|
is this token available to purchase? thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
red flag! anonymity is a concern, but "red flag" posts from newbies is also a concern. 3 and 1 posts respectively. fudders?
|
|
|
|
|
are the owners of Gold Guard and One Gram the same people, and how long has Gold Guard been operating?
|
|
|
|
WAVES is now the only top 20 crypto not on Polo. It's gotten this far without Polo, what happens when they add it?
boom |
|
|
|
|
what stage of development has this project reached please?
|
|
|
|
People DO NOT VOTE for Team Elite! If you do you will get small amount of Lisk as reward but in the long term you will be HURTING THE LISK PRICE BY VOTING FOR TEAM ELITE!Team Elite members so far forged around 2.8 million Lisk. Out of that they gave 30% to the community, that's 840 000. The rest they kept for themselves, that's around 2 million Lisk. Is there anything else needed to say? Why is Lisk hardly moving with the price? Because those guys, Team Elite, they are leeches, pure inflation for the Lisk ecosystem. They built few useless tools with over 2 million $ in their pockets. If you check how much they donate to some other members who are actually doing great stuff for the Lisk ecosystem it's a joke: http://prntscr.com/fekzm0A lot of Elite team do nothing, they just pay monthly for theis VPS and collect >8000 euros for themselves, and you cannot punish those individuals because they're into this mafia Elite group which is giving them a lot of votes. And those individuals do not deserve to be into top 101 because there are people outside 101 who actually do GREAT stuff for Lisk and they don't even get chunks of Elite's earnings as donations. Lisk Elite guys have no shame to present themselves as great contributors of Lisk. "We're securing the network"  Only thing you guys are securing are your pockets. You should all be ashamed of yourselves. The whole Lisk mining / distribution model just sucks. Which is secure indicator for huge price manipulations once (if ever) the team releases some API. Lisk and price manipulation? oxymoron. |
|
|
|
Currently at a conference, will answer over the weekend. I am quite curious on how much is left in the funds.
Screenshot of a presentation I prepared for tomorrow. It's already outdated because everything grew even higher. I think by now we are at $45M. Not sure, haven't calculated it.  Hang on hang on, if they had faith in lisk, why do they hold so much in BTC? Fiat I could understand to pay long tem commercial costs, but BTC? if you beleive in your product you wold carry the bulk in LSK?  I mean it also incentivizes you more fiat leaves a paper trail. |
|
|
|
Currently at a conference, will answer over the weekend. I am quite curious on how much is left in the funds.
Screenshot of a presentation I prepared for tomorrow. It's already outdated because everything grew even higher. I think by now we are at $45M. Not sure, haven't calculated it. is it appropriate to include the LSK holding in the calculation? I think so. Nothing wrong with letting folks now that the project has the capitalization to execute the vision. My question is where is the project on the timeline above. The slide states Nov. 2016, and it is 6 months later at this point. three months behind the nominal schedule due to a fixation with trying to incorporate the foundation in Germany, although you never know, there might be a surprise announcement that puts things back on that schedule. Wrong. The slide just covers the establishment of the foundation. It's a presentation slide so obviously there is a lot I would say what is not written there. The values are up to date however. "the lost three months" - i recall that's how you expressed the delay of 2016 due to the foundation 'hiccup'. the SDK should be 75% completed by now. |
|
|
|
Currently at a conference, will answer over the weekend. I am quite curious on how much is left in the funds.
Screenshot of a presentation I prepared for tomorrow. It's already outdated because everything grew even higher. I think by now we are at $45M. Not sure, haven't calculated it. is it appropriate to include the LSK holding in the calculation? I think so. Nothing wrong with letting folks now that the project has the capitalization to execute the vision. My question is where is the project on the timeline above. The slide states Nov. 2016, and it is 6 months later at this point. three months behind the nominal schedule due to a fixation with trying to incorporate the foundation in Germany, although you never know, there might be a surprise announcement that puts things back on that schedule. |
|
|
|
|
does Waves employ a vetting procedure for projects wanting to ICO on the platform?
|
|
|
|
thanks  |
|
|
|
Currently at a conference, will answer over the weekend. I am quite curious on how much is left in the funds.
Screenshot of a presentation I prepared for tomorrow. It's already outdated because everything grew even higher. I think by now we are at $45M. Not sure, haven't calculated it. is it appropriate to include the LSK holding in the calculation? |
|
|
|
|
what's the latest version number of the lite client?
|
|
|
|
delegate spam  also wasn't the Lisk Logo meant to have got an upgrade? It's been ages now ... the whole project is undergoing a total branding redesign. only the Lisk name will remain the same. Taikonauten agency, Berlin. https://www.taikonauten.com/ |
|
|
|
Why is the WAVES community so against Polo?
Wouldn't you want that exposure on such a big exchange?
I think it's just polo against Waves. They didn't list it as they do with the big volume coins. Waves has got a lot of potential also (unlike LISK that is struggling but still listed on polo)! it's some sort of discrepancy between sasha and the polo guy .. some sort of "do not start ico before we're not ready to trade waves on polo" and sasha didn't care and just started ico thats why polo guys are offended and don't want to list waves and loosing a lot of cash day by day .. soon waves > polo yeah, ultimately money talks and people patch up their differences when there's profit to be made. |
|
|
|
|
is there price discovery data for the token?
|
|
|
|
Guys why this coin is not on the polo?
Sasha and Tristan didn't see eye to eye, and Waves has its own dex. |
|
|
|
$7 million doesn't seem enough to build even one factory. are construction costs low in Magnitogorsk?
you read the FAQ? is not a very expensive factory, what they want to build and is more about tech what they will use to make Zrconium. i've read everything, but i want to discuss this project with the 'crowd' and not just take the info at face value. i like to chew thinks over with other people. |
|
|
|
|
does Sasha Ivanov vet projects wanting to launch on Waves?
would he know who the team are?
is there an escrow for Ping?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
