All of his post have only as goal to get people to write him MP and propose them information about Bankera or some documentation to send the to jail an guess what you have to pay to get that information...and we all know what happen once you pay
|
|
|
But I already have it my dear Paid shiller... All people this is the letter our incompetent paid shiller received from the LCB La Souvenir shop hahahah
|
|
|
Miaw Miaw I lie more than I have false accounts here miaw miaw Ps: If you want I can show you the letter LCB sent me, it has been written in a Souvenir shop called Bankera, Bankera who won the first view in a court against Lithuanian Central Bank about Banking Regulation, Yes believes me this company is a Souvenir Shop, well that means LCB lost against a Souvenir shop debates about Banking but who cares about my arguments....you all know I am an incompetent shiller Please give me more Kleenex Yeah Yeah Get us the letter of weeks ago first you told you received already one letter and now a second, Chiche...get us the scan of both hahahaah ps: Please the letter not from the souvenir shop...
|
|
|
Well, I will pay attention to the development of your project this year, especially how you can increase the price of BNK tokens and gain market confidence. and when will you update your token information on CMC?
Hi and welcome to Bankera Real Community, Well we all hope the new services and the ones that they are pushing will help the price but honestly I have to say that the most of us here are for the WR as the profit is in that not really the price. regarding the CMC issue, what they have been doing is trying to get solved but CMC is not responding as fast or clear as we all would like, first they wanted to be listed in 3 exchanged to be shown correctly then once Bankera has been listed in three exchanged, they changed the criteria and needed that all echanges are in transparency data foundation they created months ago, Bankera is still in a close touch with CMC since a year last information we received from Team was that they have sent new requested information to CMC last week I think it is a matter of time to get it solved now, like ...getting our paid shiller and troll crazy...it will also b a matter of time
|
|
|
Miaw Miaw Miaw I can't stop lying I can't stop crying, please give more Kleenex
hey Hey Hey incompetent paid shiller who even did made it to be contracted by Bankera to promote them due to his shady profile and lack of Ethics.... Where is the LCB card you promised us to show weeks ago and the new one you just received yesterday after creating your third false profile May be you got the letter from the Shop souvenir hahahahahaha
|
|
|
Ok I nderstand how the system works but the issue is now if one vote a negative feedback the flag will show untill he quits his feedback, but if he does not or has gone, what the 200 positive can do? we dont have even a green flag lets say ok you show the red one until the other quits it, but how about the 200 not shown ? at the end it is a matter of who votes first? Here's how the flags work: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153344.0The specific part that is relevant to you: Some changes: - If the number of pre-flags-system negative trust ratings is greater than the number of all positive trust ratings, a warning banner is shown for guests & low-login-time newbies. Thank you very much I have been reading this between yesterday and this morning but I have to confess it is not clear and easy to read at least for me may be because English not being my first language in the case of thepositiveve votes are higher than negative what happens with the red warning, I understand it will still shown as for example here the user who created the topi has this ratings Trust: +14 / =0 / -0 and has the warning box, may be the system could also allow positive voter to quit the warning based on votes otherwise it is unfaire that some can have weight for their vote and other not
|
|
|
Ah wonderful, that makes sense now, so it is not even a flag just a feedback, and is there a way we give a good feedback to at least change it?
Because it does not have a sense if 10 people vote Bad feedback and we are 200 are Ok with the service and due to those ten the warnin is shown If you want more details on how this system works (Default Trust) check this post: 2419329067823cab5b4e5ac5dd18a6abf1f57f45e753f5fc934292f3085a3717 | why did I pick this post?
This belongs in Meta.
For the purposes of explanation, trusting someone simply means that you carry their feedback in the "trusted" section.
Depth is the degree of which you recursively trust those in your trust list and those that are in the trust lists of people that you trust.
For example: Depth 0 means that you only trust people who you add to your trust list. Depth 1 means that you trust people who are in your trust lists, and in the trust lists of people you added to your trust list. Depth 2 means that now additionally, the people in the depth 1 lists are trusted by you. Depth n means that you trust the people in the depth n-1 lists.
An illustrative example:
This symbol: -> means adding someone to the trust list.
You -> A A -> B A -> C B -> D B -> E
Depth 0:
A is trusted.
Depth 1:
A is trusted, B and C are trusted.
Depth 2:
A is trusted, B and C are trusted, D and E are trusted. If you're familiar with CS terminology, think of it as a tree with nodes, where parents add children to their trust list.
Basically, feedback is binned in two different categories: trusted and untrusted. Anyone in your trust list will send trusted feedback (in your view) and all else will be untrusted. These members are on the DefaultTrust network which means that unless you change your trust list, they will have feedback that shows as trusted. Ok I nderstand how the system works but the issue is now if one vote a negative feedback the flag will show untill he quits his feedback, but if he does not or has gone, what the 200 positive can do? we dont have even a green flag lets say ok you show the red one until the other quits it, but how about the 200 not shown ? at the end it is a matter of who votes first?
|
|
|
So for the readers:
The alert message you see above has been set by the FUD group here with negativefeedback, it is not a RED FLAG, that means it is ONLY the opinion of who sent the Red feedback we know is the FUDDER
here more explanation:
"They have not been flagged. They have been given negative feedback. There is no flag to oppose unless you want to create one, but you won't achieve your desired result of removing the negative feedback. The users that sent the feedback are the only ones that can remove it."
|
|
|
They have not been flagged. They have been given negative feedback. There is no flag to oppose unless you want to create one, but you won't achieve your desired result of removing the negative feedback. The users that sent the feedback are the only ones that can remove it.
Ah wonderful, that makes sense now, so it is not even a flag just a feedback, and is there a way we give a good feedback to at least change it? Because it does not have a sense if 10 people vote Bad feedback and we are 200 are Ok with the service and due to those ten the warnin is shown
|
|
|
Hi everybody, I am new here so we are not really used to the flag concept, so there is a Topic of our community project that has been flagged red, and we obviously want to oppose this flag but we are not able to find where to Oppose (Usually we find them in the Trust of the user but in our case the Creator or the topic has no flag assigned to him) So in our case the topic is: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2091093.0And the creator of the topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1101537Does not have a flag shown so we cannot Oppose to it Anyone can help us figure that? How can we find the associated flag and to vote Oppose to it Thanks a lot
|
|
|
About this souvenir shop - Vilnius is my hometown and i am passing this small shop every day, the building with address Pilies str. 16 is very huge, it has large inner yard with many buildings in it, other thing it is common in Lithuania that one address is for mail and actual office is located in other location. Also every few months we can see some articles in the largest Lithuanian bussiness newspaper about Bankera and Spectrocoin also with interviews from Vytautas Karalevicius (one of the founders of Spectrocoin and Bankera). The last thing - you can find a lot of job proposals from Bankera and Spectrocoin in such sites as www.cv.lt, the other thing you can always check how much taxes they are paying for the salaries in the site: Spectrocoin https://rekvizitai.vz.lt/en/company/spectro_finance/ for June they paid Social insurance taxes 21,546.98 € Bankera: https://rekvizitai.vz.lt/en/company/bankera/ for June they paid Social insurance taxes 7,780.71 € Everyone can check it. Also you can translate this article, it is about fine for Bankera from LCB https://www.vz.lt/rinkos/2019/06/12/teismas-panaikino-baudas-bankeros-ikurejui-ir-susijusiai-imonei Excellent Information and valuable
|
|
|
Meanwhile, just to remind readers: 1. Spectrocoin has an E-Money Licence, and has been operating under AML regulation, and been working for 06 years in Europe 2. They Have arrow Banking Licence through their twin company Pervesk 3. They launched Loans with Crypto collateral and people already started to contract the loans 4. They have been in a court with Lithuanian Central Bank about regulation discussion and they won the first case
Now remeber:
1. Some paid shiller wanted to be contracted by Bankera to promote them here and were rejeted due to their shady profile and lack of ethic 2. These incompetent shiller are telling us a Souvenirs shop won a court case with nothing less than the LCB in a Lithuanian Trial court
|
|
|
Ah but first what happend with the last LCB letter you received? You told us you will show hahahah Anyway are you talking of the same LCB institution that lost a court affaire about regulation in Banking against Bankera? You means the same Souvenirs Shop you say is Bankera won against LCB about regulation of Banking get us the Letter....or go and cry
|
|
|
Our famous Sherlock who is working with Interpol, FBI and who know what else he comes up with isn’t able to find an office hilarious 😂!
guys give him a second he is trying to find the passwords of his old acccounts...he cannot be at the same time redacting the LCB letter, painting images, and also creating multiaccounts and most of all bagging Bankera to contract him as a paid shiller...too much for a simple incompetent fudder
|
|
|
Just to remind who is Bankera Some staff for the people which are whiling to invest in the project:
A certificate of appreciation from attending the 5th Virtual Currencies Conference at Europol and presented the core issues we are facing and actions we take in respect of cybercrime: https://www.instagram.com/p/BkVUqqRg7S0/http://mita.lrv.lt/lt/naujienos/lietuvisku-inovaciju-gide-simtametes-ir-siandienes-inovacijosThe Agency for Science, Innovation and Technology (MITA) has presented its new publication, "A Guide to Lithuanian Innovations" Among them, the first is the successful cryptocurrency exchange and virtual wallet SpectroCoin The CEO, Vytautas Karalevičius, comments the implementation of the fifth EU Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD 5) in Lithuania on an interview to Bitcoin.com: https://news.bitcoin.com/lithuania-to-adopt-crypto-regulations-even-stricter-than-the-eus/https://blog.spectrocoin.com/en/2019/01/spectrocoin-receives-crypto-licences-in-estonia/They hold crypto licenses in Estonia. They share a lot of security tips to keep community safe: https://blog.spectrocoin.com/en/2018/11/cashing-out-on-the-crypto-rush/https://blog.spectrocoin.com/en/2019/03/how-can-businesses-fight-cybercrime/ https://blog.spectrocoin.com/en/2018/05/protect-yourself-from-scams/ www.instagram.comhttps://www.instagram.com/p/BkVUqqRg7S0/43 Likes, 0 Comments - SpectroCoin (@spectrocoin) on Instagram: “This week our CEO @vytautas.karalevicius attended the 5th Virtual Currencies Conference at Europol… http://mita.lrv.lt/lt/naujienos/lietuvisku-inovaciju-gide-simtametes-ir-siandienes-inovacijoshttps://news.bitcoin.com/lithuania-to-adopt-crypto-regulations-even-stricter-than-the-eus/Lithuania, one of the Baltic tigers that has in past few years demonstrated it doesn’t shy away from new technologies and the digital economy, is Lithuania, one of the Baltic tigers that has in past few years demonstrated it doesn’t https://blog.spectrocoin.com/en/2019/01/spectrocoin-receives-crypto-licences-in-estonia/SpectroCoin Receives Crypto Licences in Estonia SpectroCoin now officially holds virtual currency exchange and wallet licences in Estonia, creating new https://blog.spectrocoin.com/en/2018/11/cashing-out-on-the-crypto-rush/Cashing Out on the Crypto Rush | SpectroCoin Blog To help our customers to avoid becoming victims of cryptocurrency scams, SpectroCoin presents the most common https://blog.spectrocoin.com/en/2019/03/how-can-businesses-fight-cybercrime/How Can Businesses Fight Cybercrime | SpectroCoin Blog Security is one of the main parts of SpectroCoin - raising awareness and sharing knowledge about cybercrime is https://blog.spectrocoin.com/en/2018/05/protect-yourself-from-scams/Protect Yourself from Scams | SpectroCoin Blog We are constantly on a lookout for fake SpectroCoin scam websites so that we could protect our users from Have fun with that!
|
|
|
So what happend with the LCB letter our paid shiler received personnally Not yet seeing any scanned letter.... Ay get us some smart fudder please, things are very borring here with the multiaccount posing with same stupid past spam
|
|
|
|