Perhaps tomorrow (or soon) I'll post some miner pr0n.
Woohoo!
|
|
|
We tried investing before...
Yes, as much as I love losing 100 BTC...I think the minimal interest isn't worth the risk. I vote Yes. Agreed and a yes vote here on the avalon. Funds should be spent on increasing hashing power as soon as the right buying opportunity presents itself, not loaning it out or risking on other investments.
|
|
|
We really deserve better than this.
Right? I know I have better things I could be doing with the money I invested into this, I am sure other people do as well. Well, considering that the btc that I "invested" would now be worth over 3000.00 USD , just holding on to it would have been the wiser decision.
|
|
|
We really deserve better than this.
|
|
|
Good for them! Great job with promotion.
|
|
|
It seems Garr's hands are tied behind his back, cut him some slack.
He cannot refute the claims for fear of his orders being cancelled. Cancelled orders would not only hurt him, but his mining company (and investors), and people that have purchased some of his orders.
Stop being silly insisting he explain himself... maybe after his orders are delivered, we can revisit this issue.
But until then, it is heartless to insist he explain himself with the possibility of his order being cancelled if he does.
+1 Garr is being blackmailed with the threat of having his order cancelled to claim ownership of that account.
|
|
|
Heh.
Request to make a motion for a full BFL refund, and another to just auction off the entire preorder.
Sadly this is not in our best interest, because they will refund in USD when we paid in BTC. I will be happy to raise a motion to auction off the remainder of the BFL hardware. Can someone second this here before I raise the motion? Please raise a motion to auction off BFL hardware pre orders.
|
|
|
Thanks for chiming in here doublec. I'm sure many are like me and just want to know there is progress being made. I'm sure it is a monumental pain to deal with the aftermath of what happened so thanks for doing so.
|
|
|
There is no reason a large company can't accept bitcoins and exchange enough for suppliers and anyone else who doesn't take bitcoin. Bitpay's service will exchange them on a daily basis at whatever ratio of bicoin to fiat is needed. There are big incentives for first movers to start accepting them as any savings that company owns will likely shoot up in value as soon as the public announcement is made. The incentives are there, it's just a matter of time.
|
|
|
we're in a superbubble. (not a regular bubble.)
In what way is it different from a regular bubble? Do you mean that we are still in a long-term bull-market? Yes. This is a heretofore unprecedented commodity -- itself representing the invention of a whole new class of commodity -- why would anyone expect it to behave like any other existing financial instrument? Because Bitcoin is different, but human action isn't?
|
|
|
So not buying any bfl chips for nastymining?
|
|
|
Hi Garr, it seems that all of the COG.F shares are now sold. Any word on what you have planned with the proceeds? Avalon chips? Edit: NM, that is what the current votes will decide.
|
|
|
What was the total dividend amount?
just over .02 BTC per share
|
|
|
even an expensive blade will ROI eventually and start to turn profit (at current diff we are looking at over 3.5 months for ROI). 49.99 btc will remain 49.99 btc so I say buy now if it is the only deliverable option open to us.
|
|
|
Dividend seemed lower than it should be, any reason why?
Just bad pool luck. This is very important: I propose that we allocate 50btc of our COG.F funds to order one Blade. Between the growth fund and COG.F sales, we currently have slightly over 150btc erady to purchase hardware with, but I believe we should purchase one Blade then hold off for cheaper hardware in the future with the remaining coins. What do you think, shareholders? --Garrett Any chance of us buying bulk Avalon chips instead?
|
|
|
I still have not received anything. Sent an email a few days ago but no reply.
|
|
|
|