Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 02:00:42 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 [405] 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 ... 590 »
8081  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Wallet on a USB stick? on: December 18, 2015, 11:43:55 PM
You could set armory's data directory to your flash drive. It would have more than just the wallet file though. That would include all of the logs and databases that armory generates in addition to your wallet file.
8082  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Question about BTC transaction on: December 18, 2015, 10:32:00 PM
That transaction has a dust output. A dust output is an output that is less than or equal to 0.00002730BTC. Transactions containing dust outputs are considered nonstandard and are not relayed by most nodes. Most miners will also reject those transactions.

Since it has been a few days since this transaction was broadcast, many nodes have likely forgotten about it so you can try sending the Bitcoin again. But this time make sure that there are no dust outputs. Do this by either lumping the extra dust into the fee or into the other output.
8083  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: |BitcoinCore] I have to wait 1 year and 32 weeks on: December 18, 2015, 09:27:39 PM
Hi,

in first sorry for my bad English i'm French.

I bought Bitcoins and I put my BitcoinCore receiving address, but there is a problem Bitcore my client displays a download bar at the bottom that says "Catch up being the last block received was generated ago one year and 31 weeks, the transactions are not yet visible "suddenly I still have not received my BTC, what can I do to solve my problem?

Thx.
You are still syncing. You do not need to wait 1 year, that just means that the latest block it has is from 1 year and 31 weeks ago. That means that anything that came after that block (including the transaction that sent Bitcoin to your address) is not known and thus the balance is not there. All you have to do is wait for it to fully sync. It will take a few hours and up to a few days at most.
8084  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Restore Wallet.dat on: December 18, 2015, 08:11:02 PM
Hi,

If someone hacks my computer or cloud and they would steal my wallet.dat file. will that person be able to build up my wallet on another computer and steal my coins when my local wallet is still up and running on my computer?
Yes. If your wallet.dat is stolen, then the thief will be able to steal all of the Bitcoin from you. It doesn't matter if you or anyone else has it open, as long as the thief sends a transaction spending the Bitcoin in your wallet before you or anyone else does, they can steal the coins. It is best to password protect the wallet with a strong password so that even if the wallet is stolen the Bitcoin cannot be stolen. Even so, if your wallet is stolen, you should move the coins out immediately.
8085  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Bitcoin-core: only keep last x blocks on disk on: December 18, 2015, 04:53:03 PM
Things get even stranger in a configuration where you need several wallets running in parallel on different VMs on the same host. It's obviously a big overhead to store a duplicate block chain on both of those VMs.

You could just share the data volume that contains the blockchain among different vm's.

Won't it cause any conflicts, deadlocks and corruption? But if you say it's possible then I guess it would be a good idea. To my understanding block chain has been notorious for being overly sensitive and getting corrupt at the sight of slightest problems so that it has to be downloaded from scratch. But that's just like my subjective opinion.
It isn't possible to use the same blockchain data with more than one instance of bitcoin core. There are locks on the files which prevent that from being possible.

I'm curious why you don't just use an SPV interface, bitcoinj for example?

I haven't looked into those alternatives yet. I always assumed that a different node software comes with a different API/RPCs which would require my personal software to be rewritten/changed.
They usually are different API/RPCs but you might be able to find some that are similar.
8086  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: The next 12 months for Bitcoin - mid Dec update on: December 18, 2015, 02:06:15 PM
Currently my biggest confusion is why Gmaxwell quit as main committer, and who will be the next?  Huh
He did? Since when?
8087  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Stupid question: Am I running a full node? (can send output from 'netstat') on: December 18, 2015, 02:04:55 PM
Wow, I had no idea I was running a full node!

I thought I had to do some extra steps like unblock port 8333.

It's kinda cool to know I've been running a full node this whole time, without actually realizing it.

If you want to accept incoming connections, you need to open port 8333. That helps the network more but simply running bitcoin core and having connections to the network also helps.
8088  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Bitcoin-core: only keep last x blocks on disk on: December 18, 2015, 02:03:54 PM
Bitcoin core supports pruning. You can set it using the -prune=<size> where <size> is the size of the blockchain you want to store. The minimum you can do is 550 Mb. Unfortunately you can't use the wallet yet but that will be fixed in 0.12

Ok that's good news. What do you mean by not being able to use the wallet? I would need to sign transactions and listen for new incoming transactions, that's all what I need. The latter requires a wallet where to keep the private keys for signing.

edit:
But I could do my thing without wallet functions, all I need is my own (possibly C++) function for signing a raw transaction with the private key I'd provide. I need the pruned mode to allow me to construct raw transactions based on specific outputs, sign them and broadcast them. Is it possible?
Wallet functionality in a pruned node was disabled because it was still untested when 0.11.0 was released. It will be enabled in 0.12.

You should still be able to broadcast transactions using a pruned node, but I don't know about getting outputs since there is no wallet and txindex is disabled with pruning.

However you can just build the master branch from github for now and get the wallet functionality and then upgrade to 0.12 whenever they release it. It should be coming out in a few weeks.
8089  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Bitcoin-core: only keep last x blocks on disk on: December 18, 2015, 01:46:55 PM
Bitcoin core supports pruning. You can set it using the -prune=<size> where <size> is the size of the blockchain you want to store. The minimum you can do is 550 Mb. Unfortunately you can't use the wallet yet but that will be fixed in 0.12
8090  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Need help, 0 confirmation after 24 hrs + on: December 18, 2015, 03:43:03 AM
Your fees might be a little low, but the problem in those transactions are that one of the outputs in each transaction is a dust output. Dust outputs are outputs that have amounts less than or equal to 0.00002730BTC. Transactions that have dust output are considered nonstandard so they are less likely to be relayed and less likely to be mined as most nodes will reject such transactions. That is the problem with your transactions. All you can do is wait and hope they either get confirmed or are dropped by the network. If they are dropped, then you can resend them but without the dust outputs by either lumping the dust into the other output or into the fee.
8091  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Nonstandard Transaction in Mainnet and Testnet on: December 18, 2015, 02:10:12 AM
Of course you can use nonstandard transactions. But they are nonstandard, which means that they do not adhere to the standard rules. The vast majority of nodes will reject nonstandard transactions, which is why nonstandard transactions typically do not propagate very well. If you want to push it to the network and get the transaction confirmed, you will need to find a miner that will include nonstandard transactions into their blocks and you push it directly to them or their node.

Do you have any suggestion where to push the nonstandard transactions? I already tried eligius (http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/pushtxn.php) many times but no result.
No. Just look around at mining pool threads and see if they say anything about supporting nonstandard transactions. You can also PM the pool operators about it.
8092  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Nonstandard Transaction in Mainnet and Testnet on: December 18, 2015, 01:58:51 AM
Of course you can use nonstandard transactions. But they are nonstandard, which means that they do not adhere to the standard rules. The vast majority of nodes will reject nonstandard transactions, which is why nonstandard transactions typically do not propagate very well. If you want to push it to the network and get the transaction confirmed, you will need to find a miner that will include nonstandard transactions into their blocks and you push it directly to them or their node.
8093  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I found this pretty cool. The founders of Bitcoin on: December 18, 2015, 12:39:54 AM
Founding Members:  one of the original members of an organization, group, or company.
Founder/Co-Founder: The creator of a company/concept.
So by those definitions Satoshi is the sole founder since he is the only creator creator of the thing we call Bitcoin. The other guys, sirius, hal, etc. are founding members since they are of the original cypherpunks group who were interested in Bitcoin and joined the project after its announcement. They are not the founders.
8094  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I found this pretty cool. The founders of Bitcoin on: December 17, 2015, 11:43:55 PM
I don't understand why people think there is only one founder.... When there was a few people part of the initial development. People need to leave them alone, they did good to this world.
No there was not. There was only one entity called Satoshi Nakamoto which penned the original Bitcoin Whitepaper and wrote the code for the original v0.1 Bitcoin client. He was also the guy that mined the genesis block and did a lot of the early mining. Other people jumped on board to help in the early stages but they only joined after Satoshi wrote the whitepaper and they only contributed to code and hash power after Satoshi released the original client. Therefore they are not founders since they did not create Bitcoin themselves, they are only super early adopters.
8095  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: different signatures for different destinations on: December 17, 2015, 11:10:51 PM
I don't think that is possible. It may be possible to do if address B was a p2sh address that used a custom script, but I don't think it will be possible.

I am confused, with a custom script it is possible?
Possibly. I don't know as I haven't checked or tried, but it may be possible to create a custom script which requires different private keys. I think the OP codes have enough options for that logic, but as I said earlier, I do not know. You will need to try this yourself.
8096  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Best way to spend Bitcoin? Newbie's opinion. on: December 17, 2015, 11:09:21 PM
The best way is to spend it like normal money. There aren't many places that accept Bitcoin, but some online stores take Bitcoin, and you can buy things from amazon using purse.io. AFAIK Newegg, Tigerdirect, and dell accept Bitcoin. There might be some stores in your local area that also take Bitcoin, so you should check some maps and merchant directories like coinmap.org
8097  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: different signatures for different destinations on: December 17, 2015, 10:59:42 PM
I don't think that is possible. It may be possible to do if address B was a p2sh address that used a custom script, but I don't think it will be possible.
8098  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Blocksize needs to be increased now. on: December 17, 2015, 06:41:05 PM
Dude, the 8 MB limit is not each and ever block. If the cap is 8mb, and the current block size is 0.5 mb , then 0.5 mb blocks will circulate. The 8mb block is only the cap limit, not the default size.

There's no problem with 8MB blocks but do you have a way to deal with stress testers? Do you know how make their tests more expensive? Higher dust limit and Higher fees?

Maybe we should go to 2MB first which is a 100% increase.


Stress testers?  Disable 0 bitcoin fees. If they want to test, pay for it.

A stress test is the same as regular transaction. Pay and then they can send as many TX they want.

0 bitcoin fee should be disabled at protocol level. Minimum should be at least 1000 satoshi.

There is a minimum, not at protocol level but at the node level which is set by default to 0.00005. Any fee under that is not relayed by the node.

Also, the stress tests do not send transactions with 0 fees. They always send with enough fees.
8099  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory Tx failures; BTC Core stuck on (corrupt?) block 378056. on: December 17, 2015, 12:38:21 PM
There is nothing you can do to speed up the sync, and if you think you have corrupted blocks then it would be best that you do a full resync. Also make sure that all of your software is fully up to date.
8100  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] Bitcoin blockchain data torrent on: December 17, 2015, 03:27:49 AM
It's a standard zip compressed bootstrap.dat file, combining all blk*.dat files out of the blocks directory.
The actual bootstrap.dat is not compressed. The one you are downloading is, but it isn't the official one that was maintained by jgarzik.

Maybe we should discuss adding a zip level compression (or better suitable) algorithm to the Bitcoin-Qt client to reduce the amout of data needed to be transferred to update the block chain.
There is talk on the mailing list about block compression and ways to speed up syncing, but I don't think that any of it will be coming in the next release. It either isn't ready or there isn't any particular need for it. Using the actual bootstrap.dat (not the one that you used) is not actually faster than simply letting it sync.
Pages: « 1 ... 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 [405] 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 ... 590 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!