Do not forget I have not sold one $BTA  Or traded it. Can you show and confirm us your Bata address? I see you are an honest man, I think it will not be difficult for you to do it Certainly: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bta/address.dws?324.htmBCpmn5bsBxBZ57uJPToT8Sv9KpG95ZargM And confirm  Can you send 2 BTA to - BGPsjmA2c4Jw4fjpKMy2qFWrJLG8DnEDAG from BCpmn5bsBxBZ57uJPToT8Sv9KpG95ZargM after that I will send it back  What I will confirm with you is what I stated earlier, I have not sold or traded any BTA since the announcement. Thank you man, I found what I want, and so now I am sure that this is your address. Sorry for the lack of confidence. I have a few questions. Will you destroy any coins or distribute them (for example, part for the development, part for additional services), and when will be available POS Mining? Thanks The dev is still selling every few weeks he hypes big ideas to increase price at the same time coins are moved out of his Wallet. Very weird Lol this project still no progress I'm so suprised  :D And the dev needed more money look his wallet cashed out again a bit. Sold 50% so far but people please buy bata masternodes, uber nodes, meganodes, bata shoes this pc888 what are you smoking m8 Stop the hype and stop making new accounts to hype your old dead project. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bta/address.dws?324.htmWallet of the Dev slowly dumping on you guys. First develop something and show it to the world then profit And another sell off from the dev see Wallet for proof https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bta/address.dws?324.htmDev only promises with big hyping like ubernodes but no real development for years. Anyway only newbies would still buy this dev dump coins Seems like your mommy forgot to give you your meds today... I enjoy the deep insight into the crypto world of economics that you share in your posts. The humor and tactful criticism (or is it cynicism), that adds much value to the forum discussions. |
|
|
|
Кто здесь и пользователей инвестирует в вата Вы что совсем из ума выжили?
PS. Sorry for the lack of translation
If it was really вата when translated to English it would be Vata not Bata. This coin really has nothing to do with cotton but Barter as in direct trading of goods for other goods. обменивать exchange, swap, trade, change, barter, interchange выменивать exchange, barter According to Google translate. |
|
|
|
PLEASE I SEE THIS COIN HAVE ONLY 18,820,937 SUPPLY,VERY SMALL TO EASILY HIT $100 per coin.Please when we see radical movements in the exchanges.I have been holding for too long....DEVELOPER PLEASE DO SOMETHING I am not sure if we will see $100 a coin this year, but I maybe $0.01 to $0.10 is probably. Updates are coming this fall, just tied up on other projects at the moment. |
|
|
|
Vegas My FLY is open  - wallet is staking - only 4 connections Vegas I won't recommend sending anymore FLY to the Burn Address, but possibly keep the remaining coins in many chunks to keep the blockchain moving. We will not be able to send our coins to you if the blockchain stalls for a week. Agreed MM. Its a big concern I have. I understand the need for users not to stake to get their coins out. The clear answer is I stake the swap/burn wallet, and I need about 4 connections. There is no easy answer on this one, but we will get through this.Here is the bottom line, it might require about 4-5 members to "stake past the clock". Then when the clock has run out, I will distribute the VGS to those members, and the network will slowly die out on its own. Let me know your thoughts. Vegas So, I should unlock my wallet and let my Fly wallet stake? I have 7.7k in stacks of 200+ which is about 38 stacks. Then when time runs out, I can send you my wallet.dat or can confirm off of presstab,s explorer, or both? I am currently #3 on the block explorer. Okay will unlock wallet for POS, to help move the chain for others. Peace, Dennis Dennis, I am thinking that is probably the best for us and the remaining FLY holders. Keep staking and send the coins as they mature to keep the chain going. Whatever is left we send the wallet.dat or dump the priv keys and send to Vegas. We may have enough in our wallet to help keep the blockchain moving so smaller holders can get there FLY swapped. |
|
|
|
My FLY is open - wallet is staking - only 4 connections Vegas I won't recommend sending anymore FLY to the Burn Address, but possibly keep the remaining coins in many chunks to keep the blockchain moving. We will not be able to send our coins to you if the blockchain stalls for a week. |
|
|
|
My wallet is not synchronized.
Who has a list of current node?
{
"addr" : "68.71.58.226:61510",
"addrlocal" : "68.235.184.186:61510",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1501808933,
"lastrecv" : 1501808933,
"bytessent" : 30080,
"bytesrecv" : 780168,
"conntime" : 1501808724,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"pingtime" : 0.13500800,
"pingwait" : 148.87748700,
"version" : 61403,
"subversion" : "/KeesdeWit:3.1.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1282539,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : true
},
{
"addr" : "[2a03:b0c0:3:d0::4698:7001]:61510",
"addrlocal" : "68.235.184.186:61510",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1501808931,
"lastrecv" : 1501808932,
"bytessent" : 153934,
"bytesrecv" : 6027991,
"conntime" : 1501808730,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"pingtime" : 0.20501100,
"pingwait" : 143.17616500,
"version" : 61403,
"subversion" : "/KeesdeWit:3.1.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1282539,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "167.114.103.43:61510",
"addrlocal" : "68.235.184.186:61510",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1501808932,
"lastrecv" : 1501808932,
"bytessent" : 68281,
"bytesrecv" : 8635600,
"conntime" : 1501808736,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"pingtime" : 58.06930800,
"pingwait" : 7.94245000,
"version" : 61403,
"subversion" : "/KeesdeWit:3.1.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1282539,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "84.162.242.84:61510",
"addrlocal" : "68.235.184.186:61510",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1501808933,
"lastrecv" : 1501808933,
"bytessent" : 52792,
"bytesrecv" : 6631184,
"conntime" : 1501808753,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"pingtime" : 2.87916500,
"pingwait" : 53.82005800,
"version" : 61403,
"subversion" : "/KeesdeWit:3.1.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1282539,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "51.15.57.35:61510",
"addrlocal" : "68.235.184.186:61510",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1501808880,
"lastrecv" : 1501808896,
"bytessent" : 1615,
"bytesrecv" : 181682,
"conntime" : 1501808754,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"pingtime" : 6.12134900,
"version" : 61403,
"subversion" : "/KeesdeWit:3.1.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1282539,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "[2001:0:4137:9e76:3c30:656e:b38d:96dd]:61510",
"addrlocal" : "68.235.184.186:61510",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1501808917,
"lastrecv" : 1501808917,
"bytessent" : 763,
"bytesrecv" : 1645,
"conntime" : 1501808783,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"pingtime" : 1.20106800,
"version" : 61403,
"subversion" : "/KeesdeWit:3.1.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1200668,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "178.62.107.55:59108",
"addrlocal" : "68.235.184.186:61510",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1501808933,
"lastrecv" : 1501808933,
"bytessent" : 39310,
"bytesrecv" : 4807445,
"conntime" : 1501808796,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"pingtime" : 39.13623300,
"pingwait" : 9.50653600,
"version" : 61403,
"subversion" : "/KeesdeWit:3.1.0/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 1282540,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "2.36.183.200:61510",
"addrlocal" : "68.235.184.186:61510",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1501808933,
"lastrecv" : 1501808933,
"bytessent" : 226382,
"bytesrecv" : 197692,
"conntime" : 1501808801,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"pingtime" : 12.34070600,
"pingwait" : 67.18882200,
"version" : 61403,
"subversion" : "/KeesdeWit:3.1.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 96809,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "99.251.155.29:49202",
"addrlocal" : "68.235.184.186:61510",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1501808892,
"lastrecv" : 1501808886,
"bytessent" : 1522,
"bytesrecv" : 405,
"conntime" : 1501808818,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"pingtime" : 6.78138700,
"version" : 61403,
"subversion" : "/KeesdeWit:3.1.0/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 1105645,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "185.176.141.53:8962",
"addrlocal" : "68.235.184.186:61510",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1501808918,
"lastrecv" : 1501808919,
"bytessent" : 1222,
"bytesrecv" : 685,
"conntime" : 1501808857,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"pingtime" : 0.53203100,
"version" : 61403,
"subversion" : "/KeesdeWit:3.1.0/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 1282541,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "98.230.78.71:54313",
"addrlocal" : "68.235.184.186:61510",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1501808926,
"lastrecv" : 1501808926,
"bytessent" : 1702,
"bytesrecv" : 405,
"conntime" : 1501808859,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"pingtime" : 0.80704600,
"version" : 61403,
"subversion" : "/KeesdeWit:3.1.0/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 1282541,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "136.243.60.19:42010",
"addrlocal" : "68.235.184.186:61510",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1501808933,
"lastrecv" : 1501808933,
"bytessent" : 189860,
"bytesrecv" : 80951,
"conntime" : 1501808868,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"pingtime" : 8.55248900,
"version" : 61403,
"subversion" : "/KeesdeWit:3.1.0/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 290589,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "93.213.134.41:51760",
"addrlocal" : "68.235.184.186:61510",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1501808933,
"lastrecv" : 1501808932,
"bytessent" : 649899,
"bytesrecv" : 178177,
"conntime" : 1501808876,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"pingtime" : 8.55148900,
"version" : 61403,
"subversion" : "/KeesdeWit:3.1.0/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 51998,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "128.199.37.46:40736",
"addrlocal" : "68.235.184.186:61510",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1501808898,
"lastrecv" : 1501808932,
"bytessent" : 1398,
"bytesrecv" : 481,
"conntime" : 1501808890,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"pingtime" : 3.63020700,
"version" : 61403,
"subversion" : "/KeesdeWit:3.1.0/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 1282541,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
} |
|
|
|
I thought I'd got out of the woods with that bootstrap. Its not even loading the blocks from the bootstrap!  I've placed it in .amsterdamcoin2 folder and they're no bottlenecks on the system slowing it down. the wallet just doesn't want to sync. EDIT: I checked the bootstrap and it was converted into bootstrap/old but the wallet is still on block 1057281 (12 weeks behind). Here's the debug log if it helps: 2017-08-03 10:07:22 CheckBlock() : Found payment(1|50000000) or payee(1|3QJmnh) nHeight 1057282.
2017-08-03 10:07:22 ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: read txPrev failed
2017-08-03 10:07:22 ERROR: AcceptBlock() : check proof-of-stake failed for block 25188bf9bc6364e50e1e89678c1591a9e3d8ad39ea6f1e3c3ee2d6cd285bce28
2017-08-03 10:07:22 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED
2017-08-03 10:07:22 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=25188bf9bc6364e50e1e89678c1591a9e3d8ad39ea6f1e3c3ee2d6cd285bce28 After this I've got another ORPHAN BLOCK error every second until I closed the program. I will create another one by grabbing the whole ~.amsterdamcoin2 (without wallet.dat) and try that. Start the daemon with the argument -maxorphanblocks=20000 You are on Linux right? |
|
|
|
Fly wallet is moving again and will continue to move, as I "split block" the swap wallet and my personal wallet into smaller blocks. An update will be coming soon to get the Masternodes working. As soon as they are verified, I am thinking to use https://masternodes.pro/ for our MN explorer. Vegas Vegas, I opened my wallet to staking to help move the blockchain. I will move coins as they mature. |
|
|
|
|
Due to many 51% Attack on pure PoW coins, I am looking into options for the future updates to this coin.
The theme of the coin is Mining, and I would like to keep it PoW only, however, I may consider adding Masternodes or similar technology to avoid possible 51% Attacks or other types of attacks in the future.
Your comments please.
|
|
|
|
anyone ever getting staking to work? mine still wont
Nope, my fly wallet in over 2 months never staked! I know these guys don't want this made public, but it's the truth! I don't know about the new Las Vegas Wallet, I guess when I finally get coins in it, will see peace, Rick How big are your coin stacks? The smaller they are, the longer it takes to mint. Stacks of two hundred coins takes about 8-10 days. Smaller amounts, could take a lot longer to stake. Peace, Dennis I have only 30fly in my wallet, and wallet has ben stucked 8 days for staking. I did not send for swap, now again going to staking and i can't withdraw I have a wallet with a 1000 or so FLY in it, as soon as I find it I will start staking to move the block chain. I will probably end up losing it all, as it will be the last wallet staking. |
|
|
|
I think we better go with something which has master nodes.
Master node purchases may boost the coin sales huge. I would rather go as a DASH or PIVX clone instead of Bitcoin.
As the poll points out for now we will be using PIVX With or without the see-saw rewards? Yes it will have Seesaw. Specifications will be: - Algorithm XEVAN (PoW and Spork messages)
- 60 seconds block time
- Difficulty retarget every block (Kimoto gravity well v3)
- 100.000 AMS masternode collateral
- Darksend (Obfuscation)
- InstantX (SwiftTX)
- PoS 3.0 protocol
- Seesaw reward balancing
- PoW block rewards: [block# 2-151200] 7.5 AMS [block# 151201-259200] 5 AMS
- PoW rewards breakdown:
- [block’s 2-432000] 20% MN (1.5 AMS) / 80% MINER (6 AMS)
- [block’s 43201-151200] 20% MN (1.5 AMS) / 70% MINER (5.25 AMS) / 10% Available to the budget system (0.75 AMS)
- [block’s 151201-259200] 45% MN (2.25 AMS) / 45% MINER (2.25 AMS) / 10% Available to the budget system ( 0.5 AMS)
- PoW ends at block 259200 (Approx 180 Days)
- PoW rewards: [block# 2-151200] 7.5 AMS [block# 151201-259200] 5 AMS
- PoS rewards breakdown
- [blocks 259201-302399] 4.75 AMS (90% distributed to staker and masternode - 10% available to budget system)
- [blocks 302400-345599] 4.5 AMS (90% distributed to staker and masternode - 10% available to budget system)
- [blocks 345600-388799] 4.25 AMS (90% distributed to staker and masternode - 10% available to budget system)
- [blocks 388800-431999] 4 AMS (90% distributed to staker and masternode - 10% available to budget system)
- [blocks 432000-475199] 3.75 AMS (90% distributed to staker and masternode - 10% available to budget system)
- [blocks 475200-518399] 3.5 AMS (90% distributed to staker and masternode - 10% available to budget system)
- [blocks 518400-561599] 3.25 AMS (90% distributed to staker and masternode - 10% available to budget system)
- [blocks 561600-604799] 3 AMS (90% distributed to staker and masternode - 10% available to budget system)
- [blocks 604800-647999] 2.25 AMS (90% distributed to staker and masternode - 10% available to budget system)
- [blocks 648000-Infinite] 2 AMS (90% distributed to staker and masternode - 10% available to budget system)
Wallet is currently in developement: https://github.com/CoinProjects/AmsterdamCoin-v4I like the plan! You need a budget/development system to help promote the coin and its development. I am glad you are implementing a reasonable system to support future development. I am very busy, but I am available to help out in any way I can with the support of AMS coin. |
|
|
|
I think we better go with something which has master nodes.
Master node purchases may boost the coin sales huge. I would rather go as a DASH or PIVX clone instead of Bitcoin.
As the poll points out for now we will be using PIVX With or without the see-saw rewards? |
|
|
|
Can someone put the POS percentage in a percentage per year?
I will take a look at my wallet later tonight and get a number for yearly return. |
|
|
|
the project should continued as soon as possible. i have currently one (1) connection on my full node
My block explorer shows 5-6 connections. Just need a couple more to keep the network stable. Add this to your Cygnus.conf (in %appdata% directory windows / .Cygnus on Linux) addnode=cyg.midnightminer.net Block Explorer: http://cyg.midnightminer.net/Block Explorer is still up and I have a wallet staking... |
|
|
|
Dev, you should contact coryvmcs1 or whatever his name was, he posted here. They edited the source somehow to make it work for the pool, contact them maybe?
I decided to create a new Amsterdamcoin based on the current Bitcoin code. Lean and mean without PoS or masternodes. Keeping in mind the goal of this coin as payment option. Lots of things were already done for Bitcoin and thats where we profit. I think thats the best way to go. Please let me know if anyone has a better idea. In the last month several PoW only coins were victims of 51% attacks and double spend attacks. These were coins with considerable value to make it worth renting the hashing power to perform the attacks. So, if the new coin does not have the difficulty of BTC or LTC, you will need to deal with a threat that is not dealt with even in the newer code base of Bitcoin. Choose your coin algo wisely, but even CPU only algos will be GPU mine-able someday and that is when the 51% attacks will come, after you have worked hard to build up the value of the coin. Hybrids do have advantages, with or without Masternodes. |
|
|
|
Can someone tell me if the DMD v3 will have masternodes? I thought I read that somewhere. What would the collateral be for a DMD masternode?
masternodes = 10000 DMD but, there will also be a POS, which is now 25% per annum, but after launching DMD v3 will become even more. So, run this past me again  10,000 DMD for a masternode, right? Current supply is 2,172,834 DMD ( https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dmd/) = maximum of 217 masternodes if the total supply is used or a maximum of 438 masternodes when DMD reaches 4,380,000 DMD. That just doesn't make any sense. So, you are aiming for maybe 50-60 masternodes running as opposed to around 4000 MNs running for DASH and around 2000 MNs running for PIVX. You should set the collateral much lower. It just doesn't make any sense unless it's just an attempt to push the price up. I am having the same conundrum with one of my projects. But I think DMD is a holding coin of value. If too much is tied up in Masternodes that is not healthy for the 'liquidity' of the coin. DMD only needs enough Masternodes to secure the network, so yes 50 reliable masternodes may be enough. DMD is not a DASH or PIVX type of coin with high volume darknet trading. DMD is quite different from them. |
|
|
|
If DMD can be reach 1000 dollar, I promise to donated 5 DMD for the dev team I applaud your generosity. I think the dev team has several thousand of diamonds. 5 DMD is just a drop in the sea. More like a few hundred thousand diamonds. FYI, Cryptonit alone owns half of Reactor (that's ~30,000 - 50,000 DMD) and not all his nest eggs are invested in Reactor. Well you get the picture. i can gurantee u there is noone owning " few hundred thousand diamonds" entry barrier to become a member of DMD Diamond Foundation is hold at least 20000 DMD and be active supportive in DMD community so yes each foundation member own at least 20k DMD Just to be clear, I was referring to the dev team (or Diamond Foundation) as a whole owning a few hundred thousand diamonds not an individual owning that much DMD. If I choose to apply to become a member of the Diamond Foundation will I be judged to be a co-conspirator of some cult of evil means? I don't know the Dev and his accomplices very well, but they seem very competent and have the interests of all DMD holders in mind in their current and future plans for DMD. As a member of the Diamond Foundation I could contribute some of my experiences to the group. So how will you judge me? |
|
|
|
I won´t belive that this great project will die at the end with such a helpful trader tool. Is there no one willing to take over? Come on guys......  I believe people have offered to help or takeover but nothing happened. I did not even get a response from either Markus or Fyrstikken. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
