OK, I just got the news that BTM is beeing delisted from POLO. Now, on this occasion,
I learned that a forked happened and the new coin name is MARKS....
But, Polo did not update the name.
SO, could you clarify what is the situation btw BTM and MARKS?
I also saw from Coinmarketcap, that ONLY cryptopia is listing the coin with the name MARKS.
WHERE can we move our BTM coins from POLO to?
Please, could I get an answer for my questions to help me understand what is the situation btw BTM and MARKS? thanks in advance BTM and MARKS are the same, they (Bitmark team) needed a new ticker for BTM on Cryptopia, as BTM on Cryptopia means Bytom so they went for MARKS on Cryptopia. You can check this back in this thread earlier. So BTMs you withdraw from Polo to Cryptopia for example become MARKS but it is still the same coin and blockchain. HTH |
|
|
|
|
Sorry if my questions sounds stupid, but are we supposed to have the HOLD in our wallets or in Cryptopia?
Is it actually a swap or an airdrop of HUZU to existing HOLD owners?
TIA
|
|
|
|
I found back the btc adress : 14kfN1siTWYsLxteeDxXJBfk8ZP74u2Pbz
Sent to you
Sorry for the delay
check your pm please
Thank you very much, greatly appreciated! Have a merit for generously supporting open source software development! |
|
|
|
It's far from profitable, but this post reminded me that the block explorer is not paid and to say: Hi, we're still here.
Will take care of it by the end of the week.
Spartak, I would be willing to run an iquidus instance for FAIL if we can get on an exchange in the foreseeable future. It's just that I'd like rather to see funds and resources spent on an exchange listing than on a BE. Cheers - psycodad |
|
|
|
I assume swapped TIPS will be burned. Could someone let me know the burn address, so I can add a label for it in the block explorer? TIA |
|
|
|
Can you clarify the current plan (ideally before fork height is reached!) ? Do I see this right, that at block # 518191 the people that were "tricked" into upgrading to 0.9.8.3 and did not stick with 0.9.7.x will be on their own (invalid) fork? My node currently says that about 1/3 of bitmark network is on 0.9.8.3: Sep 8 13:11:12 2 "subver" : "/Pfennig:0.9.5/",
Sep 8 13:11:12 7 "subver" : "/Pfennig:0.9.7/",
Sep 8 13:11:12 15 "subver" : "/Pfennig:0.9.7.2/",
Sep 8 13:11:12 24 "subver" : "/Pfennig:0.9.8.3/",
Sep 8 13:11:12 32 "subver" : "/Pfennig:0.9.7.1/",
So these 24 nodes need to downgrade ASAP so that they do not fork off to an invalid chain that no exchange will recognize? |
|
|
|
I've never heard of a pool operator staying on an old wallet version - they would loose miners very quickly. It's in their best interest to migrate.
if we are talking about merged mining - it's litecoin or other high hashrate coin pool operators that should update their pool software and install merged mining coin daemon. Will they do it? That is one of the challenges of putting in merge-mining. I've been approaching pool operators to see what kind of commitments we can get to keep the network balanced. I would definitely merge-mine SXC. One hint though from past experience when chains went auxpow: Make sure you choose a really unique auxpow chain-id, don't make pool ops having to choose between merge-mining SXC OR another coin. Yeah.. all we need another magic-number-esque sanfu ! Not sure if I understand your post or if there is some well hidden irony I can't spot with my limited school english, sorry. In any case, ahmed once upon a time dug up a list of chain-ids in use (at that time) which might be helpful if you decide to go auxpow: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=769073 |
|
|
|
So, HOLD is still being traded at cryptopia. It still stakes pretty high, right?
At Cryptopia HOLD is delisted and not trading So HOLD is still traded at TRADESATOSHI Where do you see it as delisted? The wallet is online and accepting deposits. |
|
|
|
Just secured myself 2pcs. Great work jstefanop! Felt like I had to support your work and I coincidentally also had to A2 Terminators to replace  |
|
|
|
I've never heard of a pool operator staying on an old wallet version - they would loose miners very quickly. It's in their best interest to migrate.
if we are talking about merged mining - it's litecoin or other high hashrate coin pool operators that should update their pool software and install merged mining coin daemon. Will they do it? That is one of the challenges of putting in merge-mining. I've been approaching pool operators to see what kind of commitments we can get to keep the network balanced. I would definitely merge-mine SXC. One hint though from past experience when chains went auxpow: Make sure you choose a really unique auxpow chain-id, don't make pool ops having to choose between merge-mining SXC OR another coin. |
|
|
|
Good news. Spacecoin on cryptopia has 8 connections and is back in business! 17 nodes running the wallets. We are still looking for a new exchange. Any ideas where there is a reputable exchange we can get listed at?
Great news, thank you for taking care of it! Regarding exchanges: I liked coinexchange.io and nlexch.com so far and made personally good experiences with both. But as they say YMMV and they are probably both too expensive to get listed there. |
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your reply.
Yes, meanwhile I also got exactly 12 connections on both nodes, though my nodes show a POW diff of ~10 right now which seems wrong to me (it should be at least 10times more as it has been in the past weeks).
I will mine a few blocks to see if they persist.
|
|
|
|
Got any idea how many people are subscribed to this thread here to compare the figures?
No. But you can get some idea by comparing the posting frequency. On here there's typically what, half a dozen posts per day ... at best? The Linda Discord channel frequently receives more than that in a minute. First let me say that I appreciate your kind response a lot, thank you. Which basically is because nobody gets answers here since the thread has been abandoned by the LINDA leaders. If you check the views of this thread, it seems that quite a few people (investors?) try to inform themselves here about LINDA (and they end up with a wrong wallet since quickdeal doesn't seem to care to update the OP):  I would have no problems if the coin was launched on Discord, but I do really dislike this tendency to shovel the community from one platform to the next (i.e. Slack, Telegram, Discord etc.). If a coin has been launched on bct it should at least maintain minimal information (like link to current wallets, explorer, exchanges etc.) here, that shouldn't be asking for too much. But it seems to be a general problem with LINDA, as even coinmarketcap links to the old wallet source. I guess it too is asking too much from the leaders to keep at least this information current and accurate. I guess cmc has even a few views more than bct. Anyway, I understand that you are not in the position to change this and I am certainly barking up the wrong tree. We 'bct-leftbehinds' are actually very thankful for those few like you and Xenomole that from time to time forward essential information from discord to this thread here. |
|
|
|
Two of my SPACE nodes died yesterday upon receiving block # 1405731 at ~09/01/18 03:27 GMT. Seeing my network connections now down from ~25 to ~6 I suspect this happened to others as well. Spacecoin explorer stopped working around the same time. That block # 1405731 seems now accepted in the chain and I wonder what might have caused the nodes to stop/crash. If this is reproducable it could be nicely abused to DoS the SPACE network. Not sure why the nodes dropped off. Mine where down yesterday but it is usually attributed to spectrums internet service going down or just acting flaky. I do not believe that this was coincidence. Cryptopia's wallet is down too (though can't say if that is since the same point in time):  Also both of my nodes are in different locations, on different networks with redundant uplinks and both's debug.log ends exactly with the same line: received block 00000000023f27205c86
SetBestChain: new best=00000000023f27205c86 height=1405731 trust=29474282056660516 blocktrust=466087502913 date=09/01/18 03:27:08
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
<quite a few linefeeds and then my watchdog restarted the wallets:>
SpaceCoin version v1.0.1.4 (Jun 7 2018, 19:26:38)
Using OpenSSL version OpenSSL 1.0.1t 3 May 2016
Startup time: 09/01/18 03:30:06
...
|
|
|
|
Two of my SPACE nodes died yesterday upon receiving block # 1405731 at ~09/01/18 03:27 GMT. Seeing my network connections now down from ~25 to ~6 I suspect this happened to others as well. Spacecoin explorer stopped working around the same time. That block # 1405731 seems now accepted in the chain and I wonder what might have caused the nodes to stop/crash. If this is reproducable it could be nicely abused to DoS the SPACE network. |
|
|
|
Guys, the best place to keep up-to-date and get help with your wallet issues is Discord: https://discord.gg/gyfGdBPAlmost nobody posts here anymore. Linda is very active on Discord, with hundreds of posts every hour and lots of developer participation. That's a problem this entire industry has - - - poor marketing. You tell people that no action is here and they need to join the discord. Yes, I am well versed with discord but there is a demographic of people that use bitcointalk for their information. Think about that. There is no reason somebody from discord couyldn't step up and keep this thread up to date. just my 2 satoshi's exactly!
there are many people who have registered here at bitcointalk to get informed about their coins and either cannot or don't want for several reasons to register at another place for these informations.
Times change. It's not just Linda that has moved to Discord, many have. Bitcointalk is old and clunky. It's just not practical to discuss all the separate elements of Linda (wallets, staking, masternodes, trading, etc, etc) here in a single thread, while providing support and keeping people up-to-date on developments. Discord provides a much more modern, organised interface that makes it easy for the developers to be more involved with the community. Personally I think Discord was a good choice. It keeps all of the discussions about each crypto development conveniently organised in one place, while making it easy to add more 'servers' to switch between the discussions of all the different crypto development that you might be following with just a single sign-up. And you can access it in a browser on a desktop computer just as easily as you can from a mobile device. When you buy a product that requires support, you wouldn't expect the manufacturer to participate in every related forum on the internet -- in most cases they would have their own forums, which you would be required to subscribe to if you wished to be kept up-to-date on developments. At least with Discord you only have to register once, yet each development team has its own 'forum'. Linda's Discord channel has around 7000 members presently and typically over 600 online at any one time. Compare that to this place. It would be difficult for the developers to justify spending time maintaining and supporting this thread when it reaches so few people. Got any idea how many people are subscribed to this thread here to compare the figures? Discord is a free gamers chat which is able to run apps in your browser and is run by a company that wants to make money, while bct is a simple crypto forum run by a person who doesn't need to make money from our personal data. Discord on top of that is a security and privacy nightmare in my eyes. Read the privacy terms and ask yourself why you need a platform to run applications in your browser to simply exchange information (i.e. chat, posts). If people think discord is superior, they should probaly launch their coins there and not here so we simple "bct-only" folks don't have to deal with these repeating discussions trying us to convince to join a platform that we do not like for a multitude of reasons. |
|
|
|
I am seeing this issue even after downloading with the Boostrap and starting over. Anyone know if / how this can be fixed? I see it back even years ago with Bitcoin and Doge same ORPHAN BLOCK 751 issue I can't get the chain to download at all now that I've updated to 2, is there a bootstrap?
All I get for days now is:
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 751, prev=1d23dc1f131a0d677d0123423049ebc366740db42c9ccf3bfcb85159659dff35
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 751, prev=4fb0e6463dbd360266626199e8d2fdf23170f7c8dc4e3ab96e135b4f409395b6
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 751, prev=4e6c766c3a4902c6ac8b1b8967ec25f940d575c9f39d03b44dd7aba70fdecbad
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 751, prev=ede9d7bcf62d82cdb54799634d70503c2a79d57d444e641170628f68d403ce93
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 751, prev=582425ec066f4d34e906d6a982440ebbd55fe10619a761c325f757e8fb7913af
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 751, prev=352486049cf44c03af3f3ef1de4372c3d9ce8186c9edb20f929b0c4f138f6c07
.....
Try to start with -maxorphanblocks=2000 or higher. HTH |
|
|
|
I mean since the mandatory v3.0.0.0 update .....
<irony>A wonderful example for a well planned, deeply tested and properly communicated hard fork. </irony> |
|
|
|
Are there any more requirements? In terms of CPU capability, traffic or harddisk?
And are there any specific regions that the server should be in? I mean if someone does US I could do Europe and/or Asia.
No, not really, the only hard requirement is RAM. SSDs and powerful cores make synching and indexing faster, but you'll get there with spinning disks and slow CPUs as well but you can't do it with 512MB RAM. Also the server location doesn't matter at all. If people can reach the BE to check a transaction they will certainly not care if it is in Africa, Alabama, Albania or Anywhere. Since SFC has 4min block spacing, there are only ~133'250 blocks now, that further reduces the requirements for a block explorer, other coins have already several mio blocks and that takes a lot of time and ressources to run a BE for. And may I ask how you are involved with the project?
I am not more involved than you or most of the readers in this thread: occasional miner and hodler of SFC. I am currently running block explorers for 3 projects I support, but I am running out of ressources and need more servers before I can expand on that so I am only offering to help but not to run it myself. |
|
|
|
Please note that this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3385763.msg43930211#msg43930211is not the original SFC SolarFlareCoin project. This is only an attempt to speculate, but holders of this 3.0 project have not access to github repo, original source code and not hold any rights about the coin listed on Cryptopia This is the original project listed on Cryptopia and we arwe working with exchange admin to solve the issue and reopen market very soon. We are also considering to swap soon with a new masternode and proof-of-stake blockchain In the meantime if there's anyone that what to setup a blockexplorer let us know! Hi, I would be willing to set up a node and carry the costs for one or two small server for this. I am not heavily involved as an investor, but I see this as an opportunity to learn. Not very tech savvy though (i can compile and run stuff on Linux though ). If you give me a helping hand, I'd be glad to help out. Kind regards Nice to see some community involvement here! I'd be happy to support you in setting up an Iquidus or ABE block explorer if you have decent enough VPS for it (min. 2-3GB RAM). HTH |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
