Epic copy-pasta! A Call for Consensus
James Hilliard
Pool/Farm Admin
BitmainWarranty
Poolboy more like. FFS. do you disagree with there open letter? would you feel better if i signed it?  About 2 of those names are worth anything. All the rest are fluff - bar Hilliard. He is just a fraud misrepresenting himself as "Bitmain" (He is not) |
|
|
|
Epic copy-pasta! A Call for Consensus
James Hilliard
Pool/Farm Admin
BitmainWarranty
Poolboy more like. FFS. |
|
|
|
That silly fake email. That was the beginning of the desperation phase for Core. |
|
|
|
satoshi fodder? It can be phased in, like:
if (blocknumber > 115000)
maxblocksize = largerlimit
It can start being in versions way ahead, so by the time it reaches that block number and goes into effect, the older versions that don't have it are already obsolete.
He wanted to remove the 1MB blocksize limit by March 2011 But he did not.. and gavin met with the CIA. He did not. Instead he left. And we are unable to do it apparently. The pussies that we are. Poor orphans  Still I would simply not want any new 'benevolent' daddy messing around with the protocol's holy parameters I bought into. This is Bitcoin, its values thrives from the trustleness and the inability from any egomaniac dev to usurp it. ... bought into.. pffff You've been shorting bitcoins for two years. You just want to see it burn.  Nice comeback, hdbuck!! You pussy. |
|
|
|
Why the silly word games? Peter Todd @petertoddbtc 8h8 hours ago
@olivierjanss @Excellion What's relevant here isn't Bitcoin Core vs Bitcoin Classic, but rather, Bitcoin protocol vs Classic protocol.
3 retweets 7 likes By that definition bitcoin died with the original 32Mb -> 1Mb drop. Its core protocol v. Classic protocol. |
|
|
|
^Blitzkrieg = Lightning Network? My German is shit.
you already nailed it with BlitzNetwerk. Too funny.  |
|
|
|
I don't understand. Isn't the size of blocks the limit for number of tx?
Even if you change the network, a XMB block can still contain only an amount of Tx's proportionnal to X no?
No , the LN is a extremely efficient caching layer that doesn't involve trusting third parties and can settle much higher txs. you have absolutely no way of knowing if that is going to be true or not in the future You are being either deliberately disingenuous or you have no idea the current state of flux within LN design ( because despite having a mock up running, it is still very much at the design stage) ** apologies if my posts are a bit behind the curve. Busy day on Classic. |
|
|
|
We want an armored truck, not a safe on castor wheels pulled by a horse.
We are building a tank with hardened steal, exploding anti- tank missile panels, advanced engine and suspension components for maneuverability, and a more efficient engine to carry a larger capacity and more ammo... You simply want to double the weight of the tank and throw a bigger cc diesel engine in her that guzzles more fuel.  Post of the day right there...  |
|
|
|
WTF does that mean? This isn't one of your anarcap hugging sessions. Are you going to suicide bomb MIT or are you going to drink an extra can of Red Bull and code a bit more?
Why would violence even be an option if you know I follow the non-aggression principle ? You have a very odd perception of our values. We are very motivated to keep the true nature and purpose of bitcoin alive... You are sounding more and more like a Cultist every day. 
There are many of us that are so secure about this future that we are willing to make exceptional sacrifices to make it happen.
|
|
|
|
There are many of us that are so secure about this future that we are willing to make exceptional sacrifices to make it happen.
If you were 'secure' you wouldn't need to work so hard. You are as far from "secure" as you are ever likely to be. I'd say "scared shitless that the common dross realise that you are lying to them" would be a more accurate assessment. |
|
|
|
No one wants to comment the price and the fact that we're pushing this fucking red cliff hard?  Vitalik, along with other investors will need to make regular dumps to sustain development. The warning sign was all the spam we were seeing promoting ether and indicating a manipulated pump occurring to prepare for the dump. It will be interesting to see what Sergio Demian Lerner turing complete scripting softfork for bitcoin does to ethereum as well. It won't directly compete with Ethereum abilities but make much of it redundant and unnecessary. Wait. Wat?? I thought this was a bad idea? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=431513.20Too long in this shit to see hype and pump pretty clear...ETH is still in alpha...there was no reason for the price increase except pure speculation I don’t understand how a Turing complete scripting language can be implemented in Bitcoin. Smart contracts will burn Ethers to avoid looping. How will Rootstock handle it? Interesting tidbit from that thread: In response to a suggestion that Etereum might Assume they will adjust the fees in a reasonable way. Greg indignantly responds with : That doesn't doesn't sound like the kind of assumption permitted in a trustless decenteralized system. If you're willing to trust specific parties to do specific things— the design of paypal is far more efficient. You couldn't make this shit up if you tried. |
|
|
|
Since announcing the intent to form in December, the Hyperledger Project has received proposed code and technology contributions from several companies, including Blockstream, Yeah, buddy, You said it. |
|
|
|
That does not compute.
Advancements in asics does not equal higher value.
Silly fat man. New chip deployment = mewn... k? Meanwhile...  Come on in panicking global economy! The mempool's fine!  |
|
|
|
What does that mean for the technologically disabled such as myself and the many others here too ashamed to admit it?  |
|
|
|
[...] its like a sinking ship increases the value of all other ships or something.
That should be the mission statement. |
|
|
|
There's plenty of code, there's plenty of stubbornness, there's not enough analysis. The block size problem should have been dealt with two years ago. And if someone had done the legwork back then it would have been done two years ago. The one project trying to do this kind of stuff, ledgerjournal.org, is run by a fairly controversial member of the community. His project needs to be strengthened and there also needs to be different voices on the scene. If you want to make a difference in Bitcoin then this is a good entry point.
I didn't know about ledgerjournal, thanks. ledgerjournal is run by a charlatan. bitcoin could not care less about academics circlejerkers hdbuck is very particular about the circles he jerks in. |
|
|
|
you have displeased the thought police. Shame on you. Some of these "marginal" uses are terrible to consider. Extortion, kidnapping, and even murder
contracts become easier to set up. Extortion, for example, becomes almost unstoppable at the usual
place: the collection of a payoff and/or the spending of the payoff money Straight from May in 1996. 20 years later and it is finally becoming a reality. Im surprised they took so long- I would have thought the worlds assassins would be an impetuous client. Ignore them at your peril. Kinda surprised that Assassination Marketplace never took off. http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2013/11/18/meet-the-assassination-market-creator-whos-crowdfunding-murder-with-bitcoins/#69ad18bb1ac1I guess there's still time. . To be honest, I didn't like the UI. |
|
|
|
Yes!
Bitcoinwisdom shows $400 on average!!
Welcome back!And please stay!!!
Why's it gone over $400 on stamp? Is there no real reason or has something happened to pump up the price? I can't find any giant events that are responsible for it like the US government has decided to ditch the dollar and switch to using nothing but bitcoin. First classic block. Look at the version of the block : https://blockchain.info/fr/block-height/398364 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
