Sure I am a potential buyer. But only if someone providers a rational answer to my questions.

First some short explanation, and then the questions.

If I bought stocks, bonds or fiat currencies I hold securities by which those who put them on the market, have the liability to me. Stocks are put on the market by companies. Bonds by corporations and governments. Fiat currencies by banking system and borrowers. By putting their securities on the market, the said entities essentially borrowed capital from the market, which is why they have the liability to return it back. This happens when they withdraw securities from the market. So if I am a market participant holding their securities, the capital is returned to me when companies buyback stocks or liquidate the business, when corporations or governments pay me bond's face value, and when the banking system and borrowers sell me the seized collaterals or goods, services or labour to get currency units for liquidating the issued loans. Numbers in this case only represent the amount of capital a security issuer borrowed and has the liability to return.

Bitcoin on the other hand, is not a security. Its issuer/issuers have no liability to withdraw bitcoins from the market, and in the process, return the capital to bitcoin holders. So if I hold bitcoin, I basically hold number for being number. I hold a product similar to gold, a picture, wheat or crude oil. People buy these products for what they are, for their intrinsic value. And unlike with securities, once people bought them, no entity has the liability to buy them back in the future. So, the only way people can benefit from them is by utilizing their intrinsic value. But, here a crucial problem arises regarding bitcoin.

Gold I can utilize for jewelry, electronics, dentistry and so on, a picture for pleasing my aesthetic senses, wheat for making all sorts of foods, crude oil for manufacturing everything from plastic to petroleum. Besides, a single unit of these products is pretty cheap. However, in the case of bitcoin the only way I can utilize it is by watching it. That's all. Once I buy bitcoin, my wallet application reads a number from the blockchain, and shows it on the screen of my mobile phone. And all I can do, is to watch that number. To watch it like a picture is watched. When I sell bitcoin to other people, the new holders can also just watch a number on the screen. So, essentially no human being on Earth is capable to do anything after purchasing bitcoin, but to watch a number. Obviously, watching a number is not as aesthetically pleasing as watching a picture of a beautiful girl or a sunset.

And now the questions: if I can purchase a picture of a sunset for a couple of bucks on Shutterstock and watch something aesthetically rich, why on Earth would I purchase number "1" for $37,000 and watch something aesthetically poor? Why would I pay so much money for a single unit of a product that in comparation to gold, a sunset picture, wheat or crude oil has so low utilization capacity?

I am not here to debate what is important to people. That's individual thing. I'm here to state facts. Then, it is up to people to decide whether it is important for them to keep redeemable numbers or to replace them with just numbers. Video can't be invalid, as all it does is stating the fact that traditional financial instruments are redeemable, while bitcoin is not

Watch the video. All your statements are refuted with it.

I stated the fact that all traditional financial instruments are redeemable numbers and that bitcoins are just numbers. You showed nothing. You just said that redemption is not important. Which is your personal opinion that has nothing to do with the topic at hand. This topic is about facts, not people's opinions.

The video explains in detail how dollars are redeemable, taken out of circulation and destroyed (if digital) with every loan repayment.

So, if you decide to redeem casino tokens, and the casino that issued them, says: "redeeming is not important because financial instruments can be based on numbers on plastic", you would be ok with that? Because, you see, bitcoin is a number on digital media. Just like all financial instruments are numbers on some media. So, given your thinking, redeeming is not important because financial instruments are numbers on media. Are you aware how nonsensical your thinking is?

Because that's the reason financial instruments exist in the first place.

You are one of many people here that fail to differentiate between trading and redeeming. Trading is when a market participant converts instrument units to cash. Redeeming is when an instrument issuer converts instrument units to cash and in that way withdraws these units from market circulation. If you exchange cash for a bond you didn't redeem the bond, but buy it. Only the issuer can redeem an instrument.

I haven't defined bitcoin, just compared it. The same as a losing lottery ticket bitcoins are numbers on a media, that are not redeemable by the issuer. So it's not about how much money someone made by trading it. It's about how silly is to even consider trading it.

Read the OP. It's like a losing lottery ticket because both are numbers on a media, but not redeemable by the issuer. A stock of a bankrupt company is also not redeemable by the issuer.

Point? In the video it's explicitly stated that bitcoin is like a stock of a bankrupt company.

Regarding the last point. You are not able to redeem Bitcoin, but sell it. Only the issuer of an instrument can redeem it and then the instrument units cease to exist.

There's no such thing as mining Bitcoin. There's only software that stores numbers on a digital media via some protocol. Although, I don't know what that has to do with the topic at hand.

How is stating facts FUD?

It's not wrong. It's your lack of understanding how the banking system works. When a bank issues a loan it literally creates numbers out of thin air. When the loan gets paid, number are literally destroyed - they are zeroed out in the balance sheets of the banks. They no longer exists in circulation. With new loans they are put back in circulation, and the whole process repeats itself. Before zeroing, numbers were redeemed, meaning the banks, via borrowers, paid non-monetary value to their last holders. Bitcoin is never withdrawn from circulation. Rather it is in an infinite circulation chain, were it just serves as a gift verification like in Ponzi schemes, where you give something to someone for free and then you are verified as a member. Bitcoin is simply digital verification of membership in Ponzi-like scheme. It has nothing to do with money or redemption. All legit money in the form of a financial instrument is redeemable.

If I give you $50K for a losing lottery ticket this won't make it a winning one, but the deal would certainly make me stupid, or lucky if I find a greater fool.

Everyone can lend dollars or bitcoins and receive them back. But this is not puting them on the market or issuing them. Nor this is withdrawing them from the market or redeeming them.  Only the issuer can withdraw and redeem a financial instrument. If you lend a bond to your neighbor and then receive the bond back, that doesn't mean the bond is redeemed. Only the bond issuer can do that by paying face value.

This topic is not about people and how much money they made.

This topic has nothing to do with how Bitcoin works. Instead, it simply states two facts. First, the number that your wallet application reads from the digital media is non-redeemable. Second, numbers on losing lottery tickets are also non-redeemable. The same as numbers on paper stock or bond certificates of bankrupt companies and corporations. The same as numbers on metal/paper coins/banknotes of former countries. And the same as numbers on plastic tokens of bankrupt casinos. Which makes your bitcoins equivalent to the said things. It also states that paying $50K or even a dime for bitcoin is silly. That's all what this topic is about.

When someone states the fact that a particular car is engineless, it's pretty ridiculous to respond by saying: "you don't know how car works".

You gave the opinions about some points not related to this topic. Watch the video. I don't know what you are talking about.

That's trading not redeeming. The later is when the issuer of an instrument withdraws it out of circulation and pay redemption value in the process. Watch the video.