How much have you personally invested in BSV? More than zero, or zero?


Please don’t bring this shit here, this is a serious accusation, not a game


"Anyone" includes you too, right? Don't worry, not listening. But your claim does hold as much water as CSW's.

Bitcoin can't be a fork of itself you dimwitted tool. Just because it has undergone forks in the past doesn't mean its no longer bitcoin. You don't get to control branding. The world is moving on without you. It's a good thing that nobody who doesn't already have a hard-on for bcash believes your simplistic propaganda.

When Satoshi made Bitcoin he didn't name it "Bitcoin Cash."

"Bitcoin isn't bitcoin but this other coin is. Derp."

That's about what it comes down to.

Except for bitcoin, and about a thousand others, quite literally. A fork doesn't start being a coin the moment the original coin is born you lunatic. That's just fucking stupid, again. I don't think even other bcash fanboi tards believe that nonsense.

Really breher. The things you have to say are just insultingly stupid sometimes.

I will no longer be discussing that scamcoin Bcash in this thread. This isn't the give Bcash undeserved limelight observation thread nor is it two desperate Bcash fanboys and wall observation users fight.

Fuck Bcash, fuck Ver, fuck Jihan, fuck Craig and I feel sorry for all the fools who have drank the koolaid and sold bitcoins to buy these scam tokens and now need to imagine a fantasy land where they made a decent decision.

Fuck it.

Who gives any shits about what miners want?  It’s irrelevant.  Same as what users want.  That’s irrelevant too.

 Either they mine or they don’t.  So the incentives for mining are already built into bitcoin.   Same with users.  Either they use bitcoin or they don’t. 

Again, in bitcoin incentives are already well established from the beginning.  That’s what makes bitcoin so powerful as contrasted with the various shitcoin bitcoin wannabes.

Oh my, are you serious!!!!!

You don't know what bitcoin is, sirsplashalot?  

You might be beyond repair....   You are trying to participate in a bitcoin thread, but you do not know what bitcoin is, yet?

Perhaps this thread needs at least a basic entry level questionnaire in order that peeps understand at least the existentialist part of bitcoin, which seems to be clearly resolved already... and gone over and over and over...

Go study a bit, sirsplashalot,** and then come back here with better and more thought out question(s).

** Hint:  you are not going to become more informed about "what is bitcoin" by participating in r/btc, getting your information from bitcoin.com or other bcash pumping information sources.. Many of those "information" sources are loosely connected to reality, at best.   On the other hand, if you are able to understand what you read (which seems a bit questionable at this point), you might be able to just follow this thread for a while or go back and read this thread more before you post any further nonsense?  Perhaps?

My bullshit detector is going off the charts. You're the guy who used to refer to bitcoin as "segwit coin" remember? I do.



Which is why I am intent on countering yours. Breher, you're welcome to have your own viewpoint, just don't act like its the only one that's valid. That shit is stupid, and infuriating. And I don't blame V8s for leaving you his rating. You've been proven to be incorrect in your assertions time and time again, which is by all accounts the same as providing misinformation.

Hey jbreher, I guess you’ll never have to worry about BCH or SV blocks being full seeing as though hardly anybody uses them.

I'd say it's more real marketcap, that shows who the majority believe is worth more and the "real" Bitcoin"

No I mean if I shared Lauda's viewpoint on what people should be tagged for I would tag him as well, but I don't, so I won't.


You're here managing to blather on about nonsense, aren't you? You're hardly being suppressed.

ah, sorry for the typo, I corrected my previous post, it should be Lauda, not nutilda.
I don't know what happened with discussion about Bitcoin Cash between you and Lauda, but it seems that too strictly to tag someone negatively because difference in opinion. Theymos already stated his opinion about this.

You are so strictly DT member. I read the post I quoted, and red the trust page of that guy, then I found that Lauda (not you) tagged him or her with negative trusts due to his or her bad posts in Bitcoin Cash topic, not here.
And, what is the point of 'would tag you a second time'? Did you tag that guy, then removed tag due to his or her improvements later?

Bitcoin Cash lacks the competitive advantage of other cryptocurrencies including Bitcoin. It also is still relatively new, yet has already faced major contention leading to a heat Civil War between Bitcoin SV and BCH/Bitcoin ABC. While it emerged as a solution to Bitcoin’s scalability problem, other solutions like the Lightning Network have emerged.

Bitcoin Cash and all its hard forks appear as redudant. It seems only to have created trouble for itself, and these problems have at times reverberated throughout the cryptocurrency and digital asset market. While Bitcoin Cash appears to perform well, its overall market cap may be inflated.

Steady and heavy price losses are expected between 2019 and 2020. Whether or not Bitcoin Cash will survive another five years is a very important and relevant question. It could be possible based on its current position that BCH will have dropped out of the cryptocurrency race within the early 2020s.



https://beincrypto.com/bch-bitcoin-cash-price-prediction-2019-2020-5-years-updated-04-03-2019/

Pretty lame attempt at FUD. But at least you are doing it in the right place.

Meanwhile the capacity of LN is up 43% in the last 30 days. Obviously its users aren't having a problem with it. You have a problem with it because it renders BSV irrelevant.

Right. You don't understand how commit fees work. They are held in a temporary balance in case the channel is closed when both parties are not online, and not necessarily permanently deducted from the user's balance. It's not new:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/8scfr2/lightning_channel_commit_fees/

Dude. You didn't even read the thread. You just thought, "oh this looks like potential LN fud, lets throw it to the wall and see if it sticks.

OP resolved his problem within an hour of asking the question. There's no "controversy", there was only his misunderstanding of how commit fees worked:

"Thank you someone else also posted this before. You're right that the screen only shows the amount of sats that I can use. Until today I wasn't even aware that commit fees even existed so I got rather confused when the balance shrank more and more.

Thanks for helping to clarify the situation!"