said, the success of ethereum because in this time, the product that the smartcontract has just provided us isn't really helped allot. More and more project that is considerably scam are just devastating the market, reliability of cryptocurrency has been decreased through that. Maybe we could prefer EOS soon. |
|
|
|
Indeed maybe there is too much projects and people don't know what to choose, but PayPal is against of buying crypto with, and if PayPal will somehow fix the refunds problem and will let people buy crypto with then more people will buy crypto.
I think it is not just paypal that will going to open the opportunity for cryptos, we can even buy on bitcoin atm's that can be located somewhere on our place. Also to contact our friends abroad or near if they have available crypto that can be sold to us. But maybe, if paypal will going to let these things happen, more positivity will going to be with crypto. |
|
|
|
Mining alt is still and will be always profitable if you chose the right equipment and the right coin to mine. But you cant mining ETN with GPU right? what setup did you use for it? you still can sell all those rigs to someone else though. Or move to different coin that still less difficulty and gain more coin.
Yeah that's correct, for example if we are going to mine bitcoin, it was better to use antminer, through that we can imply the best hardware is not always the best specs but those that is directly in line with the best crypto that we are going to choose in order to make profits in mining. I think there are also altcoins profitable using your mining set, just take a look and have a research. |
|
|
|
You guys monitoring BAT?
Seems like Brave browser installations are over 10 million on app store.
What's your opinion on BAT?
I've just noticed that the marketing execution of both BAT and Brave browser is quite effective. I actually downloaded brave as I've seen the advertisement about their referral program per download. I just wonder why they need a 30 day time duration in order to successfully credit a user a valid referral. |
|
|
|
It is great to see the crypto sphere getting better by the day and this is as a result of some positive changes in the price of coins.Hopes are beginning to come alive in the mind of many of us,how i wish these changes can affect ICO. Although many believe that the problem is bull run but i think otherwise,i stand to be corrected.I believe having positive changes in ICO can actually lead to bull run,Minimizing the level of fake projects and maximizing the level of genuine projects is all we need to get back to bull run.I really wish developer can understand that coming up with genuine project is a win win situation for both community and the developer.In the past,for some reasons i have lost faith in ICO but recently i feel things can actually get better with ICO because some have been successfully concluded in recent times.
My opinion is quite the opposite of what you've just stated, the best ICO's in the market will appear whenever the market gets steady well, when there is a bull that will going to drive the market prices of such cryptocurrencies, there we could see promising ICO's appearing in the market. For now, it is very difficult to find one since not enough profit they can get with this kind of market we are experiencing right now. |
|
|
|
But honestly, I did like the move of the CEO when he delisted BSV. Tweeted a straightforward message, no fuss. I don't know if he was thinking at that time that with that such action, other exchanges will follow thru. I believe, it is his inner desire to do that not considering anybody else's opinion.
Let us see how things unfold for Binance. But right now, they are one of the reputable exchanges out there.
I see, as one of the best exchange in the market for now, binance actually can encourage other exchanges to delist and list a particular cryptocurrency. One thing is when kraken has just delisted Bitcoin SV. We can further see its market implication to make a move and be followed by small exchanges. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
