P.S I'm off to prepare / clean the house for a BBQ party weekend. I will check up once during the day and before I sleep. Busy busy weekend!
If you want to, send me a text to my google voice #: 860-631-7775 with any questions
Form submitted. Have a good weekend man  |
|
|
|
P.S Today is my birthday! Yay +1 for me! tips definitely appreciated so I can get tipsy tonight  I see what you did there! |
|
|
|
Instead of a different Jupiter thread - any thoughts on just making this one mining company. It would seem easier to me to have shares in the whole instead of each separate machine - then you can mix and match the Jupiter Vs Saturn as needed. Machines are not due until September and later. I know I would like to get more shares as I get coin from mining etc. Not so sure I want to keep track over many machines and 2 threads...
Wow great idea!!! I think I will do this if everyone is interested. It will be easier to track and distribute profits as well! If I can still have the minimum hashrate for my shares as originally stated in this thread rather than splitting the profits based on who has the most shares (if more people join it means I will have less hashrate, which I wouldn't like) I would think each share's hash rate would be the same. The major difference would be that each share is not connected to a specific machine. This spreads the risk of a failed machine across the entire company. Essentially the math is the same - right now it is X number of Gigahashes per machine divided by Y number of shares = 2.56 Gigashashes per share. The new company would be X number of Terrahashes for the company divided by Y number of shares = 2.56 Gigahashes per share (solve for Y). With this method, we can still keep purchasing units to add to the company (until some cutoff date - maybe the first shipped machine). This should make tracking our investments easier and make it much easier for ragingazn628 to keep track and get those dividends to us! If we got quite a few more machines - we could even consider setting up with one of the exchanges to make the shares transferable (sell/buy). With enough of us (and enough equipment), there is no reason that this needs to end after 2 years. That works for me, with the exception of people that ordered first on the first machines should get their shares paying out first of course. That would need to be managed somehow IMO |
|
|
|
Instead of a different Jupiter thread - any thoughts on just making this one mining company. It would seem easier to me to have shares in the whole instead of each separate machine - then you can mix and match the Jupiter Vs Saturn as needed. Machines are not due until September and later. I know I would like to get more shares as I get coin from mining etc. Not so sure I want to keep track over many machines and 2 threads...
Wow great idea!!! I think I will do this if everyone is interested. It will be easier to track and distribute profits as well! If I can still have the minimum hashrate for my shares as originally stated in this thread rather than splitting the profits based on who has the most shares (if more people join it means I will have less hashrate, which I wouldn't like) |
|
|
|
pm pirate@40 here on the forum he will explain it for a small btc donation
Actually lol'd at that, thanks |
|
|
|
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: jobs@hongkongasics.com SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:< jobs@hongkongasics.com>: host mx00.1and1.com [74.208.5.3]: 550 < jobs@hongkongasics.com>: invalid address I did have an issue with their shopping cart when first visiting the page... seems fixed now, I did Email them about the web design though and did get a reply... their current website is hideous IMO. Did you purchase?! Yea, I bought a 2 BTC guy to test it out... what's a couple BTCs anyways?  I will let you know when I don't receive it so we can put the nail in the coffin on this guy I guess....  Man your either naive, or dumb, tht site screams scam. Do you not think they may have announced being an ASIC producer, rather than keep a low profile, and allow people to stumble across them? Don't you think it's odd they are offering the exact same product range as theading competitor currently? 2BTC is approx $200! I have a few hundred BTCs, it's not the end of the world. I assumed that they had bought some Avalon (or some other) chips and tossed them in a box and called it a day, I didn't think they manufactured the chips. Oh well, live and learn. "More money than sense" comes to mind |
|
|
|
I plan on buying a share tonight, however I have another .5 BTC coming in on Friday according to Coinbase. Would it be possible to RSVP another share, or is there some kind of time limit? My apologies if this has been asked/answered already, but I'm posting this from my phone, and its kind of hard to go all the previous posts.
Just buy one now, buy another later |
|
|
|
@ragingazn628
Hey, have any of yours saturns started mining already?? if so, how much bitcoin per share you paying?
If I buy one share today, how long (approximately) will I start receiveng my dividends? (considering saturns shipment + setting up rig + 2 week mining time)
thnaks
Thanks for ignoring my message completely Do your own research man. The saturns haven't even been prototyped or produced yet, so no, no-one has any, mining or otherwise. Estimate is November |
|
|
|
|
Might be interested in buying a couple. I'm in the UK
|
|
|
|
|
You are confusing the common good to be a "oh noes i wont profit from mining anymore" rather than the actual common good of securing the entire bitcoin network and keeping the transactions churning out.
Now tell me which is more important? Advancing tech means more hash which means more security.
|
|
|
|
Anyone dumb enough to fall for this deserves to lose their bitcoins, end of story.
+1 |
|
|
|
|
Well... this thread is depressing
|
|
|
|
|
Any group buys currently in the process for avalon around Europe?
Looked at buying one unit but it was too expensive so possibly looking to split one avalon (3 modules) three ways?
1 module each. Is anyone interested in this?
I might be able to set something up if no-one else is.
Regards
|
|
|
|
Happy new year and still no ASICs! Ho Ho Ho!  |
|
|
|
|
And it's about $100 to $110 more expensive than the RPi..?
|
|
|
|
I sure as hell don't half of you guys. And the surprise!
+1 Never gonna don't give half of you guys up. |
|
|
|
I wonder if anyone was able to set up CM1 board mining with Raspberry Pi already? If yes, how many boards is one RPi able to handle?
I'm running two with my Pi. No problems here. Can probably handle a lot more |
|
|
|
Just incase anyone was interested, BFGMiner isn't working with my Cairnsmore1's but CGMiner is working fine |
|
|
|
Can anyone help me get BFGMiner working properly with the CM1 please? I have MPBM working fine, submitting shares as it should, with controller rev 1.5 and the 210Mhz bitstream on all FPGAs. I have compiled BFGMiner (i'm running RPi Raspbian linux distro) and I am launching it with the following command: bfgminer -S /dev/ttyUSB2 -S /dev/ttyUSB3 -S /dev/ttyUSB6 -S /dev/ttyUSB7 --icarus-timing short I have my pools in a bfgminer.conf file, and they are all loaded correctly on launch. The problem is that BFGMiner is reporting no shares at all, even though the green lights are flashing on my Cairnsmore1's, yet it works fine in MPBM. BFGMiner just outputs the readjustments and nothing else. Only 1 accepted share, yet the green lights have been flashing for a while now.. [2012-09-13 00:46:02] Icarus 1 Re-estimate: Hs=2.380537e-09 W=2.384182e-03 read_count=101 fullnonce=10.227s
[2012-09-13 00:46:09] Icarus 3 Re-estimate: Hs=2.380921e-09 W=2.012963e-03 read_count=101 fullnonce=10.228s
[2012-09-13 00:46:16] Icarus 2 Re-estimate: Hs=2.380716e-09 W=2.740838e-03 read_count=101 fullnonce=10.228s
[2012-09-13 00:46:22] Icarus 0 Re-estimate: Hs=2.380969e-09 W=1.712761e-03 read_count=101 fullnonce=10.228s
Also I noticed this in the BFGMiner ending session log after a 15 minute run - [2012-09-13 01:00:43] Work items generated locally: 1162 Is that significant? Any idea how I can get BFGMiner working? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
