Won't limiting the spending of sMerits in itself cause people to farm their merits.

If someone told so many users that their sMerit will be decaysed by tomorrow, a lot will probably be more inclined to sell their sMerit immediately and get something from it (which is what we are really trying to avoid here).

If your electrum is the latest version, try using this: https://www.reddit.com/r/Electrum/comments/7cjzuv/how_to_disable_2fa_from_wallet/ - by adding the secret (if you have it) into the wallet so it can sign itself.

If not the latest version, there was a bug a while ago so try updating it to the most recent version (there may have been other bugs that went fixed but weren't as major to be reported).

The majority of the forum uses the same file (index.php). Most of the stuff comes through that. Other than things like the seclog and modlpg which are separate.

This is the link to the post I just made:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3956687.new#new

If the array was (,1 hours,1 minutes) would that still get picked up by your code or do you have to look at the individual indexes in more detail? (I haven't used php very much).

I didn't think there was such limit?
There might be a ranking system so higher members get seen first, however, they probably look at PMs from everyone.

Notice how the mail just said you had to "read" some of them? It didn't say you had to actively controbute to them.

I'm guessing this has probably happened to other users before though.

I'd strongly suggest you don't post anywhere else until you get a response from a moderator on this, BAN EVASION (posting on a board other than meta is against forum rules while you have a ban and ALL accounts will be permabanned).

$1 Billion gives a bit more security than $5 million. You can do a bit more with it without worrying about the loss of funds for certain things.
It's true, that $5 million would sustain people quite well. It was said that $2-3 million is the average amount someone spends in a rich country in their lifetime so that is all that is really necessary (this is also the amount earnt).

There is also an issue that if you do get $5 million or more, you don't need to work and if you don't need to work then you have to find other ways to preoccupy yourself and it just turns into something where lots of people hate work, however, lots of people would also hat eto be paid to do nothiing and live in isolation for the rest of their lives (ie. everyone else you know works and you just spend many hours on your own and get to a point where you either have to work or get extremely bored and lonely further than you already have been from when you got the $5 million).

And it is true that everyone wants more than they can't have (generally).

So you wanted someone to give you 30% for free?

70% isn't enough. It may as well be 10% or 0.

Scroll down to the bottom left of the screen and you'll see a "lock topic" link. Once you have locked it, scroll up to the top of your post and you can delete it (since we already have evidence of your scam attempt).

0.0012BTC is a bit on the small side, you might want to wait until you get more coins.

Also, what does the 10% fixed rate mean? Is that 10% a day, a week, a month, a year, a decade or the loan term? You should try to be a bit more specific.

I do think that North Korea would have offered to give up their nuclear weapons if Trump stopped aggravating them (unless they only gave it up because there was a fire on it). They could have been handled much better anyway then sending tweets to each other.

---

@OP, as you have previously stated here that they both have committed crimes, why aren't they both proscuted.

There's a preview button next to it that sends also? Click that.

It'll go through the send steps with a breakdown

You can't turn it off simply.

You'd need to get a copy of your other private keys and find a client that will take both and allow you to sign them (electrum probably will).

Where are the other keys, are they hosted by TrustedCoin or are they on a separate device is it a 2 out of 3, 2 out of 2 signing relation also?

Try using the preview screen to sign it instead also, that at least breaks down the steps.

Keep it "as is" then. He will probably block you transferring the thread anyway at this point since what he said.

The error wasn't fixed until about 3.0.3 though, I don't know what you're saying?

Disclaimer: I messed up the quote date also, I know.

To clarify on this, what do you mean by an "earlier version" - does that mean a later version.

2.7.x software and anything up to about 3.0.3 are prone to the errrors you have described, I had the same error, I think it was something to do with rejecting the migration from redgular addresses to bech32 addresses along with the code change from using python2 to python3. [aplogies I didn't pick this up earlier].

I don't think this will get fixed.

It's such a large fix for something that isn't really an issue and it alwo means an extra few lines of code that need to be loaded before the forum loads to validate the time. It's easier just to go with the plural version, it only makes a difference once every 60 minutes (for minutes), once every day (for hours) and only once for days.

I mean noobs fall for ponzis all the time (I did when I started), someone could fall for this in the same way now couldn't they?


Ooh, how mysterious... I have to ask for info, did I not already do that?


There's always my offer, whatever you send me, I give you 100% back -fees - now doesn't that look good heh ?

1. Op, you'll have to find another way to get round this.
2. The admins are usually pretty quick at replying, if you dont get a response, chances are that you're not going to get them to change the ownership now.

This is either spam or a scam.

Why only by PM, you should do stuff publicly, I guess since you claim you can earn 200% of your investment amount every week, we're supposed to not expect collateral since the risk associated with such investment even if it does exist.
You could at least suggest limits to how much someone can put in (min/max).

Who cares?
That's a little pedantic.

It should say: "Stake your public keys here" but instead it doesn't.
Any public key can be used for verification providing it has an algorithm that is more or less collision free (or at least believed to be like the sha256 encryption type is).