This regulation applies in any country and if you carry out illegal actions, in this case the use of electricity illegally, the use without paying. So, whatever business you do, if you do it like that or other illegal actions, then you have violated the law and the risk is your business will be stopped, the assets will be confiscated in lieu of state losses.

That's true and can be said plustoken is one of the biggest crypto scams of all time. It is not as popular as bitconnect, but fraud from plustoken bad impact the market and some articles say that the market decline when plustoken fraudsters dump their assets that happened some time ago and this has come to the attention of many people, especially the crypto community.

I heard rumors that the US government will announce regulations related to stable coins and I think this has triggered libra to renew their whitepaper and roadmap, so that they can match and comply with government regulations.

So there are no more obstacles if someday libra will be launched.

If the founder sells from time to time for development reasons, then it's still fairly reasonable. But look at the facts that happen, there are a lot of promotions, advertisements and partners they have, but so far it has no effect on ripple growth.

When facebook was busy developing and wanted to launch a libra stablecoin, the government there looked compact and had planned to make regulations for it. Is this just a coincidence? Or deliberate, by lobbying the leaders of the regulators there?

It is clear how power produces a rule and must be obeyed by the stablecoin there, so that the future of stable coins will continue to be monitored and controlled according to their wishes for the reasons of that rule.

If we see from the OP explanation, then both have advantages and disadvantages, so the developer can choose according to their needs. I am curious, is there currently a project or altcoin that has used Laaps for its products? It would be interesting to compare it, between Laaps and Daaps, because the main goal is to serve the users themselves and I think they will judge and choose the best of both.

You are right, whoever he is, whatever his profession and how great or as expert as he is, if he offers investment and promises high ROI, then it is suspect. Especially if the investment is hanging MLM schemes, because it is definitely related to Ponzi and we must leave it.

What about one of the DEX from bitcoin atom? I just found it, but haven't tried it because DEX is still an alpha version and is only available on github. See their announcement here Tritium Decentralized Exchange

Before discussing it, is it worth looking at the history of the birth of BCH? Because honestly BCH was born because of dissatisfaction with the adoption of BIP91 but without an increase in block size or improvements to SegWit. So some investors, developers, miners, and some communities want another alternative to split two BTC.

You can consider BNB, it's clear their products are real and have been beneficial for the community and everyone. Binance already has its own blockchain, as well as their two exchanges namely binance exchanges (centralization) and binance dex. Their CEO is also an influential person in the crypto industry, he is Changpeng Zhao or CZ.

When investment interest in crypto continues to grow, there is a massive fraud like this. I hope that there are strict actions from the Chinese and Korean governments against this fraud incident, so that investors can be calm and maybe their assets can be returned. I think it is not only the affected markets, but public interest and trust in crypto will decrease.

I just heard the name plustoken and immediately looked for references about plustoken in, surprised when several articles or news that stated that plustoken was ponzi. Some news said that plustoken is the cause of the market fall or dumping that occurred in the last few days. Quite reasonable, because the scammers already have so many assets from his ponzi business. sad and this reminds me of the bitconnect incident.

There are many people waiting for the next halving and like some previous halving where this 4 yearly moment always makes the market move up and trigger the average crypto to reach ATH. So Bitcoin halving is a big thing that should be waiting for all crypto communities.

The last few days Ethereum has been widely discussed, from the large amount of development funds to the launch of Ethereum 2.0. Honestly Ethereum 2.0 has been awaited from a few years ago and I hope that network switching from PoS to PoS can be a solution so that Ethereum can be better and in line with the expectations of everyone, especially in its own ecosystem.

I personally look forward to these two things and hope that this moment can bring profits as compensation for losses in recent years.

Christmas is a day that awaited many people, of course there are many celebrations and a very special time to gather with family. Even though the market is bearish, it still forces us to sell assets to meet Christmas needs. But if there is income or other loans, then I prefer that rather than selling our assets, sad.

If you are in the Asian region, of course many people will recommend Singapore as a country that is friendly with crypto, but there are also other countries such as Hongkong and Japan. For the European region, then you can consider Switzerland and Germany, because both are quite friendly to crypto.

If you want information about other countries, then you can read this article. 12 Friendly Countries for Cryptocurrency

We know that so far Altcoin technology has only copied from Bitcoin, it's just that some features have been updated, but the method of use and purpose has remained the same, becoming a digital currency. In coinfloor itself, BTC trading pairs are more dominant than other pairs, that means traders there tend to trade and prioritize Bitcoin.

But in this case, I'm still confused and might bring up a difference about the meaning of crypto that is "proven", because not everyone has the same opinion and perception.

Each country's regulations regarding crypto are still limited, even many countries are not interested in and attention to the current development of crypto. Therefore, legal risk can confuse individual investors and might be able to divert investment interest in crypto.

But a government regulation that is too strict can take over and fully control an industry, so this will backfire or contradict the main goal of the crypto itself, decentralization.

In this case, the Ethereum platform has helped and created great projects on the platform. Average of the top 100 coins also come from the Ethereum platform, even Binance, EOS, Tron and others have also felt the benefits of this platform. If we see from the development funds or spending funds of a project, then it is definitely from the ICO, IEO, STO is much bigger, even EOS has a much larger fund than this case, whether the reason it makes EOS better? I do not think so.

So do not just look at a project only in terms of development funds or spending funds, but also see the extent of the benefits and contributions that have been made.

Bnance launchpad is the main place for investors who like IEO and it looks like every project they launch is always sold. When the first listing, a new project will continue to go up, can even reach its ATH, but after that many fall and look as if they were intended to be pumped and dump. Is that a coincidence? But why can it repeat and fall, so is it profitable for investors?

Honestly all the features that you will make for your platform are already available in bitcoin and I don't see any advantages or uniqueness in them. See now everyone is competing to make a decentralized platform, but why do you want to make it retreat to be semi-decentralized? We will see how the market responds to your platform.