Bitcoin Forum
July 04, 2024, 08:58:56 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 [415] 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 ... 591 »
8281  Other / Meta / Re: How can I attach a screenshot to the PM? on: November 30, 2015, 12:07:06 AM
Take a screenshot and upload the picture to https://imgur.com/. Then on the right side there should be a bunch of links for how to embed the picture. Copy the one for forums/BBCode and paste that into the pm.
8282  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Bitcoin QT not synching on: November 30, 2015, 12:04:59 AM
Thanks Knightdk.  Do you know how I can fix this?
Not sure.

Are you mining on your node? Do you have a miner pointed at your node? Do have gen=1 in your Bitcoin.conf? Are you starting Bitcoin Core with the -gen option? Did you at any time type setgenerate true into the debug console?
8283  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Bitcoin QT not synching on: November 29, 2015, 11:56:42 PM
Are you trying to mine at the same time that it is trying to sync?
Code:
2015-11-29 18:14:43 params.nPowTargetTimespan = 1209600    nActualTimespan = 1042157
2015-11-29 18:14:43 Before: 19070bfb  00000000000000070bfb00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2015-11-29 18:14:43 After:  19061242  0000000000000006124221c630a74eb92fd741b85fca40e852c970db51f963da
The above error only occurs when you are trying to mine from that node.

It looks like the problem is that it does not recognize block 271980 as a valid block.

BTW, you can ignore all of the AcceptToMemoryPool errors, those are ok and are just saying that the node is rejected a bunch of transaction since they don't match the rules you are enforcing. Usually it is for low fee transactions.
8284  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Bitcointalk Account price estimator on: November 29, 2015, 08:59:07 PM
How does everyone feel about the estimation? Is it too high, too low, or kinda accurate?
Here is an example,  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1269520.msg13102139#msg13102139, as you will notice 90% of the posts of this member made in games and rounds sub + he has a very poor post quality while the price is ~0.09BTC thanks to his potential activity tho.
I like the site and I use it frequently to estimate accounts, i don't mind to find inaccurate price since it isn't that easy thing to estimate but I like what Amadues said about considering the board, maybe keeping ×1 for all sections except off-topic & games and rounds & politics ×0.95?, is it hard to make this? Cannot be an optional setting for example since it will make a few delay? Sorry i don't know many things about coding.
I'll take a look. The site doesn't count how many posts in each section yet, so I would have to add that feature as well to make it work.

To do this I will need multipliers and thresholds, since the number of posts isn't factored into the calculation. Suggest me some multipliers and thresholds
e.g: if 80% of posts are in off-topic, games and rounds, and politics then price = price *0.9
8285  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Bitcoin-qt 11.1 Obsolete?? on: November 29, 2015, 08:52:38 PM
My Bitcoin client 11.1 is telling me it's obsolete and to upgrade.  Why is the relatively current client obsolete?
It shouldn't be telling you that. There is no current warning out there. The only thing that I can think of that would cause this warning is that somehow you ended up on a fork of the blockchain.

How would I go about verifying that?  And what should I do about it you think?
Check the highest block you have and the block hashes. Make sure that they match the blocks at block explorers like blockr.io blocktrail.com and blockchain.info. If it doesn't something is wrong and you will need to resync. Otherwise, I have no idea.

Edit: just found out why. Read this reddit thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/363szi/bitcoin_core_09x_error_message_warning_this/. It still applies to this. Upgrade to 0.11.2 since the new blocks are version 4 blocks to enable OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY. Those v4 blocks are only supported with 0.11.2 and 0.10.4 as of now.
8286  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Bitcoin-qt 11.1 Obsolete?? on: November 29, 2015, 08:16:20 PM
My Bitcoin client 11.1 is telling me it's obsolete and to upgrade.  Why is the relatively current client obsolete?
It shouldn't be telling you that. There is no current warning out there. The only thing that I can think of that would cause this warning is that somehow you ended up on a fork of the blockchain.
8287  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Question about addresses within wallet on: November 29, 2015, 08:11:04 PM
Am I save then since the wallet is always kept offline and its just 1 of the addresses in the wallet the I am exporting the private key from. Or will this compromise all other addresses?
That is safe. Just don't try to find and export or give away the master public key.
8288  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: [SOLVED] bitcoin-qt "No block source available" on: November 29, 2015, 06:11:35 PM
For the past four days, all peers show "blank" ping time, the bitcoin-qt 0.11.0C window says "1 year and 40 weeks" behind, but the new /.bitcoin/ directory continues to grow at about 0.5GB per hour.  The content of the new /.bitcoin/blocks/ as listed by a file manager in linux stops at blk00120.dat and rev00120.dat
Two days ago, it got to 9GB of RAM in use, but that is back down to 7GB now.
The size according to properties from the linux file manager of /.bitcoin/ continues to grow.  Is that correct?
If the ping time is blank then you aren't actually connected to those peers. I'm not sure why the data directory would continue to grow though.
8289  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Bitcointalk Account price estimator on: November 29, 2015, 06:06:48 PM
How does everyone feel about the estimation? Is it too high, too low, or kinda accurate?

A little bit too high atm, I'd say.
But I don't keep that thight tabs on auctions/sales.

About it… your script take in consideration the board of the post?

There is a list?
Likewise how post in off topic as to count as "0" value Smiley
Also for beginner and help…
or I see many people spam or ask info useless only to count some post in "marketplace" …
Well that is actually hard to quantify and consider the quality of those posts. And the posts aren't really factored into the calculation, just lengths for the post quality section. And post quality is completely subjective, so even that is really hard to quantify.
8290  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Bitcointalk Account price estimator on: November 29, 2015, 05:07:08 PM
Can I make one suggestion?
Add the rank member for activity and potential activity Cheesy it could be better for reading and evaluate an account immediately!
That is a good suggestion. I will add that in at some point.

How does everyone feel about the estimation? Is it too high, too low, or kinda accurate?
8291  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Bitcoin QT not synching on: November 29, 2015, 03:28:41 PM
Thanks guys.  I appreciate the help.  I'll do all that and get back to you.  Have shut down QT correctly each time.  I just restarted the computer now in case AVG needed a restart to configure the exceptions etc.  QT on startup once again says 'corrupted block database detected' so it's reindexing again.
Can you give us the debug.log?
8292  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Cheap way to attack blockchain on: November 29, 2015, 05:18:08 AM
Shit, the devs shoud fix this asap before the word gets out and FUD-ers start screaming the price down.
This is not something that can be easily fixed. The sig op limit is to prevent spamming blocks full of transactions that take a lot of time to process. Yet increasing the limit would mean that more transaction could go in that delay processing even more and a lower limit means that fewer other transactions can make it into the block. I don't think there really is a fix for this.
8293  Other / Archival / Re: REVIEW: Pros and Cons of different Bitcoin Storage methods vs. Malware on: November 29, 2015, 05:15:58 AM
I`m not sure how trezor works, doesnt it only contain 1 bitcoin address or can you hold multiple?
Trezors allow you to have multiple addresses. And they also have multiple accounts per device. It just depends on the password used.

Can the attacker browse through your fake accounts until it finds the real one and demand that from you instead?
No because he cannot know what accounts are on it since the accounts are determined by the password.
8294  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Verifying Amounts on: November 29, 2015, 04:05:48 AM
As it says, ask for the guys address. Ask him to sign a message with that address. Then you verify that signature to prove that he actually owns the address. Then look up in any block explorer like blockchain.info or blocktrail.com and search the address he gave you. They will show the current balance of that address. If it has the amount or more, he has proven he has that much Bitcoin. If he has less, then ask him again for another address and do the same thing.
8295  Other / Meta / Re: Referal Links on: November 29, 2015, 04:03:14 AM
You are not allowed to post just referral links or make posts whose sole purpose is to spread your ref link. I believe that you are allowed to make posts relevant to threads that have a link to the site and then also have your ref link there as well.

Example:
OP asking for faucet sites

reply:
Quote
Check out X.com, they have blah. Please be nice and use my reflink X.com/r=...


Something like that example so you are providing them the real site and asking people to use your reflink.

I think that once you rank up a bit you should be able to include the link in your signature.
8296  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Bitcoin QT not synching on: November 29, 2015, 01:07:35 AM
the debug log is 530 705 lines long from just the last 24hrs.  Won't paste into the window.  I can wait to see if the AVG exception change has worked...
Then just put it in http://pastebin.com/ and give us the link. Or you can give us a chunk from the bottom which includes all of the last time you tried to start it.
8297  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Bitcoin QT not synching on: November 29, 2015, 12:28:03 AM
Thanks knightdk.  I've added the bitcoin data folder to the exceptions list in AVG.  How do I post the debug log in the code brackets? I tried just pasting it into this post window but it doesn't work.
paste it into the post window and then highlight it all and click the button with the pound symbol (#) above the emojis.
8298  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Looking for some feedback regarding bitcoin debit card WageCan on: November 29, 2015, 12:20:04 AM
I have one of their virtual debit cards. It works great, it just takes some time for the card to activate and the balance on the website does not update very frequently.

Which exchange rate do they follow ? Does the BTC deposit get immediately converted to USD or the conversion takes place at the time of use ? Have you tried their physical debit card, which can be used in ATM ?
They say the exchange rate is a rate they calculate on their own. It includes a fee in it.

The deposits are converted after a few confirmation (IIRC 3 conf.) so it is really a prepaid card.

I have not used the physical debit card.
8299  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Looking for some feedback regarding bitcoin debit card WageCan on: November 28, 2015, 11:53:11 PM
I have one of their virtual debit cards. It works great, it just takes some time for the card to activate and the balance on the website does not update very frequently.
8300  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Bitcoin QT not synching on: November 28, 2015, 10:55:22 PM
Thanks guys.  Yes, I did send coins to the wallet without synching first.  I posted on the thread you linked to but my post was deleted by a moderator, who told me to start a new thread as that one apparently contains out of date info.

Not sure how much of the debug log you want me to post knightdk but here's a bit:

2015-11-28 16:34:24 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: non-final
2015-11-28 16:34:24 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: non-final
2015-11-28 16:34:24 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: non-final
2015-11-28 16:34:32 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: nonstandard transaction: dust
2015-11-28 16:34:35 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: non-final

If you mean post all of it then I will but it's long.

have had a look at my AVG anti-virus but no success in listing the file as an exception.  I'm not too technical on computers so any help with that is appreciated.
We will need all of it. Put it in the code brackets.

On AVG (at least the version that I have) you click the options arrow and select Advanced Settings. Then go to the Exceptions option and click add exception. Then just follow the instructions and add the entire data directory as an exception.
Pages: « 1 ... 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 [415] 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 ... 591 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!