Hello,

can you send me the botz.py ?

It's true mate the big boys have priced us out of mining. I went 2 and a half days without hitting a block on my 8Mh one diff hit 63 and above

I am afraid Hippie Tech is correct.  I wanted spreadcoin to be different but it is always the same.  A few are trying hard to raise value so they can sell coins they bought cheap for profit.  Mining by a few getting all the coins.  Same people from darkcoin now claim spreadcoin is best.  More games, cons, lies.  Centralized = the end.

Is there a breakdown of the top 20 miners yet?

The big boys have already priced everybody out of the mining game anyway on SPR.

Have you ever legitimately EARNED anything in life ?

But there is nothing to chew! 

What I am trying to say is: An average masternode cost ticker (with % variance) would make much more sense, since you don't want to base your choices on extreme outliers, but rather on the strong support in the middle.

You could just sort the table "amount" and get the cheapest or most expensive masternode of that moment immediately. 

Could we add something like this?



Maybe a few more informations regarding how much percentage of the coin supply is tied in masternodes, etc?

Please?  

1. People are stupid and greedy (those who don't update usually gets few more payments)
2. It is not polished yet
3. If you are here from beginning you would know about 1 and 2

Here is how GUI for masternodes will look like:


Checkboxes are only for your masternodes, they allow you to start or stop your masternode (of course you will also be able to do it with speadcoin.conf).
Other useful information is also shown, e.g. deposit amount and time before next payment for each masternode.
Addresses don't start with S because this is testnet.

Id assume a bot-net would go for large offices/companies, where people would be unaware of the extra pc usage.

Large offices/companies wont have very powerful GPU's if any at all.

It would be easier to organise a CPU botnet than a GPU botnet, because i can farm large amount of CPU power from "large" companies, but with GPU i would have to gather from individuals, which would be harder.

Impossible. What you CAN do, is make GPU simply not worth it. But it's a really stupid idea - botnets will then dominate the hashrate if your coin has any value.

EDIT: Shit, what am I saying, I'm better at CPU dev than GPU dev. Disregard my last.  

Anyone think we should put together a community bounty fund for an improved GPU miner?

I think that Evan would do better in just a straight interview scenario.

Ok i'm trying to render my massive blender water simulation. It's taking 2 minutes for each frame (25 samples) I have 1000 frames. Does anyone have a render farm by any chance? Because I need one.

edit: Nevermind I just restarted blender and it's fast again. 25 secs now.

Wow - I'm amazed that those things actually work.

Are you at liberty to disclose which one you're using ?

ok, so

With 1 round , 1 masternode and 2 other participants are involved.
With 2 rounds, 2 masternodes and 2 other participants are involved.
With 8 rounds, 8 masternodes and 16 other participants are involved.

And those are always different masternodes and different participants, that haven't been used in the previous rounds of the same session, right?
Or is there a probability that the same masternodes/participants will be used within the same session (nr of rounds) ?

Is this exclusively random (meaning for the rest of the session we are not going to use the masternode/participants that came up previously) or is it inclusive (meaning we just throw all the dices once more)