Good afternoon. What is the target audience of your project? Have you already conducted an analysis?
The first target users for Bubblo were tech-savvy smartphone users aged 18- 35 who use social networks to plan their daily activities. |
|
|
|
|
Hello. Does your platform has problems with liquidity? If so, how do you solve them?
|
|
|
|
Hi. What is Academia app? I havent heard about it yet.
This is one of several decentralized apps that will be developed by 0xcert team. |
|
|
|
|
How big is the market of migrants that will be interested in ZeroBank offers? Is it about thousands? Millions?
|
|
|
|
|
What income will i be able to get after a year of CrypStock’s operation?
|
|
|
|
|
Good afternoon. I’ve read news about cooperation of a blockchain platform with government recently. Arent you planning to do it anything like this?
|
|
|
|
|
Good afternoon. Will the Kvantor team conduct a bounty campaign in Instagram? I have a lot of subscribers.
|
|
|
|
Hi everyone! I’m getting acquainted with the GoodWork project now, and i faced some strange situation. First they said that tokenholders would choose locations of co-workings, but then they write that only locations which are most profitable from the point of view of pay-off period will be considered. What is this supposed to mean?
It’s easy to understand this. The company will choose good locations for co-workings due to tokenholders. That’s all. This is a doubtful option, doesn’t it seem to you so? What if the “OOO” tokenholders choose such a place for co-workings, where the demand for it will be zero and the company will operate at a loss? Oh, nope, it isnt that simple. I didn’t get yr idea first. Of course, the project management will consider all the options offered by the tokenholders carefully. That’s why the cities with zero demand for co-workings won’t take part in voting campaign. How will they point out whether they should open co-workings in this or that city? An entire team of specialists engaged in estimation of regions will work in GoodWork. They will analyze every offered region for prospects of opening of a co-working. If they decide that it’s better not to open co-workings in this city, it won’t take in the voting. |
|
|
|
Hi everyone! I’m getting acquainted with the GoodWork project now, and i faced some strange situation. First they said that tokenholders would choose locations of co-workings, but then they write that only locations which are most profitable from the point of view of pay-off period will be considered. What is this supposed to mean?
It’s easy to understand this. The company will choose good locations for co-workings due to tokenholders. That’s all. This is a doubtful option, doesn’t it seem to you so? What if the “OOO” tokenholders choose such a place for co-workings, where the demand for it will be zero and the company will operate at a loss? Oh, nope, it isnt that simple. I didn’t get yr idea first. Of course, the project management will consider all the options offered by the tokenholders carefully. That’s why the cities with zero demand for co-workings won’t take part in voting campaign. |
|
|
|
How much of the raised money will be allocated to the promotion of the product to the market?
30% of the funds will be used for this purpose. |
|
|
|
Hi everyone! I’m getting acquainted with the GoodWork project now, and i faced some strange situation. First they said that tokenholders would choose locations of co-workings, but then they write that only locations which are most profitable from the point of view of pay-off period will be considered. What is this supposed to mean?
It’s easy to understand this. The company will choose good locations for co-workings due to tokenholders. That’s all. |
|
|
|
|
Will the platform create its own internal reserves? Or don’t you have problems with liquidity supply?
|
|
|
|
Is there a version of the software with marketing solutions? I’m ready to consider a turn-key option.
Yes, the full version provides the following pack of solutions: development of the sites, PR, attraction of clients and many other things: http://startico.net/#buy |
|
|
|
What is the minimum amount of funds that the project needs to be launched?
The minimum goal is $6 billion. |
|
|
|
|
How much does this project need to raise in order to make it possible to consider the ICO to be successful?
|
|
|
|
If i were a manager of the company, i’d find a way to use ICS tokens, otherwise, they won’t circulate in the market and their cost won’t grow.
It does have practical use. As far as i know, the users will be able to pay commissions on the exchange with the help of ICS tokens. Sure there will be smthng else. People will pay commissions with other cryptocurrencies, what’s the point to spend the tokens which allow them to have passive income. Haha, it isnt that easy. If commission is paid with ICS tokens, its amount becomes less. That’s why traders are interested in paying commissions with ICS tokens. |
|
|
|
If i were a manager of the company, i’d find a way to use ICS tokens, otherwise, they won’t circulate in the market and their cost won’t grow.
It does have practical use. As far as i know, the users will be able to pay commissions on the exchange with the help of ICS tokens. Sure there will be smthng else. |
|
|
|
Good afternoon. Will bounty campaign cover even major social networks?
I don’t think it’s rational. Moreover, it’s hard to predict popularity of Kvantor in some particular regions, so it’ll be just waste of time. |
|
|
|
A popular portal CryptoPotato gave this ICO 7.98 points. And it's not just some "drawn score", they argued their assessment, made it from several indicators. In general, it is experts’ objective opinion about this project.
Interesting… I’d want to see it. Can you give a link? I saw many listings, but there was just some brief information about the ICO CrypStock and there either was no assessments at all, or there was, but it was unclear why they gave exactly that score. Here's their post from Facebook — https://www.facebook.com/CrypstockExchange/posts/175588109804954 there is a link to CryptoPotato website. The score itself is at the bottom of the review, there is also a small chart explaining it. The potential of the project is estimated at as much as 9 points!! Do you think a simple exchange is so potential? Now, in my opinion, there are too much crypto exchanges... imho. And have you got acquainted with information about the project, have you read the technical documentation? I also thought so at first, but then it turned out that this exchange would be different from the others. More than 50 other crypto exchanges will be connected to the system. No one else has something like that. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
