This law is simply about generating power to the building and houses. This policy is to take care of the challenges of energy and it is not really new to hear it because it is already seen around. I believe it is the awake of this Russian and Ukraine war that has waken EU to such solution. Apart from new buildings, some old buildings are being renovated to carry solar panels and I think it is good for the people to use solar energy to power their houses, it could be cheaper also and convenient.

Unfortunately while DCA being one of the most effective strategies for non market pros, it's probably the most boring method hence why most people don't want to do it. People get really addicted to the adrenaline rush of getting in and out of positions, not knowing that most of them are just basically gambling because they're doing things blindly.

https://dcabtc.com/

For me, it will be calmer to buy and improve my home, and only after I have some kind of financial cushion will I invest. I cannot trust that I cannot guarantee the safety of my family, since we are raising children, and we cannot risk their lives.

But I agree with Lucius that for very young people, it is possible to take risks, live in a rented apartment, and invest in bitcoin. But again, you must be prepared that at some point, it may happen that you will have nothing to pay for housing. Therefore, evaluate all risks.

Just save for your life savings and for your life's investments and manage them well. That way, you will never be in trouble if you invest the funds intended for investments because even if you lose, you won't get rekt since you never spend those funds intended for your savings only. And what is important is that regardless of the amount you invest, you always invest in the right projects or investments because that is your goal, invest and grow your money.

There are places that does promotions and discounts or do get buy 2 get 1 type of situations in that case. Plus, humanity will grow towards better and better technology one way or another, there is no way of stopping it. A company is only entitled on making money, there is no responsibility to get as many workers as possible, that would be ideal and lovely but if they do not need to then they won't do it.

Places like logistics are the most worked on for example, because there are so many people working in warehouses of amazon and similar places, and they are paying salaries the most, and I believe that it will become as less worker oriented as possible since they are spending so much money on RD for it.

I think if wheat becomes too expensive there are a lot of other types of grains that can be used to replace it that can be produced elsewhere or are already produced in abundance such as oat, barley and rice (these can be milled).

With the current situation of the gambler, they will feel different emotions and it affects the game itself and also their decision making that's why most of the study is related of addiction into the psychological things of a person, having tons of research and study makes more the information reliable because many researchers outcome in their data gathering have the same results.

Yes, Russia is one of the largest suppliers of oil in the world. As a result, Russia has a much bigger power to win over oil supplies to other countries. So Russia has now created a situation where they are in a strong position. Now boycotting a Russian website can be a personal matter, you can boycott any country's website if you want, if you think that country is involved in something that is endangering the lives of ordinary people. So now if anyone thinks that boycotting a Russian website will give him a lot of personal satisfaction, then he/she can definitely go ahead with his/her decision.

New world order is emerging for sure, but we need to see whether they will overtake the old one. Combined economies of US-EU-Japan has been stagnant for quite some time now, and self-destructive embargoes and sanctions will harm them even further. If Trump was in power, then he would have taken steps to increase shale oil production within the United States and the increased supply of crude oil would have destroyed the Russian economy. Biden on the other hand has went the opposite direction, and as a result the Russians are earning 10x of what they were earning in 2021.

Social media advertisements can be targeted to groups and individuals who are likely to be interested in seeing them. You can configure them to be shown to followers or friends of certain gambling communities, users who like certain brands, and have interests that suits what is being advertised. Whether or not Facebook allows gambling ads, that's a different topic of discussion. My point is, they can be configured to your taste.

I doubt Apocollapse meant being a millionaire in terms of dollars or USD. Being able to earn 1,500 dollars per week will not make anyone a millionaire (dollars) but if you will consider other currency that has much lower value than dollars such as Philippine Pesos. Then, there's a high possibility that you can be a millionaire on your country. Anyway, that is if you only do signature campaign and do not invest or trade.

Note: All calculations where done based on prevailing price in the market and dollar to naira exchange rate which goes for about $1 = #593 and Bitcoin price to be BTC1 = $30,374. Also, all calculations for food and outing/partying was done on individual bases. The rest is relative as such being roommates.

Hope it helps. Thank you!

Yes there is no guarantee of success with signature campaign. Signature campaign any other advertisement wont be a successful marketing strategy if there is no attractive offer in the casino. As a product, there should be selling points that make people who read/see the advertisement can be attracted to come and play. There were some casinos with signature campaign in the past but they failed to survive because the lack of attractive offers in the casino. All in all, advertisement should be followed by attractive offers in order to be a marketing strategy.

The problem is we don't like it if a good person joins politics because we think he is just going to end up doing dirty politics. We just don't believe that a good person can have some good effect on politics and maybe something will change in favor of the people. People actually don't want to believe that any respectable people actually can do good and bring good changes by joining politics. I say that has the problem of people's mindset.

US and Europe have not done a single thing to harm Russian economy. If anything EU has helped rebuild Russian economy ever since they invaded Ukraine. Have you checked Ruble exchange rate lately? It is at an all time high ever since 2015!!!

US tried to turn Ukraine into Afghanistan for Russia and make them get stuck there like US did for 20 years spending $7 trillion while achieving nothing. But so far the biggest harm has come to innocent people of Ukraine who are being killed or dislocated and then EU with the way inflation and food scarcity is hitting people pushing middle class into lower class and lower class to homelessness.

How can India play games on keeping Pakistan away from International Cricket, the sole reason the teams were afraid of touring Pakistan is simply because of security threats and the attack against Sri Lanka team while they were touring and some of the players were injured with bull wounds and it was an unfortunate incident and hence there was no tour planned for decades. I suggest not to drag politics here in the forum.

They put Russia in sanction thinking Russians will suffer but it seems that they are the ones that is suffering now because they can't get the supply that they want and that supplies are mainly available in Russia. There are little supply from other countries but as soon as that run dry, they will have no choice but to cut the sanctions and welcome Russia to the club again.

For the status of the war, recently there was an update which states that Russians are now backing out. This is a good news. We will only hear one day that Russians have surrendered and accept their defeat, though I don't know if this boycott thing here have helped, as well as the sanctions.

I have seen a couple of scientific articles based on gambling, and it probably would make a lot of good references since it has come out only this year.

This article^[1] is based on Australia and gambling problems. The focus of the study is as follows

• Land-based only gambling problems
• Online-based only gambling problems
• Mixed mode gambling problems

I think it will answer why people would opt-in to gamble in land-based casinos or online, or a mix of both. It is quite an exciting approach and how it affects the health problems that people may face with it.

Another article^[2] that might interest you guys is that the gambling problems that occur with games. Video gamers would affect their gambling decisions, like the effects of the loot boxes and non-loot boxes.

---

References:

[1] - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563222000917
[2] - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460322000843

Haha You know what funny part is?

PCB did file a case against BCCI but they lost the suit and additionally $2.2 Million, they even had to pay BCCI 1.6 million dollars as compensation for covering the cost, fees etc.

This case was related to 2015-2023 bilateral proposal between both boards.

PCB pays compensation to BCCI after losing case in the ICC’s Dispute Resolution Committee

Now I will very simply explain to you the essence of what is happening, who will have to pay for what. If you smoke and drink alcohol all your life and eat constantly junk food, then with a high probability, after a while a person will have either cirrhosis of the liver, or lung cancer, or degenerative diseases of the pancreas or other disorders that can lead either to disability or death. And in this situation, you will have to pay a lot of money to be cured, or to prevent diseases from killing the victim. This is how Europe is - many decades of flirting with the Kremlin, playing along and selling the European hydrocarbon market to Kremlin terrorists, support for money or for fear of disclosing compromising evidence of many decisions in favor of Russia. This deliberate destruction of the body, toxic ties with Russia, led to what happened now - now we need to "operate", make complex changes, which by themselves will not have a very positive impact on the economy and the standard of living of EU citizens, and will require increased spending. But, the situation is this - to continue, what is described above - will end in fuel blackmail and even terrorism, and real, incurable problems of the EU. Therefore, a path has been chosen - changes, diversification of supplies, sanctions against terrorists, revision of energy legislation and concepts.