 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 »
|
|
What about LOWES P.O.S. systems ? Is there a solution for their command prompt like interfaces and this sort of thing ? Has this been considered ?
|
|
|
|
"GRAFT software is already certified by Verifone for use in their terminals."
How can we verify this information? Or do we just have to believe what's written?
its true and verifone has just completed a business deal that reflects these statements if you review their latest stock activity |
|
|
|
|
666 1 kings 10:14 the last coin you will ever own, the exchange and the app. everything involved.
|
|
|
|
Congrats to all ICO "investors". Price went through 200 sat, short term target is 100 satoshi and probably 0.
Never buy russian ICO. It's always a money grab, then scammers will blatantly run or continue feeding you with bullshit like "we want to make a product done". The product is always a bullshit and no one really interested in it and of course "product" does not cost the amount of money raised and never will even if it will be trading on NASDAQ or NYSE. All ICO "investor" want is a hype and pump, it will never happen with russian ICO. They are just not capable and not interested in bribing a bucket shop like binance or even cryptopia (lol). The tradeogre was probably a trick in order to kill it and render DOA. It's like getting rid of evidence. If they run it's a crime, failed project is a failed project, basically less years in a jail in worst case.
Also, I heard they are going to pour extra shitcoins on ICO suckers if this crap will not pump to ICO price this year. It will indeed hurt not only ICO morons, but also it will hurt those who think this coin is cheap at current price (> 90% discount from ICO).
Wait, there's never been a good Russian ICO? Like, not ever? I'm not playing dumb, this is serious question, for all intends and purposes, I'm a crypto newbie  To me, this project sounds promising. I don't think there's anything wrong with it? What's your take? the project looks good on it's own. there are questions about it's full potential and that's all. I am curious myself as to how far they will innovate and integrate with common use. |
|
|
|
|
the one year potential of this project is great
|
|
|
|
How would a moderate American business declare a taxable windfall through an acceptance of a digital asset? This is a basic question that needs a very simple answer.
As well. if I accept a three dollar payment of Lite Coin, how is that stored? Is it accepted by the vendor as GRFT, LTC, $USA$ or whatever currency the vendor decides? This is important because the mechanism that transfigures these factors on a very concurrent basis is absolutely vital to the foundation of this market as an asset of it's own. This particular project could be the gateway to a better place of trade.
Honestly, we need all of this information from the point of sale available for every transaction with an anonymous ticker that's since been encrypted with a fixed sales number attached in order to appropriate records. Basically, the buyer can remain an anonymous account on our records and untraceable to any out-lying records or incoming ticker of any kind. What is important is market values involved at the point of sale. time stamps ( as for record of transactions ) for business operation are also not important. While it could be painstakingly ascertained from video and transaction records recorded at a place of business as well as market data involved in order to put time and dates on transactions, what is most important are the values involved. |
|
|
|
We need a bigger exchange guys do something about that the price is going down people lose their trust in the project because of this tradeogre has low trading volume.......
What exactly is a larger exchange going to accomplish? Well I don't know bigger trading volume price will be harder to manipulate from what I see on tradeogre is manipulation of price this coin its way better then 149 sat more people will find out about Graft if its listed on a larger exchange and so on.... Now please tell why you are not so optimist about a larger exchange  Larger exchange does not always entails larger volume . this is only true in part for coins with no real application. the same coin could show no activity due to complete lack of interest from so many active community members and therefore show no volume whatever. on a larger exchange, it's easier for a coin with actual application to begin showing real activity as people begin showing more interest and find it easy to take advantage of sites with so much more underlying volume. in other words, for coins with no actual use or sub meter innovation, an exchange showing larger volume will not improve the volume of a coin with volume that is already dithering. with a coin based on something as valuable as graft ( technology withstanding ) a successful exchange will improve the success of the market. I also believe in pacing this outcome and truly being aware of time restraints as well as deadlines. |
|
|
|
|
I want to hear about how paychecks could be distributed in standard as well as non standard options for payroll distribution.
|
|
|
|
The objectives of GRAFT are great, but the points raised above are really serious and the Development team needs to come up with more information on how they want to bridge the transacction links between GRAFT and FIAT at very low fees as they promised to do. I read that there will be incentives for merchants but that is contradictory as merchants will alway go with operations that offer them more money for their services...
I respect this project and the good interest behind, but will appreciate if they can drive home their points and clarify this aspect of the project.
As best as i can see right concerning fiat is that you either use a fiat option provided by another P.O.S. application or one built in that will take fiat payments directly. Another option might be available say for a temporary fiat wallet much like the one that coin base employs in order to store funds that enter their site from bank or credit accounts that then brokerage out the transactions as listed on the account. Tether is an option for dollar standard assets (not actually fiat). Besides all of this, I want to see the possibility of a real time transfer that will occur as selected by the P.O.S. terminal at the time of sale. This way, the accounts are filled on their own, and theres anonymous and untraceable record to confirm the numbers. |
|
|
|
How would a moderate American business declare a taxable windfall through an acceptance of a digital asset? This is a basic question that needs a very simple answer.
As well. if I accept a three dollar payment of Lite Coin, how is that stored? Is it accepted by the vendor as GRFT, LTC, $USA$ or whatever currency the vendor decides? This is important because the mechanism that transfigures these factors on a very concurrent basis is absolutely vital to the foundation of this market as an asset of it's own. This particular project could be the gateway to a better place of trade.
Honestly, we need all of this information from the point of sale available for every transaction with an anonymous ticker that's since been encrypted with a fixed sales number attached in order to appropriate records. Basically, the buyer can remain an anonymous account on our records and untraceable to any out-lying records or incoming ticker of any kind. What is important is market values involved at the point of sale. |
|
|
|
|
How would a moderate American business declare a taxable windfall through an acceptance of a digital asset? This is a basic question that needs a very simple answer.
As well. if I accept a three dollar payment of Lite Coin, how is that stored? Is it accepted by the vendor as GRFT, LTC, $USA$ or whatever currency the vendor decides? This is important because the mechanism that transfigures these factors on a very concurrent basis is absolutely vital to the foundation of this market as an asset of it's own. This particular project could be the gateway to a better place of trade.
|
|
|
|
|
on an optimistic note, the ico only brought in about 6 million dollars of the 10 million cap. unfortunately, the entire market is crashing before it makes it's way to a larger market. the team made the poor decision of starting an ico before having a fully implemented product and no one sees the silver lining as of yet. the most defining feature of multi currency acceptance hasnt been implemented and wont until the end of this year according to the website. i dont expect as much as 10 cents from this before next year, although certain projections state over 50 cents. i am disapointed so far. i cashed out of social send two weeks before the spike to cash in on this and now that money is lost and this project is all but shit.
|
|
|
|
Congrats to all ICO "investors". Price went through 200 sat, short term target is 100 satoshi and probably 0.
Never buy russian ICO. It's always a money grab, then scammers will blatantly run or continue feeding you with bullshit like "we want to make a product done". The product is always a bullshit and no one really interested in it and of course "product" does not cost the amount of money raised and never will even if it will be trading on NASDAQ or NYSE. All ICO "investor" want is a hype and pump, it will never happen with russian ICO. They are just not capable and not interested in bribing a bucket shop like binance or even cryptopia (lol). The tradeogre was probably a trick in order to kill it and render DOA. It's like getting rid of evidence. If they run it's a crime, failed project is a failed project, basically less years in a jail in worst case.
Also, I heard they are going to pour extra shitcoins on ICO suckers if this crap will not pump to ICO price this year. It will indeed hurt not only ICO morons, but also it will hurt those who think this coin is cheap at current price (> 90% discount from ICO).
But it wasn't even a Russian ICO. It was run out of the US. Both the founders also live in the US, were educated in the US and have extensive professional backgrounds working for US companies. EXACTLY. U.S.A education is some of the worst in the entire developed world. It explains why none of the numbers really add up properly. The product exists, but it's barely online and the market was built on numbers that make little sense to the public. |
|
|
|
too much is riding on the community to do. the money should have already been settled, the entire market capped from day one to the desired price and full control of the network. |
|
|
|
|
speaking of the market and not the project, I'm sure that we won't see any real price action until it's on cryptopia. Im sure that a few people may have picked up some node worthy portions of the market and put them away in a wallet, but unless it's in the same space as the profits being made on other markets, the price simply is not going to sustain or make strides. According to the market specs (which i disagree with and can't help but wonder why the numbers aren't more flush and manageable) it would require over a billion dollars invested to the market to achieve a dollar standard per share. Thats a lot of high level investment. i simply don't see the preparedness of this project to accept or call in that much cash yet. if we get a spike, i couldn't say if it would run past 10 cents or how long it could sit around 25 cents before everyone who's been waiting since day one runs off to divest elsewhere. keep all of that in mind. i see the application, but we're still waiting for a firm foothold on the concept and the application that underlies the innovation.
|
|
|
|
|
i remember that Social Send was incredibly forthcoming and straightforward about market prices , it was stated after the first peak in january that prices would return to nearly the same as before the peak and buying could begin again at that price fairly before the market moves on again. top notch team. hoping for another huge dip.
|
|
|
|
|
