|
Nothin really just localhost, user, pass
what error are you getting?
|
|
|
|
|
IS there a benefit of using nogpu.exe vs no gpu in config file?
|
|
|
|
Of course oops do u have a debug, cpu fixed?
Not today, at work... gimme another day. |
|
|
|
oops do u have a debug, cpu fixed? Sadly it's crashing the 17 lancelot instance every 10 minutes
cgminer.exe caused an Access Violation at location 0045b0b9 in module cgminer.exe Reading from location 1b30d66a.
That's not a debug build so that is useless as well I'm afraid. |
|
|
|
Sadly it's crashing the 17 lancelot instance every 10 minutes cgminer.exe caused an Access Violation at location 0045b0b9 in module cgminer.exe Reading from location 1b30d66a. Registers: eax=00000020 ebx=01e151e0 ecx=00000058 edx=1b30d66a esi=00000000 edi=00000016 eip=0045b0b9 esp=06b6f6ac ebp=00000000 iopl=0 nv up ei pl nz na pe nc cs=0023 ss=002b ds=002b es=002b fs=0053 gs=002b efl=00010202 Call stack: AMAZINGAMAMAMAMMAMAIIZNZING 0.2% About 5-10% better still over 60%
Well I don't think that's the cause then if it's only 5%. We'll investigate further. I've found a place where a fair amount of cpu usage might be lost. You might want to try the new binaries I uploaded again here that try to kerb that: http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/temp/Heh, that's more like it  |
|
|
|
|
cgminer 3.2, 3 lancelots
server=1
daemon=1
rpcuser=bteuser
rpcpassword=pass
rpctimeout=60
rpcport=7352
port=7353
maxconnections=20
printtoconsole=1
|
|
|
|
I'm assuming so. All the blocks found were mine. http://screencast.com/t/BgtR1NlSaI am the ONLY one who mined 3 blocks in the last 3 days. Without merged mining transactions can't even happen. Asic users will continue to attack bytecoin and no one will be mining bytecoin. How exactly will you use bytecoin without transactions being able to confirm? It is useless. Right now I am putting 1.2 ghs for respect but if merged mining fails, I will be removing it. Attacks will continue and no one will be mining bytecoin when they can mine btc, nmc, ixc and nmc all together as I do.
This is a last ditch effort to save bytecoin. Again, how will you use it when no one is mining? You can't send bytecoin without blocks.
Wait are you the network's only hashpower? I will gladly mine some too if you are. |
|
|
|
|
I am the ONLY one who mined 3 blocks in the last 3 days. Without merged mining transactions can't even happen. Asic users will continue to attack bytecoin and no one will be mining bytecoin. How exactly will you use bytecoin without transactions being able to confirm? It is useless. Right now I am putting 1.2 ghs for respect but if merged mining fails, I will be removing it. Attacks will continue and no one will be mining bytecoin when they can mine btc, nmc, ixc and nmc all together as I do.
This is a last ditch effort to save bytecoin. Again, how will you use it when no one is mining? You can't send bytecoin without blocks. Forking sounds bad I know, but you don't lose your bytecoin! All we get is massive mining and much fairer. Pools will work better when blocks are found every 10 minutes. Difficulty won't raise much. It's already raised because of the attacks.
|
|
|
|
Subbed does anyone here want to help me test this thing out? are there any mailing lists? or lists of addresses i can subscribe to? here is my address BM-or9zPodxMUmkrmVVGCSV9xT1AibwdTFK9 if anyone subscribes to me ill publish content just for the hell of it!
|
|
|
|
|
Mine below in sig is running on aws
try min, its fee free
|
|
|
|
|
getinfo still says 355 but not a big deal
|
|
|
|
|
PS Why no mailing list blasts?
|
|
|
|
AMAZINGAMAMAMAMMAMAIIZNZING 0.2% About 5-10% better still over 60%
Well I don't think that's the cause then if it's only 5%. We'll investigate further. I've found a place where a fair amount of cpu usage might be lost. You might want to try the new binaries I uploaded again here that try to kerb that: http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/temp/ |
|
|
|
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=zHEKaHfgYes reliably. Will post tomorrow. It gets tiresome using rdp on my phone.
No rush. We greatly appreciate the debugging but take your time. This is the unfortunate cost of such heavy development, and we're heavily dependent on users testing scenarios we can't reproduce ourselves.
|
|
|
|
|
GUI fixed!
Still requesting
X to minimize not exit
Incoming port with proxy
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure about Linux but on Windows you should no longer have com ports
|
|
|
|
|
These guys are more shady than an eclipse
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah I'm disgusted by devcoin, it's embarrassing having the word developer in it
Great work markm
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
