 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5]
|
|
Нет и никогда не было. Должно ли быть право на свободное владение оружием? Да.
|
|
|
|
|
Принимаю в своем магазине оплату биткоинами. Вот только биткоин больше уже средство накопления, а не платежа. Мелкие покупки не выгодны за счет комиссии и долго идут транзакции. Сегвит не особо помог. Гораздо перспективнее принимать полный спектр: даш, эфир, лайт, монеро и т.д. Но для обычного покупателя это чересчур сложно.
|
|
|
|
|
Помню вложился в MGO, собрали тучу денег. А платформы так и нет. Если найдут способ действительно полезного применения для игр, будет востребовано и сделанное на коленке. Пока это тупо оплата криптой как фиатом.
|
|
|
|
К сожалению, кто активно не интересуется IT воспринимают крипту так, как её подают в телевизоре. То есть мошенническая пирамида или средство расчета преступников и наркоманов. Такие знакомые просто не поймут подарок. Скажут не втягивай в свое мошенничество  |
|
|
|
|
Есть платные каналы по баунти. Кто подписан, стоит ли оно того?
|
|
|
|
|
В топку все мессенджеры с привязкой к телефону. Сигнал, Телеграм и прочие. Заказной тренд, дело даже не в анонимности, а в безопасности. Есть инструментарий перехвата смс, есть банальная замена сим, есть юридическая незащищеность .
|
|
|
|
|
Упомянешь про крипту в реальном секторе, в РФ проверками изведут. Поэтому мало верю в сбор на всякие хозяйственные дела.
|
|
|
|
|
Выгода только тому кто это контролирует
|
|
|
|
Not surprised at all if it is the case. Just look at their javascript and you know that this was hacked together rather quickly... Below an email that I have received over the weekend, obviously because I have an account at MtGox and it was compromised ---- Dear Sir or Madam, A few hours ago the Bitcoin trading website Mt Gox has been hacked. Malicious individuals have been able to obtain a database containing usernames, email address and encrypted passwords. This information has been posted publicly on the internet. As a Bitcoin supporter I'm now sending a message to every email address contained in the hacked database. This is to warn you that your username, email address and password have been leaked. I therefore strongly advice you to change your passwords. If you have used the same password on different websites it's highly recommended to change your password on all of your accounts! For a more secure alternative to Mt Gox, the community appears to be moving to TradeHill. So this is no reason to lose faith in Bitcoin itself. It must be seen as a warning that not every website can be trusted with your data however! Their link is http://www.tradehill.com/?r=TH-R15683 (Note: You can remove the Referral Code when registering if you want!) This is certainly not the only website where you can exchange Bitcoins, also check out http://www.thebitcoinlist.com/dp_bitcoin/bitcoin-exchange/Sincerely, A Bitcoin supporter 1CWSjov2N7ix41bZ8bJfHXkdLLbkUsG9Y7 XXXXXXXX@XXXXXXXXXXXX.XXXXXXXXXXXX |
|
|
|
|
Joe's ideas are good and there are many more to be implemented. Bottom line unless an outside authority can certify that a website follows secure programming practices then you are left with trusting the operator alone. Now this worked in the fall on 2010 when Bitcoin was a small community, but you can't expect to sustain the current flow of new interested users/providers without providing a trust central. Of course this goes against the decentralized concept, but let's be honest, people will get scammed if we don't do something. And if people get scammed that's what will transpire in the media. Today's BTC millionaires should step up and fund a central trust authority, if they don't do it no one else will. Oh and did we mention that Satoshi or whatever-his-name-is owns 10%+ of all bitcoins in circulation? He could finance this with his eyes closed, if he truly exists that is.
|
|
|
|
Thoughts and other ideas?
Two concepts, "BTC secure" certification and operator identity verification. This is unavoidable, and as soon as an exchange with both will appear they will become the de facto standard. Same goes for the online wallet concept as these are undoubtedly related. Currently everyone is semi-hiding in the trenches, why would you deposit $5K or same worth in BTC with MTGox - for God's sake they don't even have a mailing address on their website!!!! BB |
|
|
|
The factor of new people mining as a hobby would drop as the coin reward drops unless the value per coin were to rise exponentially. It would seem that the difficulty would have to fluctuate wildly to compensate for computing power gains and losses which would also lead to constant market corrections and volatility . That being said it would very difficult to determine profitability over time.
I think that it's all about the float. By the time we reach block 210,000 there will be 10.5M BTC in circulation. Wheter 150 new BTC get mined per hour (25BTC/block) versus the current 300BTCph will probably not amount to such a big deal. Don't forget that currently MtGox averages 30K+ BTC/day in volume. The volume will likely be much higher if Bitcoin survives to see block 210,000  Also hardware will be more powerful, cheaper and less expensive to operate in the future. Someone will always have access to powerful machines and figure out a way how to make some $$$ with them - as long as they're mining for the network, not trying to overpower it. |
|
|
|
Mais dans ce cas la le loto aussi peux tricher, les nombres sont ils réellement aléatoires ? Tu ne fais pas confiance au site... ne va pas jouer, on ne force personne a jouer...
Je n'ai jamais dit que la méthode de tirage ne changerai pas, ce n'est pas moi qui m'en occupe. Le truc louche... on a déjà eu des gagnant.
Il y a un gagnant obligatoirement à chaque tirage, le fait de tirer le nombre voulu nous apporterais quoi ?
Parce qu'un organisateur de loteries devrait pouvoir démontrer qu'il est au-dessus de tout soupçon. Soit tu n'as aucune idée de ce que tu fais, soit tes intentions sont douteuses. Si tu ne comprends réellement pas ce que ça t'apporterais de contrôler le résultat du tirage alors tu nous prends sans doute pour des cons. Bonne chance. |
|
|
|
Since currently the wallet is not encrypted, if someone steals a computer or if a hacker gets access to a machine; they can copy the wallet, then spend the wallet immediately. Encrypting the wallet is a step in the right direction, and it gives you protection against theft of the computer and a hacker who has only has intermittent access to the computer. However, even that is not enough because if a hacker gets continuous read access to your computer they can wait until you decrypt your wallet to run bitcoin and copy the wallet at that moment.
In my opinion, having bitcoin read and write to an encrypted wallet is the single biggest improvement that could be made at this time. Even reading and writing to an encrypted wallet would not stop a hacker who has continuous read access and a keylogger, however it would protect from theft and from a hacker who only has file read access.
++ Security is always about building several perimeters of defense. Of course the encryption of wallet.dat does not solve all problems, but it does add one level of difficulty for the attacker. People do not usually create passwordless GPG keys, why would one do differently when currency is involved? Also having separate encryption keys for different accounts in your wallet would be another way to even further complicate an attacker's job. The bitcoin client definitely needs some of these features badly. As for the main post, I vote #1 and #2 to start with.. |
|
|
|
Saviez-vous s'il y a un site-web canadien qui peut échanger les bitcoins?
Merci bcp!
-Obi
ben il y a bien bitcoin4cash.com, mais je crois que son stock est épuisé. Il y a deux jours j'ai essayé https://www.cavirtex.com. C'est un nouveau service canadien qui accepte les paiements Interac par email. Attention, vous devez savoir que ces paiements sont irréversibles, donc vous n'avez aucune protection si le récipiendaire refuse de remplir ses obligations. Pour ma part j'ai envoyé $100 a cavirtex, 90 minutes plus tard j'ai reçu un email de ma banque me confirmant que le transfert avait été encaissé par le destinataire. Aussitôt mon $100 était accessible dans mon compte cavirtex. J'ai donc acheté des BTC au prix du marché et en moins de 15 minutes j'avais transféré l'argent dans mon propre compte bitcoin avec plus de 6 confirmations sur le réseau. Très bonne expérience, mais puisque le volume de cavirtex n'a rien à voir avec MtGox il est difficile d'avoir un prix comparable sur leur marché, mais au moins on s'évite les achats de LibertyUSD à travers un fournisseur canadien et tout ce que ça implique en frais lorsque l'on passe à travers 2-3 intermédiaires. BB |
|
|
|
|
I understand that you administrators want to protect your 50K+ BTC pots, but restricting newcomers from expressing themselves on the main threads is a weird approach. There are 10x to 1000x more of us than there are of you, and we are the ones paying for your profits. Why are you doing this? I have been visiting this board for well over a month and I still only have 2 hours on my log. A new board is in order I think. Suggestions?
|
|
|
|
|
Je ne crois pas que ce soit une bonne idée. Pourquoi te ferions-nous confiance alors que tu ne sais même pas écrire sans faire 3 fautes par ligne?
|
|
|
|
|
D'accord dans un parc. J'amène mon bat de baseball avec BTC écrit dessus, toi amène ton cash.
LOL
|
|
|
|
|
The blocks will still be created, there just won't be any block generation awards (currently 50BTC, but this gets divided by 2 every 210,000 blocks). Once all 21M BTCs are "created" miners will only get compensated with transaction fees.
|
|
|
|
|
