-snip-
Frage:
Kann ich jetzt einfach einen Dump auf dem Desktop und einen auf dem Laptop machen und diese auf dem jeweils anderen Gerät, ebenfalls über die Konsole, importieren um dann wieder "synchron" zu sein?
Jein. (siehe unten) Oder löscht er bei jedem Import alle vorhandenen Adressen bzw. private keys?
Nein, das nicht. Nur falls letzteres der Fall sein sollte:
Kann ich den Inhalt des einen Dumps dann unter den anderen Dump im Texteditor kopieren?
Kommt auf den Texteditor an  90% der keys sollten dann zwar doppelt in der Datei vorhanden sein aber wenn das keine Probleme bereitet dann würde ich mir es somit sparen, die Dumps in mühevoller Kleinarbeit per Hand durchzugehen und eine Importdatei daraus zu basteln ....
Einfach sortieren? Ist auch eigentlich egal. Kommen wir zum "Jein" oben. Bitcoin core generiert 100 Adressen [1] für dich wenn die wallet.dat erstellt wird. Diese werden dir aber nicht sofort angezeigt. Das selbe passiert nochmal wenn Du zum ersten mal ein Password setzt. Allerdings werden dann die unsichtbaren Adressen entfernt und neue erstellt. Wenn Du jetzt auf "gib mir eine neue Adresse"[2] klickst wird gar keine neue Adresse erstellt sondern eine aus der vorhandenen Liste gewählt. Dabei wird nicht immer die selbe Adresse gewählt. Das heißt, wenn Du bis jetzt maximal 100 Adressen benutzt hast, sollte das kein Problem sein. Die gesuchte Adresse[1] ist in beiden wallet.dat Dateien. Sie wird Dir nur nicht angezeigt. Wenn Du jetzt 100% sicher gehen willst ist es wohl am besten alle privaten Schlüssel zu exportieren und in eine neue (oder bestehende) wallet.dat zu importieren, wie Du das auch beschreibst. Dabei riskierst Du natürlich das Du irgendwo unverschlüsselte private Schlüssel hinterlässt. Im allgemeinen solltest Du Dir vielleicht eine andere Möglichkeit überlegen. Ab 0.10.0 wird es watch only adressen geben. Alternativ bietet sich vielleicht eine deterministische wallet an. Wird meist als HD bezeichnet. Die haben das Problem nicht, da key/adresse N immer gleich ist egal wie oft man vom seed neu generieren lässt. [1] und privaten Schlüssel etc. [2] hab gerade den Namen von dem Button nicht im Kopf und nutze die deutsche Version nicht. |
|
|
|
It's currently one of the most entertaining spammy spots on the web board, the way it is. Don't be so butthurt! nice, burn it with fire!
FTFY. No, seriously, just avoid that section and keep reporting those that are unable to find it. |
|
|
|
-snip-
I asking because shorena said "NO" they will not lift it.
Pay attention, I quote BadBear's answer from your last post about the same topic. |
|
|
|
In letzter Zeit häufen sie die Hacks von GMX Accounts, z.B der von Akka[1] aber auch Satoshis alter Account war davon betroffen. Falls ihr also einen Mail-Account von GMX genutzt habt um euch hier im Forum zu registrieren: ändert das! Falls euch das zu umständlich ist und ihr keinen neuen Mail-Account erstellen wollt/könnt/dürft etc., trefft wenigstens die nötigen Vorkehrungen ihn wiederherstellen zu lassen unabhängig von der Mail Adresse. Dafür am besten eine Eurer Bitcoin Adressen in einem Post einbauen der nicht gelöscht und nicht editiert werden kann. Falls das nicht auf dem normalen Wege gehen sollte, weil ihr z.B. nicht an Auktionen teilnehmt o.ä. könnt ihr auch eine Nachricht (PM) an DefaultTrust[2] oder einem Vertrauten schicken. Die PM darf hinterher nicht gelöscht werden! Wichtig! BTC Adressen in Signaturen oder anderen Bereichen können von theymos nicht geprüft werden und sind kein Nachweis! Hier die Nachricht von themyos dazu: It's best to include it naturally in a post. But if you can't, you can send a PM to an account that won't delete it (you could use DefaultTrust for this). After you send it, check your outbox and make a note of the PM's ID (visible in the quote URL).
-snip-
Falls es dann jemals soweit kommen sollte, schickt ihr theymos eine PM (von einem neuen Account) mit einer signierten(!) Nachricht. Diese Nachricht muss den Namen des Accounts enthalten, die neue Mail Adresse die hinterlegt werden soll (darf nicht zu einem anderen, z.B. eurem neuen Account gehören!), das aktuelle Datum und einen Link zu einem Post oder die PM ID in der die BTC Adresse zu finden ist mit der ihr signiert. Beispiel: -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
My account Shorena has NOT been hacked/lost. Please DO NOT reset the email to. The current date is 9th of January 2015
and this is just an example. The address I used to sign this message can NOT be found in a PM to DefaultTrust with the
ID #secret, because Id like to keep this a secret.
German translation:
Mein Account Shorena wurde NICHT gehackt. Bitte setzte meine Mailadresse NICHT zurück. Heute ist der 9. Januar 2015
und dies ist nur ein Beispiel. Die Adresse die ich benutze um die Nachricht zu unterschreiben kann NICHT in der PM an
DefaultTrust mit der ID #geheim gefunden werden, weil ich diese geheim halten möchte.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
18WgDVuiGY4A4mB8YEmVggEfSmFUUKxDcJ
IM7rsujs2kPRRkvfxnsqeiYtf+HdJ/SI1e2p5Qi8HStUB1iGsYssY31BEib26esFVZ/GXC+kQE9byd8yfba700Y=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Falls es dazu Fragen gibt, fragen! Insbesondere wie man eine Nachricht signiert und verifiziert sollte mal ausprobiert werden (mit der Lieblingswallet). [1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=917636.0[2] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=122551 |
|
|
|
-snip-
True.
gmx is a german website so it's only logical to assume that the gmx exploit affects mostly germans.
Yes, I changed my mailaddress/password for the board after reading this thread. Just to be safe. Edit: I also posted a warning in the german section, link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=918752.0 |
|
|
|
Quoting two unreplied questions.  That's great! Blocktrail is becoming better day by day. Just a simple question, using PHP, can this be used for faucets?
Do you have any plan to include a "broadcast raw transaction" function on blocktrail like the one on blockchain.info and blockr.io?
~~MZ~~ It takes time for them to reply here[1], might be better to just send a mail[2]. [1] check the post dates here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=756279.msg9289621#msg9289621[2] https://www.blocktrail.com/about |
|
|
|
Yes, my last payment was for 7.1.2015  I did not understand yet how the payment works. Sometimes it seems to be daily, sometime once in two days. Its manual. We will be switching to automatic withdrawal processing within 1 week.
Everything is taking longer than usual right now due to the Holidays, but everything will be back on track on Monday.
|
|
|
|
My Account was also hacked. My Emailadress was also on GMX. But how i can received my Account "Acura360" back?
Passwordreset don´t work for me, i didn´t received the passwordreset email.
Scheint viele Deutsche zu betreffen gerade. translation: Seems to happen to plenty germans lately. |
|
|
|
one coin one wallet.
be v careful when downloading and running altcoin wallets as they almost all contain coin-stealing trojans.
Multidoge is fine, Electrum for Litecoin is fine... it greatly depends on the coin. |
|
|
|
This post in itself would be ban evasion.
AFAIK, people are allowed to register a new account to ask about their ban here in meta. If they don't use their new account (posting or sending PM) outside meta, it won't be considered as a ban evasion. Yes, asking in meta about the status of the ban is fine. -snip-
Everything you said was right. I did break unintentionally and inadvertently the rules of the forums.
I respect the decision of the admins. But I would ask them to reconsider about it.
Thank you
You allready got your answer when you "demanded"[1] your ban to be lifted. No.
No.
Sir, can I ask you why? bad English, for one. also being too impatient to wait 7 days. [1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=881140.0 |
|
|
|
|
Ill stop following this thread, if anyone has any more questions regarding the threads topic, feel free to open a new thread.
Your "what is a raid level" discussion should have been removed, but apparently mods disagree about it beeing off topic.
|
|
|
|
To help you remember: take ginseng blll Why should a newbie trust you or me?
Because he would be better of if he trusted the majority of experienced users more than the advice of a random selection of users.
If you or me are scammers, that won't matter as long as the majority of us "veterans" are not.
Sure, but scammers don't profit from leaving feedback.
They profit from not having negative feedback.
Fair enough. I think I start to see the point behind your suggestion. Leave positive feedback wherever he "hit" and wherever we like.
But even if not, would it matter? Let pirateat40 leave negative feedback. So what?
That's only a problem as long as there's very little feedback at all, which is the one thing we should really change.
Encourage people to leave feedback more often.
While I like the notion of leaving more feedback, I think it should also be backed by a reason. I usually give very little about ratings without a reference. |
|
|
|
Why would you need the trust system?
I wasnt refering to me personally, but since you are asking: to help me remember. What I tried to say is: why should a newbie trust me or any other Sr.+? So why would it matter if someone you don't necessarily trust showed up "green" in this system?
Because in your system feedback by ScammerHero[1] would count as x2 regardless of his trustworthyness. Either that or there is more to it you did not explain, because you also say: If somebody really gamed the system, "we" would notice and should leave him negative feedback, which would easily counter his efforts.
which would not change the weigth of the scammers rating if I understood your proposal correctly. If our ScammerHero now runs around and leaves negative feedback because "reasons", what could "we" do about it? [1] This is meant to be a generic well known scammer with the rank of a Hero Member. Any resemblance to real persons is purely coincidental. |
|
|
|
How about a much more straightforward approach?
Get rid of the trust list, just treat each and every feedback the same, but weighted by the rank of the person who gave the feedback.
E.g.:
Newbie: x0
Jr.: x0
Full.: x0
Sr.: x1
Hero: x2
Legendary: x4
Staff: x8
(or whatever)
Give users the option to change these settings, i.e. one might chose to ignore ratings from anything below Hero and set Hero to x100, Legendary x1000 and Staff x0 (if they don't like staff) ;-)
That way, it'll be difficult to gather a lot of "fake" feedback, and it will be easy to counter by a small number of more experienced users.
Thats a bit broad isnt it? I dont trust all Sr. Members alike. In fact the rank has very little to do with the amount of trust a person deserves in my opinion. The rank just says: has been here long, posts a lot. Thats not what makes someone trustworthy, at least not in my book. It could also be gamed / bought. It would certainly raise the price of Sr. and higher ranks which might make this infeasible. |
|
|
|
Hi all, I am newbie with bitcoin. I am trying execute createrawtransaction function. But I can't see what each params are. In manual
--------------------
createrawtransaction [{"txid":txid,"vout":n},...] {address:amount,...}
Create a transaction spending given inputs (array of objects containing transaction outputs to spend), sending to given address(es). Returns the hex-encoded transaction in a string. Note that the transaction's inputs are not signed, and it is not stored in the wallet or transmitted to the network.
Also note that NO transaction validity checks are done; it is easy to create invalid transactions or transactions that will not be relayed/mined by the network because they contain insufficient fees.
-------------------
but I can't understand what is txid,
txid = transaction ID, e.g. 2c43f351a43be08df9efe38ac040d73e757593b2c43aba48cf016dd7dc433b1b link: https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/2c43f351a43be08df9efe38ac040d73e757593b2c43aba48cf016dd7dc433b1bvout.
Is the ID of of the output of the transaction. A transaction can have more than one output, thus you need to point at which output exactly you want to spend. What mean address:amount,
address refers to the address of the receiving party amount refers to the amount of bitcoins you want to transfer. Keep in mind that the sum of all inputs will be spend even if your output is smaller. Whatever is left will go to the miners as fee. Thus 1x 2 BTC input, 1x 1 BTC output = 1 BTC fee. what meaning ",...".
etc. It means there is no limit of the number of outputs you can create or the number of inputs you can use. I would appreciate for help.
|
|
|
|
Hello,
this is blizzen! I created a new accout "blizzen1", because my real account "blizzen" is hacked. I´m in contact with theymos to clear the situation.
greets
blizzen(1)
do you know how it was taken? Was a gmx email address registered with it? Last online-time was in december, an than was an activity on january 5th. Yes, there was a gmx-email-address, but i got no answers by request. Can still access the mail address or was that password changed as well? |
|
|
|
Well that was rather anticlimactic... Let me check this out dude This is not unusual specially on dice sites like Win88. I dont even get a decent streak in primedice Primedice is a big fcking cheat. I dont want to play there anymore. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
