IT IS YOUR JOB to provide sources. Could you be anymore pathetically lazy? You don't get to come here and just tell me to google it. I am not interested in spending endless hours looking for bullshit that doesn't exist. He who claims proves, so prove it. It is not my fault if you can't follow simple instructions.
I'm good with asking for actual proof of allegations. Seems reasonable. You know, I am for Trump, but if one were not, there are certainly enough things one might complain about without having to lie. |
|
|
|
.... So Bin Laden was responsible for 9/11? Interesting the FBI never charged him with any crime related to 9/11. Even after his death and they dropped all charges against him, none were for 9/11 A U.S. judge has dismissed all criminal charges against Osama bin Laden following the al Qaeda leader's death in a military raid in Pakistan. U.S. District Court judge Lewis Kaplan, who had been presiding over the bin Laden case in Manhattan federal court, issued an order called 'nolle prosequi', which means 'do not prosecute' in Latin, a typical legal move once a defendant is deceased. It closed the case after 13 years. Bin Laden was indicted back in 1998 in the Southern District of New York for his role in the al Qaeda attack on the U.S. embassies in Tanzania and Kenya, which killed more than 200 people, including a dozen Americans. The indictment was later revised to charge bin Laden in the dual bombings of two American embassies in East Africa that killed 224 on August 7, 1998, and in the suicide attack on the USS Cole in 2000. None of the charges involved the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. The court filing included an affidavit by a senior U.S. Department of Justice official describing the U.S. military raid on bin Laden's hideout in Abbottabad, Pakistan, in May. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2004914/U-S-officially-drop-charges-Osama-bin-Laden.htmlRead more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2004914/U-S-officially-drop-charges-Osama-bin-Laden.html#ixzz45M5xQPjD Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook I have NO IDEA what you are trying to get at. Let me help you out by summarizing these events. Bin Laden, a follower of evil Islamic branch started by Sayyad Qutb, did bad things and the USA targeted him. Eventually we killed him. After we killed him, charges against him were dropped. What is the point of pursuing criminal charges against a dead man? |
|
|
|
....
Trump is a racist, a bigot and dare I say.....a cunt of the highest degree. He's a spoilt little brat who got rich from daddies cash, probably faps over naked pictures of Ayn Rand in his secret cuckold dungeon, ffs he can't even get a decent haircut....
Let's have those quotes. Better, let's have those pictures and the secret recordings of your porn fantasies. Oh....wait.... There aren't any? |
|
|
|
I've spent a lot of time in America but still don't get the state vs federal thing. Can anyone spell out how you can be selling it openly yet it's still classified by the DEA as a Bad Thing?
Let me make it Crystal Clear. It's not crystal clear. |
|
|
|
Boston Globe will publish fake front page as part of tmws Ideas section, w fake headlines from a trump presidency https://t.co/T1x0XlAKMP— Hadas Gold (@Hadas_Gold) April 9, 2016 Politico reports: The main story includes mentions of an Attorney General Chris Christie, and Fox News’ Megyn Kelly tweeting from a bar because she’s been placed on a White House black list. Other stories on the fake front page include “U.S. soldiers refuse orders to kill ISIS families” and details such as new libel laws targeting “absolute scum” in the press. Another story is about how Trump had offended the Chinese first lady by naming his new dog after her. An editor’s note at the bottom of the page explains why the paper chose to create it. “This is Donald Trump’s America. What you read on this page is what might happen if the GOP frontrunner can put his ideas into practice, his words into action. Many Americans might find this vision appealing, but the Globe’s editorial board finds it deeply troubling,” the editor’s note reads. I'm okay with Megan Kelly working in a bar. |
|
|
|
And Bernie Sanders wins Wyoming!
55.7% to 44.3% (+11.4%)
Yet somehow they each get 7 delegates?
Why does Hillary win every split? Did she win 6 coin-tosses in a row again?
Starting to Feel the Game? |
|
|
|
So Splendaboy believes government? So sad. Why would the US government plan this?.?.
.....
Here is your problem. You are trying to make up something then claim that I believe it. That's called lying. Why not just look at what I have actually said or calculated. I'm sure there's enough there you won't like. No explain why the US government would plan to blow up its own military ships. Make exact copies of planes and fabricate a story like it was shot down, and on and on TO CONVINCE SHEEP LIKE YOU TO GO TO WAR. I don't have to read anymore. You are still wondering where the people and planes may have gone. Same place as the fake plane in Operation Northwoods maybe? You mean, what? Northwoods was rejected as a bad plan. Why would I defend it as a good plan? I am not wondering where people and planes went, because I saw the planes hit the towers. I have relatives in New York that saw it with their own eyes, one of whom exited the World Trade tower 1 some fifteen minutes before it was struck. As far as I am concerned, you can have a conspiracy theory about 911 and be sincere. But if your conspiracy theory does not stand up to critical examination, you are a propagandist. Take your pick, buddy. Lol go away troll. Why would you watch a random plane take off and follow it all the way to the towers when you didn't even know it was going to the towers? Check and mate. Since that isn't even related to what I said, I conclude you have a political agenda and are a liar in pursuit of that agenda. Eg, a propagandist. Have a nice day. A plane they had no idea what it was going to do? How lucky is that? And I'm a propagandists? Lol Well, let's see. Because people from those aircraft called others on their cell phones? Because these two planes were tracked on radar? Because things were identified in the mess that came from people on the planes? Yes, if you mindlessly repeat things without thinking about them, you are a propagandist. The essence of propaganda is to get it repeated over and over - by naive, gullible but well meaning people. Have a nice day. |
|
|
|
... this is only a stupid idea, like the one of a universal basic income.
Perhaps not in all future societies. Say if robots did all the work or something like that. But today in the sense of take away from some and give to others, yeah it's incredibly stupid. |
|
|
|
that was a simple planned terror attack of US to entry in Muslim countries on the name of terrorism.
and now that has been proved that US has did it.
US has get entry in almost most Muslim countries on the name of terrorism.
an ruin them just for its benefit.
Bah. None of that is true and you know it. If the US wants to go to war in the Middle East, it will do so and you know it. No need for some fanciful complex plot. No need at all. Your kind of talk is purposeful disinformation, twisting the truth around to make aggressor be victim, and victim be aggressor. Bin Laden's stated reason for his attacks was the US presence in Saudi Arabia. Check out the broad variety of Muslim terrorist attacks. Given the truly huge number of them worldwide it's rather laughable to try to argue that some are faked. You have so many real ones to pick from! www.thereligionofpeace.com |
|
|
|
These fucking Democrat primaries are too complex. Why can't they make them simple, like the GOP primaries? ...
What? Eliminate all those juicy opportunities for corruption? |
|
|
|
If the super-rich actually paid what they owe in taxes, the US would have loads more money available for public services
"The Tax Justice Network estimates the global elite are sitting on $21–32tn of untaxed assets. Clearly, only a portion of that is owed to the US or any other nation in taxes – the highest tax bracket in the US is 39.6% of income. But consider that a small universal income of $2,000 a year to every adult in the US – enough to keep some people from missing a mortgage payment or skimping on food or medicine – would cost only around $563bn each year.
A larger income, to ensure that no American fell into absolute abject poverty – say, $12,000 a year – would cost around $3.6tn. ....
What's your opinion?
Bah. Ridiculous. Illegal immigrants would simply expand the "lower classes" and absorb any amount of money thrown in that direction. |
|
|
|
i do no think she is trustworthy.
many times in poll she appears as untrustworthy.
This is true however it is easily fixed. Just redefine "Trustworthy" to mean "untrustworthy." |
|
|
|
I am here to just say one thing? Why do YOU hate people? and you should really give a valid reason not a shitty one that says 'Because Jews, Because Christians, Because Atheists'
and Yes, I am a people's person for those who ask, just tell me, come out of your shell and say why you HATE people like myself, and I could be here to clarify things to you, or not...
Also here is something that most muslims mistake about people's person like me is that "Christianity or Buddhism hate other religions" for this I say, Christianity or Buddhism does not hate ANY religion, but they suggest to 'invite' them to Christianity or Buddhism or Judaism, as slowly, and peacefully, even if they refuse, you can try and try, until it's their choice, you stop. and for all the wars that happened, it's because this other religion decided to come into war on Christianity or Buddhism or Judaism.
If you need anything clarified, I may not be here to answer you, don't be scared, I won't be offended by anyone, also haters, you can reply, I won't care Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink  In other news -> Do not generalize. It's not being Muslim. People behave in different ways and whatever actions they take, it's all up to them, religion or not. You mean.... Plausible Deniability. Yeah right... |
|
|
|
Just wondering, is anyone here openly supporting Trump's decision to deport Mexicans? If so, why? I am not trying to judge the views or demands. I would just like to understand them. Not fight them, just understand them. Please quote and respond to me with your views if you are indeed a Trump supporter.
I am (and I am a Trump supporter.) Reading your post... it sounds more like you do not support deporting illegals at all... only in the case of them being criminals, which everyone can agree upon... nobody is arguing for illegals who are also criminals to stay here... those always get deported/extradited If you support letting them stay when they have an anchor baby, or if they are benign, or if they have useful talents/skills... then you support letting them stay, not deporting them... hate to break it to ya For me personally, I wouldn't deport criminals unless they committed malum in se vs. malum prohibitum. Then the culprit would have committed a dangerous evil crime as opposed to a regulatory infraction. I'm not gonna take thousands of dollars to deport a shoplifter. Especially if they only did it once or twice and never did it again. It's just not happening. I would much rather try deporting all the murderers no matter what race they happen to be. Yeah, here the way they get agreement on that is to agree on "felonies." Unfortunately a lot of felonies are not the major crimes they used to be. But it's widely recognized there's a problem with murderers and violent criminals going back and forth across the border. Remember, these people terrorize the illegal mexican population more than they terrorize the US citizens, because it is in those communities they live. Because of this I believe it's just political theatre, all the nonsense people are saying a la "Fear the Trump Plan." |
|
|
|
The point is not that it will prevent these things, but having the laws on the books would make it more risky for school administrators for example to stop creepers from trying over and over for fear of being cast as being discriminatory or being sued.
In a school situation there's not going to be many trans people out, maybe 3 or 4 in the whole school. Somebody that doesn't identify as trans goes in the other bathroom, give 'em hell. We could even go as far as to make it illegal to go in the other bathroom without a diagnosis of gender dysphoria from a psych. Carry a little card around showing you've been diagnosed and it's not a part time gig. There has to be a compromise somewhere in here.. My personal opinion is to simply relax the rules set. Meaning we don't need jail time for people that go into the opposite sex bathroom, and we don't need high school suspensions for it. But we don't need a whole boatload of increasingly complex law and regulation either, we need less of it. So why not just fire all those people who think their job is to make up rules about this stuff all day long? Legislation in one direction is as bad as legislation in another. If you think you can figure out "better, fairer law" you have been conned, my friend. We're on the same side here, I dislike the idea of any new legislation. Things were just fine when you quietly went in and out of your identified bathroom and maybe got a few weird looks. Now that all the media attention is on the new law people are a lot more trigger happy to do something about it. However, anything is better than getting arrested and put on the same list as someone stripping in public for going to pee. Thirty or fifty years ago a cop would never have dreamed of arresting a kid that took a leak in a dark corner of a street. Today they do and will. That tells you something. Worth thinking about. |
|
|
|
The point is not that it will prevent these things, but having the laws on the books would make it more risky for school administrators for example to stop creepers from trying over and over for fear of being cast as being discriminatory or being sued.
In a school situation there's not going to be many trans people out, maybe 3 or 4 in the whole school. Somebody that doesn't identify as trans goes in the other bathroom, give 'em hell. We could even go as far as to make it illegal to go in the other bathroom without a diagnosis of gender dysphoria from a psych. Carry a little card around showing you've been diagnosed and it's not a part time gig. There has to be a compromise somewhere in here.. My personal opinion is to simply relax the rules set. Meaning we don't need jail time for people that go into the opposite sex bathroom, and we don't need high school suspensions for it. But we don't need a whole boatload of increasingly complex law and regulation either, we need less of it. So why not just fire all those people who think their job is to make up rules about this stuff all day long? Legislation in one direction is as bad as legislation in another. If you think you can figure out "better, fairer law" you have been conned, my friend. |
|
|
|
Trump reveals plan to finance Mexico border wall with threat to cut off fundsBillionaire Republican frontrunner Donald Trump has finally revealed how he plans to force Mexico to pay for his multibillion-dollar wall along the US southern border, a linchpin of his presidential campaign that has never been fully detailed before. The key to the wall’s financing, Trump wrote in a two-page memo to the Washington Post, is threatening to halt money transfers from Mexican immigrants in the US to family back home. These remittances amount to nearly $25bn each year, roughly 2% of the Mexican gross domestic product, according to the World Bank. Cutting off these money transfers could doom the Mexican economy to recession and severely damage diplomatic relations. “It’s an easy decision for Mexico,” Trump wrote in the memo, written on campaign stationary emblazoned with his “Make America Great Again!” motto. “Make a one-time payment of $5-$10bn to ensure that $24bn continues to flow into their country year after year.” Trump has previously estimated the cost of building the wall at $8bn. In the memo, entitled Compelling Mexico to Pay for the Wall, Trump said that on the first day of his presidency he would warn the Mexican government of a new regulation that would allow for the government’s seizure of financial assets by immigrants unless they provide documentation establishing “lawful presence in the United States”. According to Trump, “the majority” of the amount sent as remittances comes from undocumented migrants.
The feasibility and legality of such a maneuver is unclear. “Trump is giving an extremely broad definition of this section of the Patriot Act and what it allows, and it’d surely be litigated,” Stuart Anderson, executive director of the National Foundation for American Policy, told the Washington Post. “It would be a large expansion beyond what the text reads.”
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/apr/05/donald-trump-mexico-border-wall-plan-remittances Bah. Mexicans are moving large amounts of money without any documentation. American citizens cannot do this, they have to report the reason for each transfer over $5000. |
|
|
|
When will people get over this battle?
Just accept that climate change is real and move on geez
The problem with this is that it has the same logical fallacy as the evangelist who asks you "Have you taken Jesus Christ as your savior?" If you answer YES, he has the privilege of retroactively defining the words and meaning of your affirmation. However, in your view, your positions may well be completely opposite of his. The problem thus is with YOU, and not those engaged in whatever you choose to call "battle." Because we all know and understand "climate change is real" is doubleplus good unreal speak. |
|
|
|
....WHY have we not got free clean energy systems ..I have heard plenty have been killed or bought out who invented these systems..Is this a lie..
Yes that's a lie...... In short, it is a patent for a device capable of producing unlimited free energy with zero environmental impact. A device resembling an electric motor which produces work without electrical input, using only permanent magnets for motive force. What some might call perpetual motion. What the inventor believes is the harnessing of energy not thought possible by conventional science based on "incomplete information and theory with respect to the atomic motion occurring within a permanent magnet." U.S. Patent Office Has Two Free Energy Devices on File ... www.apparentlyapparel.com/.../us-patent-office-has-two-free-energy-de... plenty of people wanting a patent for clean energy ..but can't get one...... Yes, those are lies. Anything in space in a vacuum will be in perpetual motion, but in a world of friction cannot be, unless energy is added to it. Nothing "produces work without electrical input." And it's ridiculous to think that the US patent office is a toolbooth allowing or preventing inventions. |
|
|
|
If you want to learn about the secret jewish government read this book: https://www.scribd.com/doc/31620243/Οι-Σαλονικιοί-Ντονμέδες-οι-ψυχοϊστορικές-συνδέσεις-τους-και-η-γεωπολιτική-στόχευσή-τους-Μέρος-ΠρώτοIn this book you can read about many criminal Jews like: Sabbatai Zevi, Jacob Frank, Arminius Vámbéry, Emmanuel Carasso, Gavrilo Princip, the pedophile Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, Talaat Pasha, Djavid Bey, Messim Russo, Refik Bey, Emanuel Qrasow, Vladimir Jabotinsky, Alexander Parvus, Eleftherios Venizelos, Adam Weishaupt and many others. Translate this book. It is very important. Looks really boring, man. Yawn. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
