Some governments are already beginning to encourage the creation of projects in the blockchain, so I imagine that soon it will become a habitual way of doing business.
The governments just can't stand anything they do not manage to control. They are creating national crypto, blockchain projects of their own. Only a few of them are able and willing to support blockchain projects created by the third parties. That will probably last until some truly international cryptoproject appears |
|
|
|
According to icomarks the soft cap for the project is 15K ETH but what if that amount is not raised by the end crowdsale? If they do not collect a soft cap, they will continue to develop the project with the money that they will have. This is my forecast. Since I do not think that in this case they will close the project and return the money to investors. Maybe, but what is the point to make a softcap, if they go further no matter, how much money they raised? Usually they stop the project and give the money back. I think the figures on ICOmarks are wrong since they state the soft and hard cap in ETH while in the white paper there is no soft cap and the hard cap is 35 million US Dollars. You can't really convert it due to the volatility of crypto. One day 1 ETH is $750, the next day it is $1000. I guess the smaller sum (either in ETH or USD) will go at the end of ICO regardless the situation in the cryptomarket. But they probably equalled ETH to some fixed price in USD while calculating their caps. |
|
|
|
The Repu token was invented to give people a reason to give ratings. People usually vote on the extreme ends. It's either a perfect 5 stars or it totally blows. Is the Repu token reward going to be worth enough that people also bother with meh ratings? And even then how are you going to compensate for the extreme ratings?
Extreme ratings are part of the process. It is taking the average of all votes. So even every vote is extreme it will make an average point around somewhere logical. There should also be some more complex logic in play but, in general the system will need lot of data to calibrate It's really interesting how complex the topic is. Fake ratings, extreme ratings etc. I'm beginning to understand why there is no demo yet. This is cool, but they have to concentrate more on something precise and come to perfection there. It can be general or business rating system. Only after that it is wise to expand to other areas |
|
|
|
|
Well, I guess if they manage to create errorless blockchain paying system, they will have to have some people in customer service in case of misunderstandings and technical issues. Generally, I think the automatisation of the system would be great.
|
|
|
|
|
From the VERY START, they need Europe or the US only. That would be more than enough. But in a month or two (in case of successful launch), they have to introduce the system to other parts of the world. However, if it is possible as of now, they may start their project in as many countries as possible.
|
|
|
|
Partnership will come, i am sure. Lets first the pre ico start  yes thats true, and I hope one of its partners is the same streaming platform or at least one of the storage media or streaming movie and can increase the number of investors coming The possibilities to partner with Storage companies are great, unless Time thinks, will eventually work this side of the lockchain, and form an independent storage service, but I do not see any such information in your WPP Partnership is always a good sign. The only question is what it may bring to the success of the project. Frankly speaking, such project as CryptoFlix cannot wven exist without partnerships, so they are doing right things |
|
|
|
Any infos if the pre-ICO started or is the private sale still ongoing? I am quite confused now about this  check the website man, the closed round is now live Yes, but shouldn't it be over aleady? I think it should, but devs announced the private sale very late, so I guess it postponed the whole thing somehow. It looks a bit off actually, since we don't have any details about the main sale, usually these stuff are set in advance. postponing the main sale is correct choice, after the market recovers a little bit more, then they'll start the main sale. With this choice, they'll definitely raise more investment. the market has already recovered mostly. the sale is safe to start any time now. I am still behind in my portfolio which is all time high in the beginning of the january. So thinking from my point of view, we have some road to go:)but you are right markets gained trust from investors in last few days. The market hasn't yet fully recovered. A few weeks back we were close to breaking the trillion dollar mark. We are still far away from that mark right now. I hope we'll see it crossed over the course of this year. But try to see the bright side. The progress is visible and apparent, so it will hopefully go on further. As for total market capitalization, this is only numbers, we have to care of what we have not of everything |
|
|
|
|
We talk here about Sphere not Repu, you've chosen the wrong thread.
I kinda still thinking how they will realize the decentralized social network and how it will look like. Will it be really decentralized?
|
|
|
|
I hearty welcome the decision of burning the unsold tokens. Regardless of how many tokens get sold this will definitely increase the value of the tokens present in the market.
totally, otherwise would be pretty dumb to not burn the unsold tokens after the sale, since the value/fundraised amount of money they did so far, tokens would loose even more on value. Actually, in view of the success of the sales and everything that the project has achieved so far, both inside and outside the munod crypto, it is a wise decision to record the unsold tokens, one can expect an excellent initial trade, no matter where they come from start it That's the coin with two sides. Burning unused tokens can be useful in terms of the price of the remaining ones, but it can also be a bad method if these tokens will be needed for some reason. So before burning them, the devs should consider everything thoroughly |
|
|
|
i really hope that they make a vlog during this event and tell us something new.
I doubt that. If this will be just presenting the project, he will probably tell the things that we alreasy new. Anyways, I will watch video later on if it's available |
|
|
|
What will be sphere's monetization scheme like Facebook has ads?
It will be stated in whitepaper as business model. They plan to create an ad platform. Advertisers can pay with SAT tokens for the ads. well I use adblocker everywhere and millions others also like me. I use it as well sometimes, but there are also millions that do not use any adblocking software. Moreover, some types of ads are allowed by adblock |
|
|
|
I saw one in ads in YouTube. Forgot the name . I'm sure there are many others out there which we haven't come across yet. Bitcointalk isn't the only [Suspicious link removed]munity
There are several of them like MedicalChain, but I don't wee them (at least now) as serious rivals to eHealth. You can browse them here - https://icobench.com/icos/healthWow, this is a long list. Hipfully the other ones are not faster because eHealth roadmap ist longterm. There are some got another approach like fitness but there are also some got nearly the same approach. But withouth spending that much time I have seen that the teams are much smaller and the information do not look that professional. At least the information in some whitepaper ;-) Competition is always good, but quality wins the game. If eHealth will be consistently doing what they planned to, I think they'll be fine. Besides, it's true that healthcare is conservative, that's why doing things slower might be better than doing them faster. Higher chance to succeed, imo. you have to be conservative in a field where every move can have such an impact on someone's life. slow and steady wins the race. if you dont run out of money meanwhile. thats why long projects need a really solid foundation and good longterm planning. review, rework, reproduce. I just looked through all those other health projects and they have much less worked out agenda than this one. But staying alert is a good thing anyways |
|
|
|
What will you do about subtitles and dubbing? Will you add them, if you do how?
Subtitle is the best , I don't really like dubbing. Cover as many language as possible would be good. Creating Subtitles can also be a job, where people are getting coins for making subtitles in their own language. To avoid misuse, some other people must have rated the translation as good, before you get the coins. Hey, that's a great idea! I used to do that shit back in the torrent days! Was that just an idea here of is it a planned frature. It would be awesome to implement a subtitle functionality where the community will be involved. It is not just translating. There also have to be processes to take care of the quality of the subtitles. It was just an idea, but I could imagine, that with a little brainstorming it can be a nice feature. Yeah, subtitles as well, I offered them to have different video quality and audio streams (if possible of course). With subs it will be even better |
|
|
|
When do they close the closed stage of contributions and start a public sale? Perhaps things will go better in public stage.
I think closed stage or private sale is the foundation of solid launch. Many who skip this struggles in this highly competitive ico market Sure, but they need to have a prior nice advertizing compaign so that such stages will be successful. The Repu's quite popular now, so that's not the case for them |
|
|
|
Why is everyone worrying about whether they reach the $10M mark? Do you think it will change things drastically if they do or don't? I would think the amount of funds raised is still plenty to reach their goals.
Interested to hear everyone's thoughts why the $10M is such a determining factor.
Maybe it's their soft cap? although the rating platform Icobentch writen that their Soft cap: 15,000 ETH ~13.8 mln of current value. No, it's not their soft cap. The whitepaper says that the team invested more than $5 mil of their own money, so there's no need for the soft cap, the project will be executed anyways. is this true? that the team invested their money just to realized the plans? hmm. regarding the 10M thing, that is not impossible amount to reach. they already collected 8.17M as of today, especially that BTC price is rising. as long as BTC will be bullish, then we can expect to reach even more than that 10M mark. Such project like MS has definitely the opportunity to collect their softcap even without their own money, even when the price of ETH or BTC will not grow further. But what is sure, the market is on the rise and that's cool |
|
|
|
|
This is funny to behold as the people who are not within the cryptoworld are trying to discredit it. Likewise, the people lucky enough to be inside, just share their thoughts about it. That concerns very famous people, who sometimes act like fools.
|
|
|
|
There are other health in blockchain campaign. What do you think about those competitions
Didn't saw other competitiors, do you have a name for us? I saw one in ads in YouTube. Forgot the name . I'm sure there are many others out there which we haven't come across yet. Bitcointalk isn't the only blockchain community There are several of them like MedicalChain, but I don't wee them (at least now) as serious rivals to eHealth. You can browse them here - https://icobench.com/icos/health |
|
|
|
then the pre-ico starts in a few days in my opinion will get good results from the early days, they have done a great job both in advertising and with the presentation of the project (demo), i hope to win the contest...
They have probably prepared already everything for a good start so I think you are right. I also have some plans for this stage)... |
|
|
|
If the AI will work as intended we will have a very nice tool to not get scammed (potentially on everything)
Repu is really something that can be used in many fields, and with the possibility of making credible what is credible, and enable us to evaluate as unreliable everything that brings us so much inconvenience in our daily lives. Among the projects I currently follow, it is perhaps the most hopeful of easy and useful application I agree that was my first thought when I saw it firts time. If it works properly is going to be a pain in the neck for scamers. With so advanced rating system, it may be harder to keep anonymous online. However, I think of this issue as of a positive one, because people should not only be accountable for their actions, but also stand by their words, either pronounced or written |
|
|
|
|
I would prefer they have not only different quality with different prices but also different audio streams so I can watch in original or in translation
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
