Analyzing history what can we take into account? Perhaps the legend statement becomes reality through the manifestation of the desire for a greater good.


The big problem for humans is time. Perhaps the anxiety of the future and the depression of the past make it difficult for us to observe the present.

Yes, that's why nearly everyone in crypto uses Bitcoin and not whatever it is you're trying to peddle. 

I get the impression Vlad2Vlad isn't a BSV shill.  They appear to dislike Bitcoin and all the forkcoins in equal measure.  If I had to guess, they're only clinging onto hope that Faketoshi is successful simply because any coin Faketoshi is associated with would be seen in a negative light.  

Maybe then people will pay attention to Vlad2Vlad's altcoin that no one cares about.  

It's not "hard to explain" in the slightest.  They think this little Faketoshi pantomime is beneficial to other altcoins, namely theirs, so they're playing along and stoking the fire.

You, Vlad2Vlad, trying to present yourself as if you have some kind of insider, secret, non-disclosable information... hahahaha.. nonsensical approaches that a lot of scammers employ.. and has not worked out too well for craigie.



If you are claiming to be associated with BSV, Craig, Calvin, or you have some kind of NDA (Non-disclosure agreement) to carrying out agendas related to those fucktwats, then you would not likely be considered to fall into any kind of bitcoin "high caliber" status.

Sure, I will concede that there are likely businesses that are built on and around bitcoin that do legitimately employ NDAs in relation to some of their products or approaches to business, so not all NDAs are scammy in and of themselves, but any NDA associated with BSV, craig or calvin would likely be presumed to be anything other than  "high caliber" since those diptwats have even been engaging in tactics that seem to be hostile to open source culture (and of course bitcoin), claiming property rights, filing something similar to SLAPP (strategic lawsuits against participation) lawsuits to attempt to threaten and quell speech, open ideas or people who truthfully proclaim them as fraudster/scammers.. and since craigie, calvin and their agents behind the scenes seem to be so fucking incompetent, they have NOT been very successful in their multi-faceted approaches to abuse systems, mislead, scamming and threatening people, even though some of their bag holding followers seem to appreciate their attempts to pumpen the quasi-incompetent (can't hardly get listed on any legitimate exchange) BSV attack-vector product (which product also has a potential side-benefit of allowing for a possible exit scam for craigie and calvinie if they were able to get a hardfork to forken over the possession of all of satoshi's coins, and any other unmoved coins, and even the dumbass BSV users (bagholders) seem to be not so dumb to fall for that extreme scammy ploy).  

I am not saying that because if you want to show that there are some folks here in the forum engaging in group think because they tend to be skeptical of shitcoins or various attacks on bitcon such as bcash forks, then you have the burden to show such proof of group think... sure go ahead with your proof.. it is likely to come off as a bunch of gibberish, but I am not going to accept your nonsensical conclusory assertion that there is group think going on without some kind of meaningful evidence (which would be a need for both facts and logic... good luck with that).

The face mask situation and various precautions against a virus remains a bit more of a complicated question, and seems to be a far from adequate attempt at an analogical way of arguing your nonsensical points to the extent that you have any points.  Is that what you were trying to do, an analogical argument?  lame at best, right?

Most of us don't play with known frauds/scammers, and it took about 5 minutes (or maybe less) for many of us to hear him first speak to realize that he was a fraud/scammer/narcisist. 

His subsequent actions have largely just confirmed the initial impressions, so probably anyone at the table would merely be bag holders of one sort or another filled with hopium and believing in matters that are contrary to the facts.

see? thats why i could never rise to the csw levels of.. whatever it is. i miss such obvious things.

*sigh*

yep - but how much time you expect that waiting game to go and finally relsove into our real world ?

Just curious...after almost 7 years of debates, 252 pages and more than 5000 posts, did anyone solve the riddle? I see the topic is still active. And I admit, I didn't read all the 5000 posts to see if the answer was found, lol.

I noticed the majority of my posts have been deleted by a moderator.

Why?

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ixc/address.dws?nulldata.htm

And why the nulldata value is > 10k ixc? What does it mean?


Anyway miningfund: 473226

I discovered that there is no fake Mr 650! I was wrong

Mr 650 is still him, but something changed in the explorer

From the second of june the command "nulldata" shows how much has been donated.

THe 777 and 650 donations all all right.

You should contact the admin of the explorer: there is probably something wrong in the counting

Vrei sa impartasesti ceva? Ce crezi ca se va intampla? Vrem detalii!

Anytime Acum, daca tot ai scris aici, crezi ca va avea loc vreo intalnire in 2020? Conditiile sunt destul de restranse in contextul COVID. Pe langa restrictiile guvernamentale, care pot fi (sau nu) relaxate, multi cred ca sunt destul de reticenti din cauza coronavirusului.

Hehe, cred ca nu ai vazut cand a fost postat topicul - in august 2016. Intalnirea aceea ar fi trebuit sa aiba loc in urma cu 4 ani. Poate voiai sa scrii un celalalt topic? Propunere: Prima adunare generala! - aici am vazut ca ai mai postat recent

I see both are still donating! IXC is @ 900 sats now on Freiexchange. Awesome!