Which coin do you think will become next Ethereum?
Which coin do you think will become next Ethereum? by comparing all the factors including the community support, trading volume, use in daily life or business or anything which matters to make any coin on top of all the coins?
For three years now, many coins have been claiming the title of "Ethereum Killer". However, so far no one has managed to do this. Even a few months ago, when gas metrics on the Ethereum network were reaching their all-time highs, nothing happened. Ethereum, as it was number one in its segment of altcoins, has remained so. |
|
|
|
|
How can free marketing hurt a project that has nothing? Bounty is a way for such projects without investing to create an advertising campaign and fulfill a marketing plan.
Of course, there are bounties of different quality, but I don't think that such a thing can harm the project in any way, rather the opposite.
The more noise around the project, the higher its chances of raising funds.
|
|
|
|
Defi itself is not a high risk investment but scams and ponzi under the cover of Defi are risk.
There is risk of some loopholes or exploit on code in Defi but such issues occurs with every financial projects be it centralized exchange or decentralized one. But if they go through internal and external audit as well encourage white hat hackers to penetrate test it, Defi would be a much more secure option than any centralized finance.
It is difficult to say whether it will be as you say. DeFi are not stablecoins, whose price rate is dictated by external factors. It looks good financially, but from a security point of view, I don't think that people are ready to keep their assets in such an unstable state. Until the cryptocurrency becomes stable like stable coins, it cannot be said that it will replace centralized financial systems. |
|
|
|
|
Why is your statement? Both Bitcoin and Ethereum have specific uses and uses. They have different protocols, which is great. If we had only one bitcoin, the market would not be complete. I don't understand why you wrote all this, because you yourself can see the difference between them. Each fulfills its role, which means it can be useful in completely different circumstances. It's up to you.
|
|
|
|
Yes, your bitcoins will be forever left in your wallet if you die today. Maybe you will give your child a private key to pass your bitcoins on to your child. So, if you are dead, your child will inherit your bitcoin and will not be buried in your wallet forever.
In the event of your death, your bitcoins will remain in your wallet. If you did not give your private key to anyone, then your bitcoins will be forever lost, which means they will serve only one good purpose - to increase the bitcoin deficit. This means, probably, this will lead to an increase in the price of bitcoin due to a decrease in their total number. |
|
|
|
Bounty tokens for hunters is not too much, but its price dropped 50% too easy in just few minutes. My tokens was unlocked but I could not sell in time, and now only get back over $ 10 for the 10 months of waiting.
Quite a standard situation. I'm not sure that we have the right to complain about the wait, because almost every project enters the market in about a year. But the fact that all our work is now estimated at $ 5-10 is, of course, nonsense. I remembered about the unlocking of coins only today, and I confess I thought that I was late with the sale. But as it turned out, I was wrong, and the price was already very low by the time of unlock. |
|
|
|
1. Project promoters (bounty hunters) should start fighting for themselves, if some projects become successful and still plan to ignore or refuse to pay bounty hunters they should take the fight and spread how untrust able the project can be over the internet.
This field is not regulated. There are hundreds of cases where a project was successful but refused to pay. Bounty hunters made a noise, and only 10% responded to this noise and paid rewards. Otherwise, almost any project can cite cheating and block payments. I've seen this too many times. |
|
|
|
|
Usually there are 3 options.
1. People understand that their project is shit, and they prefer to stop before it happens naturally.
2. They have collected enough money and are going to hide with them.
3. They have not raised enough money, and they have no choice but to finish the work ahead of time.
|
|
|
|
Altcoins are really scary, if you can do some research you will see many good altcoins that had very good start and value in 2018 and are still alive today but we never heard anything good from them anymore for some reasons, they are now like ghosts, honestly altcoin investment is more scary, this is why its better to always take profit, most especially from new altcoins, Profit is Profit, either big or small.
You're right. Cryptocurrency is cyclical and every time we can see falls after ups. Therefore, profit-taking should be the basis of a rational hold. While fixing won't get along well with hold, how can you make a profit without fixing? Even if you are the most conservative holder, sooner or later you will have to fix your profit, because this is the essence of hold. |
|
|
|
The issue is not peculiar to Airdrops alone, it has eating into bounty campaigns also, with all these default in payment for Airdrop tokens and bounty tokens, I think Escrow payment needs to be brought back, I don't understand why these was thrown aside, if these is implemented it will help eliminate these
This problem is directly related to the quality of projects that airdrops and bounty companies launch. This is what determines whether you receive your rewards or not. If the project is bad, then it does not matter if you participate in an airdrop or in a bounty company, most likely you will not get anything, and vice versa, good projects always pay. |
|
|
|
The conditions in the crypto market for new projects have changed a lot over the past 3 years.
If earlier a project, even with a weak marketing company, could easily carry out a successful fundraising, today it is necessary to make truly titanic efforts so that investors look at your project and decide on an investment.
I think this is for the best, because now it’s extremely difficult for any garbage to get to the top, but for good projects the conditions have become more complicated.
Therefore, the more hunters participating in the project, the higher the chances that he will succeed.
An alternative would be bounty companies that accept only really effective hunters, this would create a natural precedent for improving the overall quality of work among bounty hunters due to the increasing complexity of the conditions.
How do you think a bounty manager can define an effective hunter? For example, in a signature campaign there are usually few participants and, in principle, they can be examined. But if it's a social media campaign? There can be 200 or 500 participants. Even with a limited number. It's very difficult and time consuming. I don’t think that someone will do this, because projects need advertising and as extensive as possible. This is the difference between good bounty managers and ordinary ones. A good one will hire a person, for a small fee, who will check all social network participants for the quality of the content and the quality of the services provided. A good project does not need useless marketing; it needs a precise and high-quality presentation of itself through bounty hunters. |
|
|
|
|
So what? You are saying the same things that you have been saying for 3 years after the last rally. Obviously, most of the people who came during the rally were looking for a profit.
The profit ran out - they left. This is normal. There is no point in listening to what they have to say, because they have no goal of figuring out how it works; their goal was profit.
And what do you mean by "going to the moon"? In your opinion, the main goal of bitcoin is to grow in price? Then you are the same clown you are talking about.
|
|
|
|
|
I love the Binance Trust wallet. Open source, nice design, easy to use interface, the ability to connect and create multiple wallets, constant product development and support.
In addition, as far as I remember, the Trust wallet has never reported any cases of hacking, which is very good for the reputation of this product. For me, this wallet is number 1.
|
|
|
|
|
I can hardly imagine a scenario like this. Even if this happens, it can only have the opposite effect. Indeed, due to the increase in restrictions on cryptocurrency, the demand for it will also increase.
Such precedents have already been met. Bans always have very controversial consequences, including an increase in crime. Any government must understand this and act in the most productive way so as not to create imbalances.
|
|
|
|
|
I do not like branches in which people ask that they would be regretted. It will not give you anything.
The end is your way or not - it's up to you. You had 14 left 4, you lost 70%, but not 100%.
Many people in the crypto market lost 100% and restored their capital with time and hard work.
It all depends on you, how you decide it will be so. The longer you spare yourself, the longer you stay idle, wasting time.
|
|
|
|
Popular Cryptos are doing better than traditional investment. Whole crypto market is doing improvement during covid pandemic where traditional businesses are suffering a lot. So large companies, banks found crypto as better field of investment and thereby most of the giants have separate arms to handle crypto assets. They are adding cryptos mainly btc, eth, defi into investment portfolio. Good days are coming if we survive through Covid19
I cannot agree with you. Classic types of investment show themselves to be significantly more stable than cryptocurrency. Obviously, cryptocurrency looks much more attractive in the short term, but this is a very deceiving vision. Cryptocurrency is too volatile, too unpredictable in relation to classic types of assets. For example, many world stock indices have already reached a level higher than it was before the pandemic. |
|
|
|
It is surprising that talk about this exchange continues to this day. It seems to me that it became clear for a long time that the scam exit occurred at the stage of the first problems.
I would like to hear the news that these scammers were caught red-handed. If you believe how much they raised it is several million dollars, and if so, it is possible that politics is involved here.
And this is perhaps the most unpleasant thing, considering that there is no news from the regulators.
Even after it was crystal clear that the BCNEX exchange exit scam, some faithfuls still believed in the team, hoping they will return since they claimed it was bug and was already on rectification process. The exchange from onset wasn't community centric, I remember people got muted for asking reasonable questions when things started getting sour for bcnex in their telegram group. Anyone affected should just move on. The fact is that one element in the behavior of the BSNEX team defied explanation. After a long delay, they still replenished the wallet for withdrawal, and allowed some people to withdraw parts of their deposits with a limit on the amount of funds. Why was it done? After all, they were going to make an exit scam anyway, but for some reason they spent almost $ 5,000 to withdraw funds. Either they are idiots or they were playing for time for something. |
|
|
|
|
In my opinion, the most important thing in any project is technology. The more modern and future-oriented it is, the higher the likelihood that this coin will have opportunities for good growth, as it will be in demand in the market.
Try to look for projects that solve specific issues and are aimed at solving specific problems. Unique projects that solve unique problems.
|
|
|
|
If they come to me with an offer to make a vaccine for free, I'll fuck them. I would rather have natural immunity from this disease than inject myself with any vaccine. Neither Russian nor American nor any else. I will be satisfied with being in quarantine for 14 days for any signs of a cold. Vaccines are too dubious for me, I believe in biological immunity. I don't think that anyone is going to forcefully inject you the vaccine. It is purely voluntary. And as per some of the opinion polls, almost 50% of the population in various countries are saying that they will refuse to take the vaccine. So in any case, you will get plenty of company. And there is no need to go ballistic over this virus. The mortality rate is extremely low, if you are below 30 years of age and doesn't have any comorbidities such as obesity, hypertension and diabetes. It is not known what the authorities will do. In some countries it will be voluntary, in others, where the mortality rate is higher, it may be made mandatory. It is not known what the future will look like, especially in those countries where quarantine measures will be introduced for people who come from abroad. They will all need to have their Covid test results, but probably a vaccine, probably. |
|
|
|
|
The complexity of money laundering through cryptocurrency is that there is no convenient gateway through which one could anonymously transfer fiat into cryptocurrency, this is the main obstacle.
Therefore, fiat has its own methods of laundering, while cryptocurrencies have their own. Stolen cryptocurrency is very easily laundered through mixers or regular exchanges if the theft was not tracked down.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
