Latest posts of: xhomerx10

Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 [382] 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 ... 446 »

7621

Other / Archival / Re: [resolved]betcoin.tm owe me 150BTC, and got problem with withdrawal[resolved]

on: May 07, 2016, 07:36:57 PM

Quote from: axige on May 07, 2016, 01:20:48 PM hello guys! these days i have deposit 100BTC in betcoin.tm chinese vesion caishentang.com, and luckily i won 50BTC i know a lot of ppl will ask me why deposit so much btc in that website actually i was cheated by post of forum and i saw the website is beatiful and has several languages that makes me feel it is real, since i have played a lot of time before in some other gambling websites and had no problem with big amount withdraw, thats why i trusted them, i thought they are bigger than it is. last night after i win 50btc, i started to withdrawal 125BTC, then comes the problem. it is kinda telling me waiting , the withdrawal is pending kinda shit after my insist the support told me they will call me in chinese time 6pm today but at that time i received no calls, then i begun to talk to the support again the support telling me leaving a number and call me later, i told to them that i have already left my number yesterday and i cant repeat all the leaving my number and nobody call, so i insisted to wait his reply online after my insist, they say they are going to check my bets half hour later the support told me that they suspect that i bet both side(i dont know how call it in english) and my BTC is locked in ASIA GAMING(a live casino solution provider), and need check my bets instantly i contact to AG, they told me that they dont have the access to block the funds of their partners, which proved what i was thinking then i made screenshot and sent to them, i said im going to post in bitcointalk suddenly, they say there will be a guy that is going to call me ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- by the time i wrote this topic, the guy called me. he says AG suspect that i bet both side he is going to deal with that, the earliest time could be within 3 hours and if they cant take out any prof the will send my 150BTC to me before next monday 12pm beijing time GTM+8 i will keep this topic updated, hope they can give me back my money ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LATEST UPDATE thx guys, my problem is resolved after one hour they called me, they sent me all the bitcoin and 5BTC more for apologize for the invovenience i have serched the forum last night and found a lot of scam report about the website which made me very nervous but it turns to be good now, maybe because of my insist or maybe they are legit website in my case, the thing ended perfectly thank you all ,good luck -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- do you think they are that stupid to hire a guy and create a new account post his problem and get problem resolved that quickly? you can doubt it, but anyway, i've got my BTC i think my insist made them no chance to delay i contacted to AG support, they also helped me to contact the site besides, this is diffrent from other scam reports i played in chinese vesion caishentang.com, i didn't apply for any bonus, and i played bacarrat of AG but not their own games ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I dont know why you ppl always love judge with instinct not brain i dont want to sent you PM, but i cant reply message in this topic,maybe because my aacount lvl, but since you asked that's why i send PM to you i know what's txid now, i did now, but didnt know the name Im going to paste txid here for a couple of hours [deleted] if this helps you to check if im true, do it, i dont work for the fcking website i post this topic at first for help, but i didnt know they react so quick beside, deposit 100btc to a casino doesnt need a lot of knowledge of BTC coz im more a gambler than a geeker I'm going to need more than a few hours with the txid - I have many errands to do today yet before I can look at it. A brand newbie account has to wait 6 minutes between posts. edit: txid pointed to the wrong transaction (I deleted it as well) but was worth ~150BTC. Found two txids with the same time stamps as the time stamps in the image above for 100 and 55 BTC from the address in the original txid but it looks like you waited ~15 minutes and went right back to gambling. Anyway, glad you got your coins from them.

7622

Economy / Speculation / Re: Epic crash.

on: May 07, 2016, 03:54:51 PM

Quote from: JimboToronto on May 05, 2016, 06:13:30 PM Quote from: randy8777 on May 05, 2016, 09:47:41 AM ... relax duckie. if you just hold your coins for the long term then you will also make a good bit of profit... I don't think he has any coins to hold. Didn't he sell them all for $10? No no! Kwuckduck just got 0.025 BTC in a giveaway thread and it seems he's hodling! 17AVBgzwt7CSieFEmBrU5oaFjLFxoeXvNy

7623

Other / Archival / Re: [resolved]betcoin.tm owe me 150BTC, and got problem with withdrawal[resolved]

on: May 07, 2016, 03:35:37 PM

Don't PM me OP. Ask your question here in public please. I wont respond to Newbie PMs - too risky. OP wants to know how to post the txid for his payment. ^copy of the message^

7624

Other / Archival / Re: [resolved]betcoin.tm owe me 150BTC, and got problem with withdrawal[resolved]

on: May 07, 2016, 02:55:50 PM

It would be nice to see the txid for this payment otherwise it's hard to believe.

7625

Economy / Scam Accusations / creativex altered, moved and locked Basic Mining thread

on: May 07, 2016, 02:01:12 PM

creativex logged in recently to alter the OP of the Basic Mining thread that was in marketplace->securities, change the title to "btt", move it to the Turkish forum and lock it. You can view the thread here

7626

Other / Archival / Re: betcoin.tm owe me 150BTC, and got problem with withdrawal

on: May 07, 2016, 01:25:17 PM

You should move this to the scam accusation thread.

7627

Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: User swordman6996 altering posts for scamming purposes.

on: May 07, 2016, 12:34:45 PM

Doing this type of thing with a post never occurred to me. It was a good lesson for me. I'm glad Quartx grabbed a screen cap of my original post. It's nice to know that the community will rally against scammers.

7628

Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Gift ideas?

on: May 07, 2016, 12:29:10 PM

Quote from: lottery248 on May 07, 2016, 05:26:33 AM Quote from: xhomerx10 on May 07, 2016, 03:41:20 AM Take a picture of yourself blowing a kiss then print it out. Use a heavy piece of white card stock and paint or colour the entire page to appear as a bright blue sky. Carefully cut out your image of you blowing a kiss and glue that to the card stock. Using some wrapping paper with varying colours and designs (or tissue paper if you have the patience), cut out a few hearts of different sizes and glue them in front of your picture so it appears as though you are blowing the hearts from your hand(s) into the air. (if you want to be funny, throw in a few bitcoin symbols) Find a nice verse to print out (or you can write it if you have neat writing and/or can do calligraphy) and glue that onto the card stock as well. You could add some metallic sparkles or cut out some flowers to add to the picture too. If you want it to be awesome, put it inside a picture frame. edit: you should probably move this to "off topic" as it doesn't belong in "Bitcoin discussion" Here's another idea. My mom wouldn't like this I imagine... I already bought her something anyway. that kind of cup is explicitly insulting his/her son and they will leave their parents and engage runaway for sure. be respectful to children, not all of them tolerates. It says "My kids are the shit" which translates to "My kids are awesome". Now if it was written, "My kids are shit" then it would certainly be insulting to the children. My suggestion would be not to order the mug from somebody who scores lower than 100 on TOEFL. What about the craft I recommended? Are you too busy make a craft? Is blowing heart-shaped kisses insulting?

7629

Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Gift ideas?

on: May 07, 2016, 03:41:20 AM

Take a picture of yourself blowing a kiss then print it out. Use a heavy piece of white card stock and paint or colour the entire page to appear as a bright blue sky. Carefully cut out your image of you blowing a kiss and glue that to the card stock. Using some wrapping paper with varying colours and designs (or tissue paper if you have the patience), cut out a few hearts of different sizes and glue them in front of your picture so it appears as though you are blowing the hearts from your hand(s) into the air. (if you want to be funny, throw in a few bitcoin symbols) Find a nice verse to print out (or you can write it if you have neat writing and/or can do calligraphy) and glue that onto the card stock as well. You could add some metallic sparkles or cut out some flowers to add to the picture too. If you want it to be awesome, put it inside a picture frame. edit: you should probably move this to "off topic" as it doesn't belong in "Bitcoin discussion" Here's another idea. My mom wouldn't like this I imagine... I already bought her something anyway.

7630

Economy / Scam Accusations / User swordman6996 altering posts for scamming purposes.

on: May 07, 2016, 03:10:42 AM

User swordman6996 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=685252 has modified a post I made in thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1463720.0 to make it appear as though I am vouching for him. I sent him nothing and have received nothing from him. Here is the initial post (Thank you Quartx!) Here is the altered reply to that post: NB - I seriously thought that the thread would be deleted after reporting it however it has not yet been deleted. Lesson learned!

7631

Other / Politics & Society / Re: If 98% of the atoms in our body are replaced in just 1 year, what are we?

on: May 07, 2016, 01:49:37 AM

Quote from: Tzupy on May 06, 2016, 10:54:44 PM Quote from: xhomerx10 on May 06, 2016, 01:31:07 PM Quote from: Tzupy on May 06, 2016, 01:06:10 PM Quote from: xhomerx10 on May 06, 2016, 12:46:00 AM Quote from: Tzupy on May 01, 2016, 11:32:20 PM "What am I?" is a wrong question. The right question is "What am I not?". If we were defined by what we are not, the possibilities would be infinte. It is easier to define what we are. I didn't say "we were defined by what we are not", I just said that trying to define what we are leads nowhere. It's wiser to analyze and find out what we are not. And the possibilities are not infinite, they are just bodily and mental phenomena. Yes I know! That's how a discussion works. I quoted you and then I said something in reply to what you said. Clearly, you didn't say what I said; I said what I said. I didn't say what you said; you said what you said! I am me. I am not you. <-- see what I did there? "What am I?" is the right question. "What am I not?" would take much longer to attempt to answer and you would NEVER be understood. By the way, I am not mean-spirited. It does take a long time to find the answers to the question "What am I not?", but if you don't try, you'll never get the answer (you have to discover the answer yourself). To get an idea what I'm talking about, see Vipassana. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vipassan%C4%81 Interesting read but I think it would take me longer to attain enlightenment through Vipassana nana than to consider all the things I am not. Maybe I'll take it up when I retire

7632

Other / Politics & Society / Re: If 98% of the atoms in our body are replaced in just 1 year, what are we?

on: May 06, 2016, 01:42:01 PM

Quote from: BADecker on May 06, 2016, 01:40:17 PM Quote from: xhomerx10 on May 06, 2016, 01:31:07 PM Quote from: Tzupy on May 06, 2016, 01:06:10 PM Quote from: xhomerx10 on May 06, 2016, 12:46:00 AM Quote from: Tzupy on May 01, 2016, 11:32:20 PM "What am I?" is a wrong question. The right question is "What am I not?". If we were defined by what we are not, the possibilities would be infinte. It is easier to define what we are. I didn't say "we were defined by what we are not", I just said that trying to define what we are leads nowhere. It's wiser to analyze and find out what we are not. And the possibilities are not infinite, they are just bodily and mental phenomena. Yes I know! That's how a discussion works. I quoted you and then I said something in reply to what you said. Clearly, you didn't say what I said; I said what I said. I didn't say what you said; you said what you said! I am me. I am not you. <-- see what I did there? "What am I?" is the right question. "What am I not?" would take much longer to attempt to answer and you would NEVER be understood. By the way, I am not mean-spirited. I think a person can be self-centered without being mean-spirited. I may be argumentative but I am not self-centered.

7633

Other / Politics & Society / Re: If 98% of the atoms in our body are replaced in just 1 year, what are we?

on: May 06, 2016, 01:31:07 PM

Quote from: Tzupy on May 06, 2016, 01:06:10 PM Quote from: xhomerx10 on May 06, 2016, 12:46:00 AM Quote from: Tzupy on May 01, 2016, 11:32:20 PM "What am I?" is a wrong question. The right question is "What am I not?". If we were defined by what we are not, the possibilities would be infinte. It is easier to define what we are. I didn't say "we were defined by what we are not", I just said that trying to define what we are leads nowhere. It's wiser to analyze and find out what we are not. And the possibilities are not infinite, they are just bodily and mental phenomena. Yes I know! That's how a discussion works. I quoted you and then I said something in reply to what you said. Clearly, you didn't say what I said; I said what I said. I didn't say what you said; you said what you said! I am me. I am not you. <-- see what I did there? "What am I?" is the right question. "What am I not?" would take much longer to attempt to answer and you would NEVER be understood. By the way, I am not mean-spirited.

7634

Other / Off-topic / Re: Anyone use those yellow tint glasses for computer eye strain reduction?

on: May 06, 2016, 12:56:54 PM

f.lux is not meant to reduce eye strain. It is meant to change the hue of your screen. The reasoning behind f.lux is that your eye contains receptors that are sensitive to blue-green light and play a role in regulation of the body's circadian rhythm. Rather than be blasted with blue-green light around bed-time, your eyes get a nice warm light and your ability to sleep is less likely to be compromised. Yellow tinted glasses (also called shooter's lenses) are an older technology that play on the fact that the eyes cannot focus well on blue light. The blue light rays bend more and focus on a point in front of the retina rather than on it. This is called chromatic aberration. These are purported to reduce eye strain because the eye doesn't have to work as hard to obtain a good focus. I remember in the 80's when "blu blockers" became the rage. Everybody was wearing them... now not so much. If you find you are having eye strain, headaches or blurred vision using the computer monitor, you might be better off with computer lenses. These are meant for a focal point slightly further away than reading and they are also designed to reduce glare. These are awesome for reducing eye strain. I use them and I was surprised that the optometrist recommended them for my nieces who don't normally wear glasses at all (they were complaining of headaches).

7635

Other / Politics & Society / Re: If 98% of the atoms in our body are replaced in just 1 year, what are we?

on: May 06, 2016, 12:46:00 AM

Quote from: Tzupy on May 01, 2016, 11:32:20 PM "What am I?" is a wrong question. The right question is "What am I not?". If we were defined by what we are not, the possibilities would be infinte. It is easier to define what we are.

7636

Economy / Web Wallets / Re: blockchaim deducted $100 fee for $112 transaction

on: May 05, 2016, 01:23:38 PM

Quote from: pedrog on May 05, 2016, 01:02:58 PM Remember that time when you paid something with your VISA card and you accidentally ended up 'donating' an extra $100 for the VISA network? Oh no you didn't!

7637

Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why so little talk of Dave Kleiman?

on: May 05, 2016, 05:54:43 AM

Quote from: TPTB_need_war on May 05, 2016, 05:38:08 AM Quote from: xhomerx10 on May 05, 2016, 05:19:35 AM Quote from: TPTB_need_war on May 05, 2016, 02:52:32 AM Quote from: TPTB_need_war on May 05, 2016, 02:16:56 AM Quote from: AgentofCoin on May 05, 2016, 02:13:46 AM I have now reviewed your analysis and have concluded you are talking out of your ass. Please provide technical justification. Quote from: suchmoon on May 05, 2016, 02:07:22 AM Quote from: TPTB_need_war on May 05, 2016, 12:19:04 AM Quote from: suchmoon on May 03, 2016, 06:46:10 PM It's increasingly obvious that despite not being able to present actual cryptographic proof Wright is putting a lot of effort into obfuscation and trying to sway the public opinion, whether it's for his business interests or something else. You do not seem to understand the math. Either Craig broke SHA256 or he has Satoshi's private key. You do not seem to understand that linking to your own post doesn't prove anything. Can you post the public key, the message Wright signed, and the signature for everyone to see and verify? The analysis was provided by others already. The review of that is ongoing here. Quote from: xhomerx10 on May 05, 2016, 02:17:53 AM You, my friend are peerless; there can be no review of your work. Do you enjoy being a troll? You trolls can eat your words now. As much as you enjoy quoting yourself. I'm as much a troll as you are an investigator. I empathize as I know jealously is an affliction of the incapable. Enjoy your life. You'd better look up the word empathize; you might have confused it with sympathize or maybe you're trying to be funny? Thank you. I do enjoy my life.

7638

Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why so little talk of Dave Kleiman?

on: May 05, 2016, 05:19:35 AM

Quote from: TPTB_need_war on May 05, 2016, 02:52:32 AM Quote from: TPTB_need_war on May 05, 2016, 02:16:56 AM Quote from: AgentofCoin on May 05, 2016, 02:13:46 AM I have now reviewed your analysis and have concluded you are talking out of your ass. Please provide technical justification. Quote from: suchmoon on May 05, 2016, 02:07:22 AM Quote from: TPTB_need_war on May 05, 2016, 12:19:04 AM Quote from: suchmoon on May 03, 2016, 06:46:10 PM It's increasingly obvious that despite not being able to present actual cryptographic proof Wright is putting a lot of effort into obfuscation and trying to sway the public opinion, whether it's for his business interests or something else. You do not seem to understand the math. Either Craig broke SHA256 or he has Satoshi's private key. You do not seem to understand that linking to your own post doesn't prove anything. Can you post the public key, the message Wright signed, and the signature for everyone to see and verify? The analysis was provided by others already. The review of that is ongoing here. Quote from: xhomerx10 on May 05, 2016, 02:17:53 AM You, my friend are peerless; there can be no review of your work. Do you enjoy being a troll? You trolls can eat your words now. As much as you enjoy quoting yourself. I'm as much a troll as you are an investigator.

7639

Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why so little talk of Dave Kleiman?

on: May 05, 2016, 02:17:53 AM

Quote from: TPTB_need_war on May 05, 2016, 02:01:40 AM Click this quote to read what Gmaxwell and others will respond: Quote from: TPTB_need_war on May 05, 2016, 01:39:14 AM Wholly shit! I am contemplating the possibility that Craig has revealed that who ever created Bitcoin put a backdoor in it! As I already explained, the signature Craig has provided proves either he has cracked something about the way Bitcoin uses SHA256 or he has Satoshi's private key. Afaics, there are no other mathematical possibilities. But note this small detail: Quote from: https://github.com/patio11/wrightverification You'll note that Bitcoin, for reasons known only to Satoshi, takes the signature of hash of a hash to generate the scriptSig. Quoting Ryan: Well that isn't so insignificant of a detail when you think more about it in this context. A cryptographic hash function has a property named collision resistance. Collision resistance is related to preimage resistance in that if we have a way to quickly find collisions, then if the preimage is collision then we also break the preimage resistance for that particular hash value. Collision resistance is normally stated as the number of hash attempts required to find a collision or the number of rounds to break collision resistance with reasonable hardware. Normally this is exponentially less than computing the SHA256 hash function 2²⁵⁶ times. For SHA256, there are collision resistance attacks up to 46 of the 64 rounds of SHA256 (and 52 of 64 rounds for preimage attack). So what happens to collision (and preimage in this context) resistance when we hash the hash? Well all the collisions from the first application of hash become collisions in the second hash, plus the new collisions in the second application of the hash thus increasing the number of rounds that can be attacked. It seems likely that Craig has identified the back door that was placed in Bitcoin as explained above, and used his supercomputer access to find a preimage of SHA256. If am correct, this is major news and Bitcoin could crash. I urge immediately peer review of my statements by other experts. I have not really thought deeply about this. This is just written very quickly off the top of my head. I am busy working on other things and can't put much time into this. You, my friend are peerless; there can be no review of your work.

7640

Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: THIS Proves Craig Wright Created Bitcoin and is Satoshi Nakamoto

on: May 04, 2016, 08:26:20 PM

LOL This is hilarious. I see a meme in here somewhere

Pages: « 1 ... 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 [382] 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 ... 446 »