Yes, I think is a good sign for the present .... but a bad sign for the future.

They could focus to empty the orders queue without delete the news about the new product.

We are working closely with Cognitive to find a quick resolution.

Thank you,

Havelock Investments

They seem just a tiny bit noisy. 

millenium 0.000461 - 0.000624
nwfella 0.000572
tsm13 0.000502129 - 0.000589287
rdyoung 0.00055
jjohnson 0.000598
EdoBcn 0.000651
VonSpecht 0.000710
stompysteve 0.00085085

We should do this every week. Sounds fun.
Also, we could arrange a minimum bet type of thing, who gets it right wins all bets

So, to recap....a pair of 18 year old students ran a scam where they convinced us they could run 30TH of mining equipment out of their house...the equipment was late delivered and when it came they couldn't keep the breakers on for more than 10% of the equipment 10% of the time ensuring a huge loss in expected mining revenue....a friend from electrical shop class finally told them that the house didn't have enough power supply to run that many units as well as cool them. 

They ran around in circles trying to arrange a data center colo that by anyone with even meager planning skills would know should have been arranged months in advance...then decided it was all too much effort and unilaterally decide to sell all the equipment killing not only all chance of profit but guarantying the investors a loss. Add to that a unilateral decision now to add the money to the "reinvestment fund" regardless that many people just want it issued as a dividend now to recoup the massive losses they were hit with.

All along they were mining to undisclosed addresses, bouncing coins through several personal addresses, had almost zero transparency to the shareholders, and couldn't even seem to be able to put a simple spreadsheet together and ignoring the motions brought forth by it's shareholders. Yeah I'd say a scam intermingled with total incompetence that cost everyone who invested a lot of money.

Oh and I forgot to add they did this all on US soil and allowed/marketed the investment to US citizens...cue the SEC complaints in 5,4,3,2,1.

Something odd at bitmine.
http://bitmine.ch/?p=5402

Please don't take this as fud.
Whatever is going on explains the lack of speedy hardware deliveries to Peta.
Unless cryptx can tell us that its not related.

I would only agree if the hardware could be bought and delivered quickly by the supplier.
No need to increase the reinvest and lock that funding into hardware that can't be delivered to keep up with the pace.

I'll go to visit Bitmine next Monday.

I had another thought as well. Perhaps cryptx could partner with someone working on 22/20nm or even work towards 14nm so that when its ready for primetime we get it first. Of course first priority is getting the mine fully deployed and 28nm will be profitable for quite sometime, but getting ahead of the curve would be worth it long term.

On a different topic, if cryptx asked to change the reinvestment ratio from the 65/35 to 60/40 or 55/45 or 50/50, I'd likely vote yes.  I see the inevitable future to be a small number of large mining operations, and if by doing a larger reinvest petamine can climb to being one of those, all the better for the shareholders in long run.  All else equal (ha there's a broad statement) if cryptx reinvests a larger % than the difficulty rise, petamine will have a seat at the grownups table.  By having enough $ to be a lead investor/customer for each next generation round of ASICs petamine can stay ahead of all the others buying the same chips.

Thoughts?
Jesse