Bitcoin Forum
June 30, 2024, 08:20:29 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 [383] 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 ... 562 »
7641  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Study: Everyone hates environmentalists and feminists on: November 17, 2014, 07:29:43 AM





Grin Cheesy SOLD OUT! Cheesy Grin








----------------------------------------------------
Third wave feminists are good for business. Who knew!


7642  Other / Politics & Society / Re: US health care mandate (Obamacare) on: November 16, 2014, 11:53:49 PM



Gruber-gate gets to Obama: ‘No, I did not’ mislead Americans




All the president’s men could not shield the commander-in-chief from fallout surrounding recently uncovered comments made by Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber.

The health policy and implementation expert who worked closely on the Affordable Care Act and the Massachusetts health care reform law has backed the administration into a corner after it was revealed he repeatedly celebrated the misleading way in which the law was crafted and the “stupidity” of the American voter over whose eyes the wool was pulled.

“The fact that an adviser who was never on our staff expressed an opinion that I completely disagree with in terms of the voters is not a reflection on the actual process that was run,” Obama told reporters in Australia where he is attending a G-20 summit.

When asked directly if he or his administration had, as Gruber insisted, intentionally misled the public and oversight organizations like the Congressional Budget Office when they crafted the Accordable Care Act, Obama’s reply was terse and direct. “No,” he said. “I did not.”

Obama was joined on Sunday by Health and Human Services Sec. Sylvia Burwell who appeared on Meet the Press to distance herself and the administration from Gruber.

“I have to start with how fundamentally I disagree with his comments about the bill and about the American people,” she began emphatically.

Burwell was, however, not asked to respond to those comments. She was asked by moderator Chuck Todd about whether what Gruber said about “mislabeling” new taxes on health insurance plans as fees was true.

Neither the secretary nor Obama addressed Gruber’s charge directly because it is impossible to deny its accuracy.

It is not the first time the president has been pulled into a controversy over the implementation of Obamacare. After weeks of controversy following a cascade of Americans who lost their individual coverage plans which were not compliant with new Obamacare regulations last year, the president was forced to issue a personal apology.

“I am sorry that they– you know, are finding themselves in this situation, based on assurances they got from me,” Obama told Todd in the fall of 2013.

Just days after Obama issued this apology, however, it was revealed that the president was aware that millions of noncompliant plans would be cancelled. Despite his apology for the incorrect assertion Obama made on numerous occasions, that you could keep your plan if you liked your plan, the administration knew this was not true.

“That means the administration knew that more than 40 to 67 percent of those in the individual market would not be able to keep their plans, even if they liked them,” NBC News reported.

Anyone who followed the Obamacare debate in 2009 and 2010 is already aware that Obama was not being truthful when he denied that the ACA was written to evade scrutiny. Though noting that it is an imperfect feature of the American system, intellectually honest liberals who support the law are already defending the lamentable practice of deceptively crafting legislation so that it avoids creating controversy.

So how long will it be before Barack Obama is forced to walk back his definitive declaration that he never knew the ACA was crafted so as to mislead the people’s representatives who passed it?


http://hotair.com/archives/2014/11/16/gruber-gate-gets-to-obama-no-i-did-not-mislead-americans/




Obama avoided impeachment but he will remember by those who studying its actions as one of the worst president because he lied, grew government which lower freedoms and tried to shut down tea parties associations through the IRS

His minions are already hard at work trying everything to scrub his presidency and the internet. I believe this to be an impossible task. My conspiracy mind wants to believe that is why he wants to take over the Internet as a utility service, among other things Smiley

7643  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Consciousness and Quantum Physics on: November 16, 2014, 10:17:35 PM


Quantum Cognition and Brain Microtubules

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mm6Mt9BoZ_M

That was a cool video. This scientist is trying to define consciousness with equations and the mechanism of the how, going beyond the no need to do the hard thinking as consciousness is nothing but a word.

7644  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Study: Everyone hates environmentalists and feminists on: November 16, 2014, 08:34:20 PM
I thought feminism was about civil liberties for women, NOT female dominance


It was and was a great thing until...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-wave_feminism

Now everything is game for an attack from them, even that shirt made by a female designer (very talented woman I must say, that shirt is pretty cool).

It is not about equality anymore.








This is the twitter account of the friend who made that shirt for him as a birthday present... That is her on that picture.








This is her blog and her thoughts about that controversy.

http://ellyprizemanupdate.blogspot.com/2014/11/decisions-and-comments.html


That new feminism wave should use their brain before judging people as talented as Elly Prizeman



7645  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Reddit’s science forum banned climate deniers. on: November 16, 2014, 08:09:00 PM



Socialist French President Hollande: Global Warming May Lead To War





French President Francois Hollande said failure to address global warming could lead to war, and called on G20 countries to act ahead of a climate change conference in Paris next year.

“We will meet again in Paris to sign a global agreement that will prevent the planet from experiencing global warming of as much as three or four degrees (Celsius), which could lead to catastrophe, if not war,” Hollande said at the G20 summit in Brisbane.

“One way to prevent conflicts and catastrophe is by taking decisions.”

Hollande hopes countries will sign binding agreements to limit global warming to two degrees at the conference, which will run from Nov. 30 to Dec. 11, 2015.

At the G20 summit, other nations overrode host Australia’s attempts to keep climate change off the agenda and agreed to call for strong action with the aim of adopting a binding protocol at the Paris conference.

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/hollande-raises-specter-war-over-climate-change-133133544.html


7646  Other / Politics & Society / Re: US health care mandate (Obamacare) on: November 16, 2014, 07:59:06 PM



Gruber-gate gets to Obama: ‘No, I did not’ mislead Americans




All the president’s men could not shield the commander-in-chief from fallout surrounding recently uncovered comments made by Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber.

The health policy and implementation expert who worked closely on the Affordable Care Act and the Massachusetts health care reform law has backed the administration into a corner after it was revealed he repeatedly celebrated the misleading way in which the law was crafted and the “stupidity” of the American voter over whose eyes the wool was pulled.

“The fact that an adviser who was never on our staff expressed an opinion that I completely disagree with in terms of the voters is not a reflection on the actual process that was run,” Obama told reporters in Australia where he is attending a G-20 summit.

When asked directly if he or his administration had, as Gruber insisted, intentionally misled the public and oversight organizations like the Congressional Budget Office when they crafted the Accordable Care Act, Obama’s reply was terse and direct. “No,” he said. “I did not.”

Obama was joined on Sunday by Health and Human Services Sec. Sylvia Burwell who appeared on Meet the Press to distance herself and the administration from Gruber.

“I have to start with how fundamentally I disagree with his comments about the bill and about the American people,” she began emphatically.

Burwell was, however, not asked to respond to those comments. She was asked by moderator Chuck Todd about whether what Gruber said about “mislabeling” new taxes on health insurance plans as fees was true.

Neither the secretary nor Obama addressed Gruber’s charge directly because it is impossible to deny its accuracy.

It is not the first time the president has been pulled into a controversy over the implementation of Obamacare. After weeks of controversy following a cascade of Americans who lost their individual coverage plans which were not compliant with new Obamacare regulations last year, the president was forced to issue a personal apology.

“I am sorry that they– you know, are finding themselves in this situation, based on assurances they got from me,” Obama told Todd in the fall of 2013.

Just days after Obama issued this apology, however, it was revealed that the president was aware that millions of noncompliant plans would be cancelled. Despite his apology for the incorrect assertion Obama made on numerous occasions, that you could keep your plan if you liked your plan, the administration knew this was not true.

“That means the administration knew that more than 40 to 67 percent of those in the individual market would not be able to keep their plans, even if they liked them,” NBC News reported.

Anyone who followed the Obamacare debate in 2009 and 2010 is already aware that Obama was not being truthful when he denied that the ACA was written to evade scrutiny. Though noting that it is an imperfect feature of the American system, intellectually honest liberals who support the law are already defending the lamentable practice of deceptively crafting legislation so that it avoids creating controversy.

So how long will it be before Barack Obama is forced to walk back his definitive declaration that he never knew the ACA was crafted so as to mislead the people’s representatives who passed it?


http://hotair.com/archives/2014/11/16/gruber-gate-gets-to-obama-no-i-did-not-mislead-americans/


7647  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Study: Everyone hates environmentalists and feminists on: November 16, 2014, 07:47:33 PM
Wait until society figures out why women are now, as of fairly recently, smarter than men.  'Social justice' is a bitch (so to speak.)

Being a hard-core atheist I've never been much of a bible-thumper, but if my hypothesis (which I'll keep to myself for now) pans out I'll have to wonder if whoever wrote those Old Testimate warnings might have been on to something.

edit: slight

You do not have to be a believer to read the Bible. For some the Bible could be a handbook of how mankind works, some parts of it could be a sociology study on human societies constructed like a fractal image: no matter the point in time humans have been behaving and will be behaving the same over and over unless... THEN the Bible brings its solution, that you can believe or not.

Even if you include all the technologies that have been developed in the past 2000 years human behaviors have been the same, and everything, from the most selfish, from the most evil to the most noble, to the most kind, has been done, over and over by somebody somewhere.


7648  Other / Politics & Society / Re: US health care mandate (Obamacare) on: November 16, 2014, 07:32:49 PM



Democrat Senator: We All Knew Obama Was Lying About Obamacare (Video)





On ABC’s This Week Sunday morning Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand told Martha Raddatz that Democrats all know Obama was lying about Obamacare.

Martha Raddatz: Did you feel misled by Obama?

Sen. Gillibrand: He should have just been more specific. Because the point is, if you’re being offered a terrible health care plan that the minute you get sick you’re going to have to go into bankruptcy. Those plans should never be offered.

Raddatz: So were you misled?

Gillibrand: He should have just been specific. No, we all knew the whole point of the plan is to cover things people need like preventive care, birth control, pregnancy. How many women the minute they get pregnant might risk their coverage? How many paid more because of their gender, because they might get pregnant? Those are the reforms we’re talking about.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
They all knew 0bamacare was never about saving money or cheap healthcare plans for everyone... They all knew, all the democrats. How can some still support this abomination is beyond a lot of sane people...


7649  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Study: Everyone hates environmentalists and feminists on: November 16, 2014, 05:39:14 PM





http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/11/15/Brilliant-anti-feminist-spoof-claims-space-scientist-s-shirt-is-sexist

7650  Other / Politics & Society / Re: US health care mandate (Obamacare) on: November 16, 2014, 05:21:20 PM
Honestly, I'd like to know where all the American supporters of this law have vanished to.  I'd like to find out if they still stand by their prior support, and if not, why not?

The 0bama lied people will die meme may hit all who supported that law...


Can we bring back tar and feathers?

Bring it back. As a public utility service...


7651  Other / Politics & Society / Re: 0bama Administration Disarming Border Patrol Agents - Agents Forced to Share Gun on: November 16, 2014, 05:18:59 PM
He wants to flood the country, calculating he will bring new democrat voters for generations... Even if it could be painful for a lot of people right now, it will be worth it in perspective, in the long run. The part about border agents switching their mission is interesting... So why using the same old (not so old M4s) when the border agent's purpose will change to do paperwork anyway?

The full transformation of the US by this president is still moving along.
This has long been his goal, as this is why he is pushing for immigration "reform" er, making people who entered into the country illegally to become citizens

Why it makes perfect sense.

"Reform" is advocating the Rule of No Law Applies To Me and My Friends.

He is actually making civil servants (border patrols, ICE) sick of being civil servants. They feel betrayed and useless. All that for cheap political scores while he is down on the mat.

0bama will be remember for sure, but not for having 31 million twitter followers

7652  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Study: Everyone hates environmentalists and feminists on: November 16, 2014, 05:09:06 PM


1 small shirt for a man, 1 giant leap backward for women


Better not to land a spaceship on a comet than let men wear sexist clothing.


So how are things going for feminism? Well, last week, some feminists took one of the great achievements of human history — landing a probe from Earth on a comet hundreds of millions of miles away — and made it all about the clothes.

Yes, that's right. After years of effort, the European Space Agency's lander Philaelanded on a comet 300 million miles away. At first, people were excited. Then some women noticed that one of the space scientists, Matt Taylor, was wearing a shirt, made for him by a female "close pal," featuring comic-book depictions of semi-naked women. And suddenly, the triumph of the comet landing was drowned out by shouts of feminist outrage about ... what people were wearing. It was one small shirt for a man, one giant leap backward for womankind.

The Atlantic's Rose Eveleth tweeted, "No no women are toooootally welcome in our community, just ask the dude in this shirt." Astrophysicist Katie Mack commented: "I don't care what scientists wear. But a shirt featuring women in lingerie isn't appropriate for a broadcast if you care about women in STEM." And from there, the online feminist lynch mob took off until Taylor was forced to deliver a tearful apology on camera.

It seems to me that if you care about women in STEM, maybe you shouldn't want to communicate the notion that they're so delicate that they can't handle pictures of comic-book women. Will we stock our Mars spacecraft with fainting couches?

Not everyone was so censorious. As one female space professional wrote: "Don't these women and their male cohorts understand that *they* are doing the damage to what/whom they claim to defend!?"

No, they don't. Or, if they do, their reservations are overcome by the desire to feel important and powerful at others' expense. Thus, what should have been the greatest day in a man's life — accomplishing something never before done in the history of humanity — was instead derailed by people with their own axes to grind. As Chloe Price observed: "Imagine the ... storm if the scientist had been a woman and everyone focused solely on her clothes and not her achievements."

Yes, feminists have been telling us for years that women can wear whatever they want, and for men to comment in any way is sexism. But that's obviously a double standard, since they evidently feel no compunction whatsoever in criticizing what men wear. News flash: Geeks don't dress like Don Draper.

Meanwhile, Time magazine last week ran an online poll of words that should be retired from the English language. The winner — by an enormous margin — was "feminist." That's fitting. With this sort of behavior in mind, it's no surprise that so many people feel that feminism has passed its sell-by date.

Only 23% of American women and only 20% of Americans overall identify as feminists, even though most are in favor of gender equality. Feminists, who like to say that feminism isgender equality, are unhappy with this, but I think the poll captures a truth. Whatever feminists say, their true priorities are revealed in what they do, and what they do is, mostly, man-bashing and special pleading.

When you act like what pioneer feminist Betty Friedan once called "female chauvinist boors," you shouldn't be surprised to lose popularity.

"Mean girls" online mobbing may be fun for some, but it's not likely to appeal for long. If self-proclaimed feminists have nothing more to offer than that sort of bullying, then their obsolescence is well deserved.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2014/11/15/shirt-comet-girls-feminism-column/19083607/

7653  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Anita Sarkeesian - Feminist Frequency - Donating in Bitcoin on: November 16, 2014, 05:02:04 PM




To:
tjohej

Define "trolling"
define "insulting"

I don't care much for private messages. If you believe I am targeting anita unfairly say it here openly. I do not participate in your little social experiment much anymore.

And why do I get a message you sent to TECHSHARE in my inbox?


Fact: anita is a fraud. She was never a gamer as she pretended. No fuzzy logic here. Either it is 1 or 0. In her case she chose 0, thus invalidating everything she pushed after her lies.
tjohej YOU can be a much better advocate for your cause than anita. Do it for your belief in third wave feminism, don't do it for following a fraud blindly.

Fact: she can receive bitcoin if she wants. Anytime. But she rather get paid in fiat money it seems.




7654  Other / Politics & Society / Re: US health care mandate (Obamacare) on: November 16, 2014, 04:39:34 PM



Health care push comes to bars, nail salons


The pitch for health care coverage is being made at nail salons, pizzerias, mosques and even bars.
As the second enrollment period under President Barack Obama's health care law begins, advocates are employing new tactics and expanding old ones to reach people who need insurance. Some groups are targeting populations they believe slipped through the cracks during the last enrollment period.
"We've had great success at laundromats," said Robin Stockton, the navigator program director for the Center for Family Services, a nonprofit based in Camden, New Jersey.
The informal chat between wash-and-dry cycles can pique interest and lead some customers to call their hotline for more information, she said.

"Typically," she said, "the question you get back is: 'Is this that Obamacare thing?'"
Open enrollment started Saturday and runs until Feb. 15. The HealthCare.gov website, where people can sign up and search for coverage, appeared to be running smoothly Saturday.
Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia M. Burwell tweeted that the website opened shortly after 1 a.m., with more than 23,000 people submitting applications within the first eight hours. She said 1.2 million unique visitors looked at coverage using the site's window-shopping tool in the last week.
In Washington state, though, the health care exchange shut down after the first few hours of open enrollment as state officials and software engineers tried to resolve a problem with tax credit calculations.
And just days before open enrollment, an old video clip surfaced showing an adviser who helped draft the law saying "the stupidity of the American voter" helped Democrats pass the complex legislation. Obama, just before leaving an economic summit in Australia on Sunday, said the public was not misled about provisions of the law. He said there was no provision that was not extensively debated or made fully transparent.

The Obama administration aims to have 9.1 million paying customers enrolled in 2015. That's well below the 13 million that the Congressional Budget Office had projected.
In Philadelphia, Enroll America organizer Neil Rickett is armed with a list of 500 bars and restaurants as he makes his way through downtown, popping in and out of eateries. He approaches bartenders, wait staff and other service industry workers whose high turnover and odd hours often result in a lack of health coverage. He gets workers' contact information and sometimes schedules appointments to meet with them.
"By going to them, we're upping our chance of getting the people we missed or didn't get enrolled last time," Rickett said.
In New Jersey, Stockton's nonprofit is among the community-based groups guiding people through the enrollment process. When they aren't taking appointments, the 17 navigators take their enrollment message on the road.
The helpers set up tables of brochures at festivals and malls. They make cold calls to pizza parlors, Chinese restaurants and other small businesses where they sometimes post information on bulletin boards. And with encrypted tablets and mobile offices, they have signed people up for coverage at churches, synagogues, mosques and a Buddhist temple.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20141116/us--health_overhaul-enrollment_outreach-4f701aeec8.html

7655  Other / Politics & Society / More Federal Agencies Are Using Undercover Operations on: November 16, 2014, 04:17:27 PM





http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/16/us/more-federal-agencies-are-using-undercover-operations.html


7656  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Consciousness and Quantum Physics on: November 16, 2014, 05:04:58 AM
Some people claim that consciousness is a product of quantum phenomena. For example, scientists like Robert Lanza and his Biocentrism Theory, and the (IMO less convincing) "new age guru" (pseudoscientist?) Deepak Chopra with his idea that quantum entanglement creates consciousness.

While these seemingly philosophical ideas make for very interesting reading, they seem to be speculations that are profoundly unscientific, and therefore shouldn't be described as scientific theories.

They tend to rely on misinterpretations of quantum phenomena, eg using the double-slit experiment and the "Observer Effect" to try and prove that conscious beings can influence quantum effects in a specific way (when in fact the collapse of the wave-function in the double-slit experiment is not dependent on the act of observing, it is due to the necessity of interacting photons with other particles so they can be measured, which subsequently change their state. Consciousness, or even life itself is not required to collapse the wave-function - just interaction with any other particles will do this just fine).

A popular theory by Chopra misinterprets quantum entanglement and claims that it can cause the future to affect the past, and can transmit information faster than light. No experiment yet conducted has shown that these phenomena are true, in fact they all seem to show the opposite.

I appreciate that quantum effects undoubtedly affect the mind, after all our brain is merely a collection of neural connections powered by electrons/molecules that all exhibit random quantum phenomena, which could likely change our perceptions/decisions in real life. I like to theorise that these phenomena give us true free will - the innate randomness of quantum effects means human behaviour could never be predicted to 100% accuracy.

But this is a different hypothesis to consciousness being a product of quantum phenomena, which as far as I'm concerned is pseudoscientific.

I'm not a quantum physicist, but I'd like to hear some other peoples thought on this matter - is there any testable/scientific proof that consciousness is a product of quantum phenomena?

A scientific "theory" is testable, provable, and most importantly, disprovable.  Since none of these ideas meet these criteria, they are not scientific theories. 

So then consciousness does not exist...



Something can obviously exist without being a scientific theory.  I am holding a pen in my hand.  "pen" is not a scientific theory, and yet quite obviously the pen exists.  An example of what is a scientific theory would be if I attempted to explain something about the pen.  I could for example, hypothesize that the pen would have a certain displacement if a certain amount of force was applied to it for a certain amount of time, such that say, d= Vi * T + 1/2A * T^2.  This would be an example of a scientific hypothesis.  It is testable, and either correctly describes the displacement of the pen, or it does not displacement of the pen.  There is no ambiguity or room for interpretation, it is quite simply, either right or wrong.  If after conducting numerous tests to the best of our ability, and it passing every test we can come up with, it would then be called a "proven" hypothesis, aka a theory.  There is a bit more to it than that of course but I think that is a good beginning.


How would you describe Consciousness with an equation?

Well I wouldn't.  Consciousness is just a word, and like any word we can give it whatever definition we want.  You have the hypothesis not me, so you tell me the equation and\or repeatable "test" which would prove or disprove your hypothesis.  That's kind of the point I'm trying to make, if you can't describe it specifically, unambiguously, and in a manner we can all independently test, then it isn't a scientific theory (being right or wrong is irrelevant). 

The pen you are describing was born on the monitor of a CAD program, then mathematically fed to a machine tool, or a melting block of plastic. The pen was defined even before it was in your hand, even before it was created from a factory, even before the final CAD file was saved.
The pen isn't really relevant, it was simply a convenient example.  The kinematic equation I provided to you would apply to any object in any situation (this is not 100% but I think it is close enough for the purposes of this discussion).  If it only applied to that specific pen in that specific situation, it wouldn't be of much use to us.

A black hole. We predicted it could exist. We can observe what it does. We are not sure what is inside. Consciousness is like that... kinda.
Well correct.  We do not currently have any model that predicts what happens inside a black hole which is testable.  As such, it would be correct to say we do not have a scientific theory for the workings of the inside of a black hole.  Which is exactly the opposite of what you are claiming as far as consciousness goes. 




[/quote]

As such, it would be correct to say we do not have a scientific theory for the workings of the inside of a black hole.  Which is exactly the opposite of what you are claiming as far as consciousness goes. 

I don't remember pretending knowing what consciousness is in this thread. I am saying we need to trust it exists to define what we observe through/withing it. We need to trust that consciousness is not filtering our measurements and observations. It could be that what we know and understand as The Existence of Everything is trapped withing some kind of an event horizon of a black hole we can never see or observe or measure.

Maybe our universe is trapped to an ultimate beyond imagination gigantic black hole. That could explain what Dark Energy is. What we observe as an acceleration of an expansion is in reality, Everything falling forever toward a black hole. If that is true we could calculate its size, etc. And yet we would STILL need to trust that our consciousness is not distorting what Everything is...


7657  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Consciousness and Quantum Physics on: November 16, 2014, 04:32:04 AM
Consciousness is the best tool to apprehend reality.

Your reality or mine?

 Smiley


7658  Other / Politics & Society / Re: US health care mandate (Obamacare) on: November 16, 2014, 04:23:27 AM



Hitler Finds Out Field Marshal Gruber Spilled the Beans










7659  Other / Politics & Society / Re: US health care mandate (Obamacare) on: November 15, 2014, 08:01:52 PM
Honestly, I'd like to know where all the American supporters of this law have vanished to.  I'd like to find out if they still stand by their prior support, and if not, why not?

The 0bama lied people will die meme may hit all who supported that law...

7660  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Study: Everyone hates environmentalists and feminists on: November 15, 2014, 07:57:22 PM


5 Reasons “feminists” can’t complain about comet scientist’s “sexist” shirt







http://legalinsurrection.com/2014/11/5-reasons-feminists-cant-complain-about-comet-scientists-shirt/


------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe one of the scientist was a hardcore feminist and let the battery of Philae die in purpose to punish men wearing too sexy shirts...? Cheesy Grin Cheesy



Pages: « 1 ... 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 [383] 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 ... 562 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!