|
So, what's the news dev? I though it's over in the second round because of getting so little funding from expectations. Didn't think you would come here again to make this active again.
|
|
|
|
I think this is a large amount, buy Kauri from $1000 - $4999 to get a 25% bonus. Do you have a minimum purchase of this token?
You already type it, did you see it? $1000 is the minimum purchase to get 25% bonus. But I'm not sure people will go buy with that much amount, since ICO isn't a trend anymore this time. |
|
|
|
It seems like this is good news and the meeting there must be many important people I hope the meeting will have a good impact and hopefully the event will run smoothly yeah, we can have a hope for it. If it give a good impact, then Bancor will be more knownly and getting more attention among crypto users. So, this is could be a good chance to make it. |
|
|
|
Why do they swap tokens? Just for increase quantity of tokens? Do they think that this can help price? As I remeber mainner was planned to launch in Q3... is everything is still going according plan?
Maybe they think like that "it can help the price" because I see the swap ratio is 10:1. this is really make a lot of supply reduction. So clearly, that is the main goal, the dev want make Vanta more valuable. |
|
|
|
The development is looks slow, so it is not wrong if the volume of aelf token on yobit does too small or looks like it will indeed experience death. |
|
|
|
got some message deleted too, few month ago, well now seems someone is pushing the coin but volume still very low at the moment
Maybe that someone is the developers that still have some hope in his heart, however it won't be too influential because, pushing requires large funds if done by a person. That's where the community needed to alleviate it. |
|
|
|
better choise if investing in this project is buying XPOS and be partner with pundix, built your own comnunity, spreading your sales product than you buy token and hold it.
its hard to pump token price, IMO.
It's true, it was the best move until now. Buy and hold is might be the most boring thing. Expect to pump token easily? we will never seen it. Pump token price will require compactness in the community. |
|
|
|
if HitBTC removes the SUR-BTC, SUR-ETH, and SUR-USDT exchanges, the nightmare will really happen,
I hope the developer will keep the volume in the market
The only one thing that will be happen is SUR token will become trash token, it will not worth anymore. Sad to see this happen because dev team started to beat around the bush with the development. Even though SUR price dropped after ICO, at least he have it, and it will be not anymore. |
|
|
|
Participant it has been quite a long time waiting for distribution, since the bounty officially ended and until now the jinby team has not given the latest news about when the participant payments will be made, it seems like the jinby project will never pay its participants and for jinby project participants it seems there is no need to expect payment because it is clear it will be useless.
It’s not useless, cause there were a buy back 50/50 in ETH, even this token will never get any value, ETH has a market value, so, bounty huners should not let them just go away like that Really? What I think is if there's no bounty distribution, buy back guarantee in ETH is also useless, same as bullshit. Because we never get his token, what we would be convert to join the buy back program later? |
|
|
|
Mining really is a good option than ICO/IEO only if you have the resources to run a mining farm. It would consume large amount of power and a powerful rig is needed to cater the data processing faster.
It will need someone who has a high economy, would make sense if the rich will become more rich after that. Mining with sufficient funds, will only get losses, so money in the pocket is a solution to patch it. |
|
|
|
There are regional restrictions because of legal requirements, cryptocurrencies are banned in some countries, and project have to respect that, although users can also register for those bounties without disclosing their real country or region, but it will be at their own risks.
Yeah right and it cannot be underestimated, without restriction a project will look ugly by some groups. So we must understand, because it was not made by the will, but the different rules that created it. |
|
|
|
I don't think it needs a separate question to get feeling from others for the scam projects. Its absolute no. But how can we find it in first instance when the project it scam.
There's a guide how to find it like follow this thread instruction and you'll see it's scam or not. but my way is different, I only promote selected projects run by trusted managers. That's the way I avoid a scam project. |
|
|
|
|
Not a big deal for me to see it, all I believe is that the price will be higher than it is now. It looks like a small drama on the market and an opportunity for traders to make a profit. Long live the king.
|
|
|
|
|
#Authentication Post
Type of campaign: Signature
Bitcointalk Username: necromastery
ERC20 wallet address: 0x179c8174792e42035b034d7ffd68410608bec62e
|
|
|
|
I cannot recommend to hold "shitcoins"...it's too risky if you are here for a long-term ,shitcoins are good only for short-time speculation to increase your amount of btc or dollars.
Yeah I didn't think to do it, never. It was depends on high luck, like gambling. Because normally, every time I have shitcoin, in the near future, the coin loses its price. Looks I'm really not suitable for that. |
|
|
|
What ?? Are you sure about this concept, able create, list and trade shitcoins. The question is who people will buy shitcoins ? that means wasting money. Why must trade shitcoins if we can trade more profitable with choosing the major coins??
Such people have lost their minds. For me that's really does not make sense, the fact is people will not pay for coin that didn't have price in the exchange, if it have price in Shitcoins DEX it won't change anything. |
|
|
|
If you want to buy a profitable Altcoin then I suggest you buy in Exchange that has a large volume, such as Binance, Bittrex, etc. Then look at there the coins that have the largest volume.
The priority is to choose who doesn't use a bot to pump, because sometimes it's a fake volume. But I believe binance and bittrex don't use that. After see what's have the largest volume, don't be greedy while imagine a big profit. It's better to take little by little but it's often. |
|
|
|
Hello Bitcointalk Community,
i wondered if it is possible to do an ICO and an IEO at the same time?
Can i spread the total supply for fundraising and use half of it for an IEO and the other one for an ICO ?
I am looking forward to an response.
Kind Regards
Marian
I have seen some projects doing an ICO first, before going for an exchange for an IEO, one example is DEXAGE and this could become a practice, I don't like this idea, it's pushing the project funding timeline to its full limit, they should just choose between the two, if the project is good it will be funded, ICO or IEO. However, it still is a good idea if the project is really serious about the success and hate to fail. Running an ICO to collect some funds and to prepare for the IEO in a well-known exchange. Believe me, that the strategy is quite good and not a bad idea to do it. |
|
|
|
Governments are against everything that do not provide them taxes and revenue, privacy coins being anonymous and un trackable are the most troublesome for govts that want to track transactions, generally govts are against all coins but they cannot do much about them, even the fiat backed stablecoins like libra is not being supported or encouraged by govts rather they want regulations and taxes and control over them.
Because I have been in the crypto world for quite a long time, for me it is not surprising if I hear that the government is not very familiar with crypto currencies. Even in a short amount of time we can find out how much the government despises a transaction and people whose wealth cannot be traced. |
|
|
|
IEO and Ethereum are two different aspects and most of the IEOs have the different goals with Ethereum. So I don't think that IEOs are going to have any effect on the price of Ethereum.
Absolutely, "IEO success and eth go moon" Such think is a funny thing for me, although to participate in the IEO requires eth, it will not always make the price go up, like example because sometimes those who sell more than those who buy. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
