If what's stated in the OP is true, then I'll be shocked to my bones that most casinos are rugpulling gamblers and tainting their own self-earned trust. How detrimental that'll be to them in future.
haven't they got an explanation for this guy's case? I'm wondering how frustrating it can be to get logged out without an explanation (not even a response from the calcare/customer service)
So basically, they refuse to pay huge winnings at their loss? Then, just to get away with it, they accuse the user of some minor case of misconduct??

Sincerely, I'd enjoy watching matches at viewing centers aside having a steady power supply, plus a smart TV at home... You tend to get the feeling to it fullest when you're around people of the same passion for the game....

But on the contrary, something terrible happened that scared me to my  freaking bones. A close relative of mine was shot at a viewing center by armed robbers... Luckily, he survived to tell his story, this is it; "They all came in, dressed in black and had gloves on, then made their way straight to the reception after ordering everyone to get on the floor" he tried to escape but got hit.

I'm afraid, this will never happen  
It cost them millions of dollars to begin the censorships, why should they decide to stop it anyway? I can only think of the government bringing up a more sustainable means to attack privacy on casinos - should KYCs get maneuvered, not just obliterating the system per se
Not at this point.
The sole purpose of censorship was privacy invasion. I'm afraid, this is gonna get even more worse and we're gonna be toast once people begin to discover other loopholes to evade the KYCs.

Celebrities, bloggers and the Internet itself will only show you what they wanna let you see... Why would you quickly assume that the footballer is an addict, when you barely know nothing about his personal life? I could decide to listen to music and watch whatever videos, anytime and anywhere at all - That doesn't mean I'm addicted to my phone.

In his case, I have no business in adding any correctional value. He has all the money he wants and he could decide to either put it on a joker, or stake it up! Infact, gambling was made for the rich - cus in an actual sense, what does a poor man wagering with, when he barely has what to eat?

I can't really accertain this as you haven't told us exactly what you do and how much your salary is...   But lemme assume it's the regular 9-5 job and that could be around $1500? Gambling with just 2% of that is enough for a month.

I don't know really get what you mean by "gambling being a popular thing in your locality " - I mean, who follows every societal trend and gets successful with it?
exactly!! How I'm I supposed to know this? I don't even know if he's got kids and all of that.

What sort of expenditure do you make with just $1 bill? It's reasonable enough to rather say you started gambling away 'em cents from your momma's purse. If you're a Nigerian (and if), then I think you're just tryna f**k around.

I feel things won't go sideways until the day you decide to hit a casino house, or get 'em logins to a site. Getting registered and funding an account to wager is the hardest decisions that so many juvenile gamblers make so easily, without further considerations. So if this is an analogy of the real fact that degenerate gamblers are raised from the hood - just like you described, I think I'll tend to agree more.

Honestly!! What's the dude talking about? If he's making an Intro on some strange betting site, why not concentrate on that for a fact? I believe everyone that choses to gamble away their coin would know how to make a deposit.
Have you considered the fact that you could evade the blockchain fees but you can't manipulate the casinos to agree with you on this,? Neither can you evade their charges - which, to some casinos, might be atleast $10 or more?
I really thought to myself that maybe, I was daft never to have understood him at first... But since I've gotten some confirmations from atleast 6 different users, I have finally decided that dude doesn't have a clue on what he said.

People go through alot of awful things, just because they decided to dedicate their lives, wealth, insurance and properties into gambling..
Secondly, the worst thing would be breaking the family Trust; it's even more easy to regain your self - after several remorse from the effects of gambling - but it's worse when you betray people due to your lack of selfcontrol.
I can't assume myself in that position. In life, there are things you should learn to either AVOID or ADOPT. I wouldn't choose to gamble away my savings, talk more of the family fund.

i agree with the fact that anyone shouldn't wager on their teams to win. I keep wondering how proud one could be - even at some point, their teams performances over the past weeks might be as awful as any bad team in the championships.

But I'll certainly disagree with the last point of yours; if a team loses 3,4 or 5 times in a ROW, there's a possibility that they'll either struggle for a walkover, or win the match atleast. Every team's performance is determined by their position on the league table.
Assuming I'm a fan of one of the teams in the English premier League,; first thing that comes into play is understanding my team's performance at the time of play.  I could then decide whether or not to wager on 'em.

Addiction is triggered by the continuous repetition of a habit, till it becomes a lifestyle. It's somewhat easy to begin, but becomes a problem that needs y'all to seek other people's consent when y'all wanna quit.
The greatest solution to not getting into addiction is to avoid wagering at all;  you can't eat your cake and have it .. Eitherways, we spend money on alot more unnecessary things and, gambling could just be one of 'em.

"The worst thing a man would do is put himself in a pit that would take only the aid of people outside to hover him out"
That's not the reason why you are not addicted just yet.

I doubt if we've got any gambler that doesn't know the reason why casinos request for KYCs...well, if that was the case, I'd say KYCs are generally and compulsorily initiated by every individual regardless of who they are and whether or not they have multiple accounts. I believe even a kid knows about the recent money laundering sagas and how the governments are fighting to keep away from it - IMHO, crypto casinos would be one the smartest ways to move tainted coins, assuming there wasn't anything like KYC(know your customer)

---

Also, you might fall into a case of intrusion, by either your close friends or families... They can't have an access to your account for withdrawals of any sort ^{[even though the passcodes code be saved to the device you're using.]}

For the first time, I'll have to disagree with you, Chymist.
Are we gonna wait till it becomes a long standing problem to get rid of it? "When we've got all it takes to plant more tree to eschew erosion(which,is less laborious), why must we decide to Wait until the rain comes, then we begin making ridges/contour tillage"?
Initially - ain't gonna lie - I was against it (I already read a similar thread by act) .. Cus I thought I'd be a little bit controlling but, jackfuck racer is  slowly making the reputation board miserable.
page 3!!!!
I think this is even more Better.
shows cowardice. Makes no requal-sense!

$1m? Did I just read the op correctly, vod?
That only happens mostly on introductory threads IMHO. We've got a few more of 'em that would come around and ask questions, then disappear just about the time the topic becomes debatable. As long as Bitcointalk remains a forum for frequent discussion, that could be useful - depending on what the context says! ^{[ofcourse, ain't they creative newbies?]}
Again, If Theymos considers this to be perfect, it could go for an adoption. Personally, I don't think it's necessary i.e ( if the budget for the hosting is exactly what you described)

Everything is designated to work on its own for good...
Haven't you been reading through your state local budgets list? How much do they spend on housing and properties and unnecessary developments? Why don't you go ahead to protest against their doings?  You really wanna talk about things being toxic? Focus on your political toxicity!!
It cost alot to fight and gain freedom - especially through referendum... Bitcoin was introduced to help blunt the sharp edges of privacy intruders.
Edit;
Including the central banks itself -  Dude has no idea what he's talking about!

Trading is profitable, only if you understand the basics of analysis and quotation. The question should be - how efficient should a person be, to become a successful trader? Otherwise, I'd advise that you back out and HODL coin for the safety of your funds. I definitely did traded for sometime and made profit for the first few months (including loses), but it took away my time since I'd always prefer day trading.

---

on the other hand, HODLing requires less attention and skills.. All you gotta do is set up a hardware wallet - a type that would regenerate your priv keys offline (Trezor preferably)

Although the Renaissance of Bitcoin, there wasn't anything like ETFs...IMHO, there's never been some sort of support to aid the growing process other the devaluation of some local FIAT currencies.
Buying ETF is more like owing some shares capital; it doesn't mean you've got any Bitcoins... Most investors would go for this as a monitoring tool on Bitcoin price movement and volatility.
I mean, what's the sense in over paying brokerages - a tune that's much higher than the normal 30 sat/Vbyte?
The influx was an increased price + volatility.
This will only make the government more hungry in time. Lol

From the way you cultured everything, I thought you really had a good idea about Bitcoin, not until I read this... Mannn, WTF are you thinking? Holy crap!  Okay.. help me out! Would you rather store your Bitcoins in a centralized forum (assuming we had anything like that)? That's more like refilling your casino wallets with all your worth and earnings - do you not know about non-custodial wallets? [/sup][you've spent almost 2 years in here already. I'm not even sure this account is operated by the original owner][/sup]
There have been several things proposed and disposed over the years ... I can actually wrap my head around gloves' patches ... Now, I could go on and on, but you haven't stated the exact year - which also makes everything very suspicious.

Hold on a second, is this supposed to be a question or some tutoring phase on its own? If you could believe what an AI bot told you, then why should you bother asking further questions?

---

It's mandatory in most countries that you pay taxes for everything earnings; but unless you trade your coins, you're not eligible for any sort of taxation.
I'm not seeing any future purpose for liberation against the governments. That's just sad!

C'mon Mann.. I don't think that's just some government stipulations - Unless they'd charge him with the fines for his crime .. Dude has been running Memorydealers.com and agilestar.com for as long as 12years now - who knows how long he's been evading 'em taxes?
No, there's nothing stupid about it .. AFAIK, The monetary and financial regulatory system in any country works as good as what you described; they gotta make sure that currency notes don't suffer too much wear and tear thus, causing major devaluations.
Mopping out funds from circulation through the initiation of taxes, levies and internal revenue services would serve as a defence mechanism for the government and an easy way to control inflation

Edit: The only thing I'd consider as a wrong narrative or say - a selfish misconception - would be that he tried to convince people to believe BCH is BTC.

The funny thing is they only tell you what they wanna tell you, not what you wanna hear. This is just another strategy for the governments to make it look like they're intolerable but, CZ isn't serving time in jail, don't be a p***y y'all! There's no privacy guarantee on CEXs - atleast away from the gov after inducing the KYCs - so I'd say, it's unimaginably a route that has been charged of several money laundering cases ^{[just like you said]}, since they never had layeddown rule. $4 billion was enough to make the gov wheel away their initial penalty, as it is with every other criminal cases!