|
Could you release linux binaries for those of us on VPS?
@pankkake: he's taking 1PTS/block unenforced by the network, of course he can't release source
|
|
|
|
How do I get the p2pool to calculate the checksum correctly? Currently I use: class ChecksummedType(pack.Type):
#def __init__(self, inner, checksum_func=lambda data: hashlib.sha256(hashlib.sha256(data).digest()).digest()[:4]):
def __init__(self, inner, checksum_func=lambda data: BLAKE(256).digest(data)[:4]):
The error: 2013-11-12 20:17:20.430000 Testing bitcoind P2P connection to '127.0.0.1:8773'..
.
2013-11-12 20:17:25.434000 ...taking a while. Common reasons for this includ
e all of bitcoind's connection slots being used...
(in debug.log)
accepted connection 127.0.0.1:11345
ProcessMessages(version, 128 bytes) : CHECKSUM ERROR nChecksum=6d7c16f0 hdr.nChecksum=e5518cb7
disconnecting node 127.0.0.1:11345
The checksum is a single BLAKE(256) iteration, right? Do I have to do anything to the data (e.g. reverse it) before I send it out? |
|
|
|
|
Received! Thanks, Mooshire.
|
|
|
|
Please add the Star Trek Coins UFC and GPL.
+1 +1 Also KED, once the issues with stake are sorted out and the new blockchain is rolled out. |
|
|
|
I'm working on a p2pool fork for Blakecoin. Right now I can't get the blake hash to work properly... for some reason... ProcessMessages(version, 128 bytes) : CHECKSUM ERROR nChecksum=916c82af hdr.nChecksum=4bc57200
Trying now to check whether it is an endianness error... (BlueDragon747... why oh why did you use blake hash for the checksum... D:) at the time it made sense to use a faster hash for as much of the wallet hashing as possible  in Blakecoin you get about three blake256(checksum) per sha256(sha256(checksum)) so it makes sense to use it but the cost is compatibility with the Bitcoin/Litecoin software  are you using pure python blake8.py that kramble has modded or the python pow module? Oh? There's a python module? thank god :collapses: I tried making a C extension (like the litecoin_scrypt module for scrypt) from the blakecoin code and spent the entire day doing it... Is there a link to blake8.py? |
|
|
|
|
Will the project development for the exchange be opened up to the sci-fi coin community?
|
|
|
|
|
I would work on this project, however I am currently trying to hack together Blakecoin p2pool. Besides, I need to figure out how I can dual-boot my com with linux, since it doesn't support virtualisation, and its partitions are arranged in a... rather unique fashion.
Pledging 25 thousand DVC (for now... my shares are still generating).
|
|
|
|
May I ask, how are you checking this for the rest of us? In windows?
Debug Window -> Debug Log File -> Open |
|
|
|
Got an orphaned block (4318)...  Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Found Hash 00028341b321db4386ff1e3078a49c020a56e958d83acfc45d5b6ac9fe7f29f6
hash 00028341b321db4386ff1e3078a49c020a56e958d83acfc45d5b6ac9fe7f29f6
hash2 00028341b321db4386ff1e3078a49c020a56e958d83acfc45d5b6ac9fe7f29f6
ProtoSharesMiner:
proof-of-work found
hash: 00028341b321db4386ff1e3078a49c020a56e958d83acfc45d5b6ac9fe7f29f6
target: 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
CBlock(hash=00028341b321db4386ff1e3078a49c020a56e958d83acfc45d5b6ac9fe7f29f6, ver=2, hashPrevBlock=00015256e4cdc600b182ce84ea9b338e5b063f0d4589a981fda56e633b15a614, hashMerkleRoot=b87069d59d66689866a67dc31a8bd909db09e129663fc389b7eff715c74d98fb, nTime=1383820522, nBits=1f03ffc0, nNonce=790, vtx=1, birthdayA=28499000, birthdayB=44819077)
CTransaction(hash=b87069d59d66689866a67dc31a8bd909db09e129663fc389b7eff715c74d98fb, ver=1, vin.size=1, vout.size=1, nLockTime=0)
CTxIn(COutPoint(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000, 4294967295), coinbase 02de100101062f503253482f)
CTxOut(nValue=45.12500000, scriptPubKey=021564c638818e04a0f330f58d3d25)
vMerkleTree: b87069d59d66689866a67dc31a8bd909db09e129663fc389b7eff715c74d98fb
generated 45.125
Mysteriously, the client did not detect any more new blocks on the network after this:
testHash ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 0c924fe7dfc73e251f98f8c91ef8feae1b8c8411ae52cf886cdb3be530f0dc79
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 5e928db870f7ba293dddfca1980542ca52a1966e4a1d6fd46942cd1a715630c9
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 2e3411858bfe95bb1c3219b7475cc07ef5463e81eedbdb510da87ea734174a06
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Flushed 3947 addresses to peers.dat 50ms
testHash d26f211aff3bcdeaedb6ba83496594d5be9c4ba3347e8760cf3bf607f65f4b42
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 007f75d8caac6f6a64a123a2d944a30c5bd5d13cb02b0b4e1786efabb0a13df1
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 8369c38bd81ac79951beaa593d66b5b609ad2da47bcfa8380dbb42bbb8eaa11f
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 8d7345baf24155331055ca1d41dd9f90956f7fac3c30ef8089b82452adec1cac
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 9b76b655c0f50f4a097525a60eab4cb54efc43de3b1bd81adde7c2da0de73e99
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 6fa02922604b61e5dcbb38d08938592e6161614a870e187455fe77025fefc700
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 18556a1fc9ef96a6bddd2265963c9e9234a358b1762d3cb91d570ee5bf34639c
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 46b59a88ebddb3e5541a0741f0bc9f3d7cd8ddec926e8a63587509513b219439
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
... going on for hours. Neither did this block seem to have been submitted. Only after I restarted it did it start syncing. For a small-time miner like me, orphans are a serious blow, especially an orphan caused like this... EDIT: My other processes also stopped syncing around 4200~4400... |
|
|
|
I'm working on a p2pool fork for Blakecoin. Right now I can't get the blake hash to work properly... for some reason... ProcessMessages(version, 128 bytes) : CHECKSUM ERROR nChecksum=916c82af hdr.nChecksum=4bc57200
Trying now to check whether it is an endianness error... (BlueDragon747... why oh why did you use blake hash for the checksum... D:) |
|
|
|
Sigh... Left my machines mining through the night again, zero blocks. 7.4hpm (split into 4 threads of 1.85 hpm) plus 10.8 hpm (4 times 2.7 hpm).
Mysteriously, my 7.4hpm machine has been mining for nearly 40 hours straight and never found a block. In reality, it should have found 3 to 4 blocks. Does splitting into more processes reduce the effectiveness of mining? (It shouldn't, but I'm going to ask just in case). Or am I just extremely (<2% chance) unlucky?
Same here, runing 2x 8,5 hpm (17hpm total) and only found one block....what internet speed do you have?What ping do you have to US or EU ? I am wondering if that might be the problem (as I have a high ping to US and EU )  If you want to check how many orphan blocks you may have found, go to Help -> Debug Window -> Information -> Open (debug log) Look for "generated block is stale". Each one is where you found a block, but someone beat you to it. Ah... 3 stales on the slow machine... not sure how much on the faster machine (not with me now) For some reason, when I closed one of the clients by the stop command I got a BSOD via ndis.sys. Someone suggested that it might be due to Avast, anyone else have this problem? |
|
|
|
|
Sigh... Left my machines mining through the night again, zero blocks. 7.4hpm (split into 4 threads of 1.85 hpm) plus 10.8 hpm (4 times 2.7 hpm).
Mysteriously, my 7.4hpm machine has been mining for nearly 40 hours straight and never found a block. In reality, it should have found 3 to 4 blocks. Does splitting into more processes reduce the effectiveness of mining? (It shouldn't, but I'm going to ask just in case). Or am I just extremely (<2% chance) unlucky?
|
|
|
|
Note to all: I have updated my bounty! I am offering an up-to 70 PTS bounty to the person who compiles me a Windows x64 version with MAX_NONCE as 1<<22 instead of 1<<26. I will run it concurrently with the traditional version (3 threads each).
Bounty: 15 for first block, 20 for second, 15 for third, 10 for fourth, 5 for fifth mined with the new version.
(Also, if someone would compile me one with 1<<18, that would be great too, since it would fit into my 3MB cache. Same bounty conditions.)
Alternatively, someone compile something like mikealh's primecoin-hp which allow one to set miner parameters. That would be even better - +5 to all blocks including the 6th.
|
|
|
|
6-core here, how do I run more than one process in Win7?
Thank you
1. protoshares-qt -port=25550 -datadir=<dir1> 2. protoshares-qt -port=25551 -datadir=<dir2> Replace dir1 and dir2 with the respective data directories. Then, in each go to debug console and do "setgenerate true 3". Set the affinity of first process to the first 3 cores and the second process to next 3 cores. |
|
|
|
|
Benchmark: on i5-3337U running 4 clients with 2/2/1/1 processes, 1 core per client. No noticable difference between the processes with 2 threads and the processes with 1 (possibly due to core saturation). 1.9 hpm per core. No blocks yet.
On another computer running 1/1/1/1, I get 2.7hpm per core (but I don't know the processor). One block.
Any more results?
|
|
|
|
18.3 hpm mining through the night - 1 block  Anyway, it's just 468 blocks till the diff adjust, at that point I'll be getting a block every 5 days |
|
|
|
Where can I see more details on the mining procedure? Shares accepted etc? What are the commands?
Thank you in advance!
All solo mining right now. How many blocks has everyone got? I just landed my 5th. 5th. How much hashpower do you have? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
