@NeuroticFish
The two sections are already separated. We have Altcoin Announcements and Tokens. All coin ANNs go into Altcoin Announcements while ANNs of token projects go into the Tokens child board. So if you think about it, the "others" (altcoins) is also dividable on two.

If I understood the point kxwhalexk was trying to make in his OP, he is asking why we have a child board for tokens when they could all be together in the same Altcoin board. He wasn't proposing to create a new category, he was just asking why there are two separate categories. In my first post I tried to explain why it's necessary.   

I don't follow Formula One so I can't comment on the individual markets and what exactly they mean. I will have to trust that your analysis is correct because I don't see a reason you would post this and not tell the truth.

But just for the record, is there a theoretical chance that a driver can win his Head-2-Head without winning the race? Similarly, can someone win a race without winning the Head-2-Head.

There is a clear difference between the two.
Altcoin announcements is a place where you would go to announce a new coin with its own blockchain. The original Monero and Litecoin announcements were posted there and that's where they belong. Tokens don't have their own blockchains and use the infrastructure by one of the coins. Like ERC-20 tokens use the Ethereum blockchain.

Those two shouldn't be in the same category because If I want to check what's new in the established altcoins world, I shouldn't have to go through threads about ICOs and unlisted ERC20 tokens. It works the other way around as well. Since you are an ICOer like you said, you shouldn't have to see the Monero and Dash announcements while you are searching for ICO projects. 

Technically it is, but I also understand that some people can't just disappear and be unavailable for 60 days. Especially those who run signature campaigns like Hhampuz who got temp banned. Imagine the drama if signature participants stopped getting paid for 30 or 60 days. You might say, he could still pay the participants even if he is banned and he doesn't need his forum account for that. But technically that could also be ban evasion because he keeps conducting the business he normally runs on the forum.

I understand what you are saying. However, if you and I made a deal where am I expecting a payment from you on Monday and you got temp banned today, I would still expect you to find a way around that and tell me how we should proceed. I would certainly do it if it was the other way around because my personal predicament can't be an excuse for breaking an agreement we had.

Oh you do, do you? How cute. And what do your other alter egos think? Will we hear from them as well?

Zavisi koliko imaš sreće ili nesreće. Na primjer ova ViaBTC-ova besplatna usluga omogučuje ubrzavanje 100 transackija svaki sat besplatno. I tu moraš biti brz da pošalješ svoju transakciju i riješiš captcha kod u prvih par sekundi nakon što kazaljka pređe u novi sat. Jer svi isto pokušavaju. Ako zakasniš par sekundi dok je velika potražnja, ništa od toga. A onda kad ViaBTC pronađe sljedeći blok, te transakcije će bit ubačene u njega.

---

Mislim da vrijedi spomenuti i da Lucius nudi svoju uslugu ubrzavanja transakcija. On koristi ViaBTC-ov besplatni servis. Ko nema sreće ili mu se ne da bačkat sa ubrzavanjem, nek pogleda i šta on nudi > Free BTC transaction accelerator!       

I veoma dosadno. Buljiš u tekstove i naslove i pokušavaš se sjetiti da li si tu temu pronašao ranije i već ubacio u tablicu ili te samo podsjeća nazivom na neku drugu sličnu njoj. A i nisam imao ni predstavu da ima toliko toga da je već pisao o LN-u.

U vezi čega? LN tema ili...

In my opinion, that is wrong. I have seen goals being cancelled in the Italian league because the ball passed the throw-in line during the attack that lead to the goal. If the referees can cancel a goal because of a throw in, they should have the ability to do it because of properly given (or not given) corners. As we saw from the Denmark - Czech Republic example, the referee's mistake f**ked the Czechs really hard.

Evo ova ​moja patnja od teme i borba sa vjetrenjačama (tabelama). Možda se nekome svidi. Doduše nije još završena jer trebam 2018 godinu dovršiti i poredati hronološki.Ideja je bila da skupim sve postove koji se tiču Lighning Networka na jednom mjestu. U Meti je bilo traženo da admini naprave posebnu sekciju samo za LN teme. Pošto se to nije desilo, ovako će postojati jedan pregled svega onoga što vrijedi i što ima veze sa LN na jednom mjestu.
​
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5345664.0

Wait, Trezor Suite web wallet? I thought they were just developing a brand-new Trezor Suite desktop application. I wasn't aware they are creating a new web wallet as well. In that case, https://wallet.trezor.io/ will surely not be used in the future once both versions of the Trezor Suite are fully operational. It wouldn't make sense having two different web wallets and causing confusion amongst the community.

It's because of the fact they talk crap that they have many subscribers. People like to hear how the next coin is going to get them rich and they seek out those who "promise" that. On the other hand, they'll get easily bored with just tech stuff although that is supposed to be the essence of it. And most of those crypto YouTubers always organize some giveaways, and we all know how big suckers people are for free stuff.

I don't think any government would spend much time educating people about cryptocurrencies. China is no different. Instead of banning bitcoin mining, they could have been more serious about ICO's/IEO's and unlisted coins and tokens. They already banned ICOs in 2017/2018 and prevented crypto exchanges from operating on the mainland. So the claim that they are protecting their citizens from scam projects and risky investments can't be true.

The goal should not have counted. It wasn't a corner at all. If you look at the play that lead to the corner, the ball touched the Danish player's foot before going out of play. The correct decision should have been goal kick for the Czech Republic and not a corner for Denmark.

I am surprised that VAR didn't notice this, or maybe they aren't allowed to make such changes regarding corner or no corner and that decision is left to the referees. But that wouldn't make sense since they can cancel the goal if the ball went out of play or there was an offensive foul, etc.   

You are exactly in the same spot as I was. You could maybe ask eneloop to delete his post, which is #3 in your thread. Since posts #4-7 are all yours, maybe you can make some changes and merge two of them together so you can continue with your table from post #2 in post #3.

Try PMing theymos and ask him directly, why not!? You can use SFR10's post and Lauda's thread as example that it has been done before. You have a valid request and I feel I did as well.

Exactly

Just to be 100% sure, have you tried unlocking wallet B before creating wallet C on 4.1.4 as well? Just to rule out the possibility that only the oldest wallet's password can be used as the "unlock password". That shouldn't be the case, but maybe the developers overlooked that part.

A difficulty adjustment like that would also depend on when during the current period the sudden drop of hashrate occurred. If it happened at the beginning and lasted for most part of the current difficulty period of 2016 blocks, the difficulty would be reduced more than if it happened in the middle and especially at the end.   

When you say temporary, do you expect the hashrate (the miners in China) to resume their operations soon or do you think the machines will move abroad and mine from somewhere else? I don't think neither of these two options will happen that fast.

The Czech Republic has been one of the most positive surprises of the tournament so far and I am rooting for that to continue. The odds are set against them today but I believe in another upset. The Danish side has played all their group stage matches at home. After the initial shock and the defeat against Finland after everything that happened to Eriksen, they got their act together and performed well as a team. They are now on a neutral venue and I am giving the Czechs a small advantage.

England is the clear favorite against Ukraine. Saka seems to be the only doubt for tonight's match. I'd like to see Grealish in the team from the start because they seem to be performing better when he plays.   

Thanks for doing that, but I really wished it could have been solved in a different way without causing inconveniences where other users have to delete their posts. Especially after what SFR10 wrote about Lauda's thread.

So it is possible to do. Let's see if someone from the mod/admin team will respond. Since Charles-Tim already deleted his post, things are OK now in my thread, but this could be interesting for other users who might find themselves in a similar situation. I didn't judge well enough how much space those tables would take and thought there wasn't so much LN content.

If China cared about the environment and wasn't interested in eliminating the competition as a preparation for the digital yuan, why not kill off every industry that doesn't use renewable energy? If too much fossil fuels are used in the mining operations in China, why not give the miners a deadline of 1/2/5/10 years to switch to better sources of electricity instead of preventing them from conducting their businesses within a few days or weeks?

There are uneducated people all over the world who invest in bitcoin among other things. Your statement that they are trying to protect its citizens is simply wrong. Gambling is if I remember correctly banned in China, but you are allowed to play lottery in locations the state deems as good (the ones run by the state). How do you comment on that? Chinese citizens are protected from losing money in private casinos and sportsbooks, but they are free to lose it in establishments that pay taxes to the government and are operated by them.    

That's because bitcoin's adoption rate hasn't reached a stage where you can use it everywhere you go. You have to convert it to fiat if the other party you buy from doesn't accept bitcoin. Imagine it being the other way around. If you lived in a place where everyone takes bitcoin and avoids fiat. You wouldn't have to exchange your bitcoin to USD because you can get everything you need with BTC already.

Very weird assumptions you are making there OP. If Bitcoin can't be controlled, tell me, what happens if all miners shut down their equipment and stop mining forever? How will your next transaction be confirmed? Isn't that a way in which humans can control the network? I am not interested in what the chances are of something like that happening, only that it is theoretically possible. Didn't the Chinese government take control and decide what the Chinese miners can and cannot do a few weeks ago? No one can control Bitcoin you say, but can you run your mining operations without electricity?

What about full-nodes and the decentralization aspect of Bitcoin. Can't that also be influenced if all full-nodes left the network for whatever reason and we would be down to just two? Is bitcoin then a decentralized currency?