Not sure if Globe is interested in having a bitcoin exchange, pero definitely not impossible if mag spike up ang growth at adoption ng bitcoin. In the end, they will cater to demand as always.

Malaki ba ang epekto nito sa Coins.ph? Knowing na though well-known na saatin ang Coins.ph, take note na hindi pa siya ganun ka mass-adopted especially compared to GCash na malayong mas madaming users. If it's the case na magkaroon ng crypto feature ang GCash, definitely malaki ang effect nito sa potential future growth ng Coins.ph especially if they apply it sooner, basically stealing potential future customers ng Coins.ph. Hindi ganun ka-laki ang Coins.ph(compared to gaano kalaki ang Coinbase sa US) para magkaroon ng somewhat-monopoly in the long-term.

Some data para mas madali niyong ma-visualize ung size difference ng GCash sa Coins.ph:

• Android: GCash at #8 spot while Coins.ph is at #181 spot
• iOS: GCash at #4 spot while Coins.ph is at #147 spot

Screw predictions. Even the so called "experts" get it wrong A LOT, and let's not forget that drawing on charts won't be able to predict events in the first place.

Since you're interested in trading though, why not continue holding and simply allocate a certain percentage for your trading? You don't necessarily need to be all-in on trading or all-in on holding. It's possible to do both.

You know why? Because the regular Joe in the street isn't likely to take part in new technological inventions. Especially when they don't even know what a certain technology does in the first place.

None. Because not a single person I know in my city even invests in general. Just consumerism everywhere. Does that make certain assets such as gold and stocks a failure as well?

You're making conclusions that bitcoin is a failure just because you don't know anyone using it. Even though you probably know well that Bitcoin is still a very new technology.

Certain countries using Bitcoin won't really directly make Bitcoin more or less decentralized.

With that said, Bitcoin as a country's currency? Very very unlikely especially for the bigger more established countries. Bitcoin as one of the accepted payment currencies along with the country's local currency? Sure.

Let me ask you this first: since you're asking about Bitcoin concerning Joe Biden's presidency, what specific law or anything about him that you think could actually affect Bitcoin?

Knew there was something fishy about that 1 merit.

Why ask me? I don't know what you're intentions are. If you're a trader, obviously you need the funds to be on exchanges to be able to trade. On the other hand if you're more of an investor and a holder, then securing your funds using a hardware wallet is highly recommended.

You do realize that buyers on exchanges are buying coins from other exchange users right? And vice versa. Not from the exchange itself. If there's not enough liquidity to meet the demand of the buyers, what will simply happen is that the price will increase as the buyers execute the orders of the higher sell offers.

Not-so-pro tip: sa karamihan ng exchanges pwede mo makita ang "depth" ng order book. Para may idea ka kung gaano karaming units ang naka sell offer at certain prices.

Eto ung sa BTC/USDT trading pair sa Binance:

Question: What would be the <h1> heading of that specific webpage? If you're going to use the "Cryptocurrency Exchange Rates" heading, then the rates.coinplatform.com option would be a better fit, solely from the "rates" word alone as it would be more memorable for the user.

As for the "monitor.coinplatform.com" option, that could still work if you're going to use an <h1> heading such as "Monitor Cryptocurrency Prices" or something like that. I'd personally prefer "rates" though as it's shorter and the word simply fits more to your niche.

Because no matter how bullish we are on Bitcoin, it still won't change the fact that bitcoin is still a speculative play. And unless a company or individual investor has like $100+ billion in cash, it would really be risky for them to put billions in to bitcoin.

Also take note: These big players are a lot less likely to take big risks compared to us retail investors. Most of them make investments just to counter inflation, not necessarily to make huge gains like us.

Especially if the company isn't public, sure they could lie, but why would they in the first place? Especially if a certain company is big enough in size to have it's name placed in a news headline, lying just for a bit of media publicity is definitely not worth it knowing the potential repercussions.

Don't expect them to be gone any time soon. If anything, the number of shitcoin projects is actually likely to increase as Bitcoin(and the cryptocurrency space) grows more as time goes.

To simply put, scams have existed since the dawn of humanity, and it will continue to exist until the end.

With so much scams on social media it might be the case that Facebook automatically false-flags Bitcoin addresses as scams. While it's unfair for those who want to post their Bitcoin addresses without malicious intent, I really can't blame Facebook's software for being strict due to the number of scams on social media.

Not a bad thing as far as I know. Probably nothing different from Square being allowed to operate a bank: it just makes things easier for them in terms of regulations, rather than them needing to bend the knee just to be able to operate.

Doesn't really change the fact that I have a huge distaste for BitPay though.

Probably a loophole: create a donation page on your website(you definitely should have a website in 2020) and place in your bitcoin wallet address there, and post the link to that page on Facebook; rather than showing the Bitcoin address straight into a Facebook post.

USDT is definitely one of the preferred options. If you're using a KYC-exchange though, you honestly might as well use real USDs than stablecoins because holding stablecoins has it's own risks[1].

On the other hand, if you're using non-KYC exchanges like Binance, yea you're pretty much limited to stablecoins. Just remember to probably not hold onto your stablecoins for long amounts of time because of the said risks.

---

[1] PSA: Most Stablecoins Can Be Frozen, Even in Your Own Wallets https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5204055

Not really. While I think I'm a decently tech-savvy person, I'm really not into the deep technicals of Bitcoin; but more of the theoretical/economic/investing side of it. If you need to be technical to decently understand and take advantage of Bitcoin's characteristics, then we're fucked.

Take a look at the book recommendation from my previous reply.

Probably not a good idea to be using KYC exchanges if you're under 18.

With that age, you either ask your parents to buy coins for you, or you use peer-to-peer non-KYC exchanges like HodlHodl[1], LocalCryptos[2], or Bisq[3].

---

[1] https://hodlhodl.com/
[2] https://localcryptos.com/
[3] https://bisq.network/

Broski if it's the case that Bitcoin can just be shut down by Satoshi or by literally anyone just because of some documents, then Bitcoin is crap. It's actually the fact that it can't be shut down that's why there are a lot of Bitcoin enthusiasts. Even the government itself couldn't shut it down.

There is no such thing as "best coin/token" for trading. It will completely depend on your trading style and what indicators you're using, and obviously it won't be the same for everyone.