satoshi has plenty of known addresses, but you can sign a pgp message as well.

Don't use iTunes or iPhones. iTunes has always been ridiculously slow whenever I've used it. When my battered iPhone 3 breaks I won't be going back.

https://uk.webuy.com/

Anyone interested in a credit note for Cex / Computer Exchange? It's a physical voucher and can be spent at any of their stores throughout the UK, but I could also either send you the code digitally so you can buy anything from their website or I can order something myself and have it shipped directly to you. Can offer a small discount. The value is for £143.86 and am looking for £120 in BTC or LTC.

I've also got a load of blu-rays that I might trade in totaling about £170 credit, so if you wanted more I could possibly do a deal with that as well.

hilariousandco

Thanks.


Most of them were already publicly known to be his anyway, but it is amusing.

Read the sticky: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=497545.0

Haha. And then the next level of butthurt which is the false unbacked accusations of paedophilia  .


Yeah, but he's already had his fair share of threads created in his honour  .

You know you're doing something right when you get a tribute account with your username in  . I now join the esteemed ranks of vod and Badbear.

Favourites so far:

dumb ass badbear: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=335645
fuck you vod: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=380120

On a side note, just noticed there's a user called CoAndHilarious that made a few posts a while back  .

Their trust doesn't suddenly disappear once they get banned, they just can't leave anymore once they are.

But you made posts and that's the crucial element. If it was just 6/12 months of inactivity then satoshi's account would be wiped plus many other once prominent members. People who have made at least 1 post should probably be kept.

Real Madrid 4 v Liverpool 1

Real Madrid should get a few at least I think.

GIYF. High Yield Investment Program aka a scam.

Bagsy got satoshi  . What/when would be the cut off of someone being inactive?  I think maybe those who never posted and have also been inactive for over a year maybe should be wiped, but not sure about just 'inactive' accounts over X amount of time.

You can't 100% guarantee it but most people don't seem to leave negative on accounts bought and sold now unless they look like they might be involved in shady behavior (and that's assuming someone even realises it's a bought account). If you keep the sale between buyer and seller or at the most a trusted escrow you should be fine.

Constantly sacking managers isn't going to do them any good. It's the team that's the problem. Whoever they get isn't going to magically transform the squad and if they can't win with Gaal then I can't see why they would do any better with anyone else.

Yep, as long as the seeds or items are not shipped to anywhere where they're illegal you can sell them here. Cannabis seeds are actually legal in many places around the world. Like he mentioned above, seeds are legal in the UK, but it's illegal to actually cultivate them.

Agreed. I think there should be some sort of distinction shown between temp and perma as well.


Yeah, assumed it wasn't allowed on purpose. Thanks.


  I'm really surprised no one else seemed to notice they were all the same person. He's got a really distinct semi-coherent shitposting style and something else that blatantly gives his alts away every time. Wont say what it is cos I know he'll keep coming back  .

Trust him with what though? Thin air? In what capacity is the name satoshi trustable currently? It seems like you wouldn't trust him at all. And I'm aware of what the thread is called, but he's not really a bitcointalk user currently, so what would you trust him with? Money? Your identity? Your life? The only thing that would be insane here is trusting 'satoshi', but you haven't clarified in what capacity you would in fact trust him or why he is the most trustworthy here.

So he's the most trustworthy user, yet you wouldn't trust him? Your logic doesn't make sense. In what capacity do you trust him and why is he trustworthy? Satoshi is just a name; a name of someone who has been Mia for years. Satoshi could be one of many people so how do you know there isn't a trustworthy member among them?

Because he's trustworthy according to you, so why wouldn't you loan him it if he gave you a believable story? Maybe he doesn't have access to his coins anymore or is in legal trouble or in danger etc.

Did you read the article? I don't think him wanting regulations is a bad thing. I think he just wants it to be seen as a legitimate and useable currency, and if we want bitcoin to go mainstream it is going to be regulated and taxed at some point whether we like it or not.


Branson is definitely someone we'd want on our side. If he accepted it for all his businesses it would be huge for bitcoin.