Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 10:13:47 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 [381] 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 ... 444 »
7601  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: I sent a 4 BTC transaction and it's stuck because somehow no fee was attached on: May 04, 2016, 02:31:10 AM
Is this yours?

txid: 865c0ad390f6ed341fec483b42d18cc648362e0bad4501c1fa8b175fccb8e935
7602  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Bitcoin doubts for an average person on: May 04, 2016, 01:55:19 AM
Quote from: knightdk
If you choose any wallet listed on https://bitcoin.org/en/choose-your-wallet, you will be safe. If you choose a desktop wallet, you will be even safer.

Right now I am using airbitz, but I do think it is better to use a desktop client, but as the bitcoin.org site says, most of them are vulnerable to the enviroment, or in other words the OS, I know I am being a little paranoid but it is money (I would feel better to keep my money in a place were no malware or keylogger can get it), so lets say I choose Electrum, how do I start?, I create my wallet, I buy some bitcoin, like $20 worth, then I how should I proceed?, how do I create a paper wallet? and then transfer the money to that wallet, or should I just use the same wallet, but keep a copy in paper?

I know you said paper or cold wallets are better for large amounts or money but in time maybe I will buy more and I would want to keep it secure.

Thanks all for your responses

 Get a Trezor.
7603  Other / Archival / Re: Giving away .1 BTC. Seriously, no strings attached on: May 04, 2016, 01:10:34 AM
Please choose me. I need some btc now. btc address 1MX4NvBJGqUJesDHhCZDBuECfGrm7JpciB. Thanks in advance.

You only full member. He will never choose you. I also mistake when post address at thread.

No! The way he wrote the OP, he was giving 0.02 to the first person to reply and that person had to be senior member and above.  Subsequently he was going to chose 5 members at random and give 0.01 BTC.  There is nothing there which indicates any rank at all is required. 
 That being said, i'm not sure bitcoin giveaways are allowed though I have seen a specific rule against altcoin giveaways.

7604  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: I sent a 4 BTC transaction and it's stuck because somehow no fee was attached on: May 04, 2016, 01:05:12 AM
I got .1 BTC for the person that takes care of this for me.

Take part of the fee or give part of the fee to pay whats necessary to get this confirmed ASAP.

I will give you .1 BTC total to solve this issue and see the transaction confirmed.


If I am  posting this in the wrong place let me know where to go thanks

PM me please

 read this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=232979.0

pay here: 14424295685752722zNMsMiTcKGHAWgerA

Wink




I would love to pay the .1 BTC. I am not understanding what I have to do right now to make this confirm. Make it happen, or walk me through it step by step and the .1 is yours. I pay first if the person is a trusted member

1) How did you pay?  ie Blockchain.info, Bitcoin-qt, mycelium, electrum, bitgo, trezor...
 
2) Do you have the transaction ID?

also, why do you care if the person who helps is trusted?  You're taking the help first.  I should be the one not trusting you to pay once assistance is rendered... fortunately I am naïve, like to believe in the inherent good in everyone and I don't need your money.



7605  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BREAKING NEWS: SATOSHI FINALLY REVEALED! on: May 03, 2016, 11:59:48 PM
A selection of CSW's websites dating back as far as 2009, most are registered between 2013-2016.

All but 3 have disappeared from the web (even cached pages)

2 cached pages and 1 page still up

craigswright.acm.org
CLUBZUHL.COM
bitc01n.net   
b1tc01n.co   
signiaenterprises.com   
b1tc01n.org   
tuliptrading.net   
ezas.biz   
ezas.co   
demorgan.co
RIDGES-ESTATE.COM
rcjbr.com
ang-pow.com
Hong-Bao.co
Integyrz.biz
information-defense.com
c01n.net
agrisci.net
coin-exch.com



hotwirepe.com  http://web.archive.org/web/20150212124604/http://hotwirepe.com/about_us.html

interconnectedresearch.com http://web.archive.org/web/20151122153216/http://www.interconnectedresearch.com


http://www.financialguidanceforeducators.com/  (Still up)

I also came across loads of (in my opinion fake)  news articles extolling the virtues of working with Dr. Craig and his companies.

 ?! the financialguidanceforeducators is some guy in Ohio
7606  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] GPU Coin - Worldwide GPU Marketplace - UP AND RUNNING- TWITTER CAMPAIGN on: May 03, 2016, 11:43:20 PM
Bump

 You shouldn't bump the thread more than once every 24 hours and make sure you delete your old bumps.  You're no good to us banned!

PS GPUCoinRMA15MfTksZhy17efg6GyNLU2WD Wink
7607  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: I sent a 4 BTC transaction and it's stuck because somehow no fee was attached on: May 03, 2016, 11:40:25 PM
I got .1 BTC for the person that takes care of this for me.

Take part of the fee or give part of the fee to pay whats necessary to get this confirmed ASAP.

I will give you .1 BTC total to solve this issue and see the transaction confirmed.


If I am  posting this in the wrong place let me know where to go thanks

PM me please

 read this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=232979.0

pay here: 14424295685752722zNMsMiTcKGHAWgerA

Wink


7608  Economy / Web Wallets / Re: mistranslation Bitcoin blockchein on: May 03, 2016, 11:12:57 PM
Well in this transaction 572fcad3a0e189c055e1b57a68604a7a521e5eea660be99543153c5c322ae9bc
you send the change to an already used address from your wallet 1DkMNcuvdS6CBQT5vACZzS18Rv879NuGb4 @ 2016-04-29 19:37:14
and then within 5 minutes @ 2016-04-29 19:42:55 you are sending the change from here 1DkMNcuvdS6CBQT5vACZzS18Rv879NuGb4 to here 1B2JjBsT6Awuqhmk6uCYwxDMvHARteJxSj which is your "Watch only" address.  These transactions will never leave your wallet so you wont see the balance change.

That being said, blockchain.info or any other wallet I have used does not reuse addresses for change unless you specifically request this.  Considering there are other movements to already used addresses within your control, it seems you are not telling us the whole story which makes it difficult to understand what your problem is or in fact is there is a problem.  I am presently of the mind that there is no actual problem other than your understanding of how wallets work?

edit: Okay maybe it's I who doesn't understand.  You were asked to supply the private key of your "watch only" address because you transferred coins from your wallet back into that address?  Perhaps it has something to do with the way blockchain.info handles inter-wallet transfers.  Do you have any other information?

7609  Economy / Web Wallets / Re: mistranslation Bitcoin blockchein on: May 03, 2016, 10:12:17 PM
Did you try to spend your change before the initial transaction was confirmed?
7610  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BREAKING NEWS: SATOSHI FINALLY REVEALED! on: May 03, 2016, 04:09:04 PM
There are no facts I know of why Gavin Andresen's creditability should take any hit so far.

The fact that Gavin has said he believes this guy to be Satoshi when his false signature claim was debunked within hours shows that Gavin has lost all credibility (where is Gavin's response to the debunking?).

Someone who (still?) likes to call himself the Chief Bitcoin Scientist (although he should not be using such a title as he doesn't even have commit access to the repo now) should lose all credibility for simply being so easily fooled.


 I'm hoping Gavin wasn't really there because he was out taking in the London scenery while the meeting took place and he was simply using second-hand info garnered from Jon.
7611  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: 3rd dispatch - The Coward That killed Satoshi Nakamoto on: May 03, 2016, 04:06:04 PM
Wrong section.  Move this to "fantasy and fiction" as it doesn't belong here.

LOL, I grew up in a LEO/intelligence family and it is always entertaining to see what people think the CIA does. Comedy gold.  Cheesy
Do you understand the idea of compartmentalization?


 Is that when your brain locks up all the stuff you don't understand into one area and calls it whacky or tries to disprove it with "science"?

7612  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BREAKING NEWS: SATOSHI FINALLY REVEALED! on: May 03, 2016, 04:03:11 PM
All I can say is that it was a poor attempt to convince people...

Seriously who did he think he was fooling?

 This guy (Gavin Andresen, Bitcoin Scientist and lead developer)
 

This guy (Jon Matonis - Bitcoin Foundation founding director)


This guy (Rory Cellan-Jones - Tech correspondent)


and This guy (me)



possibly others.
7613  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Rare address hall of fame on: May 03, 2016, 12:24:18 PM
Granted it only ties the current record but it's nice to wake up in the morning to find a new hall-of-fame-worthy Bitcoin address on my computer while drinking my morning coffee on a day off from work even if it is only a Tuesday Wink

14424295685752722zNMsMiTcKGHAWgerA

message:
xhomerx10 controls this 17 continuous digit prefix address
14424295685752722zNMsMiTcKGHAWgerA

signature:
G36GOCRi4Qpxh+nEjR8SESvf41vEo7zM3c6oMVLqhItQeYQ1aQAHa2lKfL1JxWiDqoc6JFEane9JUo1YeWPb1UI=

7614  Other / Archival / Re: Giving away .1 BTC. Seriously, no strings attached on: May 03, 2016, 01:14:30 AM
1GfiikUnAGwDN7LhXLFPqB7uLRhXvBt8br

Probably can afford one of the ties on sale over at Sears or Winners. Going to need to get an actual job real soon Smiley. Thanks in advance!

 Good luck with the job hunt!
7615  Other / Archival / Re: Giving away .1 BTC. Seriously, no strings attached on: May 03, 2016, 01:01:02 AM
OMG free coins! This is the shit Wink

1DiarrheasXidz6XtZNpLw3pT5Xy8b928Z

7616  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: 3rd dispatch - The Coward That killed Satoshi Nakamoto on: May 02, 2016, 09:44:43 PM
Wrong section.  Move this to "fantasy and fiction" as it doesn't belong here.
7617  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2016-04-30] Media Fails In Attempt To Destroy Bitcoin In Favor Of Blockchain on: May 02, 2016, 02:03:41 PM
What the guy posted is bitcoin news-worthy... maybe not hot news, but it's still news-worthy.

 No question about that but the guy posts 3 or 4 links with excerpts and no other comment in the span of  few minutes.  There are a few other posters like this and most have sigs.
It seems disingenuous.
7618  Bitcoin / Press / Re: Media Fails In Attempt To Destroy Bitcoin In Favor Of Blockchain on: May 02, 2016, 01:08:39 PM
Shocked Shocked Shocked
his posting only at press release

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=146583;sa=showPosts

is this spam Roll Eyes

 At some point they would be considered frivolous posts especially since he is wearing a paid signature.  I'm not sure exactly where the trigger point for warnings/bans would be.
7619  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Bernie Sanders style BERNCoin Giveaway on: May 01, 2016, 01:11:27 PM
This is still in the wrong section.  You're buying likes so it belongs in marketplace.  That being said, you can probably buy more likes for your video for less money and without all the pomp.  So what if you convince a bunch from India with no skin in the game to like your Trump video for Bernicoins?  I guess its your loss.
7620  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: (Flame On) Evidence that Bitcoin is an amazing new type of sustainable 'Ponzi'! on: May 01, 2016, 04:33:57 AM
actually the only way bitcoin will work is if people spend them..

holding bitcoin is hurting it.

Does holding gold & silver hurt either one of those investments?


 Ummmm....

[image redacted for brevity]

...with respect to what?  It's feelings or my portfolio?

I'm not talking about any time frame in particular,  I mean does holding it (as opposed to spending it) hurt it as an investment.   


 Okay so for gold and silver I would have to say "no" but it is hard to compare them to Bitcoin in that respect.  There aren't many places to "spend" gold and silver as they are not recognized as a currency; rather a commodity.  Bitcoin was meant to be a currency so holding it as a commodity probably is doing it a disservice since ultimately the reward for mining will only be transaction fees and few transactions means small reward for miners.  I'm no expert but I plan to hold some coins, spend some coins and continuously refresh my stock similar to what I do with the fiat I earn working.
Pages: « 1 ... 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 [381] 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 ... 444 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!