Looking at the picture of the X6500 without heatsinks on Cablesaurus.com, it appears there is no mounting holes for a heatsink/fan combo - can we only use adhesive tape to attach them?
|
|
|
I've moved over 3GH/s - imo: this is the future of mining, centralization in the form of pools as they are today is not what bitcoin is supposed to be about Some say p2pool is similar to the way satoshi had envisioned mining to be
|
|
|
Results when attempting to apply bitcoin-4diff-5beta.txt to bitcoin v0.5.1: patching file orig/bitcoinrpc.cpp Hunk #3 succeeded at 52 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #4 succeeded at 1610 (offset -4 lines). Hunk #5 succeeded at 1640 (offset -4 lines). Hunk #6 succeeded at 1660 (offset -4 lines). Hunk #7 succeeded at 1974 (offset -4 lines). Hunk #8 succeeded at 2003 (offset -4 lines). Hunk #9 succeeded at 2012 (offset -4 lines). Hunk #10 succeeded at 2026 (offset -4 lines). Hunk #11 succeeded at 2064 (offset -4 lines). Hunk #12 succeeded at 2080 (offset -4 lines). Hunk #13 FAILED at 2109. Hunk #14 succeeded at 2142 (offset -9 lines). Hunk #15 succeeded at 2210 (offset -9 lines). Hunk #16 succeeded at 2310 (offset -6 lines). Hunk #17 succeeded at 2375 (offset -6 lines). Hunk #18 succeeded at 2421 (offset -6 lines). Hunk #19 succeeded at 2430 (offset -6 lines). Hunk #20 succeeded at 2481 (offset -6 lines). Hunk #21 succeeded at 2514 (offset -6 lines). Hunk #22 succeeded at 2542 (offset -6 lines). 1 out of 22 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file orig/bitcoinrpc.cpp.rej patching file orig/init.cpp Hunk #1 FAILED at 189. Hunk #2 succeeded at 222 (offset 11 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 258 (offset 11 lines). 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file orig/init.cpp.rej patching file orig/main.cpp Hunk #1 succeeded at 1149 (offset 20 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 1192 (offset 20 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 1206 (offset 20 lines). patching file orig/net.cpp Hunk #2 succeeded at 82 (offset 1 line). Hunk #3 succeeded at 99 (offset 1 line). Hunk #4 succeeded at 977 (offset 1 line). Hunk #5 succeeded at 1007 (offset 1 line). Hunk #6 succeeded at 1046 (offset 1 line). Hunk #7 succeeded at 1108 (offset 1 line). Hunk #8 succeeded at 1146 (offset 1 line). Hunk #9 succeeded at 1415 (offset 42 lines). Hunk #10 succeeded at 1449 (offset 42 lines). Hunk #11 succeeded at 1515 (offset 42 lines). Hunk #12 succeeded at 1522 (offset 42 lines). Hunk #13 succeeded at 1554 (offset 42 lines). Hunk #14 succeeded at 1572 (offset 42 lines). Hunk #15 succeeded at 1630 (offset 42 lines). Hunk #6 succeeded at 1046 (offset 1 line). Hunk #7 succeeded at 1108 (offset 1 line). Hunk #8 succeeded at 1146 (offset 1 line). Hunk #9 succeeded at 1415 (offset 42 lines). Hunk #10 succeeded at 1449 (offset 42 lines). Hunk #11 succeeded at 1515 (offset 42 lines). Hunk #12 succeeded at 1522 (offset 42 lines). Hunk #13 succeeded at 1554 (offset 42 lines). Hunk #14 succeeded at 1572 (offset 42 lines). Hunk #15 succeeded at 1630 (offset 42 lines). Hunk #16 succeeded at 1654 (offset 42 lines). Hunk #17 succeeded at 1706 (offset 42 lines). Hunk #18 succeeded at 1718 (offset 42 lines). Hunk #19 succeeded at 1746 (offset 42 lines). Hunk #20 succeeded at 1953 (offset 48 lines). Hunk #21 succeeded at 1968 with fuzz 2 (offset 48 lines). patching file orig/net.h Hunk #2 succeeded at 79 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 123 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #4 succeeded at 185 (offset -1 lines). patching file orig/util.cpp patching file orig/util.h Hunk #4 succeeded at 710 (offset 10 lines).
|
|
|
Please someone with a clue correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't your miner drop work and not submit it when it receives a long poll when it's already doing some work?
And extra long polls from merged mining then cause you to submit less work?
|
|
|
V1 MtGox was a case of "first impressions last" and put many off with no other place to go for similar liquidity, it's maybe why TradeHill got a number of people IMO. Anyway, great job guys - keep up the good work
|
|
|
So when are these devices (tentatively) scheduled to be sent out to everyone (pre-orders)?
Go read or something. Where do they mention anything more recent than a few weeks in to November on http://butterflylabs.com/ ?
|
|
|
So when are these devices (tentatively) scheduled to be sent out to everyone (pre-orders)?
|
|
|
>oclvanitygen.exe -d 1 -N Mtest Prefix 'Mtest' not possible Hint: valid namecoin addresses begin with "M" or "N"
>oclvanitygen.exe -d 1 -N Ntest Prefix 'Ntest' not possible Hint: valid namecoin addresses begin with "M" or "N" Is there something wrong with v0.17 Windows x86+x64 binaries when generating namecoin addresses?
|
|
|
Firefox can't find the server at www.bitcoin-p2p.tk.
|
|
|
If it's a list of 100, how come there are spots over 100 available?
|
|
|
No code improvements for higher hashrate yet?
|
|
|
Hi David, What are your thoughts on the final 0.5.0 release?
|
|
|
From what I have read so far, the 100% CPU fix for 2+ GPUs with 11.11 drivers may be Linux only
|
|
|
Nice work
|
|
|
Why would apple reject bitcoin apps?
They want to process all payments issued by i<device>, because that makes them money. But maybe with a whopping fee of 50% they might approve a BTC app someday. There is the PayPal app ...
|
|
|
Guys,
I can't find a valid share (YAY!!!) even using minerd with Litecoind (solo mining)... This is because I'm too small?!
Thanks! Thiago
Try testnet first?
|
|
|
Existing ones should be removed for fairness
|
|
|
Excellent summary, is this everything in Joel Katz' patch set?
|
|
|
|