I'm back at a 47% reject rate. I see some people are above that and some are way below. I just don't get it. With some of the coins I have a 0% reject, others go up as high as 60-70%. But I see some people (with high hash rates) that are always very low rejects, regardless of the coin.
What is the composition of your rig? 5x 7950's 5x 7950's 1x 7950 Wow that's some hashing power, more than enough for a 512 diff. I had a high reject rate with my 2x 7970's until i traced the issue to a crappy ethernet switch. Not sure what the interaction has exactly, but I moved that rig on to my gigbit switch and the issue disappeared. If I move to FTC/LTC/NVC/etc. I have a 0.1% or lower rejection rate with vardiff. Usually the vardiff ends up being set at around 260 and I have a steady 6.6 MH/s. As soon as I swap back to Middlecoin it all goes downhill again,  . |
|
|
|
I'm back at a 47% reject rate. I see some people are above that and some are way below. I just don't get it. With some of the coins I have a 0% reject, others go up as high as 60-70%. But I see some people (with high hash rates) that are always very low rejects, regardless of the coin.
What is the composition of your rig? 5x 7950's 5x 7950's 1x 7950 |
|
|
|
this is a good pool, but 512 of difficulty is too high with low difficulty coin and my 480 Kh/s gpu:
do not have time to find a share, which already found the pool to the next block, resulting in a restart of the work by the gpu with a consequent loss of earnings from that block.
I have the same problem, my hash rate is reporting at about half on the website mining DGC, not due to stales, just that it is inefficient to use such a high setting. From pool information on CGminer: Reject ratio: 2.9% Efficiency (accepted / queued): 14% Discarded work due to new blocks: 10896 Stale submissions discarded due to new blocks: 0 Unable to get work from server occasions: 40 Submitting work remotely delay occasions: 0 I'm back at a 47% reject rate. I see some people are above that and some are way below. I just don't get it. With some of the coins I have a 0% reject, others go up as high as 60-70%. But I see some people (with high hash rates) that are always very low rejects, regardless of the coin. |
|
|
|
Who can tell me what time the client can repair? Production team doing?
My Growthcoin client's running pretty well (??). Anyways, I guess OP is planning what goes next, Grw hitted coinEx @ 0.00004 and is @ 0.000029 for now  check the github repo for any "software updates" : https://github.com/growthcoinproject/growthcoinLast update was not even 2 weeks ago so nop, this coin's not dead  Also: August 18, 2013, 12:17:23 PM That's his last activity. I wonder if this is a good sign! |
|
|
|
|
Heads-up: CoinFaucets is currently offline because dot.tk's DNS servers crashed it appears. As soon as they're back up I will forward the domain to my own DNS servers. I apologize for the downtime!
|
|
|
|
...and now
[2013-08-18 20:52:17] Network diff set to 59.8M
What coin is diff 59.8 million?!? Anybody?
Take care
That one is Litecoin. And the 21.2M one you linked earlier is Novacoin. My litecoin client says diff is ~913 and Novacoin ~340 so where does this discrepancy come from? Does h2odysee apply some constant fudge-factor to throw us off the trail of which coin the pool is currently mining? It's how cgminer reports the network diff, middlecoin just follows it. So I am also running a second instance of cgminer for Bitcoin and it reports a network diff of 50.8M - I appreciate your willingness to help but I'm just not understanding. I read somewhere that cgminer reports network diff at 65,000 times the actual diff for other coins. Why? I dono, just seems to be that way. Thanks samfisher. I pointed my miner at a few different scrypt pools and it appears as though the displayed diff in cgminer is difficulty*2^16 though I still can't understand the why. I think I'm going to accept that there is a difference and let it go now At least I can figure out which coin we're mining on middlecoin.com now! Take care Difficulty 1 Litecoin (read: Scrypt) shares are set at 65,535 ("FFFF" or 16^4). Edit: to clear confusion a bit (as to how an even * an event = an odd. It's because technically 16^4 is 65,536 but since the computer reads 0 as the first number we subtract one (65,536-1=65,535). |
|
|
|
Ouch, that brings up a good question. Is it really worth mining NVC and selling at whatever price it is in x days? Prices fluctuate enough from hour to hour. Throw days into the mix and it just gets worse. I'm wondering if maybe we're not actually losing as a result.
As far as I know, it will fluctuate up just as much as it does down. I guess the question is how much variance is ok, for a profit increase? If NVC is 2% more profitable than the next coin, but might fluctuate 20% before it gets sold, is that ok? Hmm, I haven't watched the prices over time. An idea, if it is fluctuating a lot but pretty much stays within two ranges (let's call them MIN and MAX) is to wait until the price is closer to MAX, then sell them off. If the price is closer to MIN, hold on. I'm not sure how feasible that is with your selling script, though. If the range between MIN and MAX is constantly changing (ex. there are massive swings happening on the coin still), I think that'd be a new thing to evaluate. And if the MIN->MAX differences are pretty small, just roll as it is because the loss shouldn't be too big. |
|
|
|
Thanks H20.. It looks like another subpar payout today...All be it not as bad as yesterday.. Why is my mmature Unexchanged Balance (estimated BTC) so High?
Because we have a bunch of NVC blocks that will mature on tuesday, I believe. Ouch, that brings up a good question. Is it really worth mining NVC and selling at whatever price it is in x days? Prices fluctuate enough from hour to hour. Throw days into the mix and it just gets worse. I'm wondering if maybe we're not actually losing as a result. |
|
|
|
...and now
[2013-08-18 20:52:17] Network diff set to 59.8M
What coin is diff 59.8 million?!? Anybody?
Take care
That one is Litecoin. And the 21.2M one you linked earlier is Novacoin. |
|
|
|
I agree with this. That would be a lot better. I like to see how much it costs per hour, not per day.
EDIT: Lost even more advertisers.
EDIT 2: Lost them all.
EDIT 3: Decreased the prices of the ads. Let's hope I get more bids this way.
Don't feel so bad. Coinad has really lost out. Prior to update they were making 0.268 or so BTC a day After update, within 30m or so, they were down to 0.120 or so BTC a day Now, they are at 0.000 (no ads at all) per day That's a massive change. Well I do agree with you. But still, I use the BTC I get from my ads to pay for my hosting, domain and the costs of the faucet itself. I had 0.0132 a day, then 0.0048, then 0.0032 and then nothing. You pay for a subdomain Google gives out for free? :p. And you pay for their free hosting? O.o |
|
|
|
It think the new 24 hour system scared away advertisers. I mean, I get a lot of views and clicks, but nobody buys it. ( Normally 6 out of 8 are sold, now only 2 out of 8 ).
It could be because the price looks higher.
Yeah, that's definitely possible. Maybe there should be a toggle (since the price remains the same in the backend regardless) so you can choose whether you want to view per hour/24 hours. And then default it as per hour. I agree with this. That would be a lot better. I like to see how much it costs per hour, not per day. EDIT: Lost even more advertisers. EDIT 2: Lost them all. EDIT 3: Decreased the prices of the ads. Let's hope I get more bids this way. Don't feel so bad. Coinad has really lost out. Prior to update they were making 0.268 or so BTC a day After update, within 30m or so, they were down to 0.120 or so BTC a day Now, they are at 0.000 (no ads at all) per day That's a massive change. |
|
|
|
It think the new 24 hour system scared away advertisers. I mean, I get a lot of views and clicks, but nobody buys it. ( Normally 6 out of 8 are sold, now only 2 out of 8 ).
It could be because the price looks higher.
Yeah, that's definitely possible. Maybe there should be a toggle (since the price remains the same in the backend regardless) so you can choose whether you want to view per hour/24 hours. And then default it as per hour. |
|
|
|
Update! Ganey was removed from the rotation (non-paying and broken). |
|
|
|
Hey all, I've had this privately locked up for a while now. I was waiting until we had something worth using it for, and with the faucet "feathercoop" out, it has its place now! The address is FTCFaucets and it is a Feathercoin faucet rotator/timer. Right now there is only one faucet out, but this site will allow you to easily keep up with how often you can hit it, so as to avoid going too often or anything (it keeps a timer you can view as well). The faucet itself doesn't have a timer or anything, and you can only enter once every 24 hours, so the rotator will help you maximize your earnings. If you're not familiar with it already, this works the same way as CoinFaucets, which is designed for Bitcoin and has a ton more faucets in it! I'd like to request that if anyone knows of other FTC faucets or is creating one, please let me know and I'll get it in the rotator. If there are any questions, comments, etc. don't hesitate to get ahold of me. Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
Up! :p.
As a heads-up, I may start hosting sites for other faucet owners soon. I'm not 100% on that yet, though if you run a faucet and would like to try and work out a deal I'm all-ears!
|
|
|
|
Update! CoinFaucets is now on an actual server! This should curb the downtime and other problems it faced over the past few weeks, . |
|
|
|
14XuRxHn5UV9YQhzqpCHgA3Eng9LYGNhnw
My payment is August 10th , right? 201-400: 0.04 or 0.08 BTC / 30 days sorry to bother you but when do I get my 0.08 BTC ? Next time follow the rules; you have a third party ad that is explicitly forbidden as per the agreement on the first post. |
|
|
|
I cannot login to my account on my Nexus 4 (Android 4.3, Chrome).
When I try to login it makes the post but nothing happens, it asks me to login again.
Thanks for reporting. Will look into this Also, since you no longer have to out-bid the highest bidder. Do you guys think we should keep the forced bid increments? Or allow any value? Any value. If someone does equal to someone else it just means 50/50. I think that's fair. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
