So I left my 2 rigs running overnight last night but I when I woke up, I got this error and the miner stopped:
SOMETHING WRONG WITH THE DEVFEE CONNECTION. MINING STOPPED.
Any ideas how this error can be resolved? I have already checked and my WiFi connection is perfectly fine on both rigs.
Any ideas ? If the miner can't mine for the devfee, it try again every 5 sec. After a while, it just stop. Maybe your pool was down for a (too) long time. You can force the miner to restart every x minute to avoid that (make a .bat with a loop) |
|
|
|
What should a miner be mining now a days with a 750 ti? using cudaminer and or ccminer? and what pools?
i think we have come too late, i'm waiting for the next "jackpot" Crytonight Yes cryptonight (XMR/QCN/FCN/XDN/etc) and BBR (not cryptonight, wild keccak)...with cpu and/or AMD gpu only for the moment |
|
|
|
On les achète ou les ducks ?
Il faut voter pour le ducknote pour qu'il arrive sur poloniex, il est en seconde position des votes. https://www.poloniex.com/votingPour le AEON aussi, on sait jamais |
|
|
|
|
Is there any chance to see someday a cryptonote miner for nvidia ? (AMD got Claymore)
|
|
|
|
Hi, I have 1000~1200 H/s with CPUs I have 2400~2500 H/s with GPU. I mine with cpus on minergate, and with GPU on differents pools. I ran different tests, with several pools (see my msg on claymore threads - i tested for days now on XMR, QCN, BCN, and Ducknote and noted each time, after some time, how many i did with each) I SHOULD earn two time more coins with gpus than with CPUs.. In reality, i earned 20% more coin with GPU, not 100% more. There is a huge difference. Devfee in Claymore is 5% Fee on minergate is 2.5% I don't think there is a hidden fee with Claymore, but maybe the way the fee is collected make the mining much less efficient. Or it's a pool problem (node-cryptonote-pool) Of course DDOS can affect thoses pool. I believe it for XMR, but for BCN or for ducknote ? I didn't see any downtime and get similar results. Juste right now, i'm mining BCN with this config (1200H/s CPU ans 2400 H/s gpu) After 24H : 184K for CPUs and 167K for GPU  (but there is some not arrived yet, waiting for the 60 confirmation i guess) If your stats are true, it means that the displayed Claymore hashrate is completely wrong (or a hidden fee IDK). Pools report my hashrate correctly, when the stats works (but not constant.. fluctuating from 500 to 2500 H) Problem is that the miner connect to mine for us and every x seconds connect for devfee (disconnect mining for user in between?) - maybe there is a waste of mining time in the process. Claymore should test his miner without the devfee and compare it to the fee version, to see if the difference is more than 5% (but will it do that ? i don't think so..and i don't think he will let someone test a devfee free version of it (Claymore, if you read, i can do the test  ) To see if it's a pool problem, i also will mine for x hours with half of the thread of a cpu on a node-cryptonote-pool and half withe minergate. EDIT : and with a single 280x on the same pool. I just launch it: 8 threads on minergate (~330H/s but with merge mining), 8 threads on monero.crypto-pool.fr (~350H/s, Wolf cpu miner) and a R9-280X on crypto-pool.fr too (~328H/s) I will let them mine for 24h, and i will let some time (12 hours) to be sure all the payments are done by the pool, and i will post the results here. In theory, i should have approx. the same amount, but we will see if the GPU make only half than cpu, or if it's the pool based on node-cryptonote-pool wich need optimizations. I would try on Wolf pool, claiming it's the fastest pool with 0% orphan and faster confirmation, but when i tried, it can't connect... |
|
|
|
Hi, I have 1000~1200 H/s with CPUs I have 2400~2500 H/s with GPU. I mine with cpus on minergate, and with GPU on differents pools. I ran different tests, with several pools (see my msg on claymore threads - i tested for days now on XMR, QCN, BCN, and Ducknote and noted each time, after some time, how many i did with each) I SHOULD earn two time more coins with gpus than with CPUs.. In reality, i earned 20% more coin with GPU, not 100% more. There is a huge difference. Devfee in Claymore is 5% Fee on minergate is 2.5% I don't think there is a hidden fee with Claymore, but maybe the way the fee is collected make the mining much less efficient. Or, and i think it is, it's a pool problem (node-cryptonote-pool) Of course DDOS can affect thoses pool. I believe it for XMR, but for BCN or for ducknote ? I didn't see any downtime and get similar results. Juste right now, i'm mining BCN with this config (1200H/s CPU ans 2400 H/s gpu) After 24H : 184K for CPUs and 167K for GPU (but there is some not arrived yet, waiting for the 60 confirmation i guess) EDIT : Claymore is ok to make a version compatible with minergate, so we will be able to do a beter comparison soon hopefully |
|
|
|
|
mining with this miner on minergate doesn't work (not on merge mining of course)
|
|
|
|
I received several msg asking me to give my workaround for connecting claymore to minergate.
I can give you the solution i found, but it's just for the proof of concept.
Claymore can't connect to the pool for devfee, so the miner try to reconnect every 5 sec, and after some amount of time, stop mining with a message.(something like 5 minutes or so)
Claymore can't merge mine neither, we will need a special miner for that (i think).
But mining on minergate with claymore would be already very good. The best thing you can do if you also want to, is to ask the dev if he could make a version which can.
Claymore is closed source, with 5% fee. I have no problems with that, but please listen to us !
Ok, I'll add this pool  Thank you VERY MUCH |
|
|
|
|
I received several msg asking me to give my workaround for connecting claymore to minergate.
I can give you the solution i found, but it's just for the proof of concept.
Claymore can't connect to the pool for devfee, so the miner try to reconnect every 5 sec, and after some amount of time, stop mining with a message.(something like 5 minutes or so)
Claymore can't merge mine neither, we will need a special miner for that (i think).
But mining on minergate with claymore would be already very good. The best thing you can do if you also want to, is to ask the dev if he could make a version which can.
Claymore is closed source, with 5% fee. I have no problems with that, but please listen to us !
|
|
|
|
I continue with my testing :
BCN this time (no DDOS on pool so far)
CPU on minergate (with merge mining) : between 900H/s and 1200H/s seen by pool : 57K after 6 hours
GPU with pool (extrempool) : ~2400H/s : 46K after 6 hours.
I really don't understand why ther is such a difference.
I already tested with MRO on two different pool (cryptopool-fr and wolf), on QCN, and now with BCN. I always have less or barely more with GPU than with cpu on minergate..instead of 2 times more at least.
Next test : cpu and GPU on the same pool, with two differents address to control if the problem is pool or miner (i think it's pool, but i have to verify)
I asked dev for a version wich can mine to minergate's pool (even without merge mining - and still with a fee for him), but he doesn't want.
Solo is not possible neither.
How are you getting 1200H/s on Minergate with CPU? I have an i7 4771 and I'm getting around 140 H/s For CPU, i have a 4 node server with 4 x dual Xeon L5530 + dual Xeon 2687w + 3930K@4.8GHz = total 1000~1200H/s Another test : 8 hours with Ducknote : CPU on minergate : with only the dual-xeon 2687w + 3930K@4.8GHz : between 500 to 800H/s ==> 290K ducknote GPU (6 R9 280X + 1x5970= on extrempool : ~2400H/s ==> 130K ducknote for the same hashrate, cpu on minergate make 6x more coin ? (and some FCN with merge mining as bonus) Do you take in account that on extreme pool your shares "wait" 60 blocks to mature? afaik on minergate shares are immediately sent toy your account For BCN, 9 hours later, total is ~70K for gpu and 57K for cpu on minergate. I should have more than 100K with GPU. I managed to connect claymore to minergate, it works, but of course devfee can't connect to it. DevFee: Failed to invoke login, retry in 5sec... So, minergate see my miner, but less of what my miner can do (400H/s instead of 500), because the miner spend a lot of time trying to mine for the dev. - and 0 H/s for the dev obviously, and that not the goal. 06/18/14-11:05:51 - SHARE FOUND (target 1936) - (GPU 0)
SOMETHING IS WRONG WITH DEVFEE CONNECTION. STOP MINING. and sometimes, a disconnect  Speed: 528 h/s, TotalHashes: 455K, DevHashes: 0K Mining time: 00:14 Dev, for making a minergate version of your miner, you "just have" to make a version that send a login + mdp instead of a wallet address (i mean, for the dev fee) or mining for the devfee on a pool of your choice instead of mining on the same as user - for connecting to minergate, i found a workaround. Please let us the choice where to mine, it's win/win |
|
|
|
|
How to contact minergate ?
One of my withdraw never arrived ?
(QCN : transaction 9de376a7ea7df6ea21027d47f1104b94b7904694245e260ec8699f7d8640ea1f
5.242899414325 QCN )
|
|
|
|
I continue with my testing :
BCN this time (no DDOS on pool so far)
CPU on minergate (with merge mining) : between 900H/s and 1200H/s seen by pool : 57K after 6 hours
GPU with pool (extrempool) : ~2400H/s : 46K after 6 hours.
I really don't understand why ther is such a difference.
I already tested with MRO on two different pool (cryptopool-fr and wolf), on QCN, and now with BCN. I always have less or barely more with GPU than with cpu on minergate..instead of 2 times more at least.
Next test : cpu and GPU on the same pool, with two differents address to control if the problem is pool or miner (i think it's pool, but i have to verify)
I asked dev for a version wich can mine to minergate's pool (even without merge mining - and still with a fee for him), but he doesn't want.
Solo is not possible neither.
How are you getting 1200H/s on Minergate with CPU? I have an i7 4771 and I'm getting around 140 H/s For CPU, i have a 4 node server with 4 x dual Xeon L5530 + dual Xeon 2687w + 3930K@4.8GHz = total 1000~1200H/s Another test : 8 hours with Ducknote : CPU on minergate : with only the dual-xeon 2687w + 3930K@4.8GHz : between 500 to 800H/s ==> 290K ducknote GPU (6 R9 280X + 1x5970= on extrempool : ~2400H/s ==> 130K ducknote for the same hashrate, cpu on minergate make 6x more coin ? (and some FCN with merge mining as bonus) |
|
|
|
Dans la foulée de la Saffroncoin, pour partage d'infos, j'ai investit personnellement sur la Savecoin :
- Nom clair et efficace avec un objectif clair;
- Première monnaie avec "Proof of Fund", c'est à dire équivalent au "Proof of Stake" qui vous octroie des intérêts, sauf que vous n'avez plus besoin de laisser votre wallet ouverte (enfin !). Le seul fait de posséder une adresse vous offre des intérêts quotidiens automatiques (64% par an)
- Communauté et devs corrects, sans plus pour le moment.
Monnaie très très risquée :
- Risques qu'elle capote, notamment faute d'intérêt des plates-formes d'échanges parce qu'il n'y a pas de volume (Peu de vendeurs, qui ne laissent pas leur fonds sur les échanges naturellement pour bénéficier des intérêts) donc pas de frais d'échanges pour elles.
- Le marché est exceptionnellement bas , environ 2 K€, car il y'a un "loup" qui retient les acheteurs : les intérêts futurs sont entièrement préminés ! Et donc le dev a accès à une énorme wallet, ce qui doit faire fuir tout le monde un minimum rationnel et fait partie des critères de scams.
Il y a peut-être bien 90 % de risques de planter.
NEANMOINS, avec 2K€ de capitalisation au total seulement, il y a un fois 10 à à viser sur une simple volatilité classique, et beaucoup beaucoup plus plus si le dev débarque un matin avec des solutions qui plaisent à la communauté, ou par exemple un audit externe. Mon avis est que le problème de confiance est déjà évidemment anticipé au niveau du dev et qu'il a déjà plusieurs pistes pour une solution soit classique (une fondation qui en serait garante) ou plus technologique (utilisation d'un service sans intermédiaire et "untrusted" à la XCP). La communauté a aussi des idées. Les monnaies concurrentes de ce type (Unobtanium, Goldcoin...) sont plutôt dans les 200-400 K$.
Encore une fois, ce n'est qu'une fléchette parmi d'autres dans votre portefeuille, et cela concerne des investisseurs qui ont l'habitude de prendre des risques gigantesques, en misant sur le nombre et une présence un peu partout pour maximiser ses chances, plutôt que sur le bon coup parfait en un seul investissement, comme souvent on le souhaiterait quand on débute.
Apres renseignements pris, j'ai suivi ton conseil avec un petit montant : 15K acheté cet apres-midi @ 1000 sato - le cours est à 1940 là, esperont que ça continu merci du tuyau |
|
|
|
|
I continue with my testing :
BCN this time (no DDOS on pool so far)
CPU on minergate (with merge mining) : between 900H/s and 1200H/s seen by pool : 57K after 6 hours
GPU with pool (extrempool) : ~2400H/s : 46K after 6 hours.
I really don't understand why ther is such a difference.
I already tested with MRO on two different pool (cryptopool-fr and wolf), on QCN, and now with BCN. I always have less or barely more with GPU than with cpu on minergate..instead of 2 times more at least.
Next test : cpu and GPU on the same pool, with two differents address to control if the problem is pool or miner (i think it's pool, but i have to verify)
I asked dev for a version wich can mine to minergate's pool (even without merge mining - and still with a fee for him), but he doesn't want.
Solo is not possible neither.
|
|
|
|
Si on garde en tête le "misez ce que vous pouvez perdre", c'est un bon plan. Je vais surveiller ça et peut-etre investir quelques miettes
merci.
Par ailleurs, on en a deja parlé moultes fois, mais le GUI pour le wallet BBR est sorti, le cours a fait x2.5. Mais on est encore tres tres loin de la valeur qu'il devrait avoir (a mon avis, au moins autant que le MRO)
Le BBR est très bon pour le moyen/long terme. Autant que le XMR. Par contre ce qui est rageant, c'est que le dev de ccminer se targue d'avoir un mineur GPU pour le BBR, et qu'il le garde pour lui (en se vantant de se faire des couilles en or, au passage) Il a une grande gueule mais si il est seul à miner avec et que l'avantage n'est pas aussi grand que ce qu'il prétend alors il gagne juste un peu d'argent et l'effet est négligeable. Il annonce miner 5K BBR/jour (enfin, lu sur une trollbox, pas par lui directement, donc a prendre avec des mega pincettes) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.msg7350826#msg7350826 |
|
|
|
I know I'm a few days late but a big thanks to cbuchner1 for the killer G release. You do incredible work sir.
Yes, nice release. Just at the same time AMD 14.6 drivers that push a 280X from 12.5 to 20MHs Myr-G... (i was hoping having an advantage against AMD mining ) |
|
|
|
Si on garde en tête le "misez ce que vous pouvez perdre", c'est un bon plan. Je vais surveiller ça et peut-etre investir quelques miettes
merci.
Par ailleurs, on en a deja parlé moultes fois, mais le GUI pour le wallet BBR est sorti, le cours a fait x2.5. Mais on est encore tres tres loin de la valeur qu'il devrait avoir (a mon avis, au moins autant que le MRO)
Le BBR est très bon pour le moyen/long terme. Autant que le XMR. Par contre ce qui est rageant, c'est que le dev de ccminer se targue d'avoir un mineur GPU pour le BBR, et qu'il le garde pour lui (en se vantant de se faire des couilles en or, au passage) |
|
|
|
Hi, Each time i try to send QCN, i get a msg like this one : Error: transaction <66b36ecac140540217be913da2345705278ab8028ce20ef42dd73a8f6353647d> is too big. Transaction size: 126953 bytes, transaction size limit: 24400 bytes (i'm trying to send..4.7 QCN.) of course, last version etc.. |
|
|
|
SaveCoin's Market Cap
SaveCoin's Market Cap was briefly set today at approximately $867,000 on coinmarketcap.com. Anyone see it?
This was because they included the 20 million pre-mined coins into the available supply. Later in the day, they decided to remove the pre-mine and make the available coin supply 89,689 making our Market Cap $5,290. This is a big difference and exposes the confusion over our coin supply.
So what is our correct available coin supply since Proof of Funds is a new concept to many?
1. 89,689 which corresponds to 1 new coin per block = Market Cap of $5,290
2. 20,089,689 which is number 1 plus the 20 million pre-mine = Market Cap of $1,185,000.92
3. 89,689 + interest paid to date + 1 million pre-mine (since the unpaid interest is not technically available coin supply) = Market Cap of $67,349.83
I think our market cap should be accurate for future investors. I also think option #3 is the most accurate.
Anyone concur?
The premine should be included as it is being distributed as interest payments. Also out of the coin that I hold, I'm using that to pay bounties and donations/giveaways so just only counting the mined coins is wrong as there are more coins in circulation than what's been mined. I'm not sure who was behind the voting on coinwarz but I do hope that something like this won't happen again. I know a lot of folks here are excited (and by looking at the current price increase, I can see that excitement) but let's build up SaveCoin in a good way so that we have a positive reputation! I am happy to see SaveCoin in second place already though! Rome was not built in a day, neither was Bitcoin but with patience and hard work by spreading awareness, we'll get there!  The community effort so far is amazing! Market cap should consider coin in circulation, not the total amount of coin. - so i think the third is the good one (market cap of $67349) |
|
|
|
Pareil, impossible de savoir combien.. bon, ok, ça doit pas être grand chose avec 2.5KH/s, mais ça m'embete de pas donner de chiffre, ou d'en donner des faux. Sachant que les derniere 48h, j'etais pas sur la pool fr (un peu a cause des soucis justement)
Les dernieres 48H , le probleme insoluble n'avait plus lieu ( juste un retard de payout ). Et comme dit plus haut , je préféré que l'on donne pas de chiffre . Si tu a miner du 10 au 14 juin, tu es impacté de facon quasi certaine. ( conséquence du DDOS qui a pourris le mempool et surremen aussi de mise a jours des frais) Si tu sens qu'il te manque lésé ou que tu veux recevoir ce que l'on te dois Donne ton addresse et ton hashrate ( je pourrais estimé et comparé avec ce que je trouve comme payement ) . Je peut faire une corrélation quand même un peut précise, car j'ai des traces de plus de 120 transaction grâce a un chinois. Qui m'avait demandé les transactions pour sont adresse de cryptsy je crois . Je veux vraiment que personne ne se sente flouer au autres. P.S Je me sens blesser par ce qui arrive . J'ai mit ma réputation dans cette pool et surtout je n'aime pas etre la cause de perte argent pour autrui sauf au jeux . Je te donne mon adresse par MP, ainsi que mon hashrate. Merci pour ton taff, j'ose pas imaginer le temps que ça doit te prendre tout ça, sans compter le stress. Je reviendrai miner chez vous, avoir un contact clair est aussi important que le reste. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
