|
Greece refuses to jump into the abyss, so sell @285.57
Guess second place until the new first buys
|
|
|
|
|
Curse myself and my panic buys
|
|
|
|
|
buy @289.91
(we really reached as low as 283.25?)
|
|
|
|
|
Just noticed I'm first % of gains-wise again.
May you consider make another ranking to the biggest % profit, or give some honorific prize to the biggest % score
(making a new post because I don't want to invalidate my trade with an edit)
|
|
|
|
|
hummm if I sell I'll be probably top3 again, but not for long if the bulls decide to overrun the 300 barrier.
That moment when you don't know what to do
|
|
|
|
|
hodling.
please don't discount my balance, tks
|
|
|
|
I don't understand much of these international games...
international games mostly had less 2.5 goals , you can try under 2.5 goals joca's picks for more save bet last time i win under 2.5 goals bet on italy match versus croatia  international games also freaquently drawn, for this you can follow joca's premium picks. International games with balanced teams and in decisive games have less than 2.5 goals most of the times. Things are different in friendlies, or when one team is better than other(I mean better, not has more tradition or titles), or in non-decisive games. Take for example the last WC, if you bet less than 2.5 during the stage you would lose most of your bets, but most of games in the elimination stage ended with less than 2.5 goals(with exceptions, like Nigeria vs France). |
|
|
|
by the way, are you sure they deserve a -ve just for that?
Yes. They're cheating money out from a signature campaign which is dishonest. by the way, are you sure they deserve a -ve just for that?
This is debatable. I would have thought a ban is more likely / justified than negative trust. What forum rule are they breaking? Spamming. Half of the posts are just crap in the giveaways threads and the others aren't up to much. Giveaways claims are not spam. Or half of the forum should be banned, including the members that create giveaway threads. If they were spam per se, the forum would have already banned all kings of giveaways, like they did with altcoin giveaways. It is a choice of signature program's managers if they accept giveaways claims or not. Stunna used to accept giveaways claims in his PD signature campaign, for example. (and less than 100 of my posts are in giveaways threads, any way). And when you say that the others don't add too much might be because you are not interested about the subjects I mostly post. Right now I post more in gambling and about soccer, in the past in speculation, and I don't see you posting about such subjects. And I purposed give back all the money I've earned with coinomat signature(or whatever amount they agree) and don't take part in any signature campaign for some weeks at least. I think a neutral feedback would be more suitable, that way everyone would know about what I did, including signature campaign managers. Even users that scammed for many BTC or defaulted big loans got their trust back to neutral when they repaired the damage they did. (but of course my opinion is biased) Well the only reason why you are returning the money is because you were caught. Are all of these accounts yours? Do you have any others? MalinKeshar is an alt of me. And Vod used to remove their preventive negative trusts about people asking for loans after some time. One might say that the only reason they haven't scammed is because they get caught even before they could do something |
|
|
|
by the way, are you sure they deserve a -ve just for that?
Yes. They're cheating money out from a signature campaign which is dishonest. by the way, are you sure they deserve a -ve just for that?
This is debatable. I would have thought a ban is more likely / justified than negative trust. What forum rule are they breaking? Spamming. Half of the posts are just crap in the giveaways threads and the others aren't up to much. Giveaways claims are not spam. Or half of the forum should be banned, including the members that create giveaway threads. If they were spam per se, the forum would have already banned all kings of giveaways, like they did with altcoin giveaways. It is a choice of signature program's managers if they accept giveaways claims or not. Stunna used to accept giveaways claims in his PD signature campaign, for example. (and less than 100 of my posts are in giveaways threads, any way). And when you say that the others don't add too much might be because you are not interested about the subjects I mostly post. Right now I post more in gambling and about soccer, in the past in speculation, and I don't see you posting about such subjects. And I purposed give back all the money I've earned with coinomat signature(or whatever amount they agree) and don't take part in any signature campaign for some weeks at least. I think a neutral feedback would be more suitable, that way everyone would know about what I did, including signature campaign managers. Even users that scammed for many BTC or defaulted big loans got their trust back to neutral when they repaired the damage they did. (but of course my opinion is biased) |
|
|
|
Next round in the semi-final
Mali vs Serbia
Serbia already won against Mali 2-0 in the groups,i think they can pull it off
we had a great show on penalties today
serbia got w penalty stuff + two extra time things. they will be tired |
|
|
|
|
0.33
sdēl lēad akja f f a oqwṕeknc cak
|
|
|
|
|
15Q5Y8HjAqdxHvCA6gNXi8TtUt1UbrY1FT
thank you
|
|
|
|
nice scam okcoin has ruined btc
What are you talking about? Well, not for nothin, I heard a few people on the TradingView chat call it OKGox. I guess there is some speculation about their solvency after the stuff that came out after the Ver dispute. I heard a few people calling btceGox when btc-e was offline last days. But now btc-e is back online and everything is OK again |
|
|
|
|
Double-spend for some minutes with 0-confirmation transactions is easy and anyone can do it. I guess you can figure out how by yourself how to do it if you are as smart as your are trying to make us believe.
But all the addresses involved will have a double spend warning in blockchain.info for some time
|
|
|
|
|
btc-e, if you manage to get money into one of the non-wire options.
But you probably will have to pay high fees
|
|
|
|
In the past, I've had many international wire transfers out of the US routinely blocked by my bank (it may have something to do with the countries I was sending money to). They would eventually clear after I called some compliance officer and explained who and what the money was for, but it was becoming a nuisance. Using bitcoins was one way to get around this inconvenience.
And both parts need to have a bank account in the first place. And probably will have to pay lots of fees to keep it. Bank accounts aren't only a nuisance, but are expensive and hard to have. |
|
|
|
|
And Germany won and Fiji lost, more or less as expected.
Soon the first stage will end.
Any thoughts about Nigeria vs Hungria?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
