Mmm Hmm... Meanwhile, the average BTC block size has been creeping up again. We may already be on the edge of the next blockalypse.
 The first blockalypse never happened. What has happened since December 2017? BCH's market share has plummeted and bitcoin has survived just fine. Which of course will be accompanied by ever-lengthening confirmation times, and soaring fees. Once BTC returns to its eventual equilibrium of unusability, where do you think the tx demand is going to go?
Well that's easy: Lightning Network. Nobody likes Roger Ver and the only thing Faketoshi is good for is leading a circus. You still don't get it: nobody wants to back a loser or a proven fraud. I suspect you'll never get it. |
|
|
|
You don't dare engage me in a logical discussion because you know you can't succeed.
BTW "you know you can't succeed" doesn't sound like a good premise for a discussion. Can we take a minute to appreciate how telling this statement is? "You don't dare engage me in a logical discussion because you know you can't succeed." So what is TS trying to say? There's just no point in being logical with him? |
|
|
|
I smell something fishy with this thread, seems the people behind are using the controversy of JPM about being critical to Bitcoin, and they are using it now to collect funds? New era of scamming people isn't it?
I am agree with you,something is not right here. I am currently research the links provided by op. Honestly, project looks like too good to be true. What links? This project is so badass it don't need no stinkin' links. Maybe its just not for you, bro. If you can't handle the heat, don't come a knockin'. Or something. edit: how can this guy be currently researching links if they don't exist?? |
|
|
|
If you don't like the trust system, then don't use it. Right now it is only relevant for low end sig spammers.
Jet Cash, that is easy for some one who does little to no trade here to declare. It like saying no one needs air tanks because you don't ever go scuba diving. It gets used against you like it or not. Can you explain why this matters so much to you that you've talking about it every day for months? Is limiting negative trust beneficial for you or your potential clients? I don't understand the connection. You have to be more specific if you want to garner sympathy. |
|
|
|
This Bitcointalk sponsored ICO is completely SCAM:  Even their team members are FAKE! McWhortle? Who the McFuck is that??!? Imagine having the nerve to publish an ICO with a fake team. |
|
|
|
''CGI animations and photorealistic paintings.'' Because god wanted to fuck with us? Like what kind of logic are you even using lmao.
Prankster God strikes again. "Photorealistic" of what anyway? If it's not real to begin with, how would we know how to make a "realistic" rendering of it. Besides, his "earth without water" picture isn't that at all. What it actually depicts is the Earth’s geoid: a way of describing Earth’s gravitational field.Guy is a photorealistic tool shed. |
|
|
|
I updated my three posts on the first page again. The analysis has detected 3 new merit sources: 1) nutildahAhh you caught me! For months I was purposefully sitting on a stack of merits in order to not cross your detection threshold, but one night I couldn't help myself and gave out a few more than I should have. Well done, sir. |
|
|
|
First of all you have little if any trade under your belt here, so this is policy change is of little concern to you since you pay no costs for it being as it is.
From the very beginning: - It's OK to post a rating about the person in general, not tied to a specific trade.
What "costs" are you paying? How does this effect what you do? |
|
|
|
|
OP got the ball rolling on a 20-page long thread. I thought that was worthy of at least one merit, so there ya go. Its quite obvious most comments here are just bounty hunters looking for an excuse to write a post. Pretty sad that's the only reason why most people post or are here at all, but at least you have the decency to all stick to one or two sections.
|
|
|
|
This one is bad, but I'm pretty sure its sarcasm. Its right on the fine line between shitpost and satire. Hard to tell because I gave the guy his first earned merit. From a somewhat clever ANN for JP Morgan Coin: Jamie Dimon is the real Satoshi. I thrust him.
JP Morgan only wants a free world and distribute wealth equitably.
We need a professional inversor and projects like this, they are specialist in legit and profitable scams, they will put the ICO scene to another level.
I am in.
|
|
|
|
Love HoweyCoins but can't get enough (or any)?
Then you're really gonna love JP Morgan Coin.
- its light
- its right
- its Morganey, Dimoney, McDeluxeHope cross-promos are allowed in this thread.
|
|
|
|
JPM coin started with the ann topic looks like a joke.
I don't understand why such highly expected coin from JP Morgan launched with such terrible topic, very lack of essential information.
Sometimes things really are as they appear. Having said that, I think this is going to be the next biggest thing since HoweyCoins. |
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the help guys.
Meanwhile on their Telegram they are carrying on like its business as usual, but at least they won't be able to promote their scam here any more.
|
|
|
|
The beginning of the end. Bad Gateway, BAD!!! I feel sorry for everyone who got caught up in this. On the other hand it feels great to be right. I wonder what the whole "fire" ruse was about... they thought about exit scamming then but had a temporary change of heart? What a bunch of weirdos. |
|
|
|
In my prediction i think every price altcoin is still down because fail and scam project.A good project lock their token to save a fall price. But its not give effect to make their price is up because too little buyer in market.
Will the altcoin raise again in middle 2019 ?
I only believe altcoins have the potential to increase if the team working in it works well and consistently and if they have got a big support and can reach the target set according to plan, then the possibility of the project will continue to increase with many investors coming So did you buy this account or did you hack it? I need to know whether or not I should change my trust rating for you to a negative. Whoever you are, you're much, much dumber than the original kodtycoon. I also know that as a bounty hunter lobotomy patient, you'll never read this comment. So who's the real fool? Me I guess... |
|
|
|
TL;DR - Trump fulfills campaign promise, stock market rallies, liberals upset.
Wasn't his campaign promise that Mexico would pay for the wall? No. Not at all. This is an example of taking the rhetoric of a negotiator too literally. It's like fact checking the statement hamburgers "a mile high" and claiming it to be a lie. "I will build a great, great wall on our southern border. And I will have Mexico pay for that wall... Mark my words." - Donald Trump, June 16, 2015. Usually when people use rhetoric they don't say "mark my words" immediately afterward. There's not going to be a wall. As a former American who left because he was disgusted with American politics (and in general how full of shit mouthy Americans are), I know this as a certainty. |
|
|
|
This scammer's profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=317618
He took out two loans, and one bond on btcpop.co, a peer to peer crypto lending site.
(To view any of these links, you have to sign up. You can either use a temp email service, or just open a real account.)
This is the bond of .16 BTC https://bitblender.io/
This is the first loan of .1 BTC https://bitblender.io/
And this is his second "instant" loan of .066 BTC https://bitblender.io/
I PMed him here, and threatened to ruin his reputation here, if he didn't come back and repay his debts, even if that just means partial payments for now.
He admits it is his account.
Even if he could somehow argue that he "didn't" take those loans, he still deserves a negative rep for being an account seller. If he is willing to do it on btcpop, you can be sure he'd try it here.
He is also a scammer on Reddit's loan pages, although he has deleted his account there:
https://www.reddit.com/r/borrow/comments/7p91dq/unpaid_uonnz423_vantaa_uusimaa_finland_40_4_days/
https://www.reddit.com/r/borrow/comments/7r3hy9/unpaid_uonnz423_vantaa_uusimaa_finald_50eur_a/
He's still around on bitcointalk, and still doing signature campaigns. Please don't let this thief continue to make profits here.
If y'all have any questions about him, I'll be more than happy to share everything I know. Holy cow buddy, you even plagiarized your threat: This scammer's profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=321554He took out two loans, and one bond on btcpop.co, a peer to peer crypto lending site. (To view any of these links, you have to sign up. You can either use a temp email service, or just open a real account.) This is the bond of .16 BTC: https://btcpop.co/Bond/487This is the first loan of .1 BTC: https://btcpop.co/Loan/22323/altcoin-investmentAnd this is his second "instant" loan of .066 BTC: https://btcpop.co/Loan/22309/I PMed him here, and threatened to ruin his reputation here, if he didn't come back and repay his debts, even if that just means partial payments for now. The following is his message back to me: https://prnt.sc/k0wjd3He admits it is his account. Even if he could somehow argue that he "didn't" take those loans, he still deserves a negative rep for being an account seller. If he is willing to do it on btcpop, you can be sure he'd try it here. He is also a scammer on Reddit's loan pages, although he has deleted his account there: https://www.reddit.com/r/borrow/comments/7p91dq/unpaid_uonnz423_vantaa_uusimaa_finland_40_4_days/https://www.reddit.com/r/borrow/comments/7r3hy9/unpaid_uonnz423_vantaa_uusimaa_finald_50eur_a/He's still around on bitcointalk, and still doing signature campaigns. Please don't let this thief continue to make profits here. If y'all have any questions about him, I'll be more than happy to share everything I know. I think that constitutes a ban. Better try harder next time. |
|
|
|
I cannot find the software on their website. Did they remove it ?
I'd like to run that in a sandbox. Do you still have the file by any chance ?
Left a trust feedback to that profile.
Yep. I still have it. Furthermore, my Windows Defender just told me there was a CoinMiner "allowed" on my computer. If you want me to upload the original zip file let me know. Another thing: the software used to start automatically downloading to the computer of the website's visitor. This also seems to have stopped. I also left them a negative trust. |
|
|
|
Who decides who is right? If it is the community who decides, then the system is no different to what it is now. Trust ratings are countered and people are excluded over disagreements already - how would this change under your proposed system? If it is theymos who decides, then are you suggesting we simply move to a trust system based entirely on theymos' decision in every case (which would never happen as the workload would be insurmountable). Is there a third option I haven't considered?
You're exactly right, and hit the nail on the head. The guy just likes bitching above everything else. He works in "objective standards" for DT rules every chance he gets, but he never explains what they are or how they would be enforced. Theymos just made a move towards what he wants and now he's bitchier than ever. Why does he think everything has to be "political"? Am I a fucking senator or something? I'm barely interesting in the scheme of things. Furthermore, there is already a DT blacklist, and Tecshare is on it. The system allows for this situation to be reversed should he garner the votes to make it so. There's not much left to discuss. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
