If you mean users with Full rank and above before the merit system is implemented, I make sure they are still fine with their safe position to get bigger bounty stakes. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I don't see anything called safe position in this forum ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) from the perspective of the campaign managers, they will always choose the most active people in the community, there are many factors to consider someone, and the number of received merit is one of those factors. There are thousands of users in this forum, if you don't even earn a 10 merit within 120 days, you don't seem to have a chance to compete with anyone.
|
|
|
Nice, you guys seem to have lots of referrals lol. I only have 3 referrals at the moment and they all stopped using freebitco.in ![Angry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/angry.gif) ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Haha, I got some referrals by carrying their signature and putting my referral link there ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) for non-signature people, you have to introduce it in a different way, I think that's a difference 168 isn't that much. If you will look at Freebitco.in stats page, you'll see users having 50k or even 100k referrals and earned 16, 22 or even 27 Bitcoins. Interesting where they advertised their affiliate links. I have few hundreds referrals and they earned me really nice amount of BTC. I promoted my ref link on my personal website, but it's really mot easy to get big number of referrals. Never tried to promote my link in signature, interesting how many referrals you can get in this way.
LoL ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) I don't know how those people work on the cryptocurrency space, but it's clearly a good way for them to make money. 27 BTC is a huge amount of money ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) I carry their signature in the last few months and haven't even reached 100 referrals. How long have you been operating to achieve it? I am also curious about how you put your referral link
|
|
|
Pm with the details, I can do it
Also advised OP to stay away from this guy's suggestion. He is a proven fraudster, so any deal or cooperation with him should be prudent. You will not know what he cheated on you. Regarding the OP proposal, you should indicate which platform you need KYC ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) I am quite interested in working with a guy from NewYork, we can discuss a few other things to collaborate with if you like ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) PM me through telegram: https://t.me/chuckbuck to see my cooperation proposal ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) But about your KYC, I won't do it
|
|
|
I've only reffered 168 people so far (~0.00664326 BTCTC)
Wow ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) it's really great! I wonder how you can get so many referrals? Did you promote it a lot on social media platforms? You are not even a member of their signature campaign but you have twice my referrals. I am sure a lot of people are jealous of you, including me ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Not many people achieve your figure ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) I hope I can achieve your figure soon ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
Ahaa It was crazy ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Asuspawer09 is right ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) so there are no bug here, I turn on notifications for new posts in the service section. And that bounty thread posted the wrong section, so it moved to the correct section. I turned on the notification in the service but when I looked, it was in the bounties, that's why I found an error. But in fact, it is not an error. Anyway, thank everyone, I lock this topic here ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
To confirm if you have subscribed for the board or not and this is just a bug, Head over to your profile, then under Modify Profile click on Notifications and Email. You should be able to see the boards and topics you have subscribed for.
I have just checked and I am sure that I did not sign up to receive notifications in Bounties section. But I still received a single notification email ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) It is really strange, isn't it? It happend to me that after having notification on for a post or watch it even if action was un-done i'd still get notifications about it in new replies, there was no way to get rid of them but threads died with time. Excluding a bunch.
No, an post in a topic is different, but this is a thread in a section. Let's think of how bad it would be if I received a lot of notifications about new topics there that I didn't want. Something will become spam if it is sent unwanted ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
Hi, I wonder if any of you have this problem? It's been a long time since I've been interested in Bounties section. And it was strange for me to receive notifications email about a new campaign there. I thought I turned on the notification there somehow, so I went there to turn off the notification and this is the result ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FckWiYCn.png&t=663&c=Dkhmire_EvFnJA) Meaning I didn't turn on notifications but I still got the notification, it must be something wrong here. Has anyone had the same problem?
|
|
|
How about DT1's most dis-trusted DT1-elected members based on negative DT1 strength?
Just a little curious about your suggestion ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Are you talking about DT members who are distrusted the most? Or are you talking about people who are not most trusted by DT? Also want to know what its effect ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) LoyceV won't spend time on unnecessary things, I think so
|
|
|
Has this issue happened before though? Where someone has the private key given by bitaddress and the coins are still visible with public key. Basically the key pair is not correct? I've never heard of that before Thanks
Tried searching on this forum but didn't have any posts about a similar error ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Blockchain does not fully support Segwit as of now, and the issue might be just there.
I have an idea of the OP's problem through your thoughts. Previously, when I tried customizing my BTC address, I asked DarkStar_ to do it with the Segwit address, resulting from a public key, I received a private key that led to another address (It is different from the address I expected). This means that Bitaddress cannot fully support the Segwit address. I don't know how you did it, but I think your problem is here. But if I use VanitySearch to create the address for myself, it's not wrong. The problem is when you "mix" your public and private keys to create a new address on Bitaddress.
|
|
|
Any thing I should do to make sure my comp is free from malware?
Just scan your computer through specialized anti-virus software. I do not know what software your country supports ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) I just came up with a solution that I think you need to do with your computer. NeuroticFish also talk about something you may have done wrong. I hope you can get your money back, although I don't see any way in this case ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
Although I am not sure of what you are experiencing, it is not an error on Blockchain.com ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) If you have used it for many years and even use offline saved javascript version. I think the first problem you need to do is scan your computer ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) You may have been safe for many years, but you could have had a hazard a few days ago. My biggest doubt is your computer, it has a problem ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
So will the KOI token be tradable right? I have already read the website and the one pager. Maybe someone can explain me direct difference of unlocked KOI token and the locked one? So if i get i right unlocked ones get priority in bucback. This makes it more valuable right?
I think you should read their documentation if you are really interested in this project ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) But anyway a question is also good to be answered here ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) As far as I know, the unlocked KOIN will have special and exclusive features for its owner, but what those features are, I'm really not sure. Basically, a locked KOI will only be used to pay for transaction fees, I think ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
Just because Brave isn't as bad as something like Google Chrome, which is literal spyware, doesn't mean it is a good choice of browser. As tomahawk9 has said above, if you want privacy, you should be using Firefox as your browser (Tor is obviously superior, but most people will refuse to use Tor as their daily browser and only use it when the specific need arises).
Myself also a regular Tor user, but I only use it at work, with daily activities or forum activities. Tor doesn't seem necessary, and I believe a lot of people think the same way I do, so not many people use Tor every day ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
The response from Brave seems to be "We are going to keep doing it, but we will do it in a way that you don't notice". Fully expect this kind of behavior to expand to other sites. Thanks o_e_l_e_o, you helped me to better understand this situation ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) It seems I have judged subjectively, ignorance when reading the OP. In terms of users, no one likes being controlled when accessing any website, they have acted without consent from users. But if you stand on the perspective of a business, profit is required to continue operating and maintaining. It is understandable that they will continue to do it. What interests me is "Have they get any other profits if they don't do it?" It will say their greed, yes or no, very clearly For me, it is better if they ask the previous user and such links only occur when the user has agreed. In another case, if they continue to do it without the user's consent, I still don't think it's too bad when using their browser. At least, users lose part of their privacy (may lose more in the future), but it's still better than losing all personal data when using other browsers, right?
|
|
|
Hello, I am not sure whether you need Vietnamese language for your website, but I see that Sportbet.io also has Vietnamese language for their website, meaning there are many Vietnamese customers there. I think you may want a Vietnamese translation to attract more customers ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) So, I apply for the Vietnamese translation. I have lived in Vietnam for about 10 years and I am sure I can translate it in the best way if you need it. You can also view the list of projects that I have translated before: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2286018.msg23204354#msg23204354
|
|
|
When you want to go to binance.us, Brave redirects you to a REF LINK: binance[.]us/en?ref=35089877
Oh wow, an astonishing finding! Damn browsers! It is like the virus that works in the background of your computer ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) And now, the price to pay for privacy is being taken advantage ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) I don't use it, but I feel resentful when the people who develop them make them a damn virus. It really made me feel uncomfortable ![Angry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/angry.gif) Jitney referral links!
|
|
|
there is a general idea of what quality is, and which posts were made without any thought
I got your point. But sometimes I come across posts that make me say, "how does this trash deserve merit?" But if I screamed, many people would think I was selfish, someone once said that I should not complain about how others distribute merit, so the easiest thing was to just ignore it. I still keep my point that for some people, it deserves, some people think it doesn't. A general idea is something uncertain. Its similar to how the admins select users to become staff. They look at the data that is available to them, and then approach them. Unfortunately, the fact of the matter is without gaining merit yourself, and distributing it there is no way of determining whether a user would be a good judge of quality posts, because as we all know just because a user is a good poster, doesn't mean they are a user suitable as a merit source. This doesn't necessarily mean they have a zero percent chance of becoming a merit source, it just might make it harder for them to be selected if there are other candidates with merit spending in similar sections of the forum.
Well, I totally agree with your thoughts ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) I also think if someone sends merit regularly to other people or flips through the forum posts regularly, or in other words, is a member that is active on most sections, I think it will is a criterion to select a merit source ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Anyway, it's just a curiosity
|
|
|
~skip
and the "quality" of the merit distribution.
Wow, this is also quite subjective ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Suppose someone wants to become a source of merit, but they don't have much merit to distribute before, so their history of distributing merit seems to be empty. It means that only those who regularly receive merit can apply to become another source of merit. On the other hand, the quality of distribution is also difficult to evaluate, because according to theymos, merit is distributed according to each person's thinking, there is no real standard to evaluate it. Thank you for this answer, it's more clear now ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) I guess that reputation on the forum is also important fact and probably theymos and Cyrus read carefully reactions of other members. Huh? What's up, guy! I'm the one asking the question, but you're here to thank
|
|
|
Okay I made up the stuff about Tman having a religious awakening/ becoming a goat herder etc. I know, hard to believe being so plausible as it was. I have reached out to this fucker indirectly just to make sure he’s okay and that much I can confirm. I was told he’d be back around before long to call me a proper cunt and other pleasantries (as I do miss that).
Tman - shoot me a message off forum if you read this, ya prized cunt. Check in with a brother for fuck sakes.
(This post is also for those saying karma has hit him blah blah, well no, it hasn’t. He chose to take a beak is all).
Really? And now you are becoming the second TMAN here ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Too many profane words in your sentence ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) You talk about the indirect approach to him, what does it mean? If he's fine, why doesn't he work here even once ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) ya prized cunt
|
|
|
Wow you think TMAN is dead.
I don't think he died, I think he had covid-19 and was on treatment with it. Somehow, it takes a long time but he is still not cured. Very likely, who knows
I wonder who will decide if I have to choose a new source of merit? I have read through the criteria to apply as a source of merit, but who will decide to choose one of them ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) I am quite vague about it
|
|
|
|