Bitcoin Forum
June 26, 2024, 06:17:29 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 [388] 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 ... 570 »
7741  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: CGMINER ASIC FPGA GPU overc monit fanspd RPC linux/win/osx/mip/r-pi 3.3.1 on: July 16, 2013, 10:13:40 PM
Now, I can run 2 instances of cgminer, one is using the Intel GPU and another is using the Nvidea GPU.
Is there some sort of command for cgminer to use both platforms and see both GPU's in same instance?  Grin
no
7742  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Help me pick a pool on: July 16, 2013, 09:55:57 PM
Because you can't point that much hashing power at your Bitcoin-QT client.

Why is that? Sounds incredible.

The Bitcoin clients were initially designed to work with CPU mining which was fairly low burden on the client.  But now we have exponentially increased the hashing power with high end GPU's, GPU clusters and now ASIC's and the Bitcoin clients don't/can't scale with that load.

That is one of the main reasons for pools.  Pool Operators have gone through the trouble/cost of developing high performance Bitcoind's and pool server software which if very vertical market type software to keep up with the load and they often have had trouble with the ASIC loads.

So if you want to solo mine with high end ASIC's download some pool software and set it up.  I don't have time for that.

Good Luck with it.
Sam
Not only that, but the bitcoin developers have tried to distance themselves from mining entirely, not adopting the efficient forms of the high performance mining protocols that have evolved around high mining hash rate speeds, instead dissociating the work of mining to others (indirectly pools). While this may seem crazy, it is also indirectly accepting that it is virtually impossible for solo mining to make any sort of reasonable sense any more. I lament this fact, for I still think that all miners should have solo mining as their final backup should all pools fail, as a way to guarantee the bitcoin network remains secure, if not necessarily smoothly/consistently profitable for its miners.
7743  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: CGMINER ASIC FPGA GPU overc monit fanspd RPC linux/win/osx/mip/r-pi 3.3.1 on: July 16, 2013, 09:38:25 PM
Greetings.

I have a Alienware m14x with OS Windows 8 64 bits and 2 GPU's: Nvidea GeForce as default GPU and a Intel HD Graphics 4000 GPU.

With Diablo-miner, it identifies the 2 GPU's but uses only the Nvidea GeForce GT650m (25 MH/s) (GPU Load 97%).

But with cgminer 3.3.1, it only uses the Intel HD Graphics 4000 GPU, mining @ 11.8 MH/s (the Nvidea GPU load is 0%).

Is it possible for cgminer, to use both GPU's or even only the Nvidea GPU instead of the Intel one?

Many thanks in advance.

For nvidea use CUDA miner, cgminer is only for openCL devices...

CUDA miner: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.0
CUDA miner is only for Litecoin, not for BTC (I think). But many thanks for your kind answer. I now understand why cgminer doesn't use the Nvidea GPU.

This is wrong. You can build cgminer for nvidia. The precompiled binaries are for ATI, but if you download the nvidia opencl SDK you should be able to build against it. I have done this on linux a long time ago, no idea about windows. You don't get any fan control or temperature monitoring.
Alas all of this is wrong.

All you need to do is add the following to your command: --gpu-platform 1
7744  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Sapphire dual-x 7970 issue 15LTC for solution. on: July 16, 2013, 12:30:52 PM
The cgminer documentation has extensive information on how to tune a 7970 for scrypt in the SCRYPT-README.  I spent ages writing documentation, please read it. It even states there that a rate of 745kh was reached, and I mined at that constantly for a few weeks before giving up on LTC.

79x0 devices fall into 2 categories: Those that like ultra high thread concurrencies (>20k) and ONE gpu thread, and these work well at intensity 19 or 20, and those that like much lower thread concurrencies (8192) and TWO gpu threads, and ANY intensity over 13 is going to cause hardware errors or fail to start. Generally speaking, all the overclock models (Ghz edition etc.) prefer the 2 threads while the reference models prefer the one thread. 7950 have no such reference model so it's a mystery which belongs to which category.

7745  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon ASIC users thread on: July 16, 2013, 04:06:08 AM

I get a REALLY large number of invalid shares with my Avalon.

I'm not sure whats going on. It's not consistent.

One day I'll be mining and I'll get 99+% valid shares and the next day or two it will only be 88% valid shares.

I've tried mining on Ozcoin and 50btc and it seems to be bad on both.

I don't think it is my network because my jalapenos only get <1% invalid shares.

I'm using the dynamically adjusting frequency and it usually settle at about 352 MHz or so and 82 GH/s on average. Of course, according to the pool, I'm only getting 70 GH/s or so due to all the invalid shares.

I have an AC feeding directly into the intake on the Avalon and no temperature gets above 48 or 49 or so (very rarely 50).

What could be wrong?
This is normal on stratum. Every time the block changes, you get invalids. Some days burn more blocks than others.

It seems like I have way more than other Avalon users, at least from what I've seen on Ozcoin. Most of them have only a couple percent invalid shares at most, while I will have 12 or 13% invalid shares. Right now I'm standing at about 94% efficiency on average, that's with 400,000 invalid shares in the less than a week I've been mining there.


That is definitely far more than you should be getting. There is a good chance you're submitting heaps of duplicates which may also be a different form of instability that the auto mode can't check for. Try setting a lower maximum speed if you're using auto mode because clearly you're not doing 82GH of useful work.
7746  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: CGMINER ASIC FPGA GPU overc monit fanspd RPC linux/win/osx/mip/r-pi 3.3.1 on: July 16, 2013, 04:04:00 AM
It's highly likely that your hub can not provide enough power for 33 USB block eruptors simultaneously.  In fact, from your experiments, it seems to not be able to provide enough power for more than 7 at a time.  What power levels is it rated at?  Each block eruptor will need 0.5 - 0.6 Amps.

Power Supply is fine, coming from Win7 where they work.  Sparkle 400 is 30A@5v.  Thanks!

They're all hashing.

10890Mhs/333Mhs=32.7

Exactly.  It's driving me nuts that there's no work!
If your usb hub is a usb2 hub and not a usb3 hub you will be far better off moving to the latest version of cgminer instead. The only reason to stick with the old version of cgminer is if you have multiple usb1.1 devices on a usb3 hub for there remains an instability there that we've been unable to debug so far.
7747  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: CGMINER ASIC FPGA GPU overc monit fanspd RPC linux/win/osx/mip/r-pi 3.3.1 on: July 15, 2013, 08:01:13 PM
Why would I be needing to run as root even after changing /dev/ttyUSB0 to 777?

Code:
pi@raspberrypi ~/bin $ sudo chmod 777 /dev/ttyUSB0 
pi@raspberrypi ~/bin $ ./cgminer-3.3.0a  -n
 [2013-07-15 19:59:34] USB all: found 4 devices - listing known devices
.USB dev 0: Bus 1 Device 4 ID: 10c4:ea60
  ** dev 0: Failed to open, err -3                   
 [2013-07-15 19:59:34] 1 known USB devices                   
pi@raspberrypi ~/bin $ sudo ./cgminer-3.3.0a  -n
 [2013-07-15 19:59:38] USB all: found 4 devices - listing known devices
.USB dev 0: Bus 1 Device 4 ID: 10c4:ea60
  Manufacturer: 'Silicon Labs'
  Product: 'CP2102 USB to UART Bridge Controller'                   
 [2013-07-15 19:59:38] 1 known USB devices                   
pi@raspberrypi ~/bin $
cgminer no longer uses ttyUSB0 so you're changing permissions on an interface cgminer doesn't use. See the relevant readme instead (FPGA-README or ASIC-README).
7748  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: [Alaska] GPU mining is pretty much the cheapest way to produce heat :) on: July 15, 2013, 07:19:09 PM
Sorry, couldn't resist. You didn't deserve that comeback  Wink
7749  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: [Alaska] GPU mining is pretty much the cheapest way to produce heat :) on: July 15, 2013, 07:13:36 PM
I used to get 1200W of heat from my GPU rig which mined 2.7GH of bitcoin. Now I get 1200W of heat from my ASICs mining 200GH of bitcoin.
7750  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: Solo Mining profitability on: July 15, 2013, 05:54:03 PM
This is all opinion based...

I estimate based on finding 5 blocks on average per difficulty change to avoid the variance of missing blocks before a diff rise in a way that can never be recovered. That's 5 out of 2016 blocks so you need to be >= .25% of the total network hashrate. At (current) difficulty 26 million, you need to generate 5 * 26 million shares in less than 2 weeks, or 26 million shares every 403 blocks which is ~4030 mins (in reality less time because diff is rising). That's ~6500 shares per minute. You get 1 share per 71.6MH per minute, so you'll need ~6500 * 72 = 470GH. One BFL SC minirig therefore is about the minimum requirement (this week).

Not only do you need a ludicrous amount of hashrate to reach that milestone, it gets increasingly difficult to set up an efficient solo operation as the network hashrate increases. Even the most hardcore miners gave up solo mining for any extended period for the risks are too great with such a large investment.

Summary: Pool mine.
7751  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon ASIC users thread on: July 15, 2013, 12:15:01 PM
Con, what is the appropriate NMW/MWC ratio?
No such thing as "appropriate" as it's just another hardware error. If your hashrate is okay, it's okay. You can read a few pages ago about how I chose the "appropriate" hardware error target rate of <2%.
7752  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: got an unknow error in cgminer for HD7850 on: July 15, 2013, 05:46:10 AM
I'm assuming your talking about dynamic mode?

If so it's not an error.  Dynamic mode adjusts your GPU in an attempt to keep your desktop GUI responsive so you can use your computer while mining.  Dynamic mode only uses one thread instead of the default 2 so it's disabling the unused one.

--intensity|-I <arg> Intensity of GPU scanning (d or -10 -> 10, default: d to maintain desktop interactivity)

Thank you. But I can not receive any "accept" when this message appear.
You're going to have to give a lot more information then before we can help you.
7753  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [ANN] Stratum mining protocol - ASIC ready on: July 15, 2013, 05:40:07 AM
Have other pools lost interest in implementing reconnect support?
7754  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon ASIC users thread on: July 15, 2013, 05:31:40 AM
what's the difference btwn different "[Stats0,1]"?
You found it then. At some stage the avalon disconnects due to some USB issue and cgminer automatically hotplugs it. Since it's newly hotplugged it comes up as a new device (ava1 instead of ava0).
7755  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Asicminer USB Erupters...how do they even make sense? on: July 14, 2013, 05:34:23 PM
We have k1's shipping in three weeks that can be clocked up to 450mh/s. They are also cheaper. Group buy is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=254358.0
Precisely 14 microseconds after the first one of these is actually delivered, the price of the Asicminer product will magically drop to match it in price/performance.
7756  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: CGMINER ASIC FPGA GPU overc monit fanspd RPC linux/win/osx/mip/r-pi 3.3.1 on: July 14, 2013, 03:41:14 PM
Hi, I've finally given up on trying to find out what I'm doing wrong with connecting to 50btc. Here's my cgminer.conf file. It's an exact copy of another one that works fine, just with btcoxygen in stead of 50btc. Running on Raspbian with USB Erupters

Code:
                "pass" : "xxx*"
I just get the same error:
 [2013-07-14 15:33:16] ./cgminer: --config: JSON decode of file '/home/pi/cgminer-3.1.1/cgminer.conf' failed
 '}' expected near '*'


I hope someone can help. Thanks

Your password is confusing the conf file reader with the asterisk (*) there. Change your password to something without an asterisk or learn how to escape the asterisk in a json compatible way.
7757  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon ASIC users thread on: July 14, 2013, 01:13:56 PM
ckolivas
Cgminer (07/03 firmware) submit "stale" shares to a pool or discard it by default?
I found that mmpool have incredible low reject rate 0.0022% (64/2862167 diff1 and fixed difficulty = 32) but have "stale" ~0.17% (5216/2862167 diff1)
so my "stale" shares accepted by pool or not?  Huh
At any other pool I have 0.2-0.3% normal reject rate.
Cgminer submits stale shares unless you use --no-submit-stale. Some pools accept stale shares for some period after the block has changed to fake it looking like their stale rate is lower than other pools. Overall since they accept the same proportion of stales from everyone, no one actually gets paid more, it's just marketing.
7758  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon ASIC users thread on: July 14, 2013, 06:32:47 AM
It's not the pool connection. Something happens and all work ends up "discarded" until cgminer is restarted. What would cause that?
It's got nowhere to go. It prepares work and then no device is working to take it so it just discards it.
7759  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon ASIC users thread on: July 14, 2013, 04:09:47 AM
I can watch MHS5s slowly drop to 0, and eventually cgminer-monitor will restart cgminer. Why is cgminer stopping hashing?
Common reasons:
Wifi kernel problem
Overdoing the overclocking
Pool failure and the cgminer-monitor watchdog is trigger happy and kills cgminer when all it's doing is waiting for a pool to come back online.
FPGA failure in the avalon.

For maximum stability while I'm away, I limited my batch 2 overclock to 333 and it's been up for a week. At 350 it would restart cgminer every 12 hours and eventually after a few days would restart the entire router.
7760  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: USB Block Erupter by ASICMINER question - used in combo with existing dual GPU' on: July 13, 2013, 05:57:17 PM
is 1 instance of cgminer USB Erupters only mining for BTC and an additional instance of cgminer GPU only mining scrypt possible on the same PC?
Yes
Pages: « 1 ... 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 [388] 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 ... 570 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!