Bitcoin Forum
October 04, 2024, 01:26:07 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 [383] 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 »
7641  Other / Serious discussion / Re: How do you make money of bitcointalk? on: December 27, 2018, 12:12:32 AM
There are only 2 ways that I am aware of.

1- Renting your signature an avatar once you rank up.

it's not much of an income, and requires some work, but still better than nothing if you are willing to make the effort.

2-Trading goods and services

you can find a lot of good deals on the marketplace, i personally traded a lot of digital goods on the forum. if you have the skills you can always find some great deals on the market place, but indeed you need some capital to start with and to be aware of scams.
7642  Economy / Speculation / Re: Bitcoin Bottomed out ? TA analysis. on: December 26, 2018, 11:48:40 PM
Very good analysis and more grace to you airborne. Technically I believe that bitcoin has bottom out and follow the analysis that you have made I think we should not expect bitcoin will not go below $3000. That means now should be the best time for us to invest into the market.

we can still dip more tho, but if it' for long term plan, then indeed it's a good time IMO
7643  Economy / Speculation / Re: ichimoku cloud says 3100$ is the cheapest bitcoin will ever be on: December 26, 2018, 10:56:12 PM

I agree with what you are saying but with the addition that if for example TA works 80% of the times in other markets like stocks market then it means TA only works 50% in bitcoin market because of the size of the market and the severity of the manipulation that exists here.
here I chose 80 and 50 numbers arbitrarily but the point is that effectiveness of TA is reduced in bitcoin market to a point where most of the times it raises the question of why bother with it.

if TA does not work, then could please kindly tell us what does ? what do you place your entries and exists on?
7644  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: "Cannot find Signature"... What's this? on: December 26, 2018, 10:32:38 PM

1) While I am editing, can I close and open the PuTTY without danger while I have not saved the changes? (:wq)

2) Assuming the worst case, if a mistake is made, is it possible to reverse it? reinstall the firmware, set it factory default, and start over?

1- yes if you use the  "x" bottom on top ,the setting won't be saved.

2- in theory the worst case scnerio is that you'll need to reset the miner. but still shit can happen.

since you are not going to do any coding , you shouldn't make any mistake, before you save just revise the code 2-3 times, compare it to the prev code you pasted here, make sure you have not deleted anything.
7645  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: Remote Identification of S9 hardware version (S9/S9i/S9J) on: December 26, 2018, 10:28:06 PM
on my S9i it shows

Miner Type   Antminer S9i

on the overview page.

so if it says j then it's j, if S9 only then it's an S9.

then when you download the firmware, there is a different asicboost for each type on bitmain webiste.

the first asicboot which bitmain released was only meant for the S9, if you put it on S9i or S9j it will still work but will not make any difference.
7646  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: My mining farm on: December 26, 2018, 10:04:59 PM
Wow i like that  Grin
What's the temperature inside room and where are you from?


i would like to keep the where i am from " secret" Grin

as for the temps , if you mean the hot side , god knows , i never really bothered about measuring it.

for the "cold" side it ranges from 15 to 25 in winter and fall, and from 25 to about 32 in the summer and spring. i use an AC in the summer because the temps out side get way to high.

* all numbers are in degrees Celsius
So its fully divided? (I mean the wall)

This is my first time seeing this set-up and im wondering if on the other side do have ventilation or just opening up the door for releasing of heat?
About the noise i think it doesnt have difference.

fully divided yes.

ventilation is important but depending on the size of the hot room, if big enough, then simply opening the door will be enough.

the noise part ,  it makes a HUGE difference, once both doors are closed and you are sitting outside the noise is much less than in open space, they teach us this in 2nd grade! when you isolate the noise, it gets reduced.

if you want more details check the original post.
7647  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: "Cannot find Signature"... What's this? on: December 26, 2018, 09:58:52 PM
you need to alter the code make it look like this

Code:

# if [ ! -f runme.sh.sig ]; then
      #  echo "Cannot Find Signature!!!" >> /tmp/upgrade_result
#else
 #  openssl dgst -sha256 -verify /etc/bitmain-pub.pem -signature  runme.sh.sig  runme.sh >/dev/null  2>&1
# res=$?
# if [ $res -eq 1 ]; then
 #   echo "Installer Not Signtured!!!" >> /tmp/upgrade_result
 #else
#    if [ -f runme.sh ]; then
#   sh runme.sh
 # else
# echo "Incorrect firmware!!!!" >> /tmp/upgrade_result
# fi
 # fi
#fi

if [ -f runme.sh ]; then
   sh runme.sh
else
       echo "Incorrect firmware!!!!" >> /tmp/upgrade_result
fi

you have to add # to disable the first lines, and remove the # to active the last lines.

add # to the first 15 lines, and remove # from the next 5 lines.
---------------------
to be able to edit, you need to click letter " i" on keyboard.

when you done editing

type

Code:
:wq

then re-open the file to verify the editing worked by typing this

Code:
vi upgrade.cgi

if the edition is good save and exist by typing the following

Code:
:q

once done , restart the miner . and try to upload the firmware.

* do not restart the miner
*do this at your own risk.

please make sure you don't make any mistake in the code, you don't have to TYPE or DELETE anything, just use # to disable lines, and delete # to enable lines.

your codes should like the one in the image i sent in my last post.

EDITED : thanks to yonydouna and effud for correcting the restart part.
7648  Other / Meta / Re: Tool to run online SQL queries over Full Merit Data on: December 26, 2018, 09:33:53 PM

will try that later on , thanks piggy
7649  Economy / Reputation / Re: Should I remove my red tag on bountyhunters.io? DT please discuss on: December 26, 2018, 09:23:25 PM
This more like the "red and green" we talked about in my topic. asking for a private key is an act of scam be it used to scam or not should be the least of our concern. also i would love to see more of these threads where DT members seek the opinions of others.
7650  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: "Cannot find Signature"... What's this? on: December 26, 2018, 07:41:07 PM


no you went too far down,

search around line line no 40.

refer to the image i gave you from the Russian  website  >



you need to find these lines that he put blue rectangular, you need to find those 2 part of codes and delete them. they are usually around line no 40, but could be different , you just  need to scroll until you find them.
7651  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: My mining farm on: December 26, 2018, 04:09:59 PM
Wow i like that  Grin
What's the temperature inside room and where are you from?


i would like to keep the where i am from " secret" Grin

as for the temps , if you mean the hot side , god knows , i never really bothered about measuring it.

for the "cold" side it ranges from 15 to 25 in winter and fall, and from 25 to about 32 in the summer and spring. i use an AC in the summer because the temps out side get way to high.

* all numbers are in degrees Celsius
7652  Other / Meta / Re: Can we regulate the trust system ? on: December 26, 2018, 04:03:36 PM
Isn't it obvious DT won't always agree? There are clear red and clear green cases, but in between there's going to be differences of opinion at some level.

okay you have just summarized the whole issue in a very nice short statement which i couldn't do due to the lack of writing skills Grin.

i do not think anybody will debate over the "clear" red and green cases. but what's up with the gray ?

if you tag someone for being a scammer, not a single DT member will counter it and say " no allow this guy to scam others". it's  pretty obvious !

but what happens when a DT member goes out of his way and tag someone for saying "lemon"? what if no other DT member give a counter tag to the lemon tag?

who can accuse the lemon hater DT member of "abusing" the trust system when there is not a single rule that says "you can't tag someone for using the word lemon?

the tagged person will have his profile painted in red, he won't be able to make any deals with any sort of flexibility, he will be kicked out of any signature campaign even if he gets a counter rating "since most camp mangers clearly say that if you have a negative rating from a DT member you won't get paid".

who will protect say "me" from you giving me a random negative trust because i use this smiley  Grin way too often ?

for all i know no are not breaking any rules for doing so !.



7653  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: "Cannot find Signature"... What's this? on: December 26, 2018, 03:47:53 PM


ok you donig good so far, but the code is incomplete, you need to scroll down use the "down arrow" on the keyboard there will be more code.

you see this
Code:
"- upgrade.cgi 1/219 0%" 

it means you are now at Line no 1 out if 219 lines. you need to click the down arrow a few times until you find  a part like this

Code:
f [ -f runme.sh ]; then
7654  Other / Meta / Re: Can we regulate the trust system ? on: December 26, 2018, 03:30:15 PM
I think this is too limited. If you have to wait for a DT-member to be scammed before a scammer can be tagged, many innocent Newbies will be scammed too, while doing a small deal to work on a long con doesn't mean someone can be trusted either.
As an example, look at the red trust I left. Before I was on DT, it was mainly for users who cheated my giveaways, or (the first one) a non-paying faucet). After I was put on DT (around March this year), I've tagged a couple dozen users, and none of them scammed me. Since scams aren't moderated, DT is the only protection this forum has.

Maybe i failed to give a proper explanation. the point here is not that a DT member himself has to be scammed, the accusation it self has to be based on a scam action. so if a newbie gets scammed by xyz  and you tag that xyz member for scamming, it is a very valid tag. this goes for all trading related matters, call it scam/cheat/ponzi/rip-off it does not matter. as long as it's not " this guy is stupid/troll , so i gave him a negative trust because i can".

Quote
If you don't like the trust system, set your own trust list. I still haven't done it, because I prefer to see users as most people see them. But feel free to start promoting custom trust lists, if enough people agree, DT will become less powerful.

i discused this with suchmoon but i will explain it again,  the trust custom lists is only good for my own use, it does not reflect how other members view my profile. since you are a DT member then you are on everybody's list by default, if you were to tag me now, even if i would exclude you from my list, everyone else by default will see your tag on my profile.
so the trust custom list does not serve any propose on this matter.
--------------------------------------------------

even if we are never going to have any rules, i hope that the reasonable DT members will stand against those irrational tags when they see them. like that DT member who stood up for cryptohunter when he was given a red tag for being a "troll" and gave cryptohunter a positive one because he thought that being a troll does not qualify you for a negative trust of which i am sure that 99% of members would agree to that . i am by no means defending the "way" that cryptohunter went about the "gang" and all the exaggerations ,but it was sad to see only a few DTs disagreed to that and actually only 1 took an action while a few others supported that irrational feedback.



  

7655  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / My mining farm on: December 26, 2018, 03:00:18 PM
 i posted about my small farm in  bitcoin mining board and then realised that the majority of my ASICs are actually alts miners, therefore i did not want to move the topic from there as some people might find it useful there too, so i decided to repost on the ALTs too.

The front



The back




if you want more details on how i built it you can read the full story here > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5087770.0

but in general with this isolation design i got 2 major improvements over the classical.

1- Miners now run much cooler.
2- Noise is reduced to a good level.

so if you are facing any of these above issues , you might consider this type of set up.

if you have any questions, refer to my original post, if the answer is not there, feel free to ask and hopefully i will be able to assist you.

happy mining  Grin


7656  Other / Meta / Re: My NY resolution - help members who aren't Dick Heads. on: December 26, 2018, 02:34:21 PM
I would merit a long quoted poorly formatted post as apposed of a short answer with  no content or quality.

in fact this reply > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5046547.msg46684103#msg46684103

has the best answer IMO , as not so many people know that google has this function where you can search for this exact verse "1 btc to eur" and you get something like this



if i really wanted to merit anybody in the thread it would be him, regardless of his poor quotation skills.

since we do not pay these people to write, and it's not school then what matters the most is the piece of information inside the post.

Their English skills shouldn't matter neither their writing style or use of quotes.

if you visit the mining board you see many people with bad English,poor writing style and terrible use of quotations yet perfect solutions to major problems.

while I would encourage everybody to learn to type a better "looking" overall posts ,I am totally against this way of judging quality posts.
7657  Other / Meta / Re: Can we regulate the trust system ? on: December 26, 2018, 01:09:49 PM

That's a problem with signature campaigns, not with the trust system.

You seem to be (and your thread title definitely is) confusing trust system with DT, which is just one pseudo-user in the trust system that is put into users' trust lists by default. So if that's your problem you should try to change that instead of messing with the whole system. Petition theymos to remove DT altogether and/or make some sort of push towards widespread use of custom trust lists. Petition to remove DT members who you think abuse the system. Petition signature campaigns to have a different approach to trust ratings.


that signature campaign was an example of how USELESS the custom trust list is .the problem is indeed with the trust system.
and there is no confusion, as everyone seems to have understood the point and disusing it on point.

 it's not a good idea to remove the whole DT altogether as for the most part it is accurate and helpful for all other members, we are not discussing the existence of DT ,but the use case.

as someone who is a DT and their feedback appears by default to every member there has to be a set of rules, if the DT is not happy with the rule and wan't to use the trust system the way they want then they get removed from DT and can still tag people for saying "apple" if they want.
7658  Other / Meta / Re: Can we regulate the trust system ? on: December 25, 2018, 10:19:14 PM

Here is what you can do: add moderators to your trust list. You have a moderated trust system, and I get to keep mine too.

that does not solve the problem of how other members see my profile  "the main point of discussion".

assuming just to "explain my point" you were now going to give me a negative trust say for " The way i am debating with you", and then the signature campaign i am in " am not in any just assuming still" kick me out of that campaign. what will be the use of my OWN trust list?

the fact that you are by default on EVERYBODY's trust list is the reason why you need to have a few rules to follow, as your opinion reflects on everybody else eyes and not only yours.


* i am referring to "you" just for the simplicity of speech, but what i mean is DT members is general and not related to you as a person. Grin















 
7659  Other / Meta / Re: Can we regulate the trust system ? on: December 25, 2018, 09:39:46 PM
So this would put the control in moderators' hands. I don't think that's an improvement at all.

the control is already in the moderators hand, if someone can ban accounts then it's not the best argument to say that putting them in control is not an improvement. since we can not have voting , elections or anything of that kind then moderators must have control. in fact someone with the power to ban accounts can ban a DT member right now for no reason so we are not actually giving the mods any sort of extra power. and even if we were to assume so, i personally rather see a moderated trust system than a random trust system, at that point the majority of the feedback will make sense to the majority of people.


Even assuming the enforcement can be super fair, it's still not a benefit to have the trust system conform to a rigid set of rules. The variety of opinions is part of what makes it usable. For example when The Pharmacist started tagging account traders I added him to my trust list because I wanted to see which users are account traders. That was before he was in DT. It looks like your suggestion would take away that flexibility if everyone is allowed to tag only for trades. It would also remove the ability to warn about ICO scams etc.

"The variety of opinions" is the root of the problem. you can not have a "The variety of opinions" in a trust system. especially that DT member's tag is the THIN LINE between a usable account and a non-usable account[1].

[1] -almost every signature campaign states that if you have a negative trust  you can't join.
      -the majority of people  will not be willing to trade with someone who has negative trust from a DT member

I mean look at the contradiction of DT feedbacks on the same members, this would have not happen if the rules are there.
-------------


DT trust needs strict set of guidelines.
So does merit.

I do not agree with the merit part, it will be impossible to monitor , plus i totally disagree with your theory of that the top merited people got their merits from each other "at least this is what i understood" even if that was to be true, this can simply be due to the fact they actually deserved it? also if you look at most DT members merit score, is just an average, except for a few like suchmoon  whom i am totally against his/her way of describing the use of the trust system, i honestly think he/she deserves all the merit it due to the quality of his/her posts.

so please don't take this off-topic. merits are a whole different thing. we are talking only about trust system only here.
7660  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 1% fee solo mining USA/DE 251 blocks solved! on: December 25, 2018, 09:18:40 PM


I got   168,408,013   with my new pacs how close?


you need 30321 * 168,408,013 to solve the a block at current difficulty. so not even close, but not bad at all from a 900gh.

current difficulty according to bitcoinwisdom.com = 5,106,422,924,659 , so your share needs to => than that.

but it changes every aprox 14 days, so you check it on the website from time to time.

good luck.
Pages: « 1 ... 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 [383] 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!