It was pretty easy for me to tell when in near perfect synchrony QS disappeared from my sig-ad campaign, AS appeared and began trolling me, AS trolled me all night until he found an old accusation of Tradefortress, QS magically reappared and used it as a reason to get me kicked from the ad campaign---which was his stated goal (as ACCTSeller).
Are you starting to understand what "Default Trust" means? I know there some subtlety to your comment which I'm supposed to get. But I'm rather slow so I don't get it, can you spell it out for me? An enemy of the agenda of the Default Trust, is an enemy of the forum. |
|
|
|
Not sure what you're getting riled up about. I've defended you by pointing out that you haven't invented lying, cheating, or theft  You don't really think of yourself as the root of all evil, do you? I think you have implied that I was doing all of those things on here which I have not. Never in your life  I remember you asking me yesterday to prove that ACCTseller was your sock. And look, the very next day, with no effort from me whatsoever... *poof*! No more need for proof  >I think it is being a little hypocritical if you are saying that it is bad that I have a "sock" account when you are yourself a shill account. The difference being I've made no claims at being someone who belongs on some cheesy trust list, of being honest, or even of being a decent human being. I'm using an alt account to prove, by example, of just how ridiculous and intrinsically flawed this sort of thing is. >Also I have never used any account to support my own position. You've left negative trust from at least 2 of your accounts to whateverhisnickis. If that's not supporting yourself with your alts, what is? @r3wt: ever since I've discovered right-click->search with Google, comments like yours have lost a certain ...what's the word i'm looking for? I'm suprised that you were able to identify Quickseller as an alt. Most people haven't noticed the pattern yet. btw, my comment was meant for someone else who may or may not be perusing this thread. It was pretty easy for me to tell when in near perfect synchrony QS disappeared from my sig-ad campaign, AS appeared and began trolling me, AS trolled me all night until he found an old accusation of Tradefortress, QS magically reappared and used it as a reason to get me kicked from the ad campaign---which was his stated goal (as ACCTSeller). Are you starting to understand what "Default Trust" means? |
|
|
|
Not sure what you're getting riled up about. I've defended you by pointing out that you haven't invented lying, cheating, or theft You don't really think of yourself as the root of all evil, do you? I think you have implied that I was doing all of those things on here which I have not. Never in your life I remember you asking me yesterday to prove that ACCTseller was your sock. And look, the very next day, with no effort from me whatsoever... *poof*! No more need for proof >I think it is being a little hypocritical if you are saying that it is bad that I have a "sock" account when you are yourself a shill account. The difference being I've made no claims at being someone who belongs on some cheesy trust list, of being honest, or even of being a decent human being. I'm using an alt account to prove, by example, of just how ridiculous and intrinsically flawed this sort of thing is. >Also I have never used any account to support my own position. You've left negative trust from at least 2 of your accounts to whateverhisnickis. If that's not supporting yourself with your alts, what is? @r3wt: ever since I've discovered right-click->search with Google, comments like yours have lost a certain ...what's the word i'm looking for? I'm suprised that you were able to identify Quickseller as an alt. Most people haven't noticed the pattern yet. btw, my comment was meant for someone else who may or may not be perusing this thread. Oh, sorry. Not trying to play interweb sleuth, assumed this was clear to everyone. His asking me to prove it kind'a piqued my interest, that's all. I mean, who could pass on a double-dog dare? Chuck Norris only needs a single dog dare, and even that isn't always required. |
|
|
|
Not sure what you're getting riled up about. I've defended you by pointing out that you haven't invented lying, cheating, or theft You don't really think of yourself as the root of all evil, do you? I think you have implied that I was doing all of those things on here which I have not. Never in your life I remember you asking me yesterday to prove that ACCTseller was your sock. And look, the very next day, with no effort from me whatsoever... *poof*! No more need for proof >I think it is being a little hypocritical if you are saying that it is bad that I have a "sock" account when you are yourself a shill account. The difference being I've made no claims at being someone who belongs on some cheesy trust list, of being honest, or even of being a decent human being. I'm using an alt account to prove, by example, of just how ridiculous and intrinsically flawed this sort of thing is. >Also I have never used any account to support my own position. You've left negative trust from at least 2 of your accounts to whateverhisnickis. If that's not supporting yourself with your alts, what is? @r3wt: ever since I've discovered right-click->search with Google, comments like yours have lost a certain ...what's the word i'm looking for? I'm suprised that you were able to identify Quickseller as an alt. Most people haven't noticed the pattern yet. btw, my comment was meant for someone else who may or may not be perusing this thread. |
|
|
|
|
hypocrisy - the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform
|
|
|
|
|
payment will be sent out tommorow night.
|
|
|
|
so I just get back and you reward me with this PM release bs
Interesting day to come back on, considering your username! He's here for the good vibez dude |
|
|
|
Loan Amount Equivalent of $5 usd
Reason Pay host bill @ Vultr. see attached screenshot. Minimum deposit amount is $5. 1
BTC Address would give it to you at time of loan as to minify tx fee/wait time.
Term Length Tuesday 4/21/15 10pm CST ( I get paid tommorow and it goes through about 10pm my time. i can get btc instant at circle)
1[ img]http://puu.sh/hl6i1/322bee2b7d.png[/img]
What? minify tx fee? Denied. Yes the goal was to send it directly to the deposit address for bitpay instead of having to send it to my address and then back to the hosting company. At any rate, its too late now. i get paid today, so it'd be a waste of your/my time. |
|
|
|
Apropos, one of the biggest, most powerful bankers in the world has personally asked me to back off criticizing Andreas. Out of respect for this guy, whom I actually personally like, I only shine a light on Andreas on this thread, never on any of the other major social media networks, like Twitter.
Now that should tell you a lot about Andreas and what's really going on. And he's not alone, I personally think most of the top Bitcoin guys are working for someone; a government agency, the banks, large corporations, etc.
Nothing this massive and world changing is gonna be left to chance. Anybody who accidentally stumbles onto the playing field and interferes with the plan will get mowed down a la Charlie Shrem.
Things won't be looking too good for me either if I'm right about even a fraction of this stuff.
Hey bro, let me borrow about 1 million dollars. K? Serously though, if you're talking to "one of the most powerful bankers in the world" and he asked you "back off criticizing Andreas" i'd say that offers you some pretty powerful leverage. |
|
|
|
Another shocker: Spain just announced that Bitcoin will be exempt from paying VAT tax.
Buy with Bitcoin and pay no taxes!
Anybody seeing a trend yet? haha!
So one more government taking major steps to push people away from cash and into Bitcoin/Crypto. So weird how these governments do NOT actually hate Bitcoin like we've been told for years now; and on the contrary; they seem to actually LOVE this wonderful new tracking tool.
Aaaand Andreas [the bank/govt shill] is wrong once again. lol
According to some he was a scammer in the 90's. ran some type of botnet or something like that. |
|
|
|
Loan Amount Equivalent of $5 usd Reason Pay host bill @ Vultr. see attached screenshot. Minimum deposit amount is $5. 1BTC Address would give it to you at time of loan as to minify tx fee/wait time. Term Length Tuesday 4/21/15 10pm CST ( I get paid tommorow and it goes through about 10pm my time. i can get btc instant at circle) 1
|
|
|
|
|
the Email Leak was a publicity stunt to get her name buzzing.
|
|
|
|
History according to the internet. Stay in school kids.  School - especially college - is designed by the big bankers and government to be a fun place so that "kids" love to stay there. More student loans. bad, I can't resist to reply to you, you forget the main objective, improve rating (lower unemployed rate) but the most important if young male are studying (and pilling on debt) who will have the young female (in debted too)... you get it... those that print legal TENDER notes... full circle (and that's the nice ones, the others use force and coercion (Epstein, Clinton, slivio, dsk etc etc) . repayment for some will not be enough. that's the game, the real one, of the steps, not of the books neither from the street, it's not raw enough. the dices are rolling, and none can cheat the dice of reality. it's 1 or 0. nothing else in between, or like some said, is this f*ç=)"* meat finally cooked? and you know what he answered : yes, but let's first take this city, there will be bread in it...  even without sunglasses... impressive. Just read your personal text after reading this post.. my response "Please sculpt your english before posting. thank u" |
|
|
|
What would happen if someone copied the wrong address into their client and sent coins? Well I know the answer to that. Obviously, the coins would be sent to the wrong account. But then what? What recourse would the sender have to correct the error and if there is no recourse other than tracking down the recipient and convincing them to send the coins back (highly unlikely) ...
Why do you think it is highly unlikely that the coins would be returned? If somebody accidentally sent you money and asked for it back, you would return it wouldn't you? Or, are you a scumbag? It's obvious that there are many people out there who would not return money that was mistakenly sent to them. It's also possible that you could accidentally send coins to an address that is no longer maintained but is still valid. e.g. a defunct exchange's deposit address. As for your second point, I don't mean a typo, hence the reason why the title is "miscopied" rather than "mistyped". I understand that there is a checksum which prevents sending to an invalid address. The scenario which I had in mind was sending to a valid but inappropriate address. For example, if I owned a business with a list of customers and I accidentally copied Bob's address instead of Bill's. Then the coins that should have been sent to Bill would now be owned by Bob. If Bob was a nice person, then he would send the coins back to me or alternatively, to Bill. But there is no guarantee that Bob is a nice person. If it is "highly unlikely" that Bob is not a nice person, then you are dealing with the wrong people. You need new friends and associates if they are "highly unlikely" to be decent people. I guess we live in different worlds. In my world: Me: "Hey I accidentally gave you some money." Bob: "Yeah, I wondered where that came from. Here you go." This is bitcoin though. Nice people are few and far between |
|
|
|
However there may be some third party services that might allow you to do so by giving them wallet access, but then you would have to wait for 2 confirmations and pay 0.0002 fees.
That would be the best implementation. It could be a service offered by a reputable Bitcoin company, such as Blockchain.info. You would give them your old private key (that you don't intend to use anymore anyway), and your new address. They would provide a permanent forwarding service in exchange for a small percentage of the coin transferred. Yes, this is not 100% secure, but its better than forgetting your old address that you never intend to use again, not backing up the key, and then having a customer use this old address that he wasn't supposed to use. I mentioned Blockchain.info above because they already have the framework set up to do such a function in their Receive Payments API, which allows you to create a new address, and will have anything sent to it forwarded to an address you specify. It also calls a URL when with happens! The only addition they would have to make is allow the user to specify the private key instead of having the API do it. Yeah, the only other option for a business is having a low priority wallet for old keys, that you run a deep scan on every X hours, since its so bloated with spam the RPC call might take 20 minutes. |
|
|
|
|
I was thinking about a common problem we have with transaction/wallet bloat. One of the main problems with swapping out wallets in an exchange environment is the risk that a customer will deposit to an old address and then cause a big shit fit about it on social media.
So i had a small idea. Not sure if its been proposed before, but i thought i would mention it.
I would love to see a scheme implemented whereby you could setup transaction forwarding, by destroying the address and replacing it with the address to forward to, so all transactions to the old address would be forwarded to the new address.
A2A's:
1. Is it even technically possible?
2. Is it a bad idea?
3. What could be some possible problems with this idea?
4. Is it a security vulnerability?
5. could this be encoded in a transaction somehow?
|
|
|
|
multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities.
this is not anywhere close to professional.
thx you R3wt for these words .... its definly more easy to run scanner from Kali ,instead code from scratch this open source exchange you cannot sweep the work just for some basic (important also) security breach also as i said exploit need POC so please if you can report and show it would be a good contribution at least you wont find LFi/RFi here , maybe an xss or sql injection as u find as other members remind it is open source and i didnt recommend to anyone here or via PM to run the site straigh like this it flow from sense that if you like to run an exchange you must pay a DEV and security guy (a real one..) i would recommend to also change request $GET to $POST Looking through your source code, i found many of the same vulnerabilities that were in the original OpenEx scripts that i cowrote(In fact, some of the code is copied directly from OpenEx source code). To put it into perspective, i had no idea what i was doing back then(first experience with programming, delusional about my abilities). I do now: https://github.com/OpenExLLC/web -- No Release candidate yet https://github.com/OpenExLLC/live --0.1 Release https://github.com/OpenExLLC/mail -- Release Candidate is untested This exchange will be scalable, secure, and just generally awesome. If anyone wants to join this effort, you're more than welcome to. There are other components to the system, however these are the only ones i've made public at this time, Mostly because some are yet to be implemented or are waiting on other things to be completed so they can be tested. |
|
|
|
I was just going to say, much of what the OP says is truth. We need to know it even if there is disagreement from others. Well, i don't agree with genocide of the Jews. Just remove them from positions of power. They basically run the world ever since WW1. |
|
|
|
^ Suspected Jew ( Edit: Its only a joke ) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
