Sad to say but you are wrong. The hashrate displayed on the pool is calculated from the amount of shares accepted so if the pool shows a similar hashrate between two people, it means they have submitted about the same amount of shares. Hence, they are submitting shares at about the same rate.

What comes to the uber profitable coin it could certainly be true if we only looked at a very small time frame but we are infact comparing several days. There is no uber coin in existence that could create a 10-30% difference in 3 to 5 minutes, not even if there were several of these situations as Bob still has a higher overall hashrate.

Hey all. I've been on this pool a long time, haven't compared numbers in quite a while.

However the recent "let's talk about payout" caught my interest, as people reporting .01/mh or even .015/mh are way outperforming me. Like, up to 2x, that is considerable and a little worrying. I'm averaging something like 0.0075/mh.

So I poked around a little.

Here's two different users, for example:

This guy, let's call him Bob, has a steady 19 mh/s or so, and has been around since Dec 16th-
http://www.middlecoin.com/reports/1ACruk5rrJmGTkP7UyyoqGDLNZTHzkqviY.html

And this dude, Let's call him Frank, has slightly less, maybe 18 average, and just started mining on the 7th-
http://www.middlecoin.com/reports/1FxziX77LiZLZxhdXMWREMQVMyjbDmCubw.html

So these are roughly comparable hashrates, with comparable reject ratios, but Frank (the newer, slower miner) is absolutely trouncing Bob on the payouts.

WTF is going on here?
(And yes, I know all the usual explanations, but I don't think any of them actually apply to this specific example)

Hey all. I've been on this pool a long time, haven't compared numbers in quite a while.

However the recent "let's talk about payout" caught my interest, as people reporting .01/mh or even .015/mh are way outperforming me. Like, up to 2x, that is considerable and a little worrying. I'm averaging something like 0.0075/mh.

So I poked around a little.

Here's two different users, for example:

This guy, let's call him Bob, has a steady 19 mh/s or so, and has been around since Dec 16th-
http://www.middlecoin.com/reports/1ACruk5rrJmGTkP7UyyoqGDLNZTHzkqviY.html

And this dude, Let's call him Frank, has slightly less, maybe 18 average, and just started mining on the 7th-
http://www.middlecoin.com/reports/1FxziX77LiZLZxhdXMWREMQVMyjbDmCubw.html

So these are roughly comparable hashrates, with comparable reject ratios, but Frank (the newer, slower miner) is absolutely trouncing Bob on the payouts.

WTF is going on here?
(And yes, I know all the usual explanations, but I don't think any of them actually apply to this specific example)

Did Bob and Franck confirm you they've always worked with the same hashrate, each hour, for all the reported days?
No interruption, no days with some miners on another pool, no maintenance, no windows updates taking hours, no sick GPUs ?

You may be right but just with the dates and payouts of previous days and the hashrate of last hour there's no evidence.

For the last ten days beta servers could also have played a role. Some users switched and other didn't.

I dont think its a srypt asic

As I said before Why cant it be this -----

I have a feeling some guy has figured a way to create a pool which is sponging off middlecoins pool . A smartass person sponging off middlecoin who has Diverted all the hashing power from his users on his POOL that he has accumulated more users over time but all this port forwards to the middlecoin server.... Lets say 200 Users on this pool with 1000khs each, well there is your 2000mhs ? So basically everyone joins the NEW SPONGE pools server which directs back to middlecoin server and users everyones hashing power.  --200 x 1000Khs

Each day the payout get distributed to the 200 users.... according to their hashrate for the last good payout. For Example if they are all at 1000KH well then they all get 0.04 BTC which is not bad . But again I am going by good pay out day  Of 8  bTC

I think this kind of thing should be banned if proven. Making H20 do all the working while the other pool owner sponges on the profits and by passes the work of the exhcanges and trading to h20.

What u think??


TO H2o

You are now making more than enough money I think you should close the pool for new registrations only as its becoming worse for the rest of us but better for you. Is this what you want?

i'm getting like 15% rejects on the useast server. What's the most stable server? This thread moves so quick it's hard to keep up with.

I seem to be getting repeat disconnects for some reason.

cgminer keeps telling me "connection to pool 0 interrupted" and "lost [x amount] of shares due to stratum disconnect on pool 0"


Anybody else having this problem?

EU down?

Aww small loss on unexchanged. I (like everyone) was hoping for a little better, but when the red line goes up less than the blue goes down, we didn't do as well. This is normal of course, and I'm not complaining, but I find it all intriguing.