The points you stated to be considered to avoid dumping of coins are cool, except for token listing prior to release of final product. Normally if you delay listing of tokens for so long, it will only cause dip immediately when listed, so I think a project with an MVP is OK to list, they must not wait to launch their final product. Also, you mentioned max supply, I will like to know how it affects dumping, please can you elaborate?
Hello budy, how are you? thanks for commenting, in the case that these analyzes were done by 87 members who participated in a topic that I created here at bitcointalk, I just put their tips into practice and with my modest experience in this world of criptomoedas as well. I'm going to send the link from where it was listed so that you can follow the performance of these tips. https://www.finexbox.com/market/pair/TRC-BTC.html |
|
|
|
|
I created a low-supply coin and did not do any kind of ICO with bonuses, bounty, airdrop, to preserve the value of the coin, and not have those hundreds of people selling the coin and dropping its price, how would you indicate being disclosing the currency and website that look at the quality of a currency and the project?
|
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone, recently I created a topic about what each thought was important for a currency not to suffer from dumping, I read all the messages that were 87 in total and put into practice in a new currency, I found it important to put this information here for studies, today I can say that the currency that I created also had full use and is doing very well after its listing.
information for studies:
- High allocation of coins for bounty hunters.
- ICO Bonus.
- High Referral Bonus.
- Max. Supply.
- High use of coins in marketing.
- High allocation of currencies for development team.
- Lack of updating the community.
- Solid concept, proven design utility.
- Lack of differentiated, unique project.
- Lack of communication between the project and its investors.
- Turnovers that generate token profit.
- Token listing, prior to release of final product.
as I said I put all these things into practice and thank God everything is going well
|
|
|
|
|
staff are still surprised by the tips, the currency has not suffered any dumping so far!
|
|
|
|
|
hello everyone, I'm closing this topic due to finexbox and I, we get into an agreement, finexbox, took responsibility. Thank you to all the friends that always accompany you
|
|
|
|
personal, after market research and respondents, I have been working and studying tips and guidance I received from the entire community on a token where I correct other errors from other already existing ones, so I developed a low-supply token 9,900,000, and put practice all the tips that you gave me, I want to thank you very much for everyone involved, I have a great affection at all, today the token is listed at: https://www.finexbox.com/market/pair/TRC-BTC.htmlas you can see it did not have, it looks like it keeps on exchange, so far no dumping. |
|
|
|
hello person, trc, has just been listed on the finexbox, remembering this is a differentiated project, as you can see, are just 9,900,000 (million) token for a project that is already running. in addition this currency already has applications running IOS and Android, in addition to a web already in operation https://www.tradercash.org https://www.finexbox.com/market/pair/TRC-BTC.html |
|
|
|
|
I asked for a refund as another member here of the topic oriented me more nor did they even answer me they answered, is there any place to resort to it? or simply lost my money and other people can lose the same way.
|
|
|
|
|
in case there is a topic here in the forum that shows the values for listing in the exchanges but I am not finding
|
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone, everything good?
I am searching for days in the forum and I do not think that topic where the exchanges are listed, someone who knows where this topic can help me by kindness?
|
|
|
|
Your first payment was only for the initial listing but that did not happen because you made a mistake. Now that you've fixed it and wanted to proceed with the listing, you have to pay for their extra time and effort in listing your coin. That's how I see it. It may seem unfair but that's business.
right, but do not you think, that a customer has to be better served, and the more detailed information? as I showed there, he confirmed that it was only to send the github, after having ready, in the case, for that reason the other was taken from the air, for correction. You are entitled to have your opinion as a "customer" but understand that they are also running a business. They could have entertained someone else in the pipeline but they had to do yours first and for that delay, they can charge you. dear, as I said, they could have said this, before about additional value, but wait for the client to correct and then request the value, I do not think fair, I find a tremendous lack of respect for the customer. As I said, I have the confirmation email that was just to send the github. this lack of attention to the customer, does not bring security of the exchange. As I said earlier this may seem unfair to you. You didn't like that they did not mention the additional fee earlier, but it is also a mistake on your part for assuming that the additional time they will spend to list your coin is free. I'm only trying to give you another perspective here. Anyway, you know your options here. You pay to get this all done or you decline, ask for a refund, then move on to the next exchange. dear, yes, I will do as you told me, I will ask for a refund, I will send the email now, and we will see how they speak, so we already know how they deal with customers. |
|
|
|
|
I believe a lot in the word and I think it's very important in a business, and in the case I lost 0.15 btc in this exchange, and I do not want other people to lose the same.
|
|
|
|
As like the other said, it was your fault and you have nothing but to pay again.
Would you mind sharing us the exchange you are referring to? It would be better for us.
exchange is the: https://www.finexbox.com/people, when they do that, but I think it's very important to discuss these exchanges, and every time I know where we're dealing with our money, I'd be worried about the quality of my client. The word I give to him. and I think it is important to report this information to |
|
|
|
Your first payment was only for the initial listing but that did not happen because you made a mistake. Now that you've fixed it and wanted to proceed with the listing, you have to pay for their extra time and effort in listing your coin. That's how I see it. It may seem unfair but that's business.
right, but do not you think, that a customer has to be better served, and the more detailed information? as I showed there, he confirmed that it was only to send the github, after having ready, in the case, for that reason the other was taken from the air, for correction. You are entitled to have your opinion as a "customer" but understand that they are also running a business. They could have entertained someone else in the pipeline but they had to do yours first and for that delay, they can charge you. dear, as I said, they could have said this, before about additional value, but wait for the client to correct and then request the value, I do not think fair, I find a tremendous lack of respect for the customer. As I said, I have the confirmation email that was just to send the github. this lack of attention to the customer, does not bring security of the exchange. |
|
|
|
Your first payment was only for the initial listing but that did not happen because you made a mistake. Now that you've fixed it and wanted to proceed with the listing, you have to pay for their extra time and effort in listing your coin. That's how I see it. It may seem unfair but that's business.
I don't think that is unfair, because the exchange does not have any interest in listing his coin (this is because he is paying to get listed). And he made a mistake and the coin must be listed again, which requires additional work for them (someone who receives a wage is responsible for listing coins, and will have to work again). yes I am here to see the fair side of the issue, however this information should have been spoken, when asked about, after the fix the exchange would hold the listing and was told yes. ie this value information should be inserted along with the response, that is, in the end, a lack of information harmed the customer. |
|
|
|
Your first payment was only for the initial listing but that did not happen because you made a mistake. Now that you've fixed it and wanted to proceed with the listing, you have to pay for their extra time and effort in listing your coin. That's how I see it. It may seem unfair but that's business.
right, but do not you think, that a customer has to be better served, and the more detailed information? as I showed there, he confirmed that it was only to send the github, after having ready, in the case, for that reason the other was taken from the air, for correction. |
|
|
|
|
personal, I created a coin and I listed in an exchange, I paid 0.15 btc for listing.
soon after I had problem with the supply that needs to change the blockchain and the supply, so I asked if I could do this, then they spoke.
"when you're ready, you send me the github," so I flipped out the coin and started the correction, but now they're charging me 0.05 btc to list again, I do not know what to do, what do you guys think?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
