|
I don't agree. According to this depressive thinking all the coins are scams including bitcoin. Tokens are not only the coins in itself, they are just a part of the new blockchain technology that is in development process now. In 5-10 years this technology will be applied in all spheres of life, I suppose. And different tokens will be also. Apart of BTC.
|
|
|
|
|
It's better not to keep the tokens on exchanges in case of long-term investment. Use wallets.
Also I recommend you not to trade tokens using your smartphone and not hold tokens there. Always use a computer! It is safer and you can use different kinds of wallets - online, desktop, hard.
|
|
|
|
|
I prefer do the both. But my investment activity depends on the money I have. Unfortunately my salary is not big enough and I cannot invest every month. I do bounty in order to get additional earnings and to do further investments from it.
|
|
|
|
|
At first you should look through Coinmarketcap whether your tokens are there. If yes, look which exchanges trade these tokens and compare tokens' current price with ICO price. Information about operating exchanges is on the token page on Coinmarketcap.
Very often starting prices on exchanges are low so it's better to wait for the green market.
|
|
|
|
|
I can recommend you these ones:
ETH, DASH, NEO, ETC, WAVES, Stratis, Wings. These tokens are more or less stable and reliable. They can be called "established coins". The same time their development continues and they will bring %% investors.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I know people who have their accounts banned on crypto-related reasons. But this is inevitable reality we have now. I heard that the issue of the ban will be decided in the courts. Unfortunately bounty rules always require to put in #cryptocurrency #ICO and other crypto-related hashtags into tweets/posts. Maybe it is worth to tell bounty managers to allow us to use only project hashtags without any "crypto-" and "ICO"?
|
|
|
|
|
ETH already had price more than 1000 USD in January this year. Now it is usual correction and ETH will recover no doubt. Cryptomarket is in permanent development and total capitalization increases periodically. I think ETH can reach 2000 - 3000 USD in 2018. Remember last year.
|
|
|
|
|
As for me I hold mostly but in case x5-10 I sell 50% of tokens and buy the new ones which I don't have in my portfolio. Now is period of build-up of funds, relaxation will be later.
|
|
|
|
Well, let's say this algorithm needs further development. In this case, will the proposed algorithm variants be used for this project?
I think not. If the algorithm is developed by a third-party organization, it will benefit from the source code of the project. Few people will like that the project can be controlled by one firm Oh my God! He is right, if correctly and correctly insert into the source code any library for remote control of the source code, then this algorithm will be an excellent Trojan program Developers will never allow outsiders to use the algorithm they have implemented as a tool for monitoring their project. I agree, developers buy a method by which they can develop their project in a certain direction, and in the future they will write the code! Do you really think that the developers will be guided by those people who are not related to their project? where you generally found a note that developers are buying the idea of an algorithm? encouraging involvement from the periphery by creating a developer community and algorithm marketplace that promotes innovation to build machine learning algorithms that match practical utilities, 4. improving and correcting existing machine learning algorithms and models through crowdsourced fine-tuning model trainers, 5. creating a new DML utility token and leveraging on blockchain smart contract technology to provide a trustless and middle-man free platform that connects potential contributors in machine learning from all aspects. It's very interesting, but it's not written here that they buy the program code or algorithm .. |
|
|
|
Well, let's say this algorithm needs further development. In this case, will the proposed algorithm variants be used for this project?
I think not. If the algorithm is developed by a third-party organization, it will benefit from the source code of the project. Few people will like that the project can be controlled by one firm Oh my God! He is right, if correctly and correctly insert into the source code any library for remote control of the source code, then this algorithm will be an excellent Trojan program Developers will never allow outsiders to use the algorithm they have implemented as a tool for monitoring their project. |
|
|
|
The developers point out in their white paper that they want to find the ideal algorithm for data processing through machine learning on a separate device
Where did you find information about this? I thought they already use an excellent algorithm for viewing and evaluating the contents of the user's data portfolio No, in fact, judging by the rollers, developers still need to seriously work on the interface of the future platform, as well as on its technical components Perhaps, since many project participants are also good programmers, or investors will be interested in paying for freelance services if the reward for a good algorithm will cost their money |
|
|
|
The developers point out in their white paper that they want to find the ideal algorithm for data processing through machine learning on a separate device
Where did you find information about this? I thought they already use an excellent algorithm for viewing and evaluating the contents of the user's data portfolio |
|
|
|
what does the icon that appeared on the site mean? what is the rating - 4.4? Is this a high figure? and what kind of resource is it?
dude, just click on this icon. It's quite simple, site: www.trackico.ioThey have long been engaged in the drafting of ratings of various projects Why is the total score lowered? in the project something is missing, or vice versa, something that is too much or incorrectly designed? Is there a description of this kind? Of course there is. Follow the link from the main page of the project, and then open the description of the received rating. This project does not have enough points for video and reddit There are notes that little is clear about the description of the project, that is, it is not known what exactly the project does, there is no interactive part It seems to me that I understood absolutely everything about this project after reading the information about it. Including after reading the white paper! |
|
|
|
what does the icon that appeared on the site mean? what is the rating - 4.4? Is this a high figure? and what kind of resource is it?
dude, just click on this icon. It's quite simple, site: www.trackico.ioThey have long been engaged in the drafting of ratings of various projects Why is the total score lowered? in the project something is missing, or vice versa, something that is too much or incorrectly designed? Is there a description of this kind? |
|
|
|
Do you think that now the project is developing with great speed? I do not think so. Nevertheless, its own hardcap project can not be assembled independently. I am absolutely sure of this.
Independently? how do you think the project can evolve beyond self-development? I do not think that at the preselection stage the team of the project will be joined by another department for promotion You're wrong, sometimes the project team has to expand even during ICO, to get a team of professionals in a particular case As a rule, these are failed projects. A strong project always has a well-balanced and well-chosen team that does not need to be re-assembled I agree that top projects never have castling in the course of project activities. But still I think that if the team needs strengthening - it needs to be strengthened |
|
|
|
Do you think that now the project is developing with great speed? I do not think so. Nevertheless, its own hardcap project can not be assembled independently. I am absolutely sure of this.
Independently? how do you think the project can evolve beyond self-development? I do not think that at the preselection stage the team of the project will be joined by another department for promotion You're wrong, sometimes the project team has to expand even during ICO, to get a team of professionals in a particular case |
|
|
|
I want to note that the project is developing very quickly. I watch how the design of the site changes and fixes bugs that were in the first versions of the site's graphics. Respect
I think this is due to the fact that the project does attract funds. Despite the fact that the project has serious competition, nevertheless, it reached it`s softcap At the same time, until the end of the preselect, it remains about 20 days, this is a fairly strong start for such a project, we wish good luck to the project team and developers |
|
|
|
I'm talking about the fact that now there are payment systems, such as CryptoPay. What's the point of creating a whole bunch of same-type exchangers, if there is a service that integrates the project of any direction and works well with it?
The functionality of such payment systems is quite small. It is difficult to imagine a multifunctional payment system that could simultaneously operate with all types of currencies |
|
|
|
Verification does not imply the subsequent preservation of personal data in a particular place, but only confirmation of information that a person is not a bot
yes, IF it comes from a trusted project many projects can sell their consumer databases it's a bit annoying . I agree, therefore, there are trusted services for storing personal data, and in case the project does not use such a service, users may have fair questions |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
