A descending order will be nice. That way we can start looking from the latest flag. Imagine having thousands of flags, in the current order the visitor will need to scroll down all the way to the bottom. Thanks for the project. |
|
|
|
Flag for user nitrat. He seems not just a bounty manager but directly involved with the project team. Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
There was something that did not make sense to me. They gave their users very short time (few days only) and the announcement was in their ANN topic (if I am not mistaken). How many people actually read updated in ANN topic. They had clients from around the world not just from the forum.
Was there any warning quote/text in their website? I can not remember if I have seen any. It was simple to add a warning text on their website for few days or a week before they shut down completely their service.
Anyway, I left support for the flag. I hope those who lost their money, somehow get them back.
|
|
|
|
Good morning WO brothers! We are $8k+ again!!!!  |
|
|
|
Yeah, I let him sweet talk his way into the equivalent of $23 (at the time.) I figured if nothing else I would prevent an alcoholic from kicking his dog for a night or two. Maybe. I knew there was a significant risk of not getting repaid, but I guess I felt the experiment was worth it? I was wrong.
Every lesson has a price. Consider it the price for it. Next time don't buy emotion instead of making decision based on the fact when it comes to directly dealing with money. That guy had a lot of red trust. The time you gave him loan, I think he had a case where he did not pay a website designer/developer for the work he (the IT guy) did for him. Anyway, it's better to move on. In business there are risks, it's a part of the process. |
|
|
|
I will not be following any broken formats. He can either fix it or blacklist me because I flagged a known scammer if he wants create damage the common good. Up to him. Last change made DT less relevant, this change makes it next to completely irrelevant. I don't care about nor support liberalist bullshit.
I am sorry, you just don't know it yet. It's too early to call it broken format. |
|
|
|
The format is followed, the flag system is just broken. Once OP updates the initial first posts, then the flag will link to this thread which links to multiple violations (one of which will be the escrow scam). You can't link to a locked thread which is absolute nonsense. You must create a topic describing the specific acts which damaged you. It must not be self-moderated. This is fundamental flaw in the flag design and can be skipped. I'm not letting scammers like Quickseller go because I just didn't happen to be a victim too.  If mr. Theymos really insists, I can make a duplicate thread of an existing thread from 2015 just to link that in the flag. What does this accomplish exactly? Nothing. You are blaming the new system without giving it much time. The previous system was not good enough and that was proven hundred or thousand times. Give this new flags system enough time before justifying it. I will also second my brother nutildah, the format has not followed. |
|
|
|
Hello, I am planning to develop CryptoForum. Looking for Partners, Developers, Supporters, Sales specialist, SEO gurus respectively. Let me know if anyone is interested to build another great Crypto community. Cheers. There are no files or anything on the site. I would suggest to use any of the existing forum software and start from there. May be you can provide some more information to get people on board. Whatever it is, good luck. |
|
|
|
I gather that if someone creates a flag and I support the flag, the person does not need to have scammed me as well, I just have to believe the evidence the flagger presented. Correct? Also, if exchange xyz makes an exit scam, is that considered one incident that can only be flagged once? Or can each victim make their own flag?
Each victim can make their own flag. |
|
|
|
If there is a proof of connection (same person/company) then it should be practical. |
|
|
|
This guy had one of the worse trust feedback back then. What more did you expect from him? Anyway let's see if I can flag the user. Sorry to hear your lose brother. Edit: I left him a red and also left support for your flag. |
|
|
|
A ticket for today
Italy - Bosnia & Herzegovina
Bosnia & Herzegovina Total -- Over 0.5 @2.02
Iceland - Turkey
1st Half - Iceland Total -- Over 0.5 @2.55
Hungary - Wales
Both Teams To Score -- Yes @2.03
Tot Odds: 10.46
Bosnia to score is also my single ticket for tonight, with a higher bet.
Damn it man! That Hungary vs Wales match lost your the acca. Other day I had an acca five Ukraine - Luxembourg: Over 1.5 with four other picks. All were correct except this over 1.5. I also lost my acca. It's frustrating and sad when you are too close but not enough. |
|
|
|
Reapplying  Trying to understand the sarcasm if there is any 🤪 You missed this son 😜 No new positions have opened up, keep up the good work y'all  . Sorry Hhampuz for this unauthorized post 🙂 Feel free to F off me 🤣 |
|
|
|
I wanted to know it as well because for flag there's only "Support" and "Oppose" options and there's no such thing as neutral. What is it really meant to those italicized member on the flag?
They are not in the DT network. Their vote do not count. And to create a flag will there be a specific board it will be posted? No. |
|
|
|
Edit: I supported it, not sure if I'm in your network but that may have made it visible
I am not seeing any difference when I try it with ";dt" and without ";dt" https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2626817;dthttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2626817 Both you and DS are not in my trust network yet.
You and DS are in DT, QS is not so he doesn't count. Your support minus DS opposition = 0, box not shown. Yellow box needs more supporters than opponents (at least one more). Red box needs three more supporters than opponents. Only users in DT (or your custom trust network if you use that) count as supporters or opponents.
Yes I missed the DT part. It made sense for me after Steamtyme's vote. |
|
|
|
Edit: DarkStar_ made it disappear.
Yeah it moved to Inactive section LOL : http://prntscr.com/o0qpjnSo help me here: This was supported by me and QS, opposed by DS but it's now inactive. So how many vote we need it to be active. Getting a bit confused. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
